I don't think most Radqueers are literal predators, I think most of them are uneducated teenagers who are desperate for validation. If anything, most of them are more likely to be victimized. Though, one could argue that advocating RQ beliefs as an individual counts as a form of "enablement", even if you are at risk of being harmed yourself. That's a post for another day, though.
Likewise, I think framing "Radqueer Neutrals" as equivalent to Radqueers for reasons pertaining to the Pro-Contact discourse argument is inconvenient at best, and disingenuous at worst. It doesn't actually attack them in a way that matters to them. It's not the best strategy, because most of them will just side-step the accusation by being like, "B-but I'm Anti-Contact!!!"
That's not the point, dipshit. The problem is that you're less than a degree of separation away from people who aren't, and that camp all uses the same fucking label that you do, because said stated label's Core Belief is "You can believe whatever you want about yourself forever and tolerate everyone who believes whatever." Which is why Pro-Contact Pedos get conflated with Radqueer ideologues and their sympathizers. Because your stupid fucking ideology creates a direct and highly visible pipeline between the two.
And this is like, a primary fundamental discourse division within that group. You guys can't agree on this and create community boundaries in a way that matters. Because your ideology, by definition, does not let you do this, without contradicting its own stated doctrine.
And I see you all trying. I see you all slapping the "Anti-Contact" label on yourselves, as if that actually did something.
It doesn't matter. Because you're still a self-described Radqueer. Which is why other people all lump you in with the Abusive Pedophile advocates.
Though I do think that when Radqueer Neutrals say things like: "I am fine with other people who have different beliefs from me", I don't think they're actually willing to interrogate where their beliefs might genuinely differ, whether or not they actually agree or disagree with something.
Keep in mind, that tolerance of a belief is effectively the lowest-level form of endorsement - "Even if I don't agree, this deserves to be at the table, eating with us". I have never seen a RQ Neutral acknowledge this in a meaningful way. Probably because that would require them to think hard, about something that actually matters.
Anyway, the actual reason why I block Radqueer Neutrals is because if you demonstrate that you validate your mutual, Whiteboy Supreme - whose borrowed framework lets him LARP as Asian - I think you're stupid as fuck. You have demonstrated that you possess extremely poor judgement, and that you are incapable of distinguishing between very basic things that would allow us to have a good faith conversation. Why should I take anything you say on the internet seriously?
