Final Post: How My Personal Ethics Will Guide Me Moving Forward
Looking back at my earlier blog posts about my own experiences in nature has really shown me how quickly perspectives can change in a matter of months. I came into this class having just completed my program in Landscape Architecture, which revolved around developing concepts and programs within a landscape that enhance experiences for both humans and nature; designing environments that function with purpose and are consciously connected to the ecological processes of its surrounding community. One thing I struggled with when creating concepts or themes, was estimating how people would interpret what I’ve created; whether they see and use my concept for its intended purpose or walk right past it without a thought.
As the semester comes to an end and I look back at how my personal ethics have guided my development into becoming a more mindful nature interpreter, I realize where I fell short when developing themes in my program. I was too focused on what the theme might teach people and how they could learn from it, and didn’t put enough thought into how the theme would make the visitors feel at that moment, and why they should even care about it in the first place. Sam Ham, a Professor at University of Idaho made me realize this. Furthermore, (Ham, 2013) reiterates the importance that a theme's sole purpose is to stimulate thinking…a theme is a platform for individual discovery of one's own desires and interests. Meaning a theme should invoke something within a person, to want to engage and learn more; to broaden their horizons (Beck & Cable, 2011).
I am so fortunate and privileged to be educated, and because of this, I think one of my responsibilities is inspiring people to become more consciously self-aware of the interconnected processes of their environment. To show them that what they think they know, is actually part of a larger network of factors that allows for life to flourish. In this way, I think we can learn to reconnect with nature on a deeper level. David Suzuki is a prominent believer in this approach, as he states, in order for one to reconnect with nature, they must acknowledge the “interconnectedness of everything…to show that whatever we do has consequences” that affect another thing (Suzuki & Louv, 2012).
This is the approach I feel most responsible to highlight and educate people about. Taking inspiration from Silene, 2021, I believe, when in nature, you must feel before you think. Consciously stop the part of your brain that goes “oh look over there!”, and simply just breathe and take in your surroundings. I practice a lot of breathing exercises to deal with anxiety, which is on the opposite spectrum of emotions that one would think about when being in nature. However, just as breathing can help with anxiety, it can also help ground you in an exact moment in time. One of the main ethics I have developed as a nature interpreter is appreciating the power of feeling your surroundings, then thinking when in nature (Silene, 2021); to create a pause in time where certain factors of your environment start to become more apparent. Being able to create this moment in time for others, to allow them to pause and absorb, or as Freeman Tilden describes as “judicious silence”, is what I think distinguishes a novice environmental educator to a mindful nature interpreter (Tilden, 1957; Beck et al., 2018).
If I were talking about random things and wasn't paying attention to my surroundings, I would've never heard this lake trout splashes their way to their spawning grounds. A prime example of using "judicious silence in nature:)
I've realized I enjoy educating others, but not in the way of spitting facts in their face about interesting facts. What I strive for is to spark some type of curiosity within a visitor, to allude to certain ecological processes and then have the visitor connect the dots to understand (Beck & Cable, 2011). Seeing that “light bulb” moment when everything finally clicks and they understand how something works, is such a rewarding feeling. If you couple that ambition to my current profession, I think the two tie very well together, and can allow me to explore new ways of educating and interpreting the wonders of nature without explicitly saying what one should be looking for.
Canadian Yorke Edwards, a pioneer of interpretation, describes the main goal of interpretation as “opening the minds of people so they can receive…the interesting signals that the world is constantly sending out…and when those signals are added up, paint a picture of what the world is all about” (Beck et al., 2018). I really like this definition and think it describes how I want to approach interpreting nature for others. My take on what Edwards is trying to convey is that you won’t fully understand how something works until you understand what its purpose is meant for. Let's say you are unaware that trees and fungi have a symbiotic relationship that transfer nutrients for each to thrive. Just because you are unaware of this process, doesn’t mean this process never existed, it just never existed within your current capacity of consciousness. I think my responsibility as a growing nature interpreter is to invoke and inspire this new consciousness within people, to start seeing the world in a new lens where everything starts to make a little more sense.
What I love about my profession is that it is multifaceted and can be approached in many different ways. Keeping in theme of my personal ethics and the importance of mindfulness in nature, I really like how Rodenburg (2019) emphasizes the importance of creating nature-rich communities for children, to “experience the joy of discovering the…complexity and diversity of life. Being self-aware means having the ability to make mistakes, and learn from them. I am a huge believer that play and risk are vital components of early childhood development. If kids do not grow up in an environment where they could twist an ankle running, get a splinter climbing a tree, or acquire many, many scars from falling, they will not understand how their body works, what their capabilities are, and how they can push themselves further than they thought.
This is a really great documentary that shows the importance of risk and play for children!
I always used to say growing up and still to this day, scars are memories, and memories are lessons. At one point in your life, I’m sure someone has asked you “where’d you get that scar”, and what follows is typically a story from childhood (not always of course), of a time you were playing around and got hurt. I’m sure in the moment it wasn’t the best experience, but I am also just as sure afterwards, you made multiple conscious efforts to not repeat that experience and get hurt again. That right there is the essence of learning and developing a deeper awareness of your body to mind connection. Having that inner voice inside of you say “woah hold up, last time we did this we got hurt…what other options are available for me”. Being this self-aware of your thoughts and actions brings you one step closer to being able to cast your ego aside, to forget about what you think you know, and just experience an experience for what it is.
My personal ethics towards nature revolves around the idea of conscious self awareness of where you are in the present moment, how certain factors make you feel in the moment, and overall simply feeling before thinking. This is how I will approach interpreting nature for others as I grow and learn more about the amazing wonders that life offers us.
Beck, L., Cable, T. T., & Knudson, D. M. (2018). Interpreting cultural and natural heritage: For A Better World. Sagamore Publishing.
Beck, L., & Cable, T. (2011). The gifts of interpretation: Fifteen guiding principles for in-terpreting nature and culture (3rded.). Urbana, IL: Sagamore.
Rodenburg, J. (2019). Why Environmental Educators Shouldn't Give up Hope. Environmental Literacy. ClearingMagazine.org.
Silene, A. (2021, February 20). Spiritual values of protected areas of Europe: Workshop proceedings. [pages 129-132] https://www.silene.ong/en/documentation-centre/spiritual-values-of-protected-areas-of-europe-workshop-proceedings#Proceedings_Spiritual%20Values_PAs_Europe.pd
Suzuki , D., & Louv, R. (2012, July 20). David Suzuki and Richard Louv @AGO. YouTube. https://youtu.be/F5DI1Ffdl6Y
Tilden, F. (1957). Interpreting our heritage. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Caro-lina Press.