Archbishop of Envy

25/he/him infp Love Fire Emblem, Samurai Warriors, Pokemon, Persona, Chainsaw Man, and Re:Zero

[fell8999]

Hey y'all, once again, I wanna make new friends, meet new people, particularly with similar interests since I find it easier to talk about that, feel free to message me if you're into.

I'm mainly looking for people to join my discord server, where we can chill and play some modded minecraft together!

If you're into One Piece, Jojo's Bizzare Adventure, Fire Emblem, Pokemon, or Genshin Impact, feel free to message me and I'll add you to the server!

Please be between 21-26 years old, looking for people around the same age as me the two other people in the server

[wingsofhcpe]

new nabatean dropped and she's too cute not to draw!

[herssian]

"there is no way you're not using chatgpt for at least a few things here and there no matter your stance on it" what the FUCK are you talking about

[allykatsart]

[tam--lin]

it's pretty easy to imagine that you are one of some fractional holdout against AI while everyone else has fallen into some misguided love affair with LLMs, and I am so happy to tell you that this is not the case.

the US public is deeply suspicious of AI's impacts on jobs and education. Kamala Harris and the Republican party are both polling better than AI. 8/10 gen zers are concerned about AI's impact on education and only 18% are positive about this technology. there is widespread, bipartisan grassroots organizing against data centers. 97% of Britons are against Grok's "undressing" technology. the majority of Americans are concerned about AI in arenas like self-driving vehicles and healthcare. Even polling data from companies centered on AI shows significant concern around generative technology. OpenAI isn't meeting internal growth bench posts. On top of all that, Musk and Altman are currently both making fools of themselves in a very public trial.

[90-ghost]

15/05/1948

15/05/2026

78 years since the Nakba of the Palestinian people... and the Palestinians continue to suffer and pay the price for remaining steadfast on their land.

[malibuklaus]

[galadriel1010]

Sometimes you get a brief glimpse into the American worldview and decide that you don't want to know.

[transcyberism]

I cannot stress enough that this meme is entirely literal. there's no reference or subtext you don't know. these are simply the objectively most popular works of art from each denomination.

[yardsards]

but i stay silly! *←said in the most world-weary voice you ever did hear*

[fizzlepop-frog]

“but I stay silly!”

[sensiblereblogifposts]

Reblog you stay silly

[weaselle]

on it boss

[blackheartbiohazards]

"I don't want to read this" is totally valid.

"This is disgusting to me" is totally valid.

"I don't want to read this because it is disgusting to me" is totally valid.

"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.

[blackheartbiohazards]

"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.

[spellscarred]

Bro, blocking someone and then using their tag like this is, all offence, weak as fuck. Like all you had to say was, na bro I don't promote pedo protags on this here blog, because I wholly agree with the premise of your argument given contexts (i.e., writing abusive relationships to show the evils, great; writing abusive relationships to show the romance, yikes).

This response is so, so comically shitty within the context of that tag, oh my god.

[blackheartbiohazards]

"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.

[blackheartbiohazards]

"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.

[blackheartbiohazards]

"Censorship of some topics in fiction and art is good and I would be happy if it were to be enacted in a way I approved of"

and

"some things should be banned from ever being written or read about in fiction"

are both authoritarian viewpoints to hold and express, even if you don't have the power to enact them.

If you hold these viewpoints you are holding authoritarian viewpoints.

[averageidiotenby]

DUDE IT’S PEDO FICS EVERYBODY THINKS THEY’RE NASTY

[blackheartbiohazards]

Let me explain this to you in simple terms.

Something being nasty is not a good reason to ban fiction about it.

If we accept that "something being nasty is a good reason to bad fiction about it" then we give a foot in the door for all the people who truly, genuinely believe that queer people are nasty to ban all queer literature.

This is not about defending bad people this is about defending the freedom of good people from tyranny, you moron.

[kawaii-pigeon]

I think if you take it to its logical extreme. Say, banning people from writing stories of sexual abuse. That could then be said "well ANY talk about sexual abuse is bad."

And from that, you could ban books that talk about it irl. Or books like how to recover after being abuse. If its not something to be discussed AT ALL.

[plague-of-insomnia]

The fact that I’ve seen this post in some form on my dash like 100x and each time there’s new idiots who do not get that you can’t have *some* censorship.

Either you’re for it or you aren’t.

The moment you agree that something should never, ever exist in fiction is the moment that anything can be banned.

Remember a while back how Tumblr banned a bunch of tags, including many popular innocuous ones that even people who are for censorship used and were upset about?

When censorship happens, stuff YOU like can and will be banned. That’s how it works.

Remember how a bunch of people had their accounts terminated here only last year for writing about their own sexual abuse?

When you ban “pedo” topics, say, any talk of child sexual abuse in any form, that means people can no longer write about their own experiences. It means people cannot educate others so they can learn how to protect themselves or get help from these situations.

Censorship is authoritarian. Full stop.

Even if “everyone” agrees something is “gross” and “shouldn’t exist,” that does not fucking matter.

Do you know who generally believes queer people are gross and shouldn’t exist??

The same people who are banning books left and right solely because they have queer characters or relationships.

The same people who attack and kill queer folk for simply exisiting.

This is not just some fandom matter or a case of being chronically online.

Protecting freedom of expression is essential, and if you do not get that, I don’t know what to say to you.

[scientia-rex]

And the people who keep bringing up child sex abuse as a reason for censorship are doing it very specifically because everyone feels like then they HAVE to agree with the person in favor of censorship.

It’s not that there isn’t widespread societal agreement on this. It’s that they want you backed into a rhetorical corner where you feel compelled to agree with them.

[ruffboi-mags]

Also, like, we KNOW how this shit shakes out in fandom because it's happened before.

In 2007, Livejournal capitulated to the "pedophilia and sex crimes!" cries of (hate group) Warriors 4 Innocence, and you know what communities got shut down? Slashfic communities. Sexual assault survivor support communities. Authors who'd written non-smut m/m fic even got caught up in it. It was DEVASTATING to fandom spaces. I think pretty much everyone knew at least one person whose account was literally DELETED, or were a member of a community that was wiped off the map because they were considerate enough to include topics like "sexual assault" or "BDSM" in the profiles under the badly-named category of "interests" to indicate that posts on said blogs or communities may include discussion of things like that. Even if it was for a SUPPORT group. And it was because a group of religious bigots came to LJ and said essentially "EVERYONE thinks it's gross and that it's promoting CSA, we should ban it."

Like, strikethrough and boldthrough were a large part of what propelled AO3 out of a more unfocused conversation on one person's blog about hosting a site INTENDED for fandom content, into being an actual archive and nonprofit. And it's a large part of why you won't find AO3 banning topics that you find "gross".

Censorship is authoritarian and it will ALWAYS have more collateral damage than you can imagine.

[nyxelestia]

Going to add that fiction which had sexual abuse and communities which played around with it as a writing topic are the very things that protected me from irl sexual abuse when I was a teenager. I was in a dicey situation, and realized that while my situation did not match up to any of the superficial or textbook cases mentioned in passing (if at all) through school, it matched up a LOT to what I'd learned about irl sexual abuse through works of fiction and the rhetoric of my communities. I got out of that situation and dodged what was, in retrospect, one hell of a nasty bullet. If it hadn't been for that "nasty" fiction and those "nasty" communities, I would very likely have been abused, and subject to further violence spiraling out from that abuse.

[benjis-house-boat]

you can’t have *some* censorship.

[the-real-seebs]

Yup! It really is, in fact, pretty much that simple:

"I don't think anyone should be allowed to read or write this because it is disgusting to me" is authoritarian.

[madsciencepottery]

You have been visited by the twocumber. May you receive twofold luck in the coming days

[txttletale]

sorry for [remembering a tumblr post about expressing gratitude instead of apologising to make the interaction more positive for the other person] i mean thank you for having a boyfriend who was so easy to run over withmy car and reverse over three times maybe four

[wingsofhcpe]

get your fancy result from an incredible selection of (mostly pathetic, slutty or autistic, or perhaps all 3) blorbos, hand-picked by yours

Made my first uquiz during an online class bc I was bored. Feel free to take it and share! Rb with your results in the tags if you wanna, I'm curious to see what y'all get!

[oursongaboutclouds]

i don't know who he is, but the resemblance is uncanny, dare i say. he is me, i am him. wow. what a description.

😶

[sugaroto]

... I should say that I just found out yesterday that some guy from uni is scared by the way I look at him apparently 😭 (there's a reason I swear)

I dont think Im scary but its pretty spot on for almost everything 😭 except the mommy issues

[wingsofhcpe]

GDSJJDJSJJF Arlecchino--

use your Scary Privilege 🤭

[fell8999]

Ooooooo I got this one, interesting. (idk this character at all LOL)

[ryan-sometimes]

It’s so sad that students are now relying so heavily on AI for writing essays because they’re missing out on the best part of writing an essay which is when you’re a few paragraphs in and you just reach that flow state where your thought process becomes one with the essay and you’re slamming the keys so hard that you’re on the verge of destroying your laptop. I used to get high off of that shit

[pragnificent]

This is Money Snake. She only appears every 312 years. 

If you reblog her picture within the next twenty-five seconds you will have good luck and fortune for the rest of your life. 

[thingsamylikes]

I reblogged her late last year and my 2024 has been very satisfying work-wise and (secure enough to not stress out) money-wise so far. Money Snake is wise and good.

[lilacfarm]

kinda feel bad for millennials who don’t know that Harry Potter is almost a hate symbol now. Imagine that happening to any other beloved childhood media

[mossdftba]

How do people not know?

[mifs]

a lot of millennials know only the bare surface level of it (jkr = transphobe = bad) but dont really know much further than that so theyre like Okay so its fine if you just pirate the books and dont buy merch! Its fine! Im still a ravenclaw though!

[biracy]

This is already over and I'm not Directly involved* but I also think it's prob important to mention that the full extend of JK Rowling's transphobia is really often EXTREMELY downplayed. Transphobia is a form of bigotry not treated with a lot of seriousness and very flagrant and often violent displays of transphobia are seen as "acceptable" or "normal" by enough people (moreso than a lot of other forms of bigotry I would argue; I seriously think "famous children's book author thinks homosexuality is a mental illness on par with pedophilia" would be treated WAY more seriously than "famous children's book author thinks transgenderism is a mental illness on par with pedophilia" because most people literally do think being trans is a mental illness) for JKR's transphobia to be reported on mostly as "the trans community Disagrees with some of JK Rowling's statements" in its most neutral state and "can you believe the crazy pronoun mob is trying to CANCEL Harry Potter just because of a GENERATIONAL DIVIDE?" in its most nefarious. The idea that JK Rowling "just said a few things wrong and didn't use totally up-to-date language" is STILL how most cis gays especially above a certain age think about "the JK Rowling drama". The actual reality, which is that JK Rowling has spent years and years of her life not only donating to anti-trans orgs, not only publishing thinkpieces about irreversible damage and tomboy extinction and rapists in women's bathrooms, but spending basically every day on Twitter arguing with pro-trans tweets with literally three views (not likes, views), just is not reported on by mainstream media outlets. Cis people continue to treat "the JK Rowling discourse" as crazy triggered snowflakes blowing a few out-of-context comments made years ago out of proportion because they hate Harry Potter/women/family values/etc., and not more akin to the "Kanye West said he loves Hitler and somehow basically nothing has happened to his career" type situation it actually is. I just don't know how "canceled" someone really is if they still own a fucking theme park. I feel confident in saying that there is not a single trans person on this Earth who is as influential and successful as JK Rowling continues to be.

TL;DR millennials and older still manage to "not know" about JK Rowling (and by extension Harry Potter, because unlike most other "canceled authors" JK Rowling has outright said that she considers any and all mildly positive engagement with her work to be a signal of support of her ideas about trans people; I need to emphasize that this is Not Common and also not the actions of someone who got taken out of context by the crazy woke mob) because transphobia is so undervalued as an actual serious force of bigotry that mainstream media does not report on JK Rowling as a very serious and devoted bigot, in perhaps the most extreme example of "only trans people are expected to care about and notice that this is happening"

[headspace-hotel]

I think many people are just not online enough to be aware. Probably most people have heard about some kind of controversy with her in passing, but most controversies with celebrities are a whole lot of nothing, so they assume the same.

[yeonchi]

Koei Warriors Release List

This is the last main Koei Warriors Excel Guide I'll be making a post on. This, of course, is a list of all DW, SW and WO game releases going back to the first Dynasty Warriors game in 1997.

All Japan, USA and Europe release dates are listed and sortable. The list can also be filtered by console or series (through the Game Name columns).

The Koei Warriors Release List can be found here. Also check out the folder of Koei Warriors Excel Guides for more guides, including some that haven't been released as posts.

[derinthescarletpescatarian]

Oh good I'm not the only one who noticed I thought I was going insane. 90% of the stuff that people seem to want to automate with LLMs to 'revolutionise [X] industry' was already being automated much better with bots, which is depressing because before this wave of LLMs we were all complaining about how shitty all the bots make everything when they're used to do things that shouldn't be automated, but now even a misimplemented non-AI bot is a comparative relief.

[hollowboobtheory]

doomerism is just bootlicking btw

[hollowboobtheory]

I need yall to remember. "There's no point in resisting" is not a rational thought and if you really believe that you need to pay more attention. they just ran ice out of Charlotte. people have begun invoking the second amendment more and more. we have communities fighting back the gestapo and winning. trump is hemorrhaging support. his top sycophant just resigned after tearing into him. idc if her motivations are less than pure-hearted, the fact that she's seeing the writing on the wall and jumping ship is a good sign. articles of impeachment have been reintroduced and this time the sponsor wants to force a vote. the epstein files have got them scrambling. and if I might repeat my point from earlier, cities and communities are successfully fighting off ice. they are literally retreating. he doesn't have the courts, he doesn't have the police, that's why he needs ice in the first place. and he's losing the congress and senate.

you guys see that video of rednecks chasing ice into the woods during hunting season? you are the ones falling into line. you are the ones kissing the ring.

[hollowboobtheory]

as chappell roan said: it's not over til it's over. and it's never over.