What if Hillary was born a man? Based upon what I have read about Hillary’s ascension to political power, as well as the many conversations on politics I have had this past year, it seems to me that, should Hillary have been born a man and followed a similar course in her public life, she would have then been considered by the women and men around her as a self-serving, social-climbing, narcissistic a-hole, willing to stomp on the face of any man or woman alive if stomping on that face gave her a leg up towards her goals. Sad as it is, I have come to believe that it is because Hillary was born a woman that so many women and men plan to vote for her for the US Presidency in November. Seriously. For this election, that’s the ultimate qualifier in the minds of many Democratic voters. Her sex. Welcome to reality. But obviously, the majority of Democrats aren’t out there screaming on a street corner, “Hey! Hillary was born a woman and that’s why you need to vote for her!” No. They have a cover story – a political charade. But since we know that the primary reason most Hillary supporters are voting for Hillary is because she is not man, is it still worth examining the Democrats’ cover story and justifications? I think so. Perhaps then, those of us who vote based upon more than what genitals one was born with can reason with these myopic voters before it’s too late.
First, what most women and men in support of Hillary agree upon as being the plausible reasons for her widespread popularity and the fanatical following she enjoys is that she is regarded as being the archetypical self-made woman, pursuing her own self-interests while juggling both motherhood and a philandering husband. Hillary has been seen as the woman playing dirty hardball in a world of dirty men - breaking through the glass ceiling and climbing to nearly the top of a heap piled high with profligate oath-breakers, and still finding time to say to women and minorities all the things they want to hear, and sometimes in just the right contrived accent. Secondly, Hillary supporters cite her “experience.” And as her good fortune would have it, the Grim Reaper did take New York’s Tip O’Neil just in time for Hillary’s needing a seat in the US Senate – a seat that enabled her to vote for a raise in pay for the position of Secretary of State prior to her taking that office. (From what I understand, that was illegal.) Thirdly, Hillary supporters find further appeal in the way that she presents herself to the public. I’m not sure if the beaming psychotic smile and relentless affirmative head-nodding is part of that appeal, but she has certainly proven herself to the Democratic mainstream a loyalist, and the quintessential progressive, which, and in the case of the latter, at this time appears to be best described as a strategically vague version of European socialism combined with old fashioned war-for-profit imperialism. So scratch the surface just a bit, and we find that Hillary is a pretty average left-leaning American politician – nothing remarkable, just one of many beetles burrowing through a massive heap of DC dung. But there’s still that whole being born a woman thing. So let’s look a little closer at Ms. Clinton.
The Presidential Administration of William Jefferson Clinton was born into, and ended in, scandal, a myriad of accusations of corruption and wrongdoing, impeachment hearings and censure. To name a few notable scandals: the Rose Law Firm, Whitewater, the strange death of Clinton-friend, Vincent Foster and the whole Monica Lewinski thing. The actions of Clinton appointees and Clinton policies caused harm to a great number of people while they occupied the office. Do you remember the needless and unfounded attack on (and destruction of) a religious group in Waco, Texas by the federal government (under Clinton appointee Janet Reno)? Or the needless and unprovoked bombing of civilian targets during US military action against former-ally, Serbia (under Clinton appointee General Wesley Clark)? During it all there was also the strange death of Commerce Secretary Ron Brown, the questions regarding campaign donations from ultra-wealthy foreigners, and accusations of unprecedented toleration of Chinese espionage. Looking back, it would appear as though the self-proclaimed, “co-president” Hillary was there and in the middle of it all. Very quickly after leaving office, Bill and Hillary Clinton together amassed an enviable fortune – placing them in that top 1% we hear so much about these days. And whereas Bill settled into the luxury afforded by ex-Presidency, such as spending time playing golf with George H. W. Bush, Hillary continued to pursue her own political self-interests. Interesting. There IS more to Hillary’s story than just the ‘average’ scandal-laden American politician!
A quick summary will make the point: Hillary’s own path to the US Presidency, like her husband’s, is so far strewn with a myriad of accusations of corruption, wrongdoing and violations of US national security. Seriously – anyone born a man and who followed Hillary’s same path would be having a hard time convincing the media and the voting public (especially Democrats) of their being above reproach, right? Well, not exactly. You see, as the little darling of the political left, Bill Clinton was forgiven his ‘sins’ by both the socialist-leaning segment of the Democratic-voting public, and the socialists who dominate the corporate media. (That Bill! What a scamp!) But what is unexpected, is that, as the far-less charismatic member of the American socialists’ Clinton-dream-team, and despite her likely being seen even by her most loyal supporters as overtly power-mad, as well as far less magnanimous and far more self-serving than her husband (whether they admit it or not), Hillary has still managed to receive forgiveness for her many ‘sins’ and maintained a formidable degree of support.
So if its not a matter of her character, and its not a matter of her position on the issues, and its not a matter of her restraint, or lack thereof, in the use of political power, then its obviously the whole gender thing!
As far as I know, political figures in both the Democratic and Republican parties have always been surrounded, and served by, loyal, boot-licking sycophants – the type of men and women who wouldn’t say, “poop” if their mouths were full of it. But for mainstream Democrats to carry on this charade, that is, to say that they are voting for Hillary for any other reason than her being a woman, now just leaves the rest of us understanding that, this particular portion of the US population is either really stupid, or thinks that the rest of us are really stupid. I suppose that it should not come as a surprise. Remembering that it was, at least in part, the same group of Americans who supported Barrack Obama based upon his skin color that now support Hillary because of her gender, we should not be shocked that they are just as eager to cast their votes based upon this equally superficial qualifier. This is just one of those disappointing facets of basic human nature. To be fair (and to further prove my point on human nature) it should be stated that it was the mirror image of the Democrats’ loyal, boot-licking sycophants on the Republican side that was the cause for America’s being subjected to two terms of ‘W’. (It is remarkable to me how much the party-line Republicans and Democrats have in common.) There is an important lesson to be learned in this though, and that is through this demonstration of irrational bias, the Democrats have exposed the presence of the same racist and sexist attitudes within the ranks of the political left that they constantly accuse the political right of harboring. (This is a psychological phenomenon referred to as projection.)
Once again, and in that same spirit of fairness, it must be stated that I do not believe that all who vote Democratic are incapable of determining a person of good character from a person of poor character. I state this because, even though they are somehow blinded by the inherent dishonesty, slavery and ultimate tyranny that is socialism, there was a significant number of Democrats who supported Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton. And while I have no sympathy for the socialists’ cause, I can understand the frustration they must be feeling for the way they were treated by their political party, and in the end, their candidate, too.
Note that, through this rant I have used words like, “most” and “majority” in reference to Hillary’s supporters, and while continuing to maintain an effort towards fairness, it should be stated that I believe there is, and sadly so, a contingent of Hillary’s supporters who are NOT supporting her based solely upon her being a woman, and that this contingent is fully aware of her questionable past, her questionable associations, her questionable actions, her questionable tactics and her questionable intentions. This contingent of supporters I am referring to (and I am not trying to be funny here) is the equivalent to Russia’s bloodthirsty Bolsheviks – with these supporters of Hillary being bent on a collectivist world empire. These Hillary supporters are anti-free enterprise statists and social-engineers desiring absolute control over the masses – and in anticipation of launching their own high-tech versions of the Red Terror and the Great Purge, they are awaiting their own version of Stalin – with high hopes that it might be found in Hillary. They await a cold-blooded, heavy-handed tyrant and whether this awaited Stalin-to-be is in a male or female body is irrelevant to them. Scary.
In my opinion, if Hillary had been born a man, a significant portion of the women and men who support her now would regard her as one who would never get their vote for any office, let alone the Presidency. So what do we – the responsible and civic-minded-types – do about this situation? There is but one course of action: We need to remind these misguided souls that as Americans most of us share the common interest of living in liberty, peace and prosperity, and that, while there are many women who are supremely qualified to hold the office of the presidency and represent the common interests of all Americans, based upon Hillary’s past, present and foreseeable future actions, she is not one of them.
stormborns
annaxmalina
baratheonpilled
ellievsbear
kaledo-art
discoholicmusic
