Why is MAGA celebrating Nicki Minaj for supporting MAGA when she defended and married her husband, who was convicted of sexual offenses? It’s almost like the Patterns line up… 🤔
On November 14, 1960, Six-year-old Ruby Bridges walked into William Frantz Elementary School in New Orleans, Louisiana, becoming the first Black student to attend the previously all-white school. Accompanied by federal marshals and taunted by angry crowds. Ruby became a symbol of the #CivilRights movement #desegregation
You had to edit Kamala Harris next to Diddy. Meanwhile, there are real photos of Trump with Diddy and even videos of Trump praising him. That alone shows the difference between the two political camps and their supporters.
Don't. Just don't. You can condemn Trump without justifying a woman who helped commit genocide.
How many people were raped while the Biden-Harris funded Israel? Released Palestinian hostages recount horrific abuse, including forced bestiality.
Yes, Harris knew of this when she said Israel had a right to defend itself and refused to commit to an arms embargo. When she was too busy speaking.
And for anyone who wants to say, "Well, Trump did it, too," you are openly saying you are fine with Democrats committing rape, human trafficking, and genocide as long as a Republican also did it. Or perhaps as long as politician is "just paying for it" to happen and not physically doing it themselves, you justify it.
The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights gathered accounts from newly released detainees from Gaza who described rape, forced stripping and p
You’re really jumping to extremes here and honestly it doesn’t make sense. Kamala Harris wasn’t even president during all of this, yet somehow you’re pinning every single thing on her while ignoring the people who actually were in power making the final calls.
And what’s wild is that Kamala was actually one of the first high-level U.S. officials to publicly call for a ceasefire, humanitarian aid, and protections for civilians in Gaza. She spoke out when a lot of other leaders stayed quiet. So acting like she personally “funded rape, torture, genocide” or whatever extreme headline you found just isn’t grounded in reality.
Criticize policy if you want. Hold the U.S. accountable. Absolutely.
But blaming her like she was the mastermind when she wasn’t the president, wasn’t in control of U.S. foreign policy, and actually pushed for protecting Palestinian lives is just reaching.
And honestly if the point of all this is to deflect for Trump by going “Well Democrats do it too!” then just say that. Because pretending Kamala Harris is the face of every atrocity while Trump literally praised and armed the same government and faced far fewer restraints is weird.
If we’re going to talk accountability let’s be real about who had power, who made decisions, and who actually spoke up, not twist it into some rant to score political points. Especially using Gaza like this just to tear down a woman who wasn’t even the one in power. That kind of misplaced anger is exactly why these conversations go nowhere. Instead of holding the actual decision-makers accountable, you’d rather twist it into some Kamala Harris rant, which doesn’t help Palestinians at all.
Wow! So you're really going with the, "The Vice president is helpless and has no agency!"?
What a complete load of shit.
First of all, you say I'm trying to deflect blame from Trump, but I am replying to YOUR post in which you brought up Kamala Harris as some type of contrast to him. You can see it right there at the top of the chain. You could have chosen to just talk about Trump, but YOU chose not to. And now you're angry I'm talking about Harris, too? Accusing Harris of things she actually did?
Sure, Biden was more powerful. Sure, he holds a greater share of the blame. But you didn't mention him, and Kamala Harris was not a civilian. She was in a position of power. She was the vice presidenrt She had immense influence. She chose to be part of the Biden-HARRIS administration and therefore chose to be complicit in all he did. She wrote a book about why nothing that happened in her campaign was her fault, and before it even released, it became a top seller. So framing her as some poor, helpless citizen just doing the best she could isn't going to cut it.
Sure she said she would no longer be silent on Palestinian suffering...and then she was silent. Can you find a comment from her on the murder of Khaled Nabhan? On the December 11, 2024, bombing of a residental building near Kamal Adwan hospital? On how Biden lied about Rafah? Any of the multiple times Israel burned people alive with US weapons? Surely, these are atrocities someone "refusing to be silent" commented on. No? Okay then.
She kicked Muslims out of rallies and refused to meet with the Uncommitted Movement. People told her over and over again they would vote for her if she promised an arms embargo. Instead, she refused. She said there would be no change in how the US dealt with Israel.
She showed more annoyance at being interrupted than at Palestinians being slaughtered. In her book, she gets angry at people for protesting the genocide at her rallies and asks why they were at her rallies instead of Trump's. You can't make this shit up. What apparently never occurred to her was that they were there because she was in a position of power as Vice President and because they wanted to be able to vote foe her. It never occurred to her that it was reckless to violate International Law and refuse to promise to do anything differently.
Yes, all of this makes her guilty of genocide. If she were given a fair trial, she'd be in the Hague.
You want to condemn Trump, go ahead. I do, too. But don't you dare engage in genocide distortion to pretend Harris isn't guilty.
I’m going to reply one last time because it appears you’re focusing your emotional rage rather than how politics actually works.
Harris did have influence as Vice President, but she wasn’t the president and didn’t control Israel or U.S. military decisions. She spoke up publicly, calling for ceasefires, humanitarian aid, and civilian protections, and even met with Israeli officials to try to get aid through. She didn’t promise an arms embargo or meet every activist group, but that’s how politics works a VP can advocate, but they can’t do everything. Asking disruptive protesters to leave rallies happens in campaigns all the time; it doesn’t mean she ignored human suffering. And claiming she’s guilty of genocide is completely false advocating for aid and ceasefires is the opposite. Criticizing what she could or couldn’t do is fair, but turning her into the villain of Gaza just isn’t grounded in reality.You’re focused on the wrong person. If you’re going to spend energy harassing someone who had no power instead of holding the actual president accountable, spending your money on her tour instead of donating it and then complain about getting kicked out of a rally because of your own actions, that’s on you. Kamala Harris was the most outspoken voice for Gaza in both the Biden and Trump administrations she pushed for ceasefires and humanitarian aid so publicly that she even got “sushed” by staff. Meanwhile, I don’t see you putting the same energy toward the people who actually hold the power and are responsible for what’s happening in Gaza.
You had to edit Kamala Harris next to Diddy. Meanwhile, there are real photos of Trump with Diddy and even videos of Trump praising him. That alone shows the difference between the two political camps and their supporters.
Don't. Just don't. You can condemn Trump without justifying a woman who helped commit genocide.
How many people were raped while the Biden-Harris funded Israel? Released Palestinian hostages recount horrific abuse, including forced bestiality.
Yes, Harris knew of this when she said Israel had a right to defend itself and refused to commit to an arms embargo. When she was too busy speaking.
And for anyone who wants to say, "Well, Trump did it, too," you are openly saying you are fine with Democrats committing rape, human trafficking, and genocide as long as a Republican also did it. Or perhaps as long as politician is "just paying for it" to happen and not physically doing it themselves, you justify it.
The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights gathered accounts from newly released detainees from Gaza who described rape, forced stripping and p
You’re really jumping to extremes here and honestly it doesn’t make sense. Kamala Harris wasn’t even president during all of this, yet somehow you’re pinning every single thing on her while ignoring the people who actually were in power making the final calls.
And what’s wild is that Kamala was actually one of the first high-level U.S. officials to publicly call for a ceasefire, humanitarian aid, and protections for civilians in Gaza. She spoke out when a lot of other leaders stayed quiet. So acting like she personally “funded rape, torture, genocide” or whatever extreme headline you found just isn’t grounded in reality.
Criticize policy if you want. Hold the U.S. accountable. Absolutely.
But blaming her like she was the mastermind when she wasn’t the president, wasn’t in control of U.S. foreign policy, and actually pushed for protecting Palestinian lives is just reaching.
And honestly if the point of all this is to deflect for Trump by going “Well Democrats do it too!” then just say that. Because pretending Kamala Harris is the face of every atrocity while Trump literally praised and armed the same government and faced far fewer restraints is weird.
If we’re going to talk accountability let’s be real about who had power, who made decisions, and who actually spoke up, not twist it into some rant to score political points. Especially using Gaza like this just to tear down a woman who wasn’t even the one in power. That kind of misplaced anger is exactly why these conversations go nowhere. Instead of holding the actual decision-makers accountable, you’d rather twist it into some Kamala Harris rant, which doesn’t help Palestinians at all.
You had to edit Kamala Harris next to Diddy. Meanwhile, there are real photos of Trump with Diddy and even videos of Trump praising him. That alone shows the difference between the two political camps and their supporters.
Why did it take Elon Musk getting betrayed to finally reveal that Donald Trump was on the Epstein files? Why does it suddenly matter now, when it didn’t matter back then? Why is it important now to “unite Americans” over this? You weren’t getting any benefits from supporting Trump, so now you suddenly care?
The fact that so many in the MAGA movement still support Trump, even after he’s openly challenged the Constitution, makes it clear that their vote was never really about making the country better.
The difference is that Trump directly called for terminating the Constitution to overturn an election he lost, his words, not mine. If you’re going to claim Biden ‘completely ignored’ the Constitution, feel free to list specific, comparable actions. Holding leaders accountable shouldn’t be a partisan issue.
The fact that so many in the MAGA movement still support Trump, even after he’s openly challenged the Constitution, makes it clear that their vote was never really about making the country better.
From the heart of unimaginable suffering, I want to sincerely thank everyone who has supported my family 🙏🏻
Right now, famine is hitting us harder than ever, my heart cries whenever I go to the market to buy any basic necessities! The prices are crazy, and most days my children survive on just bread Hunger and thirst are destroying us, and cooking on fire increases our suffering unbearably! Severe eye and chest sensitivity, in addition to constant stomach pain due to the type of food and the way it is cooked.
All this while we flee from one place to another in fear of bombing, bullets, and imminent danger! I cannot describe what I feel, but it is a feeling beyond exhaustion!
Despite the exhaustion, your support gives us strength and I hope you will not let us down
If you can donate, please do so, or at least help us by sharing, so we can reach those who can
Your kindness truly keeps us going
>> Our campaign is vetted by gazavetters list at Momen & his family
Hello Everyone,
I am Nour Al Madhoun, 30 years old, a computer engineer from gaza, my h… Tahir Awad needs your support for Help my family r
Gaza is full of oppression #The worst is yet to come #Genocide #A resilient people
Trump wasn’t “labeled a sex offender by lawfare” he was found liable by a jury for sexual abuse and has a long history of degrading women, including once saying he’d date his own daughter if she weren’t his.
Trump was railroaded by Democrats in a civil case that was a complete joke. It was a case that NY DEMOCRATS had to temporarily change the law to even start the proceedings, using a mentally imbalanced woman who was clearly lying, who has made similar false allegations in the past against 5 separate men, and who was financed by a Democrat mega-donor.
And they pinned this ludicrous charge on him with no fucking evidence.
Your rant is full of misinformation, emotional language, and contradictions, hope you heal soon.
“Trump was railroaded by Democrats in a civil case…”
False. Civil juries are made up of regular citizens, not Democrats or politicians.
“NY Democrats had to temporarily change the law…”
Misleading … well yeah New York passed the Adult Survivors Act, but it applied to all adult survivors of sexual assault, not just Carroll.
“Mentally imbalanced woman who lied about 5 men…”
No credible proof she lied about 5 other men, that’s not in the court record.
Plus, the jury found her credible after hearing her full testimony under oath.
“Financed by a Democrat mega-donor.”
True that Reid Hoffman helped fund her case, but the court found it didn’t affect the facts or outcome, and Carroll didn’t even know about it at first.
“There was no evidence” is a flat-out lie, the jury saw a photo of Trump with Carroll (proving they met), heard the Access Hollywood tape where he brags about assaulting women, listened to two friends she told immediately after the incident, and watched Trump confuse Carroll with his ex-wife in a photo, destroying his own defense.
1) This jury of “regular citizens” also happened to be partisan Democrats. They are not mutually exclusive.
2) Changing the law was for Trump. That change only lasted a year. It was clearly aimed at him.
3) “For some strange reason – this news DID NOT make any headlines in the mainstream Trump-hating media.
E. Jean Carroll accused several men of sexual assault including a babysitter’s boyfriend. a dentist, a camp counselor, a college date, a boss, and Les Moonves from CBS – and, of course, Donald Trump.”
Les Moonves Accused of Sexual Assault by Writer E. Jean Carroll SEXUAL ASSAULT JUNE 21, 2019 By Jackson McHenry, a Vulture critic covering t
4) That jury was going to rule against Trump no matter what. The judge was prejudiced as well.
5) And it is suspicious that Reid Hoffman funded her case. Almost like there was some political motive behind it all.
6) The so-called “witnesses” are hearsay at best and not credible. And that pic was irrelevant to the case. It just means Trump once took a picture with her, like he has done with THOUSANDS of other people over the years. It’s not something he would necessarily remember doing. Nor does it mean he sexually assaulted her, especially under the highly unlikely circumstances she claimed they did.
classic example of a conspiracy-laced deflection: no real counter-evidence, just loaded assumptions, and cherry picked
First off, that link isn’t a credible source, it’s a user-generated forum post, not actual court records or journalism. Carroll never accused all those men of rape publicly, and there’s no proof those were false claims. The court didn’t find her unreliable, a jury did the exact opposite: they listened to her under oath, saw supporting evidence, and still ruled in her favor.
Just because someone on a random forum throws together a list of men and calls it “proof” doesn’t make it factual. If there was real evidence she lied or had a pattern of false accusations, Trump’s legal team would’ve used it, but they didn’t. That says everything.
Here’s what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, that was previously reported here on The Gateway Pundit. Most of these information were deemed “inadmissible” by the judge per John LeFevre:
She couldn’t recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened
She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality
The dress she claims to have been wearing didn’t exist at the time
Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible
Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman
Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed
Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her “favorite shows”)
Trump’s Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows
She has a history of falsely accusing men of rape, including Les Moonves
She told Anderson Cooper, “most people think of rape as being sexy. Think of the fantasies.”
She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat Vagina
Carroll’s interviews on TV, social media posts, and inconsistent information concerning her allegations should have been enough to throw out any case, but not with Judge Kaplan.
There is no way that this case should have been brought to court. Trump was not even told what month or year the ridiculous story actually took place.
DuckDuckGo. Privacy, Simplified.
Don’t accuse me of cherry picking. That is what you have done.
The next time you mention court documents, then cite them - specifically.
Exculpatory evidence does not have to be presented in court to have validity.
Another item that the Democrats used EJC to go after Trump was the gun charge that she “magically” dodged in rabidly anti-2A NY.
Writer and litigant E. Jean Carroll surrendered an unlicensed firearm to law enforcement officials, so why hasn't she been prosecuted?
She couldn’t recall the exact date, true, but common in trauma and not legally required? Courts acknowledge this in sexual assault cases.
The jury still found her credible, even after cross-examination. This wasn’t a “Democrat setup.” The jury was selected using normal procedures, not party affiliation.
Reid Hoffman’s involvement was disclosed. Carroll didn’t even know about the funding at first, and the judge ruled it had no impact on the case.
Trump confused Carroll with his ex-wife Marla Maples in a photo, destroying his claim that he “never met her.”
The “rape is sexy” quote was cut mid-sentence. In that same interview, Carroll says clearly she doesn’t think rape is sexy, and she was describing how the public often romanticizes it. Nice attempt at manipulation again, you’re bad at this.
The Law & Order episode thing is a coincidence and irrelevant, a court ruled her case strong enough to go to trial, and a jury decided based on testimony and evidence, not TV shows.
Trump had every chance to testify under oath or provide his own evidence and didn’t. That silence speaks volumes.
At this point, trying to reason with you is like arguing with a brick wall. You’re drowning in conspiracies and misinformation, and none of it changes the actual verdict or the facts. Keep coping.
You’re the one throwing conspiracies together and ignoring logic, facts and evidence.
Juries can be wrong and be swayed by partisan actors. The judge was clearly biased from his own remarks, per court transcripts.
The former president cannot present certain evidence his legal team was planning on using in the E. Jean Carroll defamation case.
The fact EJC could not recall in what year she was allegedly raped makes her story unbelievable. Getting the day or date wrong, maybe. But the year? Nope. Simply not credible. Btw, and how convenient is this claim for EJC? It makes it impossible for Trump’s legal team to search for exculpatory evidence. This fact alone should have gotten this case dismissed.
The jury finding her obviously fictitious story credible is proof positive they were partisan. Only an idiot or a Democrat would believe her. (See actual details of the EJC’s claims - below)
It’s irrelevant if Hoffman’s financing was disclosed. The fact that he did it is suspicious. It’s evidence of Democrat lawfare. And you have shown no proof when EJC became aware of him financing the case.
Trump’s claim is that he didn’t know her and didn’t remember meeting her. Again, the pic of them shows no relationship other than they once took a picture together. Lots of people have taken pics with others whom they did not know and don’t remember. It’s not that uncommon. Nor is it relevant to the sexual assault charge.
They cut her off mid sentence in that interview with Anderson Cooper to persevere her already spotty credibility. When they came back from break, she said that obvious coached spiel about rape not being sexy. Have you read what this woman has written about herself and her sexual proclivities? The rape is sexy comment is definitely in character for her. Btw, I saw the interview with Anderson Cooper. I can confirm she was giddy about the “rape is sexy” comment.
The Law & Order show is relevant because it was one of her favorite shows, meaning she likely saw it. And since her rape allegation closely matched a particular L&O episode, it is not a stretch to surmise that is where she got her phony story from.
Trump followed the advice of his attorneys about him testifying. His team attempted to present exculpatory evidence, but the judge threw it out.
You’re right. What I say won’t change the verdict, just like what you say doesn’t make the verdict credible. Keep lying; only braindead Democrats believe you.
The Legacy Media would like everyone to think President Trump raped a poor woman and has now been ordered to […]
WLTReport is not a credible source, it’s a fringe, hyper-partisan site known for pushing conspiracy theories and low-quality, unverified content. Just because they publish something doesn’t make it true.
If your argument relies on sites like WLTReport and distorted quotes, you’re not making a case, you’re just spreading propaganda. Very brave of you to call me brain dead.
It’s biased? Versus how the “MSM”tells the truth all the time? Like how the southern border was secure under Biden? Or Biden’s mental faculties were fine? Or regarding Hunter’s laptop? Or Russiagate? Or the “very fine people” lie? On AND on.
Get the fuck out of here with what YOU think is credible. Prove the claims of my sources to be inaccurate or STFU about their veracity.
And I’m not the one spreading propaganda. But apparently you have no problem with being a lying bitch who defames the reputations and character of others.
You called me a lying bitch when everything I said was backed by actual research, meanwhile, you came with nothing but conspiracy garbage and had the nerve to call me brain dead? Please. Try reading a real book instead of clinging to biased blogs and pretending they’re facts. You’re so deep in a cult you’ll twist yourself into knots defending your corrupt daddy and denying reality. Stay delusional , I’m done here. Girl, bye.
romaincrisis
2087
izzy806
amandla
dailybridgerton
