Host: Jay Co-host: Emmett

He/Him/They/Them user of We/Us/I/Me 27 year old legally blind diagnosed DID system! ♫♬♪Cuz I'll make a plural outta you!!~♫♬♪

[daydreamers-choir]

Hello, and welcome to daydreamers choir

our discord is actuallyjace

Check who is fronting!!~

#we speaks = for original posts

#saved for later = posts we'd like to come back to at a later time.

We are

27 years old transboy

Diagnosed with DID

Legally blind with optic nerve hypoplasia and nystagmus

Heavily suspected of having AUDHD

White American with French Canadian heritage/ancestors

Using I/we interchangeaby

Diagnosed with multiple insufficiencies. The one we are most comfortable talking about is our adrenaline insufficiency.

We are strongly anti-harassment

We will not tolerate hateful people on our blog, and will block on sight if we see you being a bigoted ass wipe!~

[daydreamers-choir]

It's nice seeing a pro endo system with a cdd nice to know we are not alone cause we suspect we have a cdd and will never go back to anti endo communities cause they caused our host to deny us

RED: We were in a lot of anti-endo spaces before and those were some of the worst parts of our systems journey. It also caused our previous host to deny our existence. Being around those types of circles also influenced us to fake claim other systems, and I feel like that's the most heartbreaking part for us. I know we can't go back and change what we did, but we can at least change what we do now and be there for the people we've hurt in the past.

[daydreamers-choir]

RED: Blocked the not syscourse person. It kind of feels like what is and isn't syscourse to them is a bit shaky. Like, I think if we got an ask relating to syscourse It should be okay to put follow-up posts relating to that ask into the tag. For the post about the wonderland system which I think they said was vague, I'm not too sure, that post could give someone inspiration to research the situation and gain their own opinion of it. I do think it belongs in syscourse. I know my system previously had sent in our own post to be submitted onto that blog, but I personally feel like we should block them for our own system's sake

[daydreamers-choir]

To my knowledge being anti-endo can be considered racist (or at least very ignorant) when one is particularly hateful towards spiritual plurals or when a culture involves a form of plurality or at least a "more than one" experience. Which is one of the reasons the "boundary of normalcy" exists in texts like the ICD-11, but its not the only example.

Spiritual plurality itself is a wide varied experience that is experienced by humanity as a whole. No one set cultures "owns" spiritual plurality either.

Tulpamancy is a good example of this and is the well most studied too from my understanding, while it does have roots in Tibetan Buddhism over the years its evolved to be its own thing that includes a wider amount of experiences. Waiting till the day when some anti-endos hear that *some* native Americans who are two-spirit consider the experience to be plural.

Hope this covers a sort of "why" anti-endos are at most considered ignorant of other cultures, or sometimes yes: blatantly racist as many have a very white-American centrist view and can have a "white savior" view when they try policing other systems and plurals.

RED; Ah this makes sense. Thank you for explaining this to us!

[daydreamers-choir]

My Syscourse Take is that a person’s other diagnoses, including addiction, shouldn’t result in people ignoring or dismissing someone’s plurality.

RED: I wholeheartedly agree with this

[daydreamers-choir]

ngl if you're endo-neutral I don't want you around. I can accept "it's none of my business/I'm not informed enough to have an opinion/I'm a singlet so it's not my place to say" but at the same time it's not enough to just not hate me you have to actually support my existence.

Like if someone was just neutral about say, trans people, you'd probably not wanna be around them as much as someone who's actually supportive of trans people

RED: We are not Endo neutral though, we are pro Endo! We were simply asking how being anti-tulpa/anti-endo was racist because we personally did not know.

[daydreamers-choir]

being anti tulpa (and endos as a whole in a way) is racist as hell but nobodys ready to talk about that

RED: Can you explain more on this? I'm a little unsure on how it is racist, but would love to learn!

[daydreamers-choir]

RED: I'm feeling a little bored right now. people should send us syscourse asks!

[kingcatnine]

reminding everyone to wear sunscreen because the sun is a deadly laser: 😁😊

having to spend 10 minutes slathering yourself in grease just to safely be outside in the sun for 20 minutes. because the sun is a deadly laser: 😐👎

[torracat]

i havent eaten an apple in days. the doctors are closing in. my barricade wont last much longer. theyre coming. tell my family i love them

[torracat]

i havent eaten an apple in days. the doctors are closing in. my barricade wont last much longer. theyre coming. tell my family i love them

[torracat]

i havent eaten an apple in days. the doctors are closing in. my barricade wont last much longer. theyre coming. tell my family i love them

[asterosian]

“Do trans men belong in women’s spaces?” I hate the phrasing of that question entirely. It’s secretly multiple questions disguised as one while using a vague term that serves no purpose other than to lead someone to a specific conclusion.

So let’s rephrase it.

“Do trans men belong in women’s spaces clinics that offer services meant for those with vaginas, uteruses, etc?” If they have the relevant anatomy that needs care, then obviously yes. I’m sorry, do you want trans men to get cancer and die because it went undetected too long? Because that’s how you get trans men to get cancer and die because it went undetected too long. Also, why is that space considered a women’s space to begin with and why should we let it stay that way?

“Do trans men belong in women’s spaces feminist advocacy groups fighting for abortion rights?” Yes because leaving trans men out means the people writing the law can simply forget trans men exist and write it in such a way where some asshole familiar with the law can use the exact wording to justify denying necessary care to a trans man because he is a trans man. If the law says “no woman should be denied access to abortion care…” and the trans man is legally a man, he will find himself in the same situation as the trans man who gets that phone call from his insurance saying “hey, sorry, but since you’re a man, we’re not covering that pap smear and you will be charged the full amount.” Not just in terms of paying either. “If you were a real man, you wouldn’t need an abortion. Come back after you fix your documents so they indicate you’re a female, but like, maybe motherhood would fix you so. Idk not my problem anymore. Goodbye!”

“Do trans men belong in women’s spaces lesbian book clubs or whatever?” They’re probably already there anyway and they’re not causing any problems just by being men in what is traditionally a women’s only thing. Plus, chances are they’ve been there since before coming out as trans so you’d just be kicking him out for coming out. I don’t have to explain to anyone why that’s kind of messed up, right?

“Do trans men belong in women’s spaces Should we kick people out of our arbitrarily female-only group if they come out as trans?” I guess I have to explain after all. It’s not gender validating for us to be suddenly ejected from every space we’ve found friends in before. You’re punishing someone for being trans. That’s all they did, was be trans.

[redriot-jirai]

reblog this post to get an ask in your inbox...

[chilethesilly]

“neopronouns and xenogenders are why transphobes don’t take us seriously!!” why the hell are we catering to transphobes?? punching sideways isn’t gonna make them hate any of us less

[zombiesta]

you're not an ally to intersex people if you only mention their existence when defending being transgender and ignore them in any other conversation.

you're not an ally to intersex people if you don't support "afab" intersex people considering themselves trans women and/or cis men.

you're not an ally to intersex people if you don't support "amab" intersex people considering themselves trans men and/or cis women.

you're not an ally to intersex people if you don't support intersex people refusing to identify as trans or cis.

you're not an ally to intersex people if you don't support intersex people identifying as both trans and cis for the same gender.

you're not an ally to intersex people if you use shi/hir pronouns, the h slur, the fu slur, etc while being perisex.

you're not an ally to intersex people if you are unable to listen to us without mentioning your kinks.

you're not an ally to intersex people if you aren't willing to learn about intersex issues.

[alephesyz]

i'm an enby butch trans woman and it pains me so much that so many trans people are anti-transmasc, it's devastating to see that our trans brothers and siblings have to endure discrimination WITHIN the trans community. i'm so sick of how some of you treat transmascs and trans men. DO BETTER!