Courage is being scared to death - and saddling up anyway.
John Wayne, American actor, (1907-1979).
noise dept.
taylor price
Sade Olutola

⁂

Discoholic 🪩

pixel skylines

tannertan36
KIROKAZE
$LAYYYTER
hello vonnie
almost home
NASA

Janaina Medeiros

PR's Tumblrdome
Not today Justin
Peter Solarz
art blog(derogatory)
occasionally subtle
Game of Thrones Daily
YOU ARE THE REASON
seen from Togo
seen from Togo

seen from Tunisia
seen from Togo

seen from China
seen from Panama
seen from France
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Libya
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@deadlydagger
Courage is being scared to death - and saddling up anyway.
John Wayne, American actor, (1907-1979).
A conference is a gathering of people who singly can do nothing, but together can decide that nothing can be done.
Fred Allen, comedian (1894-19560
The only way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
Russell Lynes, American writer (1910-1991)
The life of the nation is secure only while the nation is honest, truthful and virtuous.
Frederick Dougless (1817-1895)
Dan Connor's Blog turned 5 today!
WHAT MADE ME DECIDE TO BECOME A LAWYER AND WHAT DID I LIKE MOST ABOUT THE PROFESSION?
On December 15, 1961, at age 22, I walked out of what I thought would be the last classroom in my life. It just goes to show you that there are two words that should be used sparingly: they are "never" and "always."
I loved playing football and was determined to continue playing even though my eligibility had expired at the end of the 1961 season. But the Marine Corps had a couple of military bases with football teams that played against college teams. One was Quantico and the other was Camp Pendleton. It looked like I was going to be drafted into the service one way or the other as they had sent me a notice to appear for a physical examination to see if I physically qualified for the military. If I passed the physical examination and got drafted, I would have a two year hitch as a dog face (Army slug). Both the Navy and the Marines had a three year hitch but it was remarkably better duty. The Marine Corps recruiters said they thought that they could ensure my matriculation into one of their two bases where I could play football.
I also met with the local recruiting agency for the Navy and they advised me that they had a football team in Japan that could play a college schedule. So I was caught between the two branches of the service. I was not interested in the Army or the Air Force at all. One of the people that I was working with, Harold Headlee, had been a Navy SeaBee and he crystallized the nature of the services for me. He told me I could decide between a Marine, ending up in a foxhole eating food out of cans, sleeping on the dirt, ducking hand grenades and other types of artillery. Or, I could be on a ship, eating three square meals a day in the wardroom, sleeping in a nice warm bed at night, and benefiting from other things that the Navy had to offer; such as sailing the seas of the world, an adventure in and of itself.
So I joined the Navy, went to Officer Candidate School in Newport, Rhode Island for 18 weeks, and then was assigned to a destroyer home ported in San Diego. (The promise of playing football in the Navy was a phony pipe-dream). During the three years that I spent on this ship, we sailed the entire Pacific Ocean twice and had many positive and negative experiences. One of the things that Harold never told me was that, in rough seas, we would have to hang on our rack throughout the night to keep from being tossed out of it onto the deck. He did not tell me that, if the seas got really rough, our full plates of food would fly across the room banging off the bulkhead, food all over the floor. At least, we never got shot at.
My Navy experiences were extensive and would be the subject of another essay. However, they did play into my ultimate career as a lawyer.
After officer candidate school, I reported to my ship on September 3, 1962. Twenty-five months later, in October, 1964, I had a 10 day leave during which I returned to my home right before my ship was due to head to the Western Pacific again at the end of October. I had already made up my mind that I would leave the Navy once my obligation was up in August 1965. I wanted to be a football coach, walking in the shoes of one of the great football coaches of all time, Woody Hayes. So I went to see Woody one afternoon while I was at home to discuss with him what I would need to do in order to enter the field of coaching college football. I did not know whether I had the talent to be a football coach but Woody assured me that I definitely did have all that I needed to be a success. He also assured me that he could set forth a path for me to establish a career in coaching. He would let me be a student assistant coach with Ohio State, learn how things needed to be done in order to be successful. However, there was a condition. He said while I was a student assistant coach, I needed to go to law school.
My heart sank. I told him that I never wanted to go into a classroom again and especially to law school which would have required three years of school. I told him pretty much flat out that I would not agree to that. He said that would be no problem but those were the parameters within which I had to comply to receive his assistance. (I think he had a vision of the future that I was too young to see).
After my leave, I went back to my ship and, strangely enough on my bunk was the biography of Clarence Darrow, one of the great trial lawyers of all time. To this day I have no idea who the book belonged to or how it got on my bunk. But I read the book cover to cover very quickly and was kind of inspired by it. While I was reading about Clarence Darrow, I was talking to one of the sailors on my ship who, at the same time, was reading about Samuel Leibowitz, a great trial lawyer and judge in the state of New York. As the sailor and I finished our respective books, we traded so I got to read that book as well.
Shortly after I returned from my leave, our ship left for the Western Pacific. Our destroyer group was escorting an aircraft carrier, the Coral Sea. We always stopped at Pearl Harbor to refresh and replenish before continuing to Westpac. On the way to Pearl, the Coral Sea blew a boiler and was unable to continue until repairs were made. So we were hung up in Pearl Harbor for 60 days. During that time and thereafter on that trip overseas, many of our sailors got into mischief, resulting in courts-martial. A court-martial consisted of a prosecuting officer, a defense officer, and several officers sitting as a jury. I was assigned to be a prosecutor and/or a defense counsel on every one of these cases.
An officer’s day is filled with many duties while on ship at sea. One day as I was working hard to prepare for one of the cases that I was handling, I said to one of my fellow officers that I was really enjoying doing these courts-martial and, if I did not have all of the extensive duties otherwise, the courts-martial work would really be challenging and exciting. Bingo! A transformation took place on the spot.
As a result of all of these factors coalescing at the same time, I made a decision to at least apply to law school, take the LSAT, and see where this took me. When I was released from the Navy in August 1965, I went to the administrative offices of the Ohio State law school to see what the status of my application was. I was told on the spot that I was admitted and to come for orientation at a particular date at the school. Jody Wharton, the Assistant Dean who interviewed me, who became a good friend of mine throughout the years, later told me that as soon as they saw my photo in full Navy dress blues, I was in!! It was clearly an easier process than later when my children went through the same thing.
I compressed my law school education into nine straight quarters. In other words, instead of taking summers off as most of my classmates did, I went to school in the summer of 1966 and 1967. I was not allowed to work for the first year of law school, per student rules. However, during the 1966 and 1967 football seasons, I was a graduate assistant coach. In 1966, I coached the freshman team. But in 1967, due to the number of guard and tackle positions, I was elevated to be a varsity coach, assisting Bill Mallory who was our defensive line coach. This was truly an unbelievable experience to prepare me for a career in coaching. I was able to be a definite part of the defense coaching team, participating in the evaluation of the players week to week and was present at all the defensive coaches’ meetings early in the morning, during the course of the day, and in the evening. Sometimes we would have meetings until 11 o'clock at night and have to be back on campus at 6 o'clock or 7 o'clock in the morning for more meetings or to work with the team. In addition to this great experience, Woody paid me $500 for the 1966 season and $1000 for the 1967 season. That and the little bit of money that I received from the G.I. Bill kept me afloat financially until I graduated.
I graduated from law school in December 1967. By that time, I was firmly committed to the law. By and large, coaching was the toughest job I've ever had, even harder than running jackhammers, hod carrying, digging footers, you name it, jobs that I had while in college. So I decided to be a lawyer!
I practiced law for 47 years. The first few years were kind of rocky. I did not receive a great job offer like some of the better students in my class. As a result, I accepted a couple of jobs that I did not like all that well and then worked for the County Prosecutor’s office for ten months during which I tried 47 jury trials. I was in trial all the time and as soon as I finished a case, I started another one right away. Sometimes, I had a jury deliberating while I was impaneling a jury in the same courtroom. I also started a little side practice on my own where I sometimes worked in the evening and also every Saturday and Sunday. So I was working seven days a week for about 27 months.
Well, if I wanted to be a trial lawyer, I sure got my feet wet in that career. But I was working so hard that I literally ran out of steam. In March 1971, I collapsed and was out of work for a week. Believe it or not, I was so happy to be in bed feeling like I just could not do anything but rest. After the week off, I returned to work for a week but collapsed again and had to take another week off. My body was sending a clear message to me which I finally understood.
In April 1971, I left the prosecutor's office, hung my shield, and became a real good trial lawyer. I developed a reputation statewide and nationally to some extent in my areas of practice. That lasted until 2014 when I retired. It was quite a thrill for me to seek justice for those who could not achieve it by themselves. There was no greater sense of excitement then to have a client reach out to shake my hand with tears in his eyes, telling me thanks for working so hard for him.
It is kind of ironic that high-powered law firms did not seek me out when I graduated. But, striking out on my own, working diligently every day, I was able to build a law firm with seven lawyers and 10-15 staff. This was a great contribution to our local community as well as making law in the legislature and the Supreme Court. Early in my life, I would never in a million years have thought that I would be a lawyer. Yet, that was exactly what I was cut out to do. There are no coincidences in life. We each have a plan set in stone. Our job, each of us, is to sort out what the plan is and follow it to its conclusion. Hopefully we will benefit those with whom we come in contact. In my case, that is definitely what happened.
If one looks at my history set forth above, it is clear that a large number of occurrences had to take place in a timely manner for me to end up where I am today. In another essay, I laid out my educational and athletic experiences.
From the time that I started high school until I left the University of Dayton six years later, I had one setback after another, a lot of adversity. In a high state of frustration, I entered Ohio State to finish my education but, through a miracle, I was able to play football, played for two of the greatest coaches in history and won a National Championship. I was urged by Woody Hayes to enter law school which I did not want to do, read the biographies of two great lawyers, was commissioned by the captain of my ship to participate in a large number of courts-martial, changing my attitude about law, was admitted to law school in a breeze, passed the bar and my life was changed forever. This is how I developed my philosophy of life: you never know what opportunities will prevent themselves, or what adversity you have to overcome to accomplish your goals. So: be prepared, never give up, show up every day.
Daniel D. Connor
December 22, 2018
CUBANS ARE OUR FAMILY!
Fulgencio Batista was an historic figure in Cuba. He played a major role prior to World War II and thereafter. He was president of Cuba twice, the second time beginning in 1952. When he ran for president in a three-way race, right before the election, being supported by the Cuban Army, he staged a coup and seized power. During his rule in the 1950s, he had a star-crossed administration, friendly to the United States but had various political backings including that of organized crime.
On December 31, 1958, Batista told his cabinet and top officials that he was leaving the country. He knew that his presidency was over. On January 8, 1959, Fidel Castro and his army captured Havana and became Cuba's leader.
Prior to Castro's insurgency, honorable people, very disappointed in the totally corrupt, and crime ridden Batista administration, supported Castro. However, shortly thereafter, Castro showed his true colors, as he became a communist dictator. He nationalized all the banks and took over many other private farms and establishments.
Castro established an alliance with communist Russia and started rounding up all of the Cuban children to send them to Russia for indoctrination of the communist way. José Infante, a former supporter, did not support the Castro government and was ordered to appear before revolutionary, Che Guevara, who was supporting Castro. Che Guevara advised José that he needed to support the Castro government or be assassinated. At this point he sent his two sons, René and José, out of the country to a location known as Camp Kendall in Florida. Shortly thereafter, the entire Infante family left Cuba. José Infante’s father-in-law was extremely wealthy, owning 26 banks in Cuba and had many other assets as well. The government confiscated all of these. The entire family became by and large destitute.
Catholic Charities is an organization that had been established by the Catholic Church throughout America and internationally to support those who had fallen on hard times. Camp Kendall was basically a way station to house Cuban refugee children until they could be placed with families throughout the United States.
A man named Joe Gibboney was the head of the Catholic Charities program in Central Ohio. My mother and father were both active members of the Catholic Church in Central Ohio and, because of this, were contacted by Gibboney for assistance with this program. As it turns out, quite a number of Cuban children were going to be sent to the Columbus, Ohio area so a fairly large number of families needed to be recruited to accept these children until they could be repatriated with their parents, wherever they may be.
One night at dinner our parents told my sister, Jane, my brother, John, and me, about the situation and asked for our input as to whether we would be willing to accept a child in our home until the child would be able to return to his parents. Mr. Gibboney had advised my parents that he had selected a boy to come to live with us if we agreed. The boy was about my brother's age, which was about 16 years old at that time. This occurred in late 1960 or early 1961.
All five of us agreed that we should participate in this program. However, after Mr. Gibboney was notified that we would participate, he said that the boy that he had selected to come with us had a younger brother and it was the wish of the parents that the two boys be kept together. So we had to have another meeting but it was a no-brainer. We agreed to accept both of them.
Accommodations would be somewhat of a problem since we had a three-bedroom house. My parents occupied one bedroom, Jane had a room to herself and my brother, John, and I shared a room. So we were running short of space and had to decide how to accommodate these young boys. We had a finished basement but did not have furniture to accommodate a bedroom situation. Also there were no toilet or shower facilities in the basement. We had some time to get organized before the boys would come to us so we were able to construct a bathroom, finish a shower facility and obtain furniture.
One day in May 1961, the two boys showed up. One was named René, age 16, and José, age 10. René spoke very little English but was able to get by but José neither spoke nor understood English at all. Of course, my mother was freaking out, scared to death that they would not be happy with us and so she thought up all kinds of activities for that first night and the next day to get the ball rolling. My memory tells me that they went to play miniature golf that evening. The boys called it golfito.
I had taken two years of Spanish in high school so I knew some of it. I checked my Spanish dictionary and looked up butter and mustard, for what reason I don't know unless both of those would be on the table at dinner. I also told them that they were los dos Pilotos, which were words that we used in the Spanish stories that we read in class. To this day, I am ribbed mercilessly about “the two pilots.”
All of us kids drank milk at dinner and that first night my mother poured milk for both of the Cubans as well. There was a large amount of dialogue between the two boys, all in Spanish of course. We had no idea what was going on but were told later that Jose’ did not like milk at all and did not want to drink it. Rene’ ordered Jose’ to just suck it up, drink the milk and keep his mouth shut about not liking it. From then on, however, we always had chocolate milk for Jose’ which he gulped down without hesitation.
My mother took immediate steps to enroll the boys in school, René at St. Charles and José at Our Lady of Peace. There was only about one month left before summer vacation so the two of them kind of struggled to get through, but everyone was giving them plenty of leeway recognizing their situation. There was wide acceptance of them by all of their peers. All the kids at Our Lady of Peace, within a day or so, had Spanish dictionaries so that they could communicate as well as possible.
Of course, the friends that José had made in school remained close to him during the summer. By the time school started in the fall, José was extremely proficient in English and, as it turned out, José's English was better than René. It goes without saying that this was a great experience for the entire community on many fronts. Also, both of the boys were assimilated into our family quite nicely, although some of the other families who took children in did not have the same success that we had. To this day, we have maintained a close relationship with the two boys as well as with other members of their family. While one would assume that this was a charitable act by our family, all five of us felt that we received a great reward by having these two Cuban boys in our lives.
Renée was a big hulking giant whereas José was a skinny little guy with a big smile. I think it was probably due to his young age of 10, his facile mind picked up the English language very quickly. He would entertain us all with his hilarious explanations of any event that he would describe. Many of these events would've been something that had taken place in Cuba but many were also things that happened in the daily lives of all of us.
José spoke with his mouth but also with his hands and the overall gyrations of his body. Story after story came out even before he could speak well in English. He would pantomime whatever it was he was trying to tell us and asked René to assist him if he needed a word that he could not otherwise play out. Because of the greatness of these two boys and the greatness of our family as well, it did not take any time at all before we were one complete family.
There was one kind of a hiccup in the situation but I think it is an important part of the story. The boys joined us in May 1961. About five months later, in October, we got a call from Blanca, the mother of the two boys. She was in Florida and wanted to come to Ohio to see the boys. My mother was very upset about this because she thought that Blanca was coming to spy on us to see if we were treating the boys properly. Of course, that was not an issue at all. You can just imagine a mother being separated from her sons for such a long time and wanting to see them if for no other reason then just to be close to them for a day or so. My mother, as wonderful as she was, was insecure. This obviously was in play when she was concerned about Blanca spying on her.
Blanca did come to see the boys and stayed at a bed and breakfast type facility in our neighborhood. But, as always happened with our mother, she became fast friends with Blanca and remained so until she died.
When it was time to go back to school in the fall, I asked José if he felt comfortable with our language so that he would not be embarrassed in front of his classmates. He looked me right in the eye, waved his hand, and said: "Danny, I know ALL!" While that may have been a little overstated, it was nevertheless reassuring for me.
The boys had a nickname for everyone and every thing. Because my brother was really white and tall and skinny, they used a Spanish name for him, which translated as "a long drink of milk." Because my right ear is bigger than my left ear, they constantly made fun of that, holding their right hand up against their right ear, waving it like it was so big that the wind could blow my ear around like a kite. They also had a Spanish name for "big ear," which they enjoyed using with glee. I do not remember the name they had for my sister, but they had one. They were both very observant and as they picked up various idiosyncrasies of all of us, they joked about them.
They came from a very wealthy family and they lived an extravagant lifestyle in Cuba. Their grandfather owned 26 banks and, in addition to their beautiful home, they had servants to take care of their needs. It was hard for them to believe that our mother did the cooking. After they had been here a short time, they saw that a nice meal was on the table every evening, but they could not figure out how it got there. They never saw a cook other than our mother to prepare the food. So they questioned: "Where is the cook?" But, because of their accent, the word "cook" came out as "cuk,” pronouncing oo like u. They were quite astonished that our mother was, in fact, that cook.
Part of the time that they were here, José had a paper route. My mother drove him around to assist in delivering papers. Quite often, my mother would pick José up at the school and take him to lunch at a small restaurant nearby. At first, Jose’ was happy about this but he started pushing back because he wanted to stay at school during lunch hour to play with his friends. My mother had her feelings hurt about that but you can understand José's desires and it also exemplifies the fact that he had established warm friendships in the short period of time that he had been with us. Every kid at Our Lady of Peace had in his back pocket a Spanish Dictionary. And by the time that the boys left us, his friends had at least a working knowledge speaking and understanding Spanish.
My brother played football at St. Charles and René went with him to practice every day. In the early days of the practice where they were not scrimmaging hard, Renée was very upset and kept asking as to when are we going to: "smash?" Before the first game, the school submitted an application to the Ohio State Athletic Association to waive Rene’s ineligibility due to the circumstances. In Ohio, if you transfer schools, you could not participate in athletics until you had been at the new school for at least one year. We felt this did not apply to René at all and certainly had extenuating circumstances. However, they turned us down so he was not able to play. To this he was apoplectic. There must have been some significant politics involved here as this was turning out to be a major screw job.
I heard stories, however, from his classmates that he was a bodyguard for everyone. If the students in his class were being bullied in any way by the upperclassman, they would call upon René, this hulking giant, to handle the situation, which always put an end to it in short order.
My brother drove to school every day and, of course, René went with him. In those days, all cars had seats that were like a bench in both front and back. So three people could sit on either the front seats or the back seats. No bucket seats like there are now. The Cubans had never dealt with cold weather before so this was a new experience for them. One day in the middle of winter, René, who normally sat by the window on the passenger side, slid into the seat and moved over right next to my brother in the middle seat. Kind of like a boyfriend and/or girlfriend would do. Well, my brother was a little put off by this and asked René why he was sitting so close to him. Well, they were going to pick up another person who would sit in the front seat by the window. So Renée typically would start out in the seat by the window and then move into the middle seat when this other kid got in. Rene's explanation as to why he started out in the middle seat was that he was tired of sitting in the window seat and warming up that cold seat and then the other passenger would get to sit in a warm seat by the window and René would have to sit in a cold seat in the middle again and warm it up. We got quite laugh about that.
As I previously indicated, our dinner table each evening was a real treat. The boys would tell us many stories about their lives and would have a unique spin about their daily activities, which also were enjoyable to listen to. One thing that really aggravated the boys that they refused to accept was my father's proclamation that they would never return to Cuba. They both insisted that they were determined to return to their homeland. This was a typical prediction by my father who seemed somehow to have a significant ability to see into the future on many issues. While I, as a 22-year-old college student, would expect to do everything the boys could do in order to get back to their homeland just as I would have had I been displaced. But my dad somehow knew that 60 years later, 2018, the boys are still here in America.
Both my brother and Rene’ had quite an interest in girls. Interestly, their respective cultures game into play. Girls that John thought were significantly overweight, Rene’ thought they were quite attractive. At first, we did not understand this but, upon examination of the topic, in the Latin American culture, a heavyset woman was indicative of a family that was well settled financially.
For Christmas, 1961, we went to Florida for the holiday. Because there were seven of us, we had to take two cars. We traveled together the entire time until we got to North Carolina. Somewhere there José exclaimed that he had to go to the bathroom. I told him just to hold it until we stopped. He was almost screaming that he really had to go and we had to stop as soon as possible. In those days we had no cell phones to communicate with my mom and dad in their car. Jane was with them and my brother and the two Cubans were in the car that I was driving. So we pulled off at a rest stop for José to go. As soon as he was finished, I jumped back on the road and was traveling at a high speed to try to catch up with my dad. Well that never happened but I got arrested for speeding. Any chance that the police officer could just write me a ticket? Absolutely not. He told me that he was arresting me and my only choice to be released was to post bond. So I had to follow him to some police station where they had to call in a justice of the peace to decide what my punishment should be. They did not make a final determination but they did make me post bond of $60 which, as I recall, was all I had. So I paid the money and then got back on the road. In the meantime my parents had gotten off the road when they realized that we were no longer with them. They contacted the police somehow and asked that some sort of a plea be put over the radio with a message to us to meet them at some location. When they got there, we had not heard the message so we were nowhere to be found and we never did hook up until we got to the hotel in Florida. It was not a good scene.
While we were in Florida, we had an opportunity to meet the father of the two boys, José Infante senior, a handsome man with a brilliant mind. He had obtained employment as a professor at a college in North Carolina. We also met Blanca again and were able to spend some time with her. The boys also had a sister whose name I cannot remember and I am not certain as to how she was handled. I do not think that she was sent to Camp Kendall. Perhaps since she was a girl, the parents felt they could keep her with them.
As I indicated before, René was the more mature and more common sense person then José. But José was the life of the party at dinner every night, which is when we all had an opportunity to get together and discuss the events of the day. José had the habit of sticking out his little finger daintily whenever he was drinking something. This looked like a dainty way of drinking the beverage. So we ridiculed him a little bit but then we started sticking out our little fingers when we drank something as well. Not to be outdone, José started drinking with his index finger pointed out rather than the small finger. This was typical of the interplay among all of us, which was clearly enhanced by the presence of the two boys.
José loved oysters. They came in a jar which was a long narrow tube filled with them. The entire family as I recall did not care for oysters at all as they were kind of a slimy type of seawater animal. But José would have the jar of oysters sitting before his plate when we would sit down for dinner. A beaming smile would appear on his face when he saw them. He would pick one up out of the jar, tilt his head back, drop it in and simply let it slide right down his throat. Then he would squeal: "S’Connor, I just love these." (S’Connor was how it came out when he meant to say, “Ms. Connor).The rest of us at the table would simply cry out: "eewweee, gross."
Once I asked José about his understanding of the Spanish language. In particular I wanted to know if, like English, the vocabulary was virtually unlimited. Undaunted, José said he knew every word in the Spanish language. So I got out our dictionaries and started firing complicated words at him. He was no match for the dictionary and we had a lot of fun about his so-called lack of knowledge of his own language. All in good fun, of course.
There were some TV programs that we all watched as a family. I can't recall any of them now but it seemed like among all of us, we would imitate various characters on the TV shows and, of course, the boys certainly played a role in that, more José than René. John and Jane both had a more intimate contact with the Cubans then I did because I was six years older than John and René and about 12 years older than José. So there are probably a lot of details that did occur of which I had no knowledge.
There was a family down the street who was the direct opposite of our family. They had two children and, including the Cubans, we had five; they were ardent Methodists, we were Catholic; we were Republicans, they were Democrats. With respect to the religious aspect, the father was very much anti-Catholic and ridiculed our faith or criticized it when he chose. He was so anti-Catholic that, when his daughter became engaged to a Catholic boy who was a law school classmate of mine, he refused to invite anyone to the wedding and refused to walk his daughter down the aisle. In our household, we mused about the father being torn between voting for John Kennedy, a Democrat, who also was a Catholic. When he went into the voting booth, his soul had to be torn between his faith and his politics. We never knew.
Our parish priest, Father George Foley, who I have referred to in other essays, was very close to our parents. He probably came to dinner at our house once every two or three months and, even during my high school and college years, I would still serve Mass for him when possible. One day, Father Foley contacted my mother and asked her to come to the rectory so that he could talk to her. He gave her something like $50-$100 in cash. Father Foley said it was to assist with the support of the Cuban boys with us. My mother thought that was the end of it but it turned out that every month, Father Foley gave her a similar amount of cash for the rest of the time that the Cubans were with us. My mother thanked him profusely and asked Father Foley why he was doing this, as our family was capable of supporting the boys. Father Foley would only say that this was not of his doing but there was an anonymous benefactor who was offering this support. Since we did not know the identity of the benefactor, my mother gave Father Foley a picture of the boys so that the benefactor would be able to see that the boys were being taken care of and the money was being put to good use. My parents were humbled by this whole event.
In April 1962, almost one year after the boys arrived, I left home for Navy Officer Candidate School in Rhode Island. I was not home again until Christmas 1963. I probably had some information about things that were going on at home but I was plenty busy on my ship so kind of lost track of what was happening with the Cubans. Within a month or so after I left home, the Cubans returned to their mother in Florida where they have resided ever since. They have both had very successful careers and families. Congratulations to them.
Roll the calendar forward about 20 years from when the boys left us, sometime around the early 1980s. My parents were invited to take a vacation with other couples to take a cruise on the Great Lakes. My parents rarely vacationed so this was a little unusual for them. As it turned out, the couple that lived down the street that were ardent anti-Catholic and also Democrats were on the cruise as well. One day my mother was sitting out on the deck sunning herself and the husband of the couple came out and joined my mother on the deck. They talked for a while and then he handed her a photograph. She could see instantly that it was a photograph of René and José. Mom asked the man how he got that and he said he had received it from Father Foley years ago. This was a man who would walk across red-hot coals rather than spend time with a Catholic priest. Yet he traveled to Our Lady of Peace monthly with money that was given to my parents to help with the boys. This was a demonstration of true charity and unconditional love. He had kept quiet all those years without any thanks, without any applause, without any boasting, but saw what he thought was a need and came to the rescue. While we had judged this man as someone who was highly prejudiced, virulently anti-Catholic, here was a man with a heart bigger than all the gold in Fort Knox.
Father Foley, my mother and father, and the benefactor down the street have all passed away. But all of them played a significant role to come to the aid of these children and their family at a critical time in human history.
In 1962, the Infante family was well settled in Florida and René and José returned to live with them as well. Nevertheless, we have maintained a close relationship with them down through the years. They have come to visit us from time to time, especially when my parents and sister, Jane, passed away. I met with them twice in the late sixties and early seventies when I traveled to Florida. My brother, John, has traveled annually to Florida and met with both of the Cubans and other members of their family while there. True to their heritage, Rene’ and Jose’ both have been enormously successful in building their families and also in their respective careers. Their success in business is quite remarkable. It is a great tribute to them and their family that in spite of the displacement of their state of life, personally and economically, they have been so successful.
This essay it is a mere snippet of the things that occurred since René and José entered our lives. It would take thousands of pages to provide a true representation of the enrichment brought to our family by them. Hopefully, the reader could get a semblance of the greatness of this relationship between René, José and our family.
There was another factor here. Mom and Dad showed their community leadership, both professionally and personally, by stepping up in the time of others’ need. This was one example of those great qualities which were evident throughout their lives.
It is truly hard to believe that our family was chosen out of the blue to have these two young boys sent to us and have them become members of our family ever since. While outsiders perhaps have looked at our family and admired us for welcoming Rene’ and José into our home, the exact opposite is true. Our family is the eternal beneficiary of having these truly wonderful young boys in our lives.
Daniel D. Connor
December 12, 2018
MY DEFINITION OF LOVE!
A Course In Miracles defines a miracle as a full commitment of unconditional love. Unconditional as given completely from one to another without compensation (recompense) and is expecting absolutely nothing in return. Unconditional in that the love is given completely for the good of the receiver even though it may be a detriment to the giver.
It is a “miracle” because the unconditional nature of it rarely occurs.
A good example of unconditional love is exemplified by a story told to me by my ever-loving daughter. She proposed that both she and I were in a totalitarian country and the government gave her the right to choose which one of us should be executed. She said that she would tell them to execute me! I was a little stunned by that response but she explained that she really did it for my benefit. This was because she felt that I would be so miserable if she were executed that it was really better for me to die so that I would not suffer so much. Now that is true love!!
Theologically speaking, a perfect example of unconditional love was the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, who gained absolutely nothing from mankind in response to His sacrifice. However, He submitted to this passion and death in order to accomplish salvation for all of us.
Unconditional love is rarely found. Perhaps it is mostly observed in the commitment of a parent to a child. However, some parents are incapable of unconditional love even for their children. They look inward, conducting themselves in a very selfish way to accomplish only what they think is best for them. In my law practice, I found this to be extremely prevalent. In countless occasions where a family was breaking up, case after case, the two parents were completely incapable of putting the needs of their children first, doting upon their own needs rather than taking a course of action that would be best for the children.
Love should not be confused with passion. The hormonal rush of a romantic relationship is usually misunderstood to be love. There may be some aspect of love present but, deep down, a new relationship typically does not have enough substance to it to put either party in a position to deny themselves in order to benefit the other person. As a relationship continues to grow, and a commitment to the other person becomes stronger, the passion of the new relationship will subside but, nevertheless, it is exchanged for a true permanent and powerful commitment to the other. Thus, passion is exchanged for unconditional love.
Volunteer work is not, of itself, a demonstration of unconditional love. However, there is some kind of euphoric feeling about doing volunteer work, knowing that you are doing something to benefit another person and are not expecting or receiving anything in return, not even a thank you. This is a totally different feeling that one has rather than having an expectation of compensation or some other duty in return.
A Course In Miracles has another theory about love. What is it that a person gives it away and then, instead of having less of it, one has more of it? This is counterintuitive because, whatever things we have, we wish to keep a tight hold of them to prevent the loss. However, with love, the more that you give to others, the more love you retain and increase.
In my association with the Missionaries of Charity, founded by Mother Teresa, I observed that the sisters demonstrate unconditional love every minute of every day for a lifetime. It is really quite remarkable. There are thousands of Missionaries of Charity nuns who exist for no other reason than to support the poorest of the poor around the world.
The sisters work and pray 19 hours per day. They sleep no more than five hours per night. They get a vacation of three weeks every 10 years. One would think that the sisters are in a perpetual state of exhaustion. It is exactly the opposite. They are incredibly happy. Each of them has three habits. They have two habits for their normal workdays. Each week they exchange the habit that they have been wearing for a clean habit that has been washed. They continue to exchange these two habits weekly. There is another habit that is put away clean for special occasions, primarily for religious events such as baptisms, confirmations, etc.
The sisters are dedicated to supporting people who are incapable of nurturing themselves. They do not preach religion but draw people to them and their holy Catholic faith by the goodness of their example. It is really quite remarkable. I observed countless numbers of people who came to admire the sisters and there dedication to their faith and to the people that they support. After witnessing this conduct, large numbers of people want to share in the holiness and happiness of the Missionaries of Charity. The sisters ask for nothing in return but are exhilarated when, through their example, other people become committed to the Catholic faith.
This is a complex issue, much more so than I have the capability to address it. However, these are some of my thoughts from a practical view. It is more likely defined by each of us resulting from our own experiences. One way or the other, we need more of it in our world.
As you can probably tell, I have struggled with this issue but please take these comments for what value they offer. I can say without hesitation that I have received more than my share of love from others and for that I am very grateful.
Daniel D. Connor
December 3, 2018
HAVE I EVER PULLED ANY GREAT PRANKS?
Generally, I would say no, absolutely not. I am not into pranking people and I don't appreciate being pranked by others. There was however, one time, during the winter of 1957, I did authorize a prank and solicited others to join me. There is a caveat however. The effort here was in one sense to prevent a punishment imposed upon someone who did not deserve it.
This situation occurred during the last semester of my senior year in high school. Our Latin teacher was Father O'Brien who maintained a love-hate relationship with all those who crossed his path. Father O'Brien is an iconic person and that is not in a good way. He was kind of a sinister person who tried to catch you unawares and punish you inappropriately. He was also one of those guys who you always tried to get the better of him as he was always trying to get the better of you.
I will give you an example, which is not that of the prank that this essay is about. But it gives you an idea of what Father O'Brien was all about. Donnie Schaefer, one of the most unassuming quiet guys in our class, never bothered anybody, was always dignified and respectful. One day he raised his hand in Father O'Brien's class and inquired whether he could sharpen his pencil. Father O'Brien yelled at Donnie that he was out of line by raising his hand, disrupting the entire class, by asking for permission when he should have just left his desk and gone to the pencil sharpener.
One must understand the geography of the classroom. Leaving the hallway and walking through the door of the classroom, one would be facing the most left part of the class and the classroom. To the right, the entire class was spread out except for the one or two rows of desks, which would be directly in front of you. Also to your right about 5-10 feet was the desk from which the teacher taught while he faced the class. Just past the desk where the teacher sat was a pencil sharpener on the right-hand wall. Donnie Schaefer had a desk that was very close to the wall on which the pencil sharpener was mounted.
As instructed, after Father O'Brien yelled at Donnie, Donnie went to the pencil sharpener and grinded away as he sharpened his pencil. He then sat down and the class continued.
What ensued the next day could possibly be called a prank. A bunch of us got together and went to a local drugstore that sold school supplies. We each bought about five or six pencils. (I am laughing out loud just thinking about how this all transpired).
About five minutes after the class began on the next day, one of us left his desk and, without permission, quietly went to the pencil sharpener and started sharpening his pencil. After a couple of cranks on the sharpener, another student walked up, waited until the first student had completed sharpening his pencil and then he started sharpening his pencil. In short order, there was a line of about five students in front of the pencil sharpener, all waiting to sharpen their pencils and, of course, sharpening their pencil when it was their turn. Well, it didn't take too long that Father O'Brien realized that his lecture had to be louder as his voice had to increase its intensity due to the loud noise being made by the pencil sharpener. Once this became apparent to him, he started yelling that everyone needed to go back to their desks. Meanwhile, while the pencil sharpening was going on, we were all intensely looking at Father O'Brien to see how he would handle this. The whole thing was totally hilarious. What was really hilarious about it was that no other teacher at St. Charles could be pranked like this and it played out only because of the personality that Father O'Brien was.
On one other minor occasion, Rick Bauman brought a harmonica to school that was only about 1 inch wide. Rick sat in the back left seat of the classroom. Before Father O'Brien showed up, Rick put the harmonica in his mouth and held it between his teeth so that he could blow into it without moving his mouth. So a few minutes after Father O’Brian's class started, this very soft harmonica note could be heard throughout the classroom. Well, nothing happened. However, about five minutes later, Rick did it again. Now any other teacher would simply have said that whoever was making that noise would have to stop it. Because of the nature of who Father O'Brien was, we knew that he would never handle it that way. Every time Rick created the little noise, O'Brien's head started snapping around sideways and up and down, eyes searching, trying to figure out what was going on without letting on that he was being irritated by it. This happened for about five times before Father O'Brien finally lost his temper and said whoever was doing it should stop or he was going to put the entire class in detention. That ended it but, to this day, when members of our class get together, the harmonica incident was always brought up.
Well, let's get to the serious prank that this essay is all about. Fred Richards, like Donnie Schaefer, was a quiet, unassuming, self-effacing high school senior. He was a lot of fun but he never did anything inappropriate or anything that could cause a problem for anyone. One day Father O’Brien charged into the classroom and accused Fred of stealing one of Father O'Brien's hubcaps. Fred denied it but Father O'Brien was relentless; he continued to accuse Fred and said that he was going to call the police and file a report, stating that Fred was the thief.
That night, Rick Bauman and I planned to antagonize Father O'Brien and establish Fred's innocence. So after a basketball game, Rick and I and a couple of other students went to the faculty parking lot, removed the other three remaining hubcaps on Father O’Brien’s car and made a quick and safe getaway.
The next day, Father O'Brien was fit to be tied. He was literally screaming at Fred Richards and demanded a complete confession from Fred. Of course, Fred was totally innocent, at least concerning the three hubcaps that we took and Fred's protestations were falling on deaf ears of Father O'Brien. At this point, I started to get a little nervous that we had exacerbated the situation and put Fred in even greater jeopardy than he had been before. So I jumped up and told Father O'Brien that he was out of line accusing Fred without any evidence to support the accusation. With this, John Balkans, who sat right behind me, yelled out: "Hey Connor, how do you know so much about all of this"? A couple of other guys chimed in as well. That caused me to sit down and shut up right away. That night, Rick and I returned to the scene of the crime, opened the back unlocked door of Father O’Brien's car and put the hubcaps on the back seat. I had prepared a lengthy letter explaining the whole situation to Father O'Brien but I chickened out at the last minute and did not leave the letter.
The next day, Father O'Brien was pacified. He apologized to Fred. But we never did, as far as I know, find out who took the other hubcap. If nothing else, we got to tamper with Father O'Brien with no repercussions to us or to Fred.
One other thing that was not even close to a prank did occur between Father O'Brien and me. Latin was probably my best class through the four years at St. Charles. As seniors, we were reading Virgil. I was not very diligent in my studies of that course. Needless to say, Father O'Brien was not happy with my performance. And rightly so. A friend of mine, Bernie Vechazone, had what was commonly known as a "pony." This was the best study guide of Virgil in the history of the human race. Without a complete description of what it offered, needless to say, if you used it, you were certain to get “A” in the class. I was complaining one day about how I was struggling and Bernie asked me if I wanted to use his pony. Of course I accepted. So after several weeks, I was doing brilliantly well in the class. One day, Father O'Brien, our teacher, challenged me, asking if I had a Virgil pony. Of course, I did not want to lie in open court so to speak so I just shot back at Father O'Brien: "Father, I cannot believe that you would accuse me of such a thing!”
So Father O'Brien responded by stating how can my work in studying Virgil be superior to his two best Latin students, Carter and Dunn. To which I responded: "Father, you need to reevaluate as to who is your best student!" To this day, whenever I see John Carter and/or Bill Dunn, I refresh their memories as to who was their superior in Father O'Brien's Latin class.
As disliked as Father O'Brien was, a couple of things were left as his legacy. First, there is a softball team made up of former St. Charles students. They named the team: "The OBs." Secondly, there is an artwork at the Vatican in Rome that has, in the lower left corner of the back of the artwork: "OB was here." Strangely enough, the least liked teacher at St. Charles nevertheless had some lasting impact on all of us.
Daniel D. Connor
November 5, 2018
STOP DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME!
I sit here on a peaceful island in the Caribbean. It is Sunday afternoon, November 4. Saturday night I went to bed. This morning’s clock registered an expected time without any change, any tampering, or “adding” an hour to my life! Arizona, Hawaii, and my present location all refuse to engage in this insanity of semi-annual time change.
Dr. Chris Winter, MD, President of Charlottesville Neurology and Sleep Medicine Clinic in Virginia, has done a study regarding how the time change affects appetite, accidents, mood, heart attacks and strokes, all with negative implications. His findings were confirmed by other studies as well. There were no positives found from these semiannual time changes.
Countries in Europe are now considering doing away with the time change. What a great benefit the United States could achieve if we would follow their lead! After many years of this "experiment," let us all worldwide return to one standard, terminating this nonsense called “saving time.”
MY MOTTO
Never give up; be prepared; show up every day. These are the essentials of success.
HOW I REBELLED AS A CHILD!
I think I inherit my stubborn quality from my mother rather than my father. My father was a great negotiator in business, was a true optimist, always trying to work with all parties to come up with a positive conclusion. Not my mother! She would fight to the death to prove a point. I guess that was her Irish heritage as opposed to my father who was half German and half Irish. In his case, the stubborn values that he inherited from the German side of his family were somewhat minimized by his Irish blood. Even though I am only 25% German, it seems like that was a dominant factor in my life.
The most prominent example of my rebel nature occurred when I was five years old in kindergarten. This portends my future for the next 74 years. Even today, I am astounded at my determination to follow my own lead in spite of very clear instructions from my teacher. What escapes me was why the teacher wanted all of us to stand up and march around the classroom, bending over, letting our arms and hands dangle and swing back and forth like the trunk of an elephant. To me, it was embarrassing to carry out this charade. The easy answer was to simply say to the teacher: "I am not going to do that."
At this stage of my life I look back and wonder: how incredible was it that a little five year old child, in school for the first time of his life, having a conflict with an adult teacher, and the child wins the argument by sticking to his guns. I do clearly remember sitting in my desk, watching the rest of the kids parade around the room supposedly acting like an elephant. I still clearly remember that I thought how stupid they all were and how did they have the willingness to participate in this fiasco. Actually it took more courage to walk like an elephant then to sit at my desk and act like a normal student. Apparently this was a controversy between my teacher and my parents as my mother told this story for the rest of her life.
In an earlier essay, I made reference to the two occasions whereby I had some sort of conflict with my mother and advised her that I was no longer going to live in this house. I would go somewhere else to live where the people would treat me with love and affection. This was before I was of school age. My mother wisely took me up on my challenge, helped me pack a suitcase, and sent me out the front door of our house. I don't remember how far away I got but at some point my brilliance won over my stubborn attitude. So I turned around and headed back home. My mother had locked the door so here I was standing on the front porch, having to ring the doorbell of my own house. On both occasions, my mother acted very surprised and wanted to know what I was doing since I no longer lived there. She finally let me in and that was that.
One thing that I do not recall but was told to me by my brother as my mother told it to him. Apparently, when I would misbehave, my mother would send me to my room as a punishment. However, when I had served my time and could return to civilian life, she would call up and tell me that I could come down now. Ha, fat chance! Apparently I would refuse to come down, staying in the room as long as I chose. In other words, she imposed the punishment to start but only I would determine when it would end! Shades of Finn Ferguson.
During my years in grade school, I was a member of the Boy Scout troop for our school. During the course of each school year, we would typically have some sort of outing over a weekend. I was not a big fan of these outings but it was an annual ritual and I chose to join in with the rest of my friends. When the weather was warm, we would pitch tents and set up a campsite where we would eat and sleep, but would also go on hikes to explore the area. One year, we had one of these outings during the winter. So, instead of having a campsite, we stayed in what they called a longhouse at Camp Lazarus, which was a few miles north of Columbus. It was colder than the North Pole that weekend and the meager potbellied stove was not adequate to keep the longhouse warm. So we did the best we could to catch a few winks throughout the night even though our body temperature probably dropped below 50° for most of the time.
When we got up on Sunday morning, it was still extremely cold outside and overnight a couple of inches of snow had fallen. The plan that had been laid out the day before was for Sunday to hike throughout Camp Lazarus, then set up a mini campsite, cook our breakfast, eat, and then return to the longhouse after which we would pack up and go home. Since we were facing inclement weather that Sunday morning (at least in my wise judgment), I was certain that the troop leader would call off the hike and simply prepare breakfast in the longhouse. No such luck. But if the troop leader thought that I was as crazy as he was, he was deadly mistaken. I told him that I was not feeling well and would elect to stay in the longhouse and make my breakfast there. One of the other guys who was two years older than I followed my lead and stayed back as well. So the adult chaperone, the other scout, and I cooked breakfast in the longhouse, ate at a table and chairs and, all things considered, had a pretty sweet meal.
When the bedraggled balance of the troop arrived back at the longhouse, the scout leader looked me in the eye and said: "listen buddy, you need to learn how to follow orders." It was kind of like being ordered to walk like an elephant. If the order was stupid, little Danny Connor was not about to comply.
This next issue was not exactly about being a rebel; it was more about outfoxing the teacher but it kind of fits in this essay as well. My fourth grade teacher was Sr. Mary Quentin. She made it very clear on the first day of class that she was in charge and would impose strict discipline on us, her meager students. One of the rules that she imposed was that she would not stand for us waving our hands in the air willy-nilly to either ask a question or answer a question. The only time that we could raise our hands would be if we had to go to the restroom. Otherwise, if she posed a question that we wished to answer, we must sit up very straight with our arms across our chests and, depending upon who did this the best, she would then call upon that person. Well, it looked pretty hilarious for all of us attempting to sit up straight, folding our arms across our chests and literally jumping up and down in our desks to try to get her attention so that we, more so than any other student, would be called upon. Well, this lady was the dedicated purveyor of malice. She had lots of rules that made no sense at all and, of course, this was clearly a challenge for yours truly. After a few runs of almost throwing my shoulder and elbow joints out of whack trying to do what she said to get her attention so that I could answer the question, I discovered that she would never pose the question to anyone who clearly could answer correctly. Instead, she would call on the person that was slinking down in their desk, portraying a student who knew absolutely nothing about the topic at hand.
So it does not take a rocket scientist to figure out how to solve this problem. Whatever question was posed by her to the class that was something that I understood thoroughly and was prepared to submit a long-winded monologue, instead of sitting up straight and folding my arms, I would simply slink down as low as possible in my desk, hang my head, and avoid any eye contact with her whatsoever. Well, that hit the jackpot. Anytime I was ready, willing and able to provide the answer that she was looking for, I portrayed this sad sack presence. Of course, she would then call on me only to be gob smacked right in the kisser when I laid out the answer to the question and even gave her more information than she wanted. Then, after a while, she could never figure out whether I knew the answer or not. She might have been a fox but she could not outfox the super fox! In any event, it was a real reward to get rid of her and pass on to the fifth grade.
The principle of Our Lady of Peace, Sister Lucille, was my teacher for the rest of the time in grade school except for sixth grade. She was no peach either. There were many issues that I had to deal with concerning her but two stand out that involved, not only me, but my mother as well. It is kind of funny how the way people in our society wear their hair becomes a cultural issue, changing from year to year. In each case, hair could determine a person's acceptance in society. In the early 1950s, most men and boys wore their hair fairly long. When one entered a prison his or her hair was totally cut off or at least cut down to just a stubble.
During each school year, I would wear my hair fairly long according to my mother's desires. However, around May or early June, when the weather warmed up, my mother would have my hair cut very short, called a crew cut. This displeased sister Lucille but she never made a big stink about it until I was in eighth grade and graduation was coming up. At this point, Sister Lucille put her foot down and ordered me and/or my mother that under no circumstances was I to have my hair cut short for graduation. Well, you can guess where this is going. No one is going to tell my mother how her children are going to dress or present themselves. So off I go marching to the barbershop to have the shortest crew cut in history. I was more of a pawn in this deal at that point; I was out of the picture in terms of the conflict for the rest of the year. Whether Sister Lucille had the stones to confront my mother about it or not, was out of my purview. I do know, however, that I did graduate with the best looking crew cut Sister Lucille ever saw.
This was only one of the sagas that took place on the battlefield where stood Mary Connor and Sister Lucille holding their ground. I was only the third class to graduate from our Lady of Peace. And I was fully aware of the goings-on between Sister Lucille and the two classes ahead of me. Threats were made on a daily basis by Sr. Lucille vowing to cancel graduation because of the alleged misconduct of the students in the graduating class. Day after day these threats prevailed. However, both classes ahead of me did graduate and attended a party afterward put on by Sister Lucille and the other nuns.
When I reached eighth grade, the same drum role of threats thundered on a daily basis. She said that we were not the kind of students that were acceptable to graduate. And even if we were allowed to graduate, we certainly did not deserve a post-graduation party and that was just that. Well, the swords of combat were raised again. My mother contacted Father Foley, our pastor, and advised him that Sister Lucille had threatened not to have a party after graduation if we were even capable of graduating. And my mother said that she was happy to have a party for the graduates at our house. But she wanted Father Foley's approval before she took any action on this issue. Father Foley gave her his full stamp of approval.
So my mother went to work planning the biggest and best graduation party that our Lady of Peace ever thought of. Sooner or later, the word filtered down to Sister Lucille that there was going to be a graduation party and that she was to have no role in it. A couple of weeks before graduation, the telephone in our home rang and I answered. It was Sister Lucille who wanted to talk to my mother. I was standing by to hear my mother's side of the conversation. Apparently, Sr. Lucille said that she would like to host the graduation party and she understood that my mother was planning to have one as well. So she wanted my mother to back off and she would carry the ball. My mother simply said that Father Foley had given her approval to have the party and that she would follow his lead one way or the other. So she instructed Sister Lucille to contact Father Foley and my mother would follow whatever orders he issued. A day or so later, Sister Lucille called back and advised my mother that she had spoken to Father Foley and that he instructed Sr. Lucille to let Mary Connor host the party since the planning was well underway. (I have often thought that Father Foley absolutely jumped on this opportunity to stick a hot poker up Sister Lucille's rear end because she was pulling this kind of stunt every year and Father Foley was sick of it).
Anyway, we had the graduation, we had a great party, and my class went on to greatness. My guess is that, on graduation night, Sister Lucille spent a lonely few hours. I don't think anyone was gratified by Sister Lucille's misfortune but she did need to learn an important lesson, which definitely occurred on this occasion in June 1953. The next year Sister Lucille put out the word very early in the school year that last year a student had his hair cut like a convict and came to school wearing a black and white striped shirt looking like a convict and that would not be permitted this year at all. This event was not a demonstration of my own stubbornness but I had kind of a role in playing out that of my mother. I guess that's where I got it.
Finally, this is an issue more of arrogance than rebellion. When I was at Officer Candidate School in Newport RI for 18 weeks, I seriously considered making a career in the Navy. However, after 4 to 6 months of active duty on my ship, I realized that the bureaucracy of the Navy was too much for me. I was willing to serve my time and to work hard in performance of my position, but, after I had completed my service, I will have felt that I had performed my duty to my country.
However, about that time, the Western Pacific Fleet Admiral put a notice out to all young officers. The tenor of his instruction was that too many young officers were leaving the Navy, which was a great loss to the service. So he asked that all young officers who intended to leave the Navy after their term of duty, would they please send a letter to him explaining the reasons why and what could be done to change things. I was very impressed with the fact that the admiral, instead of letting the status quo continue, he wanted to sincerely make changes that would benefit the service. So I got to work on my letter in good faith advising him of the things that were paramount in my deciding not to make this a career. Of course, anything like this has to go up through the chain of command. Therefore, my department head had to see it, the executive officer had to see it, the commander of the destroyer had to see it, the Commodore of this division group and so on all the way up to the admiral. Whether it reached him is questionable.
When my contemporaries on my ship realized what I was doing, they cautioned me severely and encouraged me to leave it go because I was jeopardizing my position on my ship due to the critical nature of some of my comments. None of the rest of my friends sent any information at all. But I truly felt that this was a sincere request and should be sincerely responded to. I don't know that anything changed but I did my part and I do not regret any of it. Maybe there was a little bit of rebel on this issue but, as a Naval Officer, my duty was to carry out my responsibility to the men under my command as well as those above me in the chain of command including the 7thFleet Admiral. I may have taken a hit because of this. My work load was enhanced significantly and others who did not match my skill were awarded responsibilities ahead of me which was totally unjustified. Maybe this was to teach me a lesson. If so, it did not work as to this day, I am still a rebel. Notwithstanding all of this, I served my time and have nothing to regret.
Daniel D. Connor
November 4, 2018
My Response to Columbus Ohio Dispatch Editorial Attacking Donald Trump
Dear Editor:
Sunday's editorial exemplifies the kind of "bomb throwing" that the mainstream media has engaged in against Trump relentlessly since the 2016 election and before. The Dispatch and others hate Trump, we get that.
However, among your ongoing smears of him, how about a little objectivity? Is there any chance that the Dispatch can balance the good with the bad? Has the Dispatch ever applauded Trump for the soaring markets, the roaring economy, the plunging unemployment numbers among all cultures, the huge GDP, consumer enthusiasm, numerous new startups, record low applications for Medicaid, record income to the Federal Treasury, the successful challenge to NATO, the reformation of NAFTA, the tremendous softening of North Korea in its relationship with both South Korea and the US, lobbying Germany to slow down its purchases of natural gas from Russia, the recent effort regarding the opioid crisis, obtaining the release of numbers of those imprisoned in other lands. In addition, Trump has reasserted our close relationship with Israel, our major ally in the Middle East. As much as the press hates him, Trump continues to be available daily to answer questions. How many Presidents have done that? And all of this in the face of a phony attack on his legitimacy to serve.
None of Trump’s rhetoric can match the ongoing increasing conduct and speech of the left. This includes the unprecedented attacks violating protocol by Trump's predecessor, which has never occurred before in this 79 years of my lifetime. And, speaking of lies, none can match those of Obama: you can keep your Dr, period; you can keep your plan, period; and, the big one, standing on the tarmac in front of four Benghazi coffins, looking straight in the eyes of the families, telling them that it was the result of a video! How cruel can one be?
Finally, in spite of Trump’s rhetoric, he has refused to take scalps of those who committed felonies by members of the Obama administration. Eric Holder, (perjury); Hillary, (classified material); Susan Rice, (unmasking); Lois Lerner (weaponizing IRS against conservative non-profits); and countless others in the FBI and Department of Justice.
Trump has refused to be bullied. Instead, he responds in kind to those who have abused him and other Republicans who are too gentlemanly to retaliate. Unfortunately, the Dispatch has joined those who attack and finger-point instead of trying to quell the fervor.
What I read as a Child
From my earliest days, I was a voracious reader. My Father gave me several books when I was about 8-10 years old. Treasure Island, The Last of the Mohicans and Robinson Crusoe were the first that I received from him on Christmas. I think that he gave one of them to me twice. Perhaps as his mind grew older (he was only mid-thirties at the time), as mine has, he might have forgotten that he had already given one to me. Even though I remembered, as a gentleman, I did not call him out on it.
When I was about 10 or 11, he gave me “Teen-age Football Stories,” which I really enjoyed. I imagined that perhaps I could accomplish the feats that I read about therein. I so loved that book that I was reminiscing about it to my son Chris (I was bemoaning the fact that it no longer was in my bookshelves), and he somehow tracked down a copy and gave it to me as a wonderful gift. “Football Greatest Coaches” was another book that Dad gave to me shortly before I became a teen-ager.
However, I was by no means dependent upon receiving books from my parents. From as little as 8, I would travel by bus to the library at Como and High streets (about two miles away) in Clintonville, a village in Columbus, Ohio. It was not unusual for me to ride the bus all over town. The books that I checked out from the library would mostly be about the old west as recorded in dime store novels but biographies as well. Dodge City, Matt Dillon, Wyatt Earp, Bat Masterson, Wild West heroes, were among my selections.
When I would hear about other historical characters that somehow fascinated me, I would go ASAP to the library and get a book about that person, reading it from cover to cover. Two that I clearly remember were biographies of nineteenth century oligarchs, Andrew Carnegie and Bernard Baruch. To this day, I clearly remember how shrewd Carnegie was. He was trying to establish a railroad including sleeping cars and needed financial support from a guy named George M. Pullman. When Pullman resisted, Andrew said that he loved the idea of having the sleeping cars christened as a “Pullman” car. That sold the deal.
This was a clear example of one of Carnegie’s theories. “There is no limit to what humans can accomplish if no one worries about who gets the credit.”
A young but enthusiastic fellow who wanted to borrow money to start up his own enterprise approached Bernard Baruch. Baruch did not lend the money but loaned him some stock to manage. This way the young man would have to be scrupulous about handling the stock and work diligently to improve its value, after which the original “loan” would be returned to Baruch. That way Baruch would be confident that the “loan” would not be frittered away like cash, but he would be helping the young man without risking the investment.
I remember three books that I obtained from the library at my grammar school: Our Lady of Peace. Bomba the Jungle Boy, The Boy Who Batted 1000, and one other that I cannot remember the title. The main character was an 8thgrade Catholic boy whose names were Matthew Mark Luke John and a last name that escapes me. I would love to read those books again even though they were 8thgrade level. Recently, I called Our Lady of Peace to inquire about the books but, alas, no luck.
The unique thing that applies here is that none of these books were assigned to me. I had a fascination with each of them due to their content. As a parent, I discovered this concept when my third child, Katy, was in 3rdgrade (too bad, too late). At a teacher conference, they told me to just let her read things that fascinate and/or interest her; that will get the juices going and she will read forever. History proved them to be correct. I wish that I had known this with my two older children although they did quite well anyway.
I am happy that this question was posed. It was fun reminiscing about the books that I read, my journeys to the library, and re-visiting the lives of those who formed our nation.
Daniel D. Connor
October 25, 2018
HAVE I EVER DOUBTED MY FAITH?
This is a very complicated issue. It would seem that a one word "yes" or "no" would suffice but, in my case, a more thorough examination is required. As I have stated in earlier essays, my affiliation with Catholicism began when I was in first grade, attending daily Mass at Immaculate Conception Church. (Little Danny Connor trudging daily from his Dad’s car, across the school playground, to the side door of the church to attend Mass).
My over arching commitment to my Catholic faith has persisted for 74 years since first grade. However, that is not to say that there have been no lapses.
By and large, my commitment to daily Mass has been a life long routine. Ironically, there have been years where I went to daily Mass during the week but refused to go on Sunday. I reconciled my conscience by convincing myself that going to Mass five or six days per week completely absolved me from my Sunday obligation. This was opposed to all the “sheep” who only attend Mass one time per week on Sunday. Finally, I realized that the tremendous spiritual value of the Mass and the Eucharist were so powerful that any opportunity to partake regardless of the day should not be avoided.
Having said this, I have to admit that there were times when I just completely lost any sense of spirituality. I remember one time in particular in 1988 where I had such a personal sense of empowerment that I felt that I was just simply invincible. I remember thinking that I was living such a perfect life that nothing could happen to me that would deter me from having complete control over every aspect of my existence.
Shortly after that time, other than loss of a child, every bad thing that could possibly happen to anyone happened to me. My family broke up, my sister came close to death, all three of my children had serious negative occurrences, an employee of mine tried to steal my business, and I developed a neurological disorder that was very painful and debilitating. One day, I actually challenged God to hurt me again as every new day I would be slapped in the face and sucker punched in the gut and I would expect that to happen today. Well, I got my wish. My stepbrother was killed in an Army accident.
After that, I opened a clear channel of communication with the Good Lord. I said: "Okay, you got me. I am helpless without your guidance. I want to live the life that you have commissioned for me to live. But you have beaten me so badly that I can hardly get my feet on the ground and live my life in a productive way. So help me up, give me some guidance, and I will follow you." After that, everything seemed to smooth out in a beautiful way. All I needed to do was recognize how important my faith in God was and how much I needed to rely upon Him.
By the middle of the 1990s, my life was in great order. Following a number of spiritual guides during the 1990s, I volunteered to serve the poorest of the poor with Mother Teresa's Missionaries of Charity. This really enhanced my spiritual level and commitment to my faith. I have written another essay on this topic.
So, to answer the question that has been posed, while my Catholic faith has certainly been the bedrock of my life, there have been times when my fervor waned somewhat, followed by some "punch in the nose" that got my attention and my spirituality returned in full force.
The message here is that we can't always maintain the highest level of our spiritual commitment. Even the saints have had doubts. But if we have a basic foundation for our faith, keeping ourselves open through prayer, our lives will keep us on the right track.
Looking back over 79 years, the tools of my Catholic faith, Mass (the most powerful prayer in all of human history), The Holy Eucharist, the rosary, and other sacramentals have served me well. Only when I forgot to use these powerful tools did I have times that lapses have occurred. Hopefully, in the few years that I have left, I will not forget this lesson.
To conclude, I do not think that I have ever actually "doubted" my faith. I have always felt that it was the one truly Holy Faith, and was the clearest path to eternity. The problem was that, at times, I stumbled in my commitment to it and needed to "get charged up" to renew that commitment. Kind of like being a 4.0 student, who becomes a little over confident, then slacks off and grades slump a little. Oops, let’s get back to it in full force.
I have occasionally pondered about there being an overwhelmingly all-powerful God, and how could that possibly be. I then reflect upon the miracle of the Blessed Mother appearing at Lourdes, Fatima and Guadalupe, the miraculous cures that have taken place there, and my faith is reassured. In addition, all but one of the 12 Apostles (John) were tortured and martyred in a very cruel way. All they had to do was renounce their faith in Jesus Christ and they would be freed. They refused to do so because they had a clear vision of their future in eternity. They certainly would know if Jesus were a fraud.
So if doubts ever do occur, they are quickly banished by the foregoing thoughts.
Daniel D. Connor
October 20, 2018
WHAT AM I MOST HARD ON MYSELF ABOUT?
When I was six years old, it was 1945 and World War II had come to an end. My father had five brothers, all of whom served in the war. The five of them considered me, who had never seen them before in my life, as fresh meat. The entire family made up of nothing other than needling each other to the fullest extent of the law. I am not kidding! The humor was abundant and they all got it except for me who did not have any idea what these lunatics were capable of doing to a little kid.
They started off by confusing me about their names. When I first learned who was who and became confident that I could address them as such, they kept changing their names on me so that within a few minutes, I had no idea of what anyone's name was.
This is only a start of the way my life would go for the next few decades. The entire Connor family had great humor and was relentless in using it on each other and other people. Even when I got to be an adult, the ribbing continued although, as an adult, I participated with it to the full extent.
Unfortunately, for my social advancement, I carried this weird sense of humor with me everywhere. Regardless of who it was and what the situation was, I made ridicule of almost anyone unless the person was someone of major stature who would not tolerate it or someone that I knew would not be able to take the ribbing. There were a few friendships that were broken up over my lack of understanding that my humor fell on deaf ears.
As I grew older, I was able to temper my sense of humor, trying to discern the nature of my company and how what I said would affect them.
However, even at my present age of almost 80 years, I still make mistakes and crack jokes about people close to me and even those who were not so close. Typically, what would happen is that I would run at the mouth incessantly trying to get laughs from people who were not about to cooperate.
Consequently, after a social event, I would return home and start to reconsider how the company that I was in was accepting of what I was saying. My great wife always tries to assure me that I did not step over the line but I would dispute her opinion by feeling bad about my conduct. Her response always was that I was too hard on myself, the friends that I was with understood my humor, and I should not worry about it. However, to answer the question, it appears that that is the thing that I am most hard on myself about. Regardless of how many times I have sworn to myself that I would lighten up on the humor but it never fails to return the next time I am in a social event. I still work on this project, sometimes unsuccessfully. However, if I leave humor out of my social events, I become a pretty boring person. So take it or leave it, I can either be fun loving and humorous or keep my mouth shut and be the most boring person in the room. Not a good choice either way. I still work on it and one day I may be successful. But, when I meet my Maker, I hope I have enough common sense to get past the Pearly Gates before the worst happens.
Daniel D. Connor
August 30 2018
A life spent making mistakes is not only more honorable but also more useful than a life spent doing nothing
George Bernard Shaw - (1856-1950)