Talking ‘Terrorist Attack in Paris’ with Children
Written by: Can, Ran (Chinese) Translated by: Ma, Lan
Can Ran is a famous author on children’s early reading in China. Her writings are mostly based on her experiences but not from academic angles. Her publications include ‘A Trip Riding on A Whale’ series, which are popular among thousands of Chinese young parents. She is also one of the founders of a small private experimental nursery. This is her simple summary of the class ‘Talking Terrorist Attack in Paris with Children’ in that nursery. It isn’t an academic article but only a journal online. However, I found it’s interesting to realize how the class about sensitive problems be run in this Chinese experimental nursery, and how these Chinese young children understand and discuss about terrorist attack – their thinking, expressions and emotions. Therefore I translated it and hope it will be useful for more people. (I have asked the author’s authorization)
I always encourage teachers to discuss with young children (boys and girls) together, particularly in the ‘News and Affairs’ class. During these courses, children can surprisingly find that even for the same thing, different people will have different feelings, although the start point of their thinking is same. I believe that it is an important course for 5-6 y/o children to realize that ‘sometimes, the way of my good friend to look at the world is different from mine’.
In fact, comparing with some other affairs, the open discussing space about Terrorist Attack in Paris isn’t very large for these young children. Even for the adults, generally, at the moment of hearing about such ‘injustice affair’, the intense feeling also will repress the desire of discussing with the others. When I was preparing for this class, the biggest challenges for me are: 1, How to explain the affair briefly and clearly to the 5-year-old children; 2, How to guide them to understand ‘justice’ instead of infusing adults’ considerations, while leave the enough space for them to express their own thinking?
The structure of this class is a bit more complex than before. We should discuss: 1, Which kind of place is Paris like? 2, What happened? 3, Who are the terrotists? 4, How would the Parisian children feel about this affair? 5, Conclusion - the factors of ‘justice’. At the beginning, I also added the terrorists’ policies and activities about children in their control area. But then I found this part is unnecessary in this class.
As the other classes before, this class also has many barriers, but the children and teachers broke through them one by one.
Firstly, we show the attractions of Parts: fashion, perfume, Eiffel Tower…My friend also made Macarons for our class. These things let the children have specific realization about Paris. Thus, that city has become closer to us.
When we were talking about the terrorist attack, the teachers chose the language and pictures very carefully. However, the most sensitive girl in our class still turned her head around, though she said ‘my father had told me about this thing’ before the class started. At the same time, the boy in the class was very impassioned when he heard of some specific words such as ‘police’ ‘bomb’ and ‘gun’ (and also saw the pictures). He showed the burning desire of talking and kept raising hand and interrupting the others. He almost fell into boasting that ‘I will fight with the terrorists!’
The other girls are calmer. When we were discussing the question that ‘what were those terrorists thinking when they aimed at the people?’ All the girls expressed as ‘whatever their reasons are, they shouldn’t do that.’ ‘It isn’t acceptable that they hurt the common people, particularly hurt children.’ Meanwhile, the boy seemed to think much deeper about ‘terrorist’s heart’ – he argued that ‘Terrorists want to show they are more powerful than the other people. They want to own the others’ love and attention. They are afraid the others ignore them.’
When the teachers asked that if we should organize a mini march and write what we want to talk with the Parisian children or the terrorists on posters, all the children responded eagerly. It is interesting that the girls only agreed to write for Parisian children, but refused to write anything conversing with the terrorists. At the same time, the boy argued that ‘The march is useless. The real terrorists will snatch the posters and destroy them, then use their guns to kill you.’ After I explained ‘the meaning of a March is showing the people’s determination that they are absolutely not afraid of violence and won’t tolerate the terrorists’ activities’, the boy accepted the idea and decided to join the march.
During the whole class, the boy insisted to repeat his argument again and again: ‘the people should snatch the terrorists’ guns and aim at them!’ Meanwhile, the girls’ expressions are more about their sadness and worries.
At the last, when I showed the picture that Eiffel Tower lighted the colors of French national flag, and explained that’s the way through which the people say ‘NO’ to the terrorists, all the children cheered.
I found that in such kind of discussions about social problems, these young boys and girls have shown their different ways to look after this world.
The girls mostly use ‘maternal manner’ to understand the world. They empathized much easily with the Parisian children, and showed more intense emotion on the damage sustained by the beautiful and good things. Meanwhile, the boys understood the world by ‘fatherhood manner’. They had much deeper understanding about the motivation of terrorists’ activties. Although they said ‘it’s wrong’, they still had self-awareness about the motivation of violence.
Through these discussions, the boys will realize the girls’ worries and rejection to destructive power, as well as their love and defending on kindness and beauty. Meanwhile, the girls will realize the boys’ understanding on destructive power, and the way they check and balance themselves and destructive power. I think it is one aspect of the important significance of this class.
[The words: The Parisian children, I wish peace will be with you.]
In their long journey in the future, they might witness the real ‘injustice’ in one day, or might be not. For most people, the daily life is covered by tangled and emotional ‘right and wrong’, just as a lonely road full of mist.
[‘The magic of justice’ ‘Justice is an old magic existing in everyone’s heart’]
But these children have experienced about ‘injustice’ and ‘truth’ in this class. They have seen that when facing this kind of affairs, different people would show different attitudes: someone will become hawks; someone will be hesitant and worried; someone will tend to evade the problems… ‘That’s why we need to communicate and understand the others.’
‘Justice’ doesn’t exist in any absolute truth. It exists in your understanding and love. You are marvelous children.
[The boy’s poster: ‘The French children, don’t be worried! Peace will be with you.’ ‘The terrorists, why do you hurt the others?’ ‘The terrorists, it’s a wrong way to show your claim! You should do right things.’]










