Global and social media- China
Thoughts and findings-
‘Made in China’ is a stamp we have seen on almost everything that we own, so it only makes sense that they have one of the most progressive social media activities in the world, regardless of their communist political ruling. Social media accounts enable people of China to access areas that are prohibited in any other way. Such as clothing brands, people in China are able to access via WeChat people who provide services in different countries that stock clothing brands that are illegal in China. For example, in Australia a brand such as Zimmerman or Review is blocked from the Chinese market, however, Chinese women in Australia have services over WeChat that sell such items back to China, labelling them as gifts. Without WeChat this service would not be possible.
In China, “internet usage has expanded more quickly than anywhere else in the world” (Mckinsey, 2012, p.1). Sites such as WeChat have recorded around 963 million active users monthly on their platform (Statista, 2017). Reportedly 490 of those users are in China alone, making up more than half the monthly users of the platform. With 84% of the 1.36 billion population in possession of a smart phone. A factor to this statistic can be the prohibition of Facebook and Twitter within China, therefore, forcing citizens to use sites that are legal.
WeChat is also used in China as a method of currency, where people can pay with a cryptocurrency for their meals and shopping. It is also a method to order food whilst sitting at a restaurant that has worked towards broadening the scope of what a social media site can accomplish.
A few years ago in 2012 the Chinese government instated the ‘Great firewall of China’ which was a online barrier from the citizens of China accessing any politically sensitive information they government did not want their people to see. Due to the firewall websites have been shut down for violating their constitution and attacking state leaders (Lecture, 2018, May 18). The government is constantly fighting to keep barriers around their citizens in the name of ‘protection’ but the influence of the internet could not have been foreseen by any government.














