Is the Big Bang theory a myth?
And God said, “Let light shine out of darkness” and thus was light. (Genesis 1:3)
Was this the Big Bang? No! No-thing could stand in more extreme contrast to the modern cosmologies.
To understand Genesis, you need to read Enuma Elish first, because this is the story Jewish Priests used for their inspiration while they were in exile in Babylonia. This once-mighty city in Iraq - a microcosm of human history, on the desert plains 60 miles south of Baghdad, where the sun turns horizons into flashing pools of mercury. Adam and Eve’s Garden of Eden is said to have been nearby.
Understanding why historic events took place is important. To do this, historians often turn to geography. Of course, the Babylonian creation myth it is of vital significance for them. A thing being so, the word that says it is so, is the truth. Nevertheless, Enuma Elis (also spelled Enuma Elish) is a Babylonian creation myth with an unclear composition, though it possibly dates back to the Bronze Age.
This piece was thought to be recited in a ritual celebration of the Babylonian new year. It chronicles the birth of the gods, the world, and man, whose purpose was to serve the gods and lighten their work load. The focus of the narrative is on praising Marduk, the patron god of Babylon, who creates the world, the calendar, and humanity. Maybe you can be a better judge of that than I can, (all for understanding historical events). However, the Genesis account has nothing to do with the Big Bang.
On the principle that ignorance is darkness and knowledge is light, this is a case of darkness versus light, and Genesis is on the former side, not the latter. It ignores centuries of human culture and history that built our iconic cityscape. In addition, it fails to acknowledge the continuing plight of some neighborhoods that fall outside of the more affluent that are benefiting disproportionately.
The key to addressing this kind of division is to have better -not fewer- arguments. After all, argument is fundamental to any democracy, and limiting arguments can suppress needed deliberation. But these are the Arguments which are Facing History and Ourselves. These tensions are not just about old versus new (nihilism). They are inextricably linked to race, class and neighborhood identity.
Earth is our natural world
One of the difficulties found in the first chapter of Genesis is the mention of light-apparently before the creation of the sun.
However "the light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it," since people, blinded by their passions, could not overcome it.
The Bible says light was created after the heavens and the Earth, which is false, and incompatible with cosmology and physics. God made two great lights, the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night, (the sun that produces light and the moon that reflects light). He also made the stars. God made many stars when he created the cosmos, that is the physical heavens. Then God made the two lights appear in the newly cleared atmosphere.
Earth’s atmosphere is special. Our Earth is the only planet in the solar system with an atmosphere that can sustain life. The Earth’s atmosphere protects and sustains the planet’s inhabitants by providing warmth and absorbing harmful solar rays. In addition to containing the oxygen and carbon dioxide, which living things need to survive, the atmosphere traps the sun’s energy and wards off many of the dangers of space. So the sun is giving life to our planet. Plants need sunlight (solar energy) to grow. Animals, including humans, need plants for food and the oxygen they produce... Finally, the Sun is a natural source for visible light waves and our eyes see the reflection of this sunlight off the objects around us.
The color of an object that we see is the color of light reflected. All other colors are absorbed.
But I was told, to my great surprise, that shadows are not black but of a neural tint. So, the color of the shadow must be the average color of the diffused light, and must vary, as that varies, with the colors of all surrounding thing's. This primitive scenario ideally corresponds to a 'liveness detection' that it is either indecompos - able or zero. This primitive problem is used typically between homogenized, but might be useful to some atoms who won't give the big plot twist away (conspiracy theorists). Thus was at once explained the inconstancy I had already noticed? Yes, reflection is when light bounces off an object. Nevertheless, the modern age of alienation had truly begun some time before, when our kind of cruelty realizes that this fair experience of uncreated light presupposes the transcendence of space and time.
They are interested in my stories, not just because of oral traditions, but because it justifies their lifestyle. So whenever somebody says oral tradition, I want to say, "Could you show it to me? I know you can not show me oral tradition, but can you show it to me some way in the text, or at least, in the lifestyle of somebody who would have cared about it? " Otherwise we have a free-floating oral tradition that is meaningless.
The hairy shadows think it suits them better, while demanding responsibility from those who are not immediately responsible to them!
Nevertheless, there's no such creationist reality narrative in certain eastern philosophies which serve as the ideological basis for certain spiritual practices. They promote an eternal ongoing process of return, a cycling (recycling) of all energy and matter.
This is true in the World's of Uncreated light. What if God doesn’t exist? What would people do then? What if his ‘existence’ is simply a lie, or it’s used to live stream murder and sexual assault?
That’s toxic. However, He isn’t the most recognised and internationally praised superhero, and He don’t fight any crime. Instead, He use His powers over stone and metal to repair the damage caused by the catastrophic fights other heroes get into.
Of course, the reason why someone is doing something is unknown... What exactly does that mean? Although Genesis seems to be related to the Big Bang, the truth is that it has nothing to do with it..!
Let me think about it..! In the moment of creation. In The Moment, 100%. That moment is a particular point in time. And some moments you remember forever..!
The irony of a defining moment is that if you don’t define it, it will surely define you.
When we reach for explanations beyond our universe, we’re reaching beyond the limits of science. So what is the universe expanding into, if not into some pre-existing empty space? This old metaphysical question has perplexed and intrigued humankind for ages. In the last 10 years the vacuum has taken center stage as a font of confounding mysteries like the nature of dark energy and matter; only recently has the void turned into a tantalizing beacon for cranks. Could the vacuum contain dark energy, gravity particles, and frictionless gears?
Nothing can make us go back in time and fix our bad decisions. Nothing can predict our future precisely. There are two forms of nothing which we can delineate: one concerns the absence of something and the other hint perhaps worth noting is the extraordinary aptness of our Super' eXistence. What is the eXistence? It is an attribute and an attribute is a property of some entity. And you have to understand that time is the fourth dimension in mathematical terms. Our three-dimensional world exists in the present, but it also moves forward in time. However, we cannot creatively use the concept of zero yet. One thing is certain. In addition to our own three-dimensional of space, other three-dimensional "branes" may float in a higher-dimensional space!
Contrastingly, in physics, spacetime is any mathematical model which fuses the three dimensions of space and the one dimension of time into a single four-dimensional manifold. Spacetime diagrams can be used to visualize relativistic effects, such as why different observers perceive differently where and when events occur.
The environment destruction caused by humans is a global, ongoing problem. By the year 2050, the global human population is expected to grow by 2 billion people, thereby reaching a level of 9.6 billion people.
Today, a wide range of environmental problems has emerged. However, we are far from powerless in the face of this global threat. We are protecting the natural environment on the individual, organizational or governmental levels, for the benefit of both the environment and humans.
Accelerating environmental, climatic, and biodiversity changes push scientists, engineers, and various stakeholders to explore new environmental applications, and even functional integrations of robotics technologies into ecological systems. Consequently, we must confront a multitude of novel ethical challenges. But it is not so clear how to understand or evaluate the challenges presented by environmental applications of robots because the very nature of these emerging technologies remains unclear. So what are the real challenges? People who think about machine ethics make it sound like you can come up with a perfect set of rules for robots. What we already know here is that there are no universal rules!
Ever since humanity’s beginnings, we seem to have possessed an innate capability to murder each other. This urge manifests itself in many ways. For example, we first thoroughly examine any emerging technology in order to assess its potential to either wage war or to support it (although to be fair, an amazing number of inventions have emerged from war-related research).
For transhumanists, this matter is of utmost importance. Their view is that technology deserves special respect that is in no way inferior to that given to humans. Most transhumanists emphasize only the benefits that their movement would supposedly bring to the human race. Perhaps they omit possible problems because, like all Culture of Death movements, they lack even the most fundamental understanding of human nature. Their primary problem seems to be not dishonesty, but ignorance.
As a species we should seek to rescue ourselves by entering into a symbiosis with humanoids and environmental robots. The humanoid beings that will come out of such a symbiosis (as a combination of living organisms and electronic systems) could survive civilizational catastrophes and break free from the limitations of biology. These could be humanoid robots capable of performing the kinds of actions we see as intellectual activity.
However, imagine an industrial robot that suddenly breaks down. An investigation reveals that it has been damaged intentionally. Sometime later, an offender is found who had access to the machine’s software. The company sustains losses and the perpetrator is legally liable. But then there might be other considerations here that will matter in the future. Deep learning, the category of AI algorithms that kick-started the field’s most recent revolution, has fallen short in imbuing machines with sophisticated reasoning, grounded in a conceptual model of reality.
Photo by Aideal Hwa @aideal | Unsplash
Machine's don’t truly understand the world around them, which makes them fall short in their ability to engage with it... assuming the robot is a sophisticated mechanism and that its operation relies on reasoning algorithms? in the future the most sophisticated robots will be able to write their own source code.
We are now faced with the so-called black box dilemma (double equals 0 problem). This is reasoning: Is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. Reasoning could be behind of what is emerging from the insights of an AI black-box. I am referring to circumstances in which people no longer understand the principles that drive intelligent technologies in the field of artificial intelligence.
Such technologies grow independent causing some to believe that things are slipping out of our control. But it doesn't take a creative conspiracy theorist to devise a logical explanation that involves the double equals zero problem frequent antagonists... The issue is one of accountability.
A subconscious computer can’t explain what it’s doing. Because it’s a black box, the process is hidden. So, can we still use this technology: a machine that cannot justify its own decisions? Maybe this is one of the most challenging questions we are facing in AI today. If an AI program is a black box, it will make predictions and decisions as humans do, but without being able to communicate its reasons for doing so. Nevertheless, true love always has a way of working thing’s out... If you use %g to print (in C) the floating point number instead of %f, you’ll see that it’s not actually zero. After all, C (or C++) is a major AI programming language used for artificial intelligence and can be an effective choice for building most parts of an AI system or robot. Moreover, new frameworks and guidelines are been created in daily basis that identify objectives and priorities for ethical AI. This is certainly a step in the right direction.
Artificial Intelligence enables for most organisations their digital transformation! This springs partly from the ‘black box’ nature of the algorithms (sets of digital instructions implemented to achieve defined goals) dictating AI responses, which are difficult to understand for members of organizations that are being increasingly shaped by AI.
Artificial Intelligence is now playing a crucial role in the digital transformation that allows machines to detect, understand, act and learn.
0,000… equals 0! Nothing is impossible
The sequence of natural numbers never ends, and is infinite. One-third OK, 1/3 is a finite number (it is not infinite). But written as a decimal number the digit 3 repeats forever (we say “0,3 repeating”):
There’s no reason why the 3s should ever stop: they repeat infinitely.
So, when we see a number like “0,999…” (i.e. a decimal number with an infinite series of 9s,) there is no end to the number of 9s. A humanoid being cannot say “but what happens if it ends in an 8?”, because it simply does not end. (This is why 0,999… equals 1).
How would you describe yourself? Will your actions regain your reputation? It’s basically the same reputation that you had, within any model of the fascinating Creative Conspiracy theory.
There is no doubt, we are the ‘nihilistic players’ into a wildly unfamiliar place, wherein the objects are acting as though they can be in two places at once, particles leading double lives as waves and information appears to travel faster than the speed of light. Probably all of these mystical arguments are supporting the claim that quantum physics and consciousness are a (strong) defense of panpsychism.
However, the word uncertainty is used a lot in quantum mechanics. Consciousness is innate to the universe as such. Nothing is certain.
Maybe the crux of quantum science is the relationship between consciousness and reality. The name for that relation is varied, and serves as the groundwork that points out to a most fundamental problem, namely the possibility to overcome dualism. Haven't you ever asked yourself, "where does consciousness comes from?" Instead of a code encrypted in the wiring of our neurons, could consciousness reside in the brain’s electromagnetic field?
But, can you answer to the question? "how can the events in space and time which take place within the spatial boundary of a living organism be accounted for by physics and chemistry?" Sometimes, everything seems random. Life, on the other hand, has withstood the elements for billions of years precisely because it is able to build order out of chaos. The living thing persists turning all that small scale chaos into large scale order.
Human Systems Dynamics (HSD)
These unforgettable memories through iterative cycles of Adaptive Action ruled so far the game which, meanwhile, is including mechanisms for the players to change the rules to whatever sort of game they want to play... Transhumanists game? Immortalists maybe?
The Immortalists game it’s slaitly different. “It sounds like you’re saying we can choose to live. Or we can choose to survive.”
Similar, our modernized world throughout its Human Systems Dynamics (HSD) helps us see, understand, and influence the patterns of interaction and decision making that shape our world. However, crazy bloggers like me continue to struggle with a question that seems almost unbearably basic: what gives the quantum world its distinctively counter-intuitive quantum flavour? Today, in the quest to build a quantum computer (billed as the superior successor to ordinary PCs,) we have finally identified the true root of quantumness. It is this fake and fabled edge of the quantum phenomena! So, forget the Information Age... From the ‘information age’, we are moving towards the ‘Reputation Age’, in which information will have value only if it is already filtered, evaluated and commented upon by others...
A civilised cyber-world will be one where people know how to assess critically the reputation of information sources, and can empower their knowledge by learning how to gauge appropriately the social ‘rank’ of each bit of information that enters their cognitive field.
Making a pact with the Devil
What will happen if we avoid self indulgence and abandon ourselfs? When we self-indulge, we obtain the object of our desire up front-whether it’s some glorious 'high’ (think cocaine, really good New York cheesecake, Ecstasy, or a reckless splurge at Tiffany’s); or an almost rapturous sense of tranquility that before then may have been painfully elusive (think heroine).
However, the bill for such self-indulgence (i.e., the associated 'costs’ of our intemperance,) invariably arrives later, only because we believe conflict sensitivity forms the foundation for peacebuilding programming.
Unfortunately, sometimes we're completely unable and even negative to recognize and receive totally our inside beliefs and assertion. Its the truth that comes from the gut, not the book. Because he is an introvert. Introversion is a major personality trait that specifically was engaged for the case which is defined by what it is not: extroversion. The introverts are people who get their energy from spending alone their time and away from the real world.
Humans will start living in a virtual world surrounded by machines and eventually they'll also start getting detached from the real world. This can affect the emotional ability of humans.
When people will be surrounded greatly by machines which will do all their jobs as well as make decisions for them, people may have less empathy for each other in future. However, some scientists may have found the most plausible explanation for the era of the great reboot, In my opinion, the "simulation hypothesis" is an obvious choice.
HSDI, EWT, NewScientist, Quora, DDI
Writing method: Plagiarism
Big Vision for the future, small steps to get there `
