Battling With Feminism: Gender Equality and Gender Identity
Feminism has been an interest of mine since my late teens. With a personal history of young sexual activity and a society of increasingly sexually aware pre-pubescent girls and boys I have come to attribute a lot of blame to the media and overly-accessible porn, arguments which I will explore more thoroughly in later posts.
In this particular post, however, I would like to tackle an article that I read yesterday on the "over-sexualisation" of women and try to explain my point that there is a difference between gender identity and gender equality. I am tired of people trying to create some sort of "genderless" society; gender roles are important to how society, families and relationships function - and there is nothing wrong with them.
To give context, this article was trying to demonstrate the "over-sexualisation" of women by recreating Miranda Kerr's GQ shoot and interview, but rather, with a male. Naturally, when posing in the same manner as Victoria Secret Model, Kerr, and re-quoting statements expressing a bi-curious nature of the model from the male perspective, readers reacted in a different manner. I'm arguing that this does not show an inequality.
Yes, society has created "femininity" and "masculinity". Within these two constraints women and men are sexy for different reasons, a man in a suit is just as sexy as a woman in lingerie, and both sexes are sexualised in this way. Just because this man doesn't look as sexy as Kerr in a sodden white vest with his legs apart does not show that women are over-sexualised in society, it merely shows that different sexes aren't sexualised in the same way.
If we want to look at how women are over-sexualised in the society we live in we need to look at how sexualisation is vast, accessible and an every day challenge. For example, women in underwear on the back of buses advertising Scrap Metal Merchandisers (see Eric France Metals). Or Kelly Brooke's billboard advertisement for the London Olympics - naked. Online there is a vast amount of porn, 95% of which is for a male audience, that glamourises women and is accessible to anyone, any age, for free. Lynx Adverts, lads magazines, music videos among many more also show sexualised women.
So although I don't disagree with the premise of the article that, indeed, women are oversexualised, can we please stop confusing equality and identity. Just because a male model cannot pose in the same way doesn't mean inequality, it is the fact that sexualised male models (in the form that they are sexualised as men) is far, far less vast than sexualised women.