Quite often the response to our protesting against the paparazzi is that the celebrities have âchosenâ this life and they should put up with the annoyance. First and foremost, most of them did not choose to be a celebrity â they chose to be an actor, a singer, an author, etc., and society (we) has made them that celebrity. âCelebritiesâ are people just like us. They just want to live their lives in peace, to walk down the street with their friends or partner or kids without being bombarded by camera flashes and screaming crowds. They didnât ask for this life. We gave them this life by buying magazines that flaunt these images, by tuning into entertainment specials that show Britney or Lindsay or whoever their target of the moment is doing totally inane things.
Secondly, this is more than a minor annoyance. What you see is celebrities looking pissed off. Maybe you think theyâre overreacting. Maybe you think theyâre snobbish. What you donât see is swarms of more than 5, 6 or 7 â maybe even 50 photographers blinding them with their camera flashes, screaming their names, chasing after them, bumping against them, jumping in front of their cars, chasing them in their cars, damaging them and their property in the process.
We all know about the alleged paparazzi involvement in Princess Dianaâs death â and yet we do not learn. We still want more, and nobody considers what could go terribly wrong all in the pursuit for the perfect picture.
In 2007, George Clooney was injured in a motorcycle accident with his girlfriend. Innocent enough. He went to hospital and was treated, but the staff of the hospital deemed it okay to look at his private medical records â because he was a celebrity. Then, when Mr Clooney next decided to go back to riding his motorcycle he found himself being apprehended by paparazzi â speeding paparazzi â all aiming for that perfect shot. As he put it, âWhat theyâre doing is illegalâŚItâs high-speed chases and theyâre competing with each other. Theyâre not trying to catch me doing something stupid, theyâre trying to create me doing something stupid. You donât get to break all these laws and then say, âIâm just doing my job.ââ So soon after what could have been a tragic accident his life was at risk â for a photograph.
We criticise celebrities for running red lights but what the media donât show us is the 8 or 9 cars following them. Weâre not saying that every illegality a celebrity commits has paparazzi to blame. It doesnât. But certainly in a lot of cases, we are only seeing one half of the story â the photographers half, the half they want you to see, and not the circumstances that led up to the accident or illegality or simply annoyed expression on their targetâs faces.
What we donât see is the children of these celebrities being mobbed, being screamed at just as loudly as their parents (sure, you say, the parents âchoseâ this life, but what about their offspring?), and in a lot of cases begging back that they stop (Suri Cruise on multiple occasions has expressed distress at the photographers that follow her and her parents around), so what about the psychological damage? What about the fear of never leaving the house lest someone captures you in a vulnerable moment?
Be it a physical or an psychological ailment, the paparazzi can be responsible for a lot more than celebrities just looking bad. So the next time you smile or roll your eyes at a photograph in a magazine or a newspaper or one of those gossip sites on the web â consider the other side. Is endangering anyone â no matter their career, no matter their status, social, financial or otherwise â really worth a few pictures that weâll forget about in a day or two? Is it?
Just something to think about.