Um, no. This line of reasoning is only true IF you believe that poor people are responsible for the bulk of crimes. They aren't. Poor neighbourhoods are policed more than any other, and poor people are less likely to have access to legitimate legal help.
So again, I say, poor people are not morally bankrupt. Equating poverty with crime is saying that they are.
Edit: and I need to add that the clarification put forth by treatquestion is not the mainstream poverty = crime clarification. For the most part, poverty is equated with crime because poor people are supposedly desperate, have not had good values instilled in them, are hungry, have no other choice, or some other bullshit.


















