PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
art blog(derogatory)
YOU ARE THE REASON

gracie abrams
Noah Kahan
NASA
Misplaced Lens Cap
★

Origami Around

Love Begins

No title available
Show & Tell
Color Me Curious
The Bowery Presents
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

PR's Tumblrdome
Mike Driver
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
No title available
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Slovenia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Mexico

seen from Singapore

seen from Venezuela

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Mexico
seen from United States
seen from Cambodia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Guatemala
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Congo - Brazzaville
@elisestitt-blog
Atmosphere
Architecture is only important when it creates a feeling. The feeling can be anything. It can make you feel small and insignificant, or it can make you gasp in awe and admiration. It can inspire, demand, articulate, overwhelm, comfort, distress or facilitate. Without feeling, there is no meaning, no importance.
Architecture demands atmosphere. The atmosphere of a building or of a particular spatial quality dictates how people react, interfere and ultimately participate within that space. Without this atmosphere, the space is simply elements put together. With atmosphere spaces invite dynamism, movement, mystery and energy.
Atmosphere can be created within any space. The use of thresholds, colour, vision, temperature, scale and light can change the tone of a space and therefore the ambience. These elements need not stay static. Atmosphere can change and develop over the day, or even weeks and months. It is a forceful element of architecture that influences the spatial qualities and use of a particular domain. By changing how people interact with the atmosphere of the architecture, designers can effectively change how a space is perceived and used. The change in interaction allows for multifaceted use within a single space.
But does an architect truly control this atmosphere? Do they dictate how, when and what feelings are felt, desires desired and longings longed for? Is there still an atmosphere if there is no one to appreciate or experience it? The control of the atmosphere of a particular space is now in the power of the participants. Through use, audiences can transform spaces as they no longer need to rely on architecturally designed cues. This means architects must design for more uses than only those they anticipate. But is that still enough?
Constant Nieuwenhuys envisioned the story of New Babylon, a utopian anti-capitalist city.
“Its main theme is a new regard for social space. It is the medium for a new creativity that is to manifest itself in daily life, by means of continually varied arrangement of the environment, in harmony with a dynamic way of life. The interior of these buildings consists of a large public space serving the purposes of social life. This gives rise to a multiplicity of difference ambiences that can be altered at any given moment. The character can be influenced and determined by an abundant manipulation of colour, sound, light, climate, by use of the most varied kinds of technical apparatus, and by psychological procedures. But New Babylon will first be realized by its inhabitants.”
(Niewenhuys, 1960)
Nieuwenhuys imagined a world where the users defined the space. Yes, the architect designed it, but users defined it through how they interacted and participated with the space. Through using the space, the architecture becomes a vibrant part of society and allows people to interact with each other and their environment. The function of the building is adapted to the needs of the user, not the other way around. In this case, the atmosphere of the space is entirely dependent on the audience.
Contrary to Nieuwenhuys’ view of users defining the space, Mies Van Der Rohe’s campus at the Illinois Institute of Technology presents atmosphere in architecture through a different means. The use of materials, lighting effects and diverse programming are what determine the atmosphere within the space. The use of “programmatic zones are spliced together” produces “abrupt linkages and opportunistic appropriations.”(Rice, 2008) This effect creates opportunities for users in employing the spaces. One does not move directly towards a function, but instead comes across a point where options become available. These areas of opportunity become defined through furniture, ceiling height or a change in floor surface. The effect of lighting on the space is also highly intelligent as it changes the ambiance. The varying levels of illumination and contrast also help define the multiuse zones within the interior. The most striking feature of the building is the orange polycarbonate that filters the light in different zones. The way audiences react to the architecture is what defines the atmosphere within the space. The atmosphere has been clearly defined by the architect and users simply interact with the space without needing to define it.
Olafur Eliasson combines the approach of both Mies Van Der Rohe and Nieuwenhuys. He believes that atmosphere is created through materials, but realized through audience. His installation, The Weather Project (2003) used the “manipulation of colour, transparency and the reflection of light to dissolve the material of interior space into the material sensory quality of atmosphere.”(Frichot, 2008) Eliasson’s work is so intense it demands the audiences’ engagement and, as such, transforms his work and the atmosphere within which it is housed. Many reports “describe how visitors were sprawled across the ground, transfixed by the looming interior sun and the subtle shifts in light and humidity.” (Frichot, 2008) This notion of atmosphere being realized through audience is seen again through the Horizon series (2003, 2004) where “the second-person pronoun of the titles clearly places the ownership of the artwork with the beholder: the art is incomplete without the uncertainty of the one who perceives it.” (Frichot, 2008) Eliasson’s works attempt to offer different kinds of engagement with spatial experience and how these can be manifested through interior atmosphere and audience realization.
Gernot Bohmes’ article ‘Atmosphere as the Subject Matter of Architecture’ makes the observation that architecture shapes space. That is, space is experienced by physically being in it. Bohmes announces “We can sense what kind of space surrounds is. We sense its atmosphere”(Bohme, 2005)He cites Peter Zumthor “There are two basic possibilities of spatial composition in architecture: the closed architectural body, which delimits, and the open body, which embraces an area that is connected with infinite space”(Bohme,2005) Bohmes debates this point and instead declares that architecture articulates space and therefore atmosphere.
Jonathon Borofsky’s ‘Man Walking to the Sky’ (1992) shows how atmosphere can be created through use. The artwork defines the space, and in turn defines the atmosphere through use. It is “simply an explicit rendition of what lines, beams, ledges, or ridge turrets do to space: they furnish it with a suggestion of movement.” (Bohme, 2005) The notion of movement within the artwork opens the space and articulates it through concentrations, directions and configurations in space.
The same happens in James Marsh’s documentary ‘Man on a Wire’ (2008). The spatial qualities of the World Trade centre are altered because of the location where the Phillipe Petit chooses to perform. By breaching the architectural space, Petit changes the spatial dimensions of the building itself. Whilst both these examples aren’t architectural, they both involve an experience of space that doesn’t require objects or elements. This is different to traditional architecture, a space of place and distance, which are essentially defined by objects and elements.
All these examples show how atmosphere is utilized within various spatial dimensions, either through materials, audience, light or simply the definition of space. What they all have in common is the belief that atmosphere is imperative to good architecture. It makes you feel. Coop Himmelb(l)au said “Architecture must blaze.”(Himmelb(l)au, 1980) I say so must atmosphere.
Nieuwenhuys, C. 1960, ‘New Babylon’ in U Conrads (ed.), Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp.177-78
Rice, C. 2008, ‘The Atmosphere of Interior Urbanism’, Architectural Design, vol. 78, issue 3, pp.88-91.
Frichot, H. 2008, ‘Olafur Eliasson and the Circulation of Affects and Percepts In Conversation, Architectural Design, vol. 78, issue 3, pp.30-35.
Böhme, Gernot 2005. “Atmosphere As The Subject Matter of Architecture” in P Ursprung (ed), Natural History, Herzog and de Meuron, Switzerland, pp.398-406
Peter Zumthor, Thinking Architecture, trans. Maureen Oberli-Turner, Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, 1998, pp. 21
Coop Himmelb(l)au, 1980, “Architecture Must Blaze” in A Danchev (ed.), 100 Artist’s Manifestos, from the Futurists to the Stuckists, Penguin, London, pp.396-398
Alexander Brodsky
My first ever wikipedia article.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Brodsky
Alexander Savvich Brodsky (1955) is a Russian architect and sculptor. He is one of Russia’s best known architects, particularly for his works of paper architecture.
Early Work
Alexander Brodsky was educated at the Moscow Architecture Institute where he graduated in 1978. [1] Brodsky’s first encounter with the public eye was during the late 1970’s. He was a key member of the paper architects (visionary architecture), and furthermore, worked alongside Ilya Utkin in his etchings of distorted cityscapes. [2] Paper architecture was a response to state sanctioned architecture that consisted of standardised and often poorly constructed buildings, which imbued their environments with a communist aesthetic. [3] Such a response allowed paper architects to retreat into their imaginations and defy uniform Soviet architecture through vivid depictions of constructivism, deconstructivism and postmodernism. [4] According to Anna Sokolina, paper architects rose to prominence within the Western world as many of their works won prestigious awards in professional competitions [5] and helped to shape an understanding of Russian modern and postmodern architecture. Scholarship has shown that the whimsical and constructivist etchings of Brodsky and Utkin translate mere illustrations into narratives through the introduction of human characters. These were narratives that voiced man’s alienation within the urban world [6] and provided a commentary on the loss of Moscows historical architectural heritage. [7]
Installations
Brodsky travelled to New York in 1990 at the invitation of gallerist Ronald Feldman and then moved there in 1996 to complete public projects as well as personal installations. [8] In 1996 the Public Art Fund asked Brodsky to transform an unused set of tracks in the Canal Street subway station. Brodsky transformed the station for two months into a Venetian lagoon using a 5000 gallon tank, which held life-size gondolas and cut out passengers. In 1999 Brodsky created Palazzo Nudo in Pittsburgh, a 16 metre high house shaped skeleton with the crumbled ruins of the metropolis heaped in the centre. [9] Coma, 2000, displayed at the Guelman Gallery in Moscow showed the city “as if it was in a hospital or on a surgeon’s table” and his work produced for 2006 Venice Architecture Biennale was an ominous and foreboding comment on the doomed fate of Venice sinking into the sea. [10] Night Before the Attack, 2009, is Brodskys most recent installation, which discusses the associations of emotion with structure and scale. [11] Brodsky used the title to enlighten the viewer’s understanding of a story that lay beneath the artwork. Such a narrative has imbued new meaning and significance to the old structures that have been appropriated within the insallation.
Built Work
Brodsky has really only been an architect since 2000, with his first commission in 2002. He claimed that his return from artistry to architecture was difficult. Despite the commission that Brodsky received upon each work, his efforts were burdened with a mental and physical toll - “I was near a serious mental problem. I’d never had this responsibility, and I was alone. It was my first experience communicating with workers and clients.” [12] His first commission, 95 Degrees, a restaurant near Moscow on the Klyazma Reservoir shows Brodsky’s specific and often wary architectural style. Everything is precisely thought out, from the materials of wood and plastic, to the subtle deformation of the wooden stilts (all are tilted at a 95 degree angle). [13] Also built in 2002 is Apshu, a restaurant – club hidden in the basement of a building Moscow. The space is specifically framed through recycled window frames and creates a sense of nostalgia that isn’t usually found in postmodern work. [14] One of Brodsky’s most famous works is the Vodka Ceremony Pavilion built in 2004 for a contemporary art festival at the Klyazma Reservoir. Again, recycled timber window frames are rescued from industrial buildings and reused. Painted white and forming the structure of the pavilion, the window frames create a sense of Russian tradition from the industrial heritage that defined 20th Century Moscow. His projects often have a cerebral and ephemeral quality, despite often being permanent. [15] A literally ephemeral project, Brodsky produced a pavilion on the Klyazma Reservoir in 2003 from ice cubes that were attached to a wooden structure and metal cage. The pavilion was lit from the interior, causing the building to glow. When spring came, the cage was removed and the ice cubes sunk to the bottom of the lake. [16]
Brodskys projects are often built from nothing. [17] His use of recycled materials, window frames, glass and plastic bags to create new structures creates a unique aesthetic. His architectural style combines local and reused materials in such a way that creates buildings that feel both traditional and modern but remain inventive and original. [18]
Critics on his work
Brodsky has been revered in Soviet architectural culture since the late 1970’s when he first entered the public sphere as a member of the paper architects. [19] Fellow Russians adore him and have called him the “most important Russian architect alive today”. [20] His reputation as a paper architect has expanded beyond Russia. He maintains a global presence, achieved in collaboration with Ilya Utkin, as well as his built projects that display Brodsky’s specific style, referred to as “New Russian Architecture” by architects in his own studio. According to Mark Lamster, Constantin Boym declared, “When it comes to Brodsky, there is a reverence – like he is our genius.” [21]
The paper architects of the late 1970’s and 1980’s gained critical and commercial success outside of Russia though professional competitions [22] and exhibitions. Interest in Soviet paper architecture was high from the late 1980s until the early 2000’s with many exhibitions across America, as well as in Western Europe. [23] This interest in Brodskys work allowed him to travel to America and to begin exhibiting his installations.
Brodsky’s installations were well received (he was invited to participate in the 2006 Venice Biennale) [24] but did not, however, translate into commercial success. In light of this fact, Brodsky returned to his original profession - architecture. His buildings have been applauded for their tendency to incorporate traditional elements of Soviet architecture, such as form, material and techniques, into modern and unique structures. [25] They have also helped to define Russian architecture within the 21st Century, and more importantly, to determine the future direction of architectural culture.
Many viewers however criticise the lack of radicalism within his built works. [26] Whilst his earlier etchings and installations are an obvious reaction against the dehumanising nature of Soviet approved architecture and the lack of care for traditions, the anxiety and chaos of these works are not apparent in his built projects. [27] Brodsky says in reaction to this “I want to design spaces that make people feel good.” [28]
References
[1] “BRODSKY, Alexandr Savvich,” 1994, accessed 18 Nov. 2011; available from http://www.artinfo.ru/artbank/scripts/english/author_base.idc?author_id=540
[2] Lamster, Mark. “Return of the Prodigal Son” Metropolis Magazine, (May 2006).
[3] Dorian Moore. “Paper Architecture,” Spatial Agency, accessed 18 Nov. 2011; available from http://www.spatialagency.net/database/paper.architects
[4] Sokolina, Anna. “Alternative Identities: Conceptual Transformations in Soviet and Post-Soviet Architecture,” ARTMargins Online, (2001).
[5] Sokolina, Anna. “Alternative Identities: Conceptual Transformations in Soviet and Post-Soviet Architecture,” ARTMargins Online, (2001).
[6] Droitcour, Brian. “Alexander Brodsky,” Artforum, 48 (2001).
[7] Galilee, Beatrice. “Alexander Brodsky,” Icon Magazine, 54 (2007).
[8] Lamster, Mark. “Return of the Prodigal Son,” Metropolis Magazine, (May 2006).
[9] Lamster, Mark. “Return of the Prodigal Son,” Metropolis Magazine, (May 2006).
[10] Galilee, Beatrice. “Alexander Brodsky,” Icon Magazine, 54 (2007).
[11] Droitcour, Brian. “Alexander Brodsky,” Artforum, 48 (2001).
[12] Lamster, Mark. “Return of the Prodigal Son,” Metropolis Magazine, (May 2006).
[13] Galilee, Beatrice. “Alexander Brodsky,” Icon Magazine, 54 (2007).
[14] Lamster, Mark. “Return of the Prodigal Son,” Metropolis Magazine, (May 2006).
[15] Galilee, Beatrice. “Alexander Brodsky,” Icon Magazine, 54 (2007).
[16] Lamster, Mark. “Return of the Prodigal Son,” Metropolis Magazine, (May 2006).
[17] Galilee, Beatrice. “Alexander Brodsky,” Icon Magazine, 54 (2007).
[18] Dorian Moore. “Alexander Brodsky,” Spatial Agency, accessed 18 Nov. 2011; available from http://www.spatialagency.net/database/alexander.brodsky
[19] Lamster, Mark. “Return of the Prodigal Son,” Metropolis Magazine, (May 2006).
[20] Galilee, Beatrice. “Alexander Brodsky,” Icon Magazine, 54 (2007).
[21] Lamster, Mark. “Return of the Prodigal Son,” Metropolis Magazine, (May 2006).
[22] Sokolina, Anna. “Alternative Identities: Conceptual Transformations in Soviet and Post-Soviet Architecture,” ARTMargins Online, (2001).
[23] “BRODSKY, Alexandr Savvich,” 1994, accessed 18 Nov. 2011; available from http://www.artinfo.ru/artbank/scripts/english/author_base.idc?author_id=540
[24] Galilee, Beatrice. “Alexander Brodsky,” Icon Magazine, 54 (2007).
[25] Lamster, Mark. “Return of the Prodigal Son,” Metropolis Magazine, (May 2006).
[26] Galilee, Beatrice. “Alexander Brodsky,” Icon Magazine, 54 (2007).
[27] Dorian Moore. “Alexander Brodsky,” Spatial Agency, accessed 18 Nov. 2011; available from http://www.spatialagency.net/database/alexander.brodsky
[28] Galilee, Beatrice. “Alexander Brodsky,” Icon Magazine, 54 (2007).
Article about food photography looking specifically at Carl Kleiner's Homemade is Best, Marina Aurora's Visual Recipe and Christopher Boffoli's Disparity.
Christopher Boffoli Disparity
These photographs at a micro scale show the different textures of food in a humorous way with the addition of tiny people doing ordinary activities.
http://cjboffoli.500px.com/disparity/
Marina Aurora Visual Recipe
Shows the deconstructed process of a recipe in a single shot.
http://www.marinaaurora.com/
Carl Kleiner Homemade is Best
Ikea cookbook with beautiful minimalist styling.
http://demo.fb.se/e/ikea/homemade_is_best/
How to make your mark
How to make an instant shelter
How to get lost
How to fit in
The next set of photos are for a university assignment based on the JanFamily projects. They are suggestions for inhabition, performed and photo-documented.
The first one is How to announce an arrival
Harry Seidler Building Appartment Potts Point
Berta
Vini
Hospitality Design and Detail
The eighth and final lecture of the Interior Spatial Design Lecture series was by Anthony Gill of Anthony Gill Architects (AGA). AGAis a small Sydney-based firm of three people working on residential, hospitality, retail and commercial projects. Established in 2007, the practice is interested in creating finely crafted buildings and interiors that are highly considered and hopefully timeless. Gill spoke about 3 different design projects he had worked on: Vini, Berta and Potts Point Apartment.
Vini is a small bar and restaurant in Surry Hills whose focus is on wine. Gill helped his client to design the bar, starting from a small space growing into a larger, more diverse atmosphere. The three main constraints that Gill credits for the design of Vini is budget, size, and the idea. The concept of Vini is derived from the product. This focus on wine developed into a restaurant with a working wall of wine and food that would be active throughout service. The size constraints of the space were difficult to work with, and so the working wall allowed for the kitchen to be interactive with the dining experience. The blackboard in the space was fundamental to the client’s concept of a changing food and wine list, and the blackboard mentality is reflected through the materials. The materiality of the project was extremely important to Gill and the use of form ply in the space significantly reduced the budget. The minimalistic material sucked light from the space and the ply edge gave warmth. As Vini grew, the restaurant expanded into the loading dock where a room within a room was created from a shipping container. The materiality of this was the reverse from the main room of Vini being a black box lined internally with ply.
The second project, Berta, is an offshoot of Vini on the fringe of the city. It is located on the ground floor of a re-developed warehouse and backs onto a forgotten laneway. The client for this project was the same for Vini and the concept for Berta was very similar. In the design of Berta however, the client had more money with which to work and a more exciting space. As the design was developed from the beginning, Gill was able to work with builders to realise his vision, instead of adding on spaces as they became available. The entrance created a problem as it was extremely long and thin, meaning patrons were unable use the space to sit. The concept of the working wall was re-visited in Berta, but in this case it was used to create a level of separation between the kitchen and the patrons. The working wall provided transparency in the space and removed verticals to create a more open atmosphere. The wall also acts as a tool to draw people into the space. The restaurant is divided into a bar and a dining area with subtle changes in level and materials defining use. The externally framed windows help to connect the restaurant with the forgotten laneway.
The Potts Point Apartment involved the redesign of a 38sqm one bedroom apartment in the Harry Seidler Building. The aim was to create a space that would suit a couple with a young child as well as adding more room, storage whilst still addressing privacy issues. This was achieved though using joinery to create a space. The idea is similar to that of the working wall, but instead is used as a multipurpose space that divides the rooms and insinuates program. The existing masonry of the bathroom and kitchen were used to develop where the joinery would sit in the space.
All three of these projects use joinery to activate the space and to make workable areas. The joinery helps in the planning of spaces as there is a rhythm derived from the pattern which helps with proportions and can fix design issues. Materiality is also important in all of these projects as they are durable and cheap, helping to bring down cost.
Australian Design Review, Practice Profile Anthony Gill Architects, Australian Design Review, viewed 30/5/11 <http://www.australiandesignreview.com/companies/239/contributions>
Anthony Gill Architects, 2007, viewed 30/5/11 <http://www.gillarchitects.com.au/>
Danae through art