Happy Pride Month!! âšïžđłïžâđâ€ïžđ©·đ§Ąđđđłïžââ§ïžđđ©”đđ€đ€đ©¶đ€đłïžâđâšïž
Keni
Game of Thrones Daily
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
occasionally subtle
d e v o n
I'd rather be in outer space đž
Phantogram Three
One Nice Bug Per Day
taylor price
Fai_Ryy

Kiana Khansmith

tannertan36
Cosimo Galluzzi
Color Me Curious
The Bowery Presents

No title available

Discoholic đȘ©

if i look back, i am lost
Noah Kahan
seen from United States

seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from T1

seen from United States

seen from Pakistan
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from China

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
@e-m-forster-54321
Happy Pride Month!! âšïžđłïžâđâ€ïžđ©·đ§Ąđđđłïžââ§ïžđđ©”đđ€đ€đ©¶đ€đłïžâđâšïž
âWe cast a shadow on something wherever we stand, and it is no good moving from place to place to save things; because the shadow always follows. Choose a place where you wonât do harm - yes, choose a place where you wonât do very much harm, and stand in it for all you are worth, facing the sunshine.â
â E.M. Forster
thank you george merrill for touching e.m. forster's backside "gently and just above the buttocks", inspiring him to write Maurice
E. M. Forster, Maurice
A happy ending was imperative. I shouldnât have bothered to write otherwise. I was determined that in fiction anyway two men should fall in love and remain in it for the ever and ever that fiction allows, and in this sense, Maurice and Alec still roam the greenwood. - E.M. Forster
Extracts from E.M. Forster: A New Life by Wendy Moffat
Maurice was a revolutionary new genreâa gay love story that ended happily. It was Morganâs cri de coeur. For him, âa happy ending was imperative. I Âshouldnât have bothered to write otherwise. I was determined that in fiction anyway two men should fall in love and remain in it for the ever and ever that fiction allows.â
...
But Morganâs earlier skepticism about the progress of tolerance for homosexuality was well founded. In October 1952, Christopher [Isherwood]âs first copy was shepherded by hand, from Cambridge to London to New York to Chicago to Los Angeles, by trustworthy friends, all gay men. They chose this method of delivery to protect both the book and its author. On both sides of the Atlantic, the cold war fueled anxiety about the loyalty and patriotism of homosexuals, and the machinery of the state was being used to gather evidence and entrap gay men. In the United States, the House Un-American Activities Committee had begun a âlavender scareâ to root out homosexual men in government, who were deemed a security risk because their sex lives made them vulnerable to blackmail. The U.S. postmaster general revived the eighty-year-old Comstock laws to prosecute gay men who used the mail to convey âobscene, lewd, lascivious or filthyâ materials. In London, police sting operations against gay men were intensifying, and men who were arrested often found their personal papers confiscated without a warrant. Morgan jocularly called the packet enclosing the typescript âthe main goodsâ to emphasize their clandestine machinations. He dotted Âevery i, composing a contract that expressly permitted Christopher to have the American rights, and formally requesting a special waiver from his literary executor.
The men who arranged this pony express were not being paranoid. Even very eminent men who were homosexual were being prosecuted and humiliated. The actor Sir John Gielgud was caught up in a sting operation in a public lavatory when he was at the height of his career on the London stage. Just months before the Maurice manuscript was spirited to CalÂiÂfornia, the famous mathematician Alan Turing, whose solution to the Nazi Enigma code machine had materially helped the Allies win the war, was caught in the net. He was forcibly given female hormones to âcureâ him of his homosexual desires as part of a plea bargain to avoid imprisonment under the same laws used to convict Oscar Wilde in 1895. Two years later, Turing killed himself. None of Morganâs friends wished to risk the loss of Maurice or the liberty of its author in those perilous times. There were still plenty of âbeasts and idiots who . . . prowl in the darkness, ready to gibber and devour.â
In Christopherâs study, late into the autumn night, Christopher and John Lehmann discussed the mechanics of publishing Maurice in America. The thought of Morganâs death evoked a bit of black humor: John drily called the pages Forsterâs âliterary remains.â But the men shared a reverence for the novelâs place in gay patrimony. The typescript was weighed down by the care so many had taken to preserve it for so long. It was heavy with a history of stealth. For six decades Forster had nurtured it in secret, painstakingly revising and adding chapters. He commissioned two wondrously named lady typistsâMrs. Jones and Mrs. Snatchfoldâto copy the contraband manuscript in pieces, to protect them from the novelâs secrets. He carefully kept track of each copy of the typescript, requesting that the chosen reader return it to a safely neutral locationâusually the Reform Club. Late in old age, when he was almost eighty-five, Forster reflected on the cost of this lifetime of effort: âHow annoyed I am with Society for wasting my time by making homosexuality criminal. The subterfuges, the self-consciousness that might have been avoided.â
...
All his long life Morgan lived in a world imprisoned by prejudice against homosexuals. He was sixteen when Oscar Wilde was sent to prison, and he died the year after the Stonewall riots.
...
TL;DR: Please keep writing gay happy endings. Please fight against censorship. We can't go back.
Also, read Maurice by E. M. Forster. There's some absolutely beautiful sentences in it. And men climbing through windows for kisses.
e. m. forster literally, in a time where being gay was completely illegal in england, wrote a novel with the central premise being "gay sexuality and sensuality is natural and not disgusting, gay men [in our context: allo gay men] need sex with other men as a component of a fulfilled, happy life. this should not be suppressed, rationalized away or shamed" and the internet media analysis brigade went on to churn out takes like "clive was better for maurice than alec because clive and maurice had pure uwu platonic love and all alec and maurice did was have icky yucky gross sex with each other"
E. M. Forster began writing Maurice in 1913 after visiting gay socialist pioneer Edward Carpenter and his working class love George Merrill on their farm. They inspired the relationship between Maurice and Alec, and Forsterâs own rough trade fantasies of being âloved and even hurtâ by a âstrong young man of the lower classes.â
Forster finally had sex for the first time in 1917 at the age of 37, and made up for lost time so hard that he never wrote any other books after that.
Raise your hand if you too possess an intense, almost religious faggotry
Maurice (1987)? :)
never seen | want to see | the worst | bad | whatever | not my thing | good | great | favorite | masterpiece
i was so worried it would end like brokeback mountain but at least this particular gay period piece had a happy ending
ask me about a film
ITS FROM MARRIAGE IN A FREE SOCIETY BY EDWARD CARPENTER. EDWARD CARPENTER!!! A GAY PHILOSOPHER, CONTEMPORARY OF EM FORSTER AND ONE OF THE INSPIRATIONS FOR MAURICE. IM GONNA BARF
The fact that Maurice by E.M. Forster start with this dedication breaks my soul
Every single day of my life I think about how destiel en español and EM Forsterâs posthumously published 1914 gay novel MAURICE contain the exact same love confession
really cannot stop thinking about how this furious and over-caffeinated tweet I wrote about people On Here having terminally stupid takes about Maurice (1914) says literally everything you need to understand me as a person :/
âAfter this crisis Maurice became a man. Hithertoâif human beings can be estimatedâhe had not been worth anyoneâs affection, but conventional, petty, treacherous to others, because of himself. Now he had the highest gift to offer. The idealism and the brutality that ran through boyhood had joined at last, and twined into love. No one might want such love, but he could not feel ashamed of it, because it was âhe,â neither body or soul, nor body and soul, but âheâ working through both. He still suffered, yet a sense of triumph had come elsewhere. Pain had shown him a niche behind the worldâs judgments, whither he could withdraw. There was still much to learn, and years passed before he explored certain abysses in his beingâhorrible enough they were. But he discovered the method and looked no more at scratches in the sand. He had awoken too late for happiness, but not for strength, and could feel an austere joy, as of a warrior who is homeless but stands fully armed.â
â Maurice, E.M. Forster
straight writers: gay people canât get happy endings in historical fiction, itâs just not realisticâŠ
an actual gay author in 1914:
straight writers: gay people canât get happy endings in historical fiction, itâs just not realisticâŠ
an actual gay author in 1914: