Community Development in the Philippine Context
As we observed on our visit to the areas surrounding Timog Avenue, development as a result of Globalisation is highly ineffective in the reduction of poverty. Timog Avenue itself is a seemingly thriving business/entertainment district. Tall office buildings, restaurants and bars are smattered amongst a sea of well-dressed businessmen and working class citizens. However, this setting serves as an illusory oasis of wealth and good development in a country that promotes Globalisation at the forefront of its economic policies.
It takes only a short walk, just one block away, to see a blatant situation of abject poverty. Crowded slum housing that packs itâs residents like sardines in a tin. Men, women and children standing idly by, perhaps still waiting for the benefits of development which they can see towering over their shanties.
It is from this example that we can see that the term âdevelopmentâ is subjective to the point of absolute ambiguity. Development in the Philippine context means an increase of wealth for the 1% richest and a widening gap for the 75% of Filipinos under the poverty line. Current estimates project that by the year 2050, an astounding 50% of residents in Metro Manila will be living in slums.
The Globalisation movement, that is, the deregulation of the economy on the global market, has never and will never consider the needs of the poorest in society. Whatever the per cent increase in the nationsâ GDP, the supposed âtrickle downâ effect of wealth distribution will be ineffective in reducing poverty.
Poor Filipinos, like the ones we saw around Timog Ave., lie outside of the formal economic sector, yet it is the ultimate irony that they serve as the backbone to the service industry that keeps the Philippine economy afloat. They work as street vendors, drivers, kasambahay (maids), sex-workers and countless other exploitative jobs that serve the bourgeoisie. It is exploitative in the sense that they have no workerâs rights and are paid a pittance because they are classed as âinformal workersâ.
The Philippine Government serves as a corrupt and elitist institution that does all but nothing to address the poverty situation of millions of Filipinos. The absence of a comprehensive welfare sector and minimal investment into people-centred development programs leaves an enormous gap that is currently filled by NGOs, Church and other peopleâs organisations. Until the time in which the Government is held accountable to transparent modes of governance, it will be an uphill battle for the multitudes of poor to achieve basic human rights.Â








