Doğa Atalay

Communication and Design Student

[dogaatalay]

Battle of revenge in the wilderness: The Revenant

The Revenant won 3 Golden Globes for Best Picture, Best Director and Best Actor (Leonardo DiCaprio). We will take a closer look at this movie.

The most intense thing to see in this movie is when the urge to survive meets motivation. Attacked by a bear, Hugh Glass is fighting a real battle to survive. Thanks to his drive for revenge, he tries to live hungry, thirsty, without shelter and protection. What keeps him alive is the feeling of avenging his son. There is no classic good character in the movie. Although Hugh Glass is the character we can empathize with and feel close to, we don't come across one good or the only bad guy. The handling of each character is pretty good. All of them have a background and we can understand them separately.  DiCaprio skillfully demonstrates maximum efficiency with minimal dialogue. I think he deserve the Oscar completely. His body language and gaze make all his feelings pass to the audience.

There is actually a good subject and message behind DiCaprio's good acting. This makes the movie unforgettable. In the first half hour from the opening scene of the film, we witness the dialogues about the animal trade made by Europeans in the American continent. In the rest of the film, we see the European states, such as France, the war for domination over the American continent and in this context the persecution of the Native Americans. In this context, the film also takes its background from the events that took place in the historical process. At this point, since Glass works in the company where the animal trade is carried out, we cannot call this character just good or just bad, the character has its own contradictions.

In the movie, we see people going wild while trying to adapt to the wild. We completely feel the integration with nature, being a part of it. In fact, we see that the war is within the human being and that the war with nature takes place only by the rules of nature. Another problem covered in the film is whether the wild nature or human beings are more dangerous.

 The scene that I am most impressed with is Hugh Glass being attacked by a bear. I think it is very successful in terms of CGI. Especially the movements of the bear created with the visual effect look very realistic. Although this film won the Oscar to DiCaprio for the first time, it gained its memorability with this scene. In this scene, the audience was afraid of the reality created with the visual effect and was able to enter the scene.

The director of the film, Iñárritu, is already a well-known director and this work is memorable. Actually, Iñárritu reflects a known concept back to the screen, but while doing so, he explains the characters very well and ensures that the script keeps its pace in the best way. This shows us that even the most classic script can actually be very successful when it is processed well and values ​​its characters. He shows us the battle of survival in the wild, believing and feeling.

[dogaatalay]

Requiem For a Dream: How addiction remove people from their dream

Requiem For A Dream is an American film from 2000 based on Hubert Selby Jr's 1978 novel. It is a tragedy film directed by Darren Aronofsky and starring Ellen Burstyn, Jennifer Connelly, Marlon Wayans and Jared Leto. Ellen Burstyn has performed so well that she was nominated for the 2000 Academy Awards for Best Actress. This movie, which was introduced at the Cannes film festival and made a tremendous impression with its music, both disturbed the audience and at the same time admired its unusual style. It also affected me in many ways.

 The film progresses in the representation of three different seasons: summer, autumn and winter. Its main subject is "addiction". The process of drug addiction has been handled so well that I think any addict watching this movie can quit drugs. The feeling of being irrational is conveyed to the audience very successfully.

The character Sera, played by Ellen Burstyn, which impresses me most in the film and which I watch with sadness, is actually the key point of the events. Sera is an old woman who is not visited by her son much, who has no one except a few friends and spends all day watching television at home. She's so caught up in television that she gets caught up in a phone call one day informing her that she is entitled to participate in a TV show. She tries to lose weight when she can't fit the dress she wants to wear on TV and starts weight loss pills with the doctor's advice. But the pills she takes lead her into an even greater psychological depression. She is unaware that it has a heavy consequence such as addiction. She begins to see hallucinations over the food.

Here we actually observe two addictions. First, television addiction, and secondly, drug addiction due to TV addiction. In fact, the character of Sera metaphorically shows us what kind of consequences loneliness and the resulting psychological depression can have. However, we can clearly see the representation of the lifestyle of the American society of that time; and todays’ whole world with this character: watching television and consuming food. These two actually take the whole life of humanity and cause it to spend months and years like this. It takes away from socialization and logic.

Sara's son Harry (Jared Leto), his close friend Tyrone and his girlfriend Marion are also addicted to drugs. They have a life they live on buying and selling drugs. The main addiction here is the desire to earn money. Behind this addiction of everyone, including Sara, underlying on a dream. Like getting rich, getting on TV, making dreams come true ... In the beginning everything is beautiful, and they make a good amount of money. This is the summer part where things are the best. In the autumn, things get a little out of the way. Here we witness drug gangs, conflicts, worsening of Marion's already existing psychological problems, dangers. While Marion has an unwanted sexual intercourse to earn money, Harry begins to take drugs intravenously. Tyrone finds himself in a dangerous situation inside the gang. Sara also gets worse and worse. Drugs and their own spiritual addiction drive them more and more from their true goals and dreams.

The last part of the movie is quite impressive and sad. It is good that it is disturbing, because this movie clearly shows us the representation of our indispensable addictions, and this way we better understand how disturbing the consequences it can have. The last section is the winter section. Now everyone is disconnected from real life and their lives have become irreversible. Dreams fail in the face of addiction. According to the opinion of some critics, this movie is actually how the American Dream ended. I do not want to give spoiler, but I can say that everyone's life ends in disappointment.

There is also a medical criticism in this movie. The doctors give Sara the pills without thinking, knowing, or caring about their effects. No subsequent treatment can reverse this error of carelessness.

Another aspect of the film that impressed me is its images. I found it very successful in artistic terms. With extreme close-up, it is highly successful to have repeated images of drug taking, the sound effects used in parallel with this scenes, the continuous emphasis of the dilation of the pupil, and the inclusion of abstract images in the meantime. The rhythm is very well captured. The dishes we see in the hallucination scenes are also remarkably successful and impressive. There is a stop motion technique in the food scenes.

 There may be people who find this movie offensive - they are right - but I think you should definitely add it to your movie list and watch it as soon as possible. The metaphorical messages he gives meet with the audience successfully.

[dogaatalay]

HOW SHOULD A MOVIE TRAILER BE?

As someone who is a little late for cinema and world-renowned movies, in the world of cinema that I have just discovered, one of the most important things I care about is movie trailers. A trailer of a movie introduces the tempo, genre and flow of that movie to the audience. At this point, it is much more important to feel the soul and feel of the film than to give the whole plot.

The word trailer comes from the word fragment. In other words, it is a fiction that presents the tiny parts of the film to us and creates a mini-movie in itself. The trailer is short, intriguing, and striking; it is more important than promoting the film and summarizing the events. We know the movie from the edge, we wonder, and this leads us to watch the movie.

Some people find trailers dangerous. They prefer to close their eyes and ears until they watch the movie because they fear the movie's spell will be broken. This varies from person to person. I think if a movie trailer is well edited, intriguing, and striking, it will contribute to the film itself, but if it is a trailer that reveals a long and clear plot, I can't say the same thing.

The concept of teaser is different from trailer. The teaser is a mini-series that aired before the trailer, and it gives footage from the movie, just like the trailer. In some cases, the teaser can be shot separately from the movie scenes and we may not see this scene in the movie. Teaser means intriguing advertising. As we can see from the fact that it is an advertising term, teaser is pulled purely with commercial concerns. We can call it an intriguing advertisement.

If you are not young, you will remember Turkcell's "Bir adam vardı canı sıkılan" promotion. Without mentioning the campaign yet, there was only a figure of a man walking around with the tune "Bir adam vardı canı sıkılan". The fact that Turkcell was not mentioned may have made the event bigger at this point and made the campaign more interesting and intriguing.

The importance of montage emerges in the trailer. Auxiliary elements such as different shooting techniques, methods of telling the event, and music used during filming also help the trailer a lot. It is also important to connect the parts of the film with auxiliary elements such as music and effects and adjust the tempo accordingly. In fact, we see that we can change the genre and tempo of a movie by using different transitions and music. In this case, it is possible to turn a horror movie into a comedy. Everything is possible with fiction. In fact, this may be a clue that the trailer is a marketing technique.

Remember that although it is possible to make a good trailer, it should not be better than the movie itself. It is always better to stay one step behind the movie so as not to break the spell. Instead of disappointing in the end, the audience said, "Wow, what a beautiful movie!" It is always more important to say. The trailer should only be intriguing.

AVENGERS: ENDGAME TRAILER

The trailer of the movie broke a record and became the world's most watched trailer in 24 hours. It has watched by 289 millions. First of all, the good news is that the story is not revealed much. There is only one slightly noticeable exception. It revolves around the first movie. This trailer has meaning for every member of the team. For example, it is not known how long Iron Man jumped from Infinity War to Endgame while drifting through space. This is also intriguing. There are also clues in the movie itself and its sequels. Since Captain Marvel will be released 1 month before this movie, we understand that this movie also includes Captain Marvel.

[dogaatalay]

Cartoons Meet Classical Music

Although it is not mentioned much, cartoons are among the first places where a person meets classical music. It is possible that we have met classical music either through our family or through cartoons. When we hear classical music somewhere, it surely feels familiar from somewhere. Even if we don't know the name, definitely at least one of them has had a connotation before. So why? How and why does cartoons merge with music?

One of these reasons is the natural development of animation. Before the golden age when synchronous techniques were developed, the best results were obtained with classical music. During the silent cinema period, there were small orchestras in the halls. The animated film was sent silently, while the orchestra was playing live on the film projected on the screen. It can also be called sound design or musical dubbing. All this is thanks to Carl Stalling, who ensures that the dance between music and line is in complete harmony.

Carl Stalling is considered the father of music in cartoons. It is also one of the most prolific names in animation history. He meets young Walt Disney while conducting an orchestra that accompanies movies to live music. It was quite interesting to me when I first read this information. When I think of today's cinema, it is very strange and surprising that there was a mini orchestra accompanying the film in the past and Stalling was also in it. They become good friends and the golden age of animation and classical music begins.

Stalling becomes the first music director of Disney studios. He makes the soundtrack for 19 of Disney's top 20 movies. The most important reason Stalling is a very important figure is that he is the person who put forward the idea of ​​making cartoons suitable for music. Until then, while making music according to the action, the whole method is reversed and a new era begins in cartoon music. This idea actually does not fit into mind. It is known that music is usually arranged and added after a job. I always knew it like that. This idea is pretty crazy, but it obviously worked.

Classical music plays the leading role in series such as Merrie Melodies and Looney Tunes. All animation studios are starting to see that this method is famous and begin to use it. If you've watched cartoons like Bugs Bunny, Tweety or Speedy Gonzales, you're familiar with how the flow of music changes according to the action. Indeed, it seems like a whole movie is based on music.

Disney's Fantasia (1940) is the peak period of classical music used in cartoons and animations. While some episodes come to life with abstract drawings, some episodes have comic stories. 8 different classical works are interpreted and visualized in 8 different sections. Joint works are also carried out with names such as Salvador Dali. While Disney plans to bring Fantasia to life as a combination of music and cartoons in episodes, this plan is interrupted by the intervention of World War II.

Stalling does not only design original music, but also sound effects made with instruments. For example, the subtleties such as the double bass we hear at every step of a character walking on tiptoe always belong to Stalling.

Thanks to my interest in cartoons and animations, I got this information. If classical music did not exist, all of these films would have been left unfinished, and most of them would not even exist. The effects, funny and rapid transitions that exist in most of the cartoons we watched in our childhood, rise and fall in a flash; the music that changes rhythm according to the action is engraved in our minds thanks to these two men. Tom and Jerry's disputes, Bugs Bunny's mischief, Speedy Gonzalez's running, Slyvester and Tweety's chases all come to life with the instrument.

[dogaatalay]

I ORIGINS: A story of reincarnation

The film “I Origins” is a deep afterlife story that makes horripilation by Mike Cahill. It is an independent film which is a deep story of a molecular biologist, Ian Gray, and focuses on his religious beliefs. He obsesses with people’s eye and study on them and takes their photos that seems interesting.

Eyes are unique and each of us has its own iris ID, eye biometry. While Ian is known for his work on human evolution, he also conducts scientific studies on the evolution and change of the eye.

Upon falling in love with Sofi and then leaving Sofi, he recognizes her from his eyes on the billboard and tracks him down. While he is about to step into a happy marriage, Sofi dies in an elevator accident and his afterlife adventure begins after this event.

What attracts attention in the film is Ian's extreme scientific perspective and Sofi's spiritual point of view. These two perspectives overlap, and they're both very extreme. While Sophie is trying to convince Ian of the energy of life and spirit after death, Ian never wants to believe him and believes nothing but the data that science can prove.

 A few years later, Ian and his colleague Karen have a child, and after registering the baby's eye database, some remarkably interesting situations emerge. Ian goes into deep investigation as a result of the baby's eye record being owned by someone else and confronts the reality of reincarnation.

His trip to India, which he went on to follow all these events, leads him to his goal and traces the spirit of Sofi, who was born in another body. When we find this, we are left with an emotional and sad but also deep scene.

This independent movie creates a simulation and tells us how reincarnation fits with science, that nobody's opinion should be on two extremes. India was chosen because it is the starting point of all these spiritual studies and beliefs. Although there are many films that deal with the afterlife, it is also interesting that this film deals with the subject through the eyes.

[dogaatalay]

Gothic (1986) and Henry Fuseli, The Nightmare: Tableau Vivant

Gothic (1986) is a psychological horror film that is directed by Ken Russell. When I have searched about the Tableau Vivant in the films, I mostly have found the horror films and the successful representation of Tableau Vivant. Briefly, Tableau Vivants are usually costumed, carefully posed, stable and silent with scenery, and can be considered as a theatrical stage. There is a combination of visual arts/paintings and film/theatre. Sometimes it is subtle and sometimes extremely obvious; however, they are really well-designed and there are detailed analyses on them.

In the Gothic’s one of the most iconic scene; there is a homunculus -which means a little human form- on the woman as a nightmare and it seems disturbing. As we know, demonic imps are indispensable pieces of horror films. The film’s poster and scene base on and refers to Henry Fuseli’s painting; The Nightmare (1781).

There is a woman lying in bed as if she stretched backwards, and above we see a tiny human form that looks like a demon. When we look at the painting, it is possible to say that the same scene is done exactly. The similarities between them are noticeably clear; they are even almost indistinguishable. It may be more correct to say it is a reproduction. It is carefully posed to remake The Nightmare and it seems like the director achieves his goal.

Everything is the same, from the white dress of the woman to the bed she sleeps on. Even the actor seems to be specially chosen. Everything except the coffee table at the bottom left, including the color of her hair, her lying position, the naked homunculus above it, and even the curtain décor at the back, has been applied one to one.

The other important point in there is the camera angle of the scene to represent the stable scenery. They are so similar to the measures of the painting that the camera angle is the same as the point of view of the painting makes the purpose more obvious. Since it is a theatrical stage, everything is detailed and applied exactly, and a still stable image creates Tableau Vivant. They have played with the light and shadow to redo The Nightmare and they deal with it successfully. Light falls on the woman's face. Its lower body remains in shadow and dark. Likewise, the shadow of the demon is reflected on the wall. Light is one of the most important factors in reflecting the spirit and atmosphere, and it has been applied and studied in detail here.

The Nightmare is not just used in the Gothic, it also works as a reference for other horror films like Frankenstein (1931) or Ju-On: The Grudge (2002) as well, because of its dark and scary atmosphere.

[dogaatalay]

A Controversial Issue: Nude or Naked?

There are variety of critics and controversies about the distinction between ‘nude’ and ‘naked’. What comes to your mind when you hear these two concepts? When I have heard it first, I thought that there is no difference between them. However, for Art historians there are different explanations of them. I am also so lucky that I had a chance to see the concepts and artworks that I will talk below in the Louvre Museum, Paris.

According to conventions, social presence of a woman is separated from the man’s presence. When the social presence of a man bases on power, economic, moral, or sexual issues, a woman’s social presence is intrinsic and lying under her own perspective and attitude to herself. Unfortunately, as a convention, how women appear and seems to a man determines how she will be treated by them. While considering the man’s place, they are the watchers and surveyors when women are the looked-at.

In the European oil painting category, women were the subjects that are always be used. The category is ‘nude’. It can be stated that the first nude categories belong to the Adam & Eve stories. The main subject was shame in these stories. As we know, Eve is blamed and ashamed of the nakedness. Based on the “shame” subject, in the Renaissance period, depiction of shame moment becomes vital for producing a work, so after a while the moment of shame is used as an exhibition. In continual times nude painting has maintained. The main roles are the spectator and a woman being watched by him. Artist paints women with no clothes because he and spectators are enjoy watching it.

On the other hand, in Non-Western Art, women were active. In the sculptures or paintings, women were not passive, there is a sexual attraction mutually between man and woman; so we can understand that the concept shifts to “naked” from the “nude”. Naked means to be without clothing, without role-playing. It means that being free from all costumes, masks, roles and being herself. However, nude is an Art form. It serves for someone’s pleasure and be seen “naked”. As John Berger says in the Ways of Seeing: “To be naked is to be oneself. To be nude is to be seen naked by others and yet not be recognised for oneself. A naked body must be seen as an object in order to become nude… Nakedness reveals itself. Nudity is placed on display”. (Berger, 1972).

What do you think about the issue if you compare it to today’s media and film perception? In variety of the films, we see woman without clothing. So it means that if she is alone, it serves to nude concept, or if she is with her partner, is it belongs to nakedness? Actually, in my view it depends to the subject matter and how she is represented. However, in the magazine covers, women are used for the sake of male gaze and pleasure. Let’s look at some of the examples of women objectification.

1- The Judgement of Paris is a Greek mythology story. There are undressed women and they are waiting for the judgement or award of men for their beauty. It is like a beauty contest that gets its origins from Ancient.

2- In Susanna and the Elders (1555-1556, Tintoretto), a woman looks on a mirror. Mirror represents that how a woman being an object that should be looked at and it also reflects the vanity of a woman. In addition, two old men watches her secretly.

3- La Grande Odalisque By: Ingres (1780-1867) represents an obedience, attractive and a sensual woman. Even though the back of her body is facing us, she directs her gaze to the spectator in an alluring way.

However, in Modern Art; there are some challenges on nude concept. Olympia (1863, Edouard Manet) challenges the usual nude concept with its active language. There is a prostitute with her confidence and comfortable body language. There is no woman with evasive and elegant appearance.

Today, unfortunately the stereotypes could not be broken, and this understanding continues to be a material for movies, paintings, magazines, and even social media. The view of women has been the same throughout history and reflected itself in the most glorious period of art.

[dogaatalay]

A Story That Touches the “Soul”

Everyone has a turning point in their life. Some of the people are happy and some are not, we are either pursuit of something or live aimlessly. The Pixar movie “Soul” makes us question that what do in our lives and what is our desire. Soul makes us question whether we know the value of the life we live in. I strongly believe that everyone should watch it, because it will appeal to everyone and all of us have a reflection in the film. It is true to say that Soul holds a mirror to our lives.

There is an equilibrium that Joe is a music teacher in a primary school; however, his desire is being a real musician/jazz artist. Everything that he wants starts to actualize until his unexpected death. It is not a spoiler, because crisis starts after his death. The crisis of death, the desire for a second chance for life, and Joe’s all sorts of endeavors that result from this desire are starting to make us laugh.

Joe tries to go the world and live his second life, but he suddenly finds himself in New World Seminar. There are lots of souls that are sent the world and live a new life as a new soul. He becomes the mentor of 22, a soul that does not want to go to world, because she does not have a desire or a reason for living another life. Joe tries to make her find her own passion, and audience witness their adventures at that point.

I think that Disney has a deep insight and knowledge of the afterlife. In a deeper interpretation, Joe neither goes heaven nor hell, so the place he accidentally fell while try to escape death is seems like purgatory. He does not know about his life and his desires and he comes here as a teacher and actually gets to know himself. Uncertainties about his life disappear, he confronts them one by one. He is neither going to heaven nor to the world without facing them. It would be correct to say that he is in purgatory at this point. He both contributes to his own life and 22’s future life. After he gains his awareness, he gets a chance to live his second life -or maybe more than second, who knows 😊- and he completes the cycle. Even it does not be told throughout the film clearly, I believe that they successfully reflect the reincarnation. So, there is a religious or philosophical belief behind the story. Souls come to life in another body and it continues until spiritual growth is complete.

Throughout the film, 22’s mood reflects people who are dissatisfied with their life, who do not know their purpose and who are not pursuing them, even suicidal. However, after she mets with the real life; she becomes aware that “glint” is not an act or just one hobby that she should interested in. Glint is everything about life. Eating, smelling, or even watching the sun can be the purpose of the life. 22 reflects lots of the people that I know. I hope that their awareness will increase like her in the future.

Disney Pixar seems out of the ordinary in terms of both story and visuality. I was always in love with Disney movies; however, the story and the deep knowledge under it makes me more interested and passionate to the movie. The graphics were simply amazing. I had some difficulties in distinguishing between animation or real. The afterlife area was incredibly good with its soft colors and visuality that pushed the limits of imagination. In addition, jazz scenes were perfect. The graphics are so good that I congratulate the team behind it. Also, the black lead role breaks the taboos and shows that Disney is cleansed of stereotypes. We have seen gender stereotypes broken down in Moana, and we see racist taboos breaking down here too. To conclude, I do not want to give spoiler but I want to say that the end of the film really makes me sentimental.  

[dogaatalay]

ILLUSION OF MOTION AND TIME: La Jetée

Have you ever watched a photo roman film? It will not be wrong to call La jetée (1962) as one of the most significant film for the cinema history. We are going to talk about its success in terms of techniques that it contains; however, firstly I want to declare my own ideas.

When I have watched it at first time, I try to understand the given idea and focused on the story. There is a portrayal of the near future in which survivors of a nuclear disaster are doomed to take refugee underground. Audience witnesses the traces of World War III, a time travel of a man and his obsessiveness for a female image. Besides the plot, there is another point that I want to emphasize about La jetée . I have been convinced how photos can be as strong as videos in movie making. It was a photo roman and I strongly support that Chris Maker, the director of the film, brings out a really successful work in terms of art.

Still images have been used in the film. There is an illusion of motions with the usage of sound, like voice overs or music. Maybe voice over was not a mandatory need, but it is undeniable that it strengths the story. When I watch it, I do not need to watch it as a video. It was effective and strong enough with the still images. The story can easily be followed. It has a similar idea with comic books; acts are shown moment to moment. There were straight cuts; showing different aspects of something with camera angles. Fade ins and fade outs helps audience to understand that time passes. There are other various editing techniques which help to the process and strength the film. Zoom in & zoom out and dissolves are seen during the film. Techniques are similar as the traditional film techniques and it is not a deficiency, so it shows that La jetée achieves its goal. In addition, repetitions attract my attention most. The same places or situations are shown a few times from different angles and different gestures. Only the scene of sleeping woman is really moving in the film, and it is climax of the movie as we can understand thanks to sound that becomes louder.

There is a suspension of disbelief in La jetée. Audience is signed a contract with the director to believe in the director’s reality. Director makes audience feel that s/he is in the same moment with the film. There is nothing impossible, everything can happen. Past and future is not same as we perceive, their future is our present. Maybe the black & white concept also strengths the “timelessness” idea. If it is considered that 12 Monkeys (1995) or Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004) inspires from La jetée, it proves that it is also timeless in terms of the story.

La jetée shows that how an extremely low budget production can be such successful and unforgettable. I can advise it with peace of mind if you want to watch something inspiring and beyond the time.

[dogaatalay]

FATBOY SLIM | “Praise You”

Attractive with its absurdity

                Fatboy Slim’s Praise You is considered one of the best music videos by lots of bloggers and other sources when I have researched about it. After the first watch, it is quite hard to understand why it is best. However, when it is investigated deeply, we can gain a new perspective about the video.

              Praise You has a pretty interesting background. I really feel shocked when I learned that the video won three major awards at the 1999 MTV awards (Breakthrough Video, Best Direction, Best Choreography) and takes its place at first in the MTV’s top watched lists. Because of its unprofessional attitude, it has been rejected at the first attempt. However, it seems like many people has understood the approach of Norman Cook, who is the “Fatboy Slim”, that he tried to show what is bad successfully later. It is hard to make something bad on purpose; so dance is also in that category. With the dancer’s funny absurdity, the performance gains attention and creates a sincere atmosphere. I expected to watch a professional video in terms of art and technique, but I am really happy with what I have watched at the end. It feels free and lively. It is carefree.

                It has been recorded in the Regency Buin Theatre, which is a movie theater. There is a huge contrast between the place and the performance of the dancers, and it makes me laugh even more, because it is obvious that they choose that place on purpose. It is unexpected that a group of people do acrobatic motions; they jump, turn, and do something strange and not much to do with the lyrics and the rhythm of the music. It can be called as freestyle with a sarcastic approach. There is no adjusted lighting, no costumes, no concept. Even camera angles are not adjusted and independent during the video. With their irrelevant and funny dance, they attract a large crowd’s attention, and a huge number of people watch them with a shocked expression. There are different people from different ages and appearances in the dance group, and the head dancer attracts the attention most, with his carelessly, crazy performance. Sometimes, they interact with the audience around them. The performance makes even the most irrelevant person watch itself.

              I am sure about that most of the people have respect for Praise You. It has done with an incredible low budget and makes itself unforgettable with its conceptless concept. As I see, it is still being remembered and liked by lots of people. Maybe, it is the result of being ahead of time and being accepted and liked even today. Whichever way you choose to make a difference, it seems like the result is good.