Installation work by Julia Sinelnikova.
ojovivo

No title available

bliss lane
No title available
noise dept.
Game of Thrones Daily

Kiana Khansmith

if i look back, i am lost
h
Doug Jones
KIROKAZE
NASA

Love Begins
The Stonewall Inn
d e v o n

tannertan36

titsay

PR's Tumblrdome
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
The Bright Sessions
seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Panama
seen from Croatia
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from Bolivia

seen from United States

seen from Uruguay
@franci-baggins-blog
Installation work by Julia Sinelnikova.
Chiharu Shiota, Uncertain journey, 2016
Phil Sims
Before James Turrel #skyspace #pantheon
The Problem With Museum Tourism
As many of you know, I really like art and museums and going to museums to look at art. Especially Renaissance art. And I was in Italy just last week, and while I was in my beloved Florence I visited the Galleria degli Uffizi, which gives me both great joy and anger at the same time. I feel compelled to explain because tumblr, of all the social media websites that I use, will most likely understand the most.
I live in New York, and I regularly go to the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Unlike in Europe, American art museums are not tourist attractions, but somehow European ones are. In New York, tourists do indeed come to museums - but these tourists genuinely care about what it is they’re seeing.
In Europe, especially in Italy (and, I’ve heard, in France - I didn’t notice this at the Prado in Spain), tourists include artworks on their lists of things they must see, and so book their tickets and rush in and rush out just to check off that they saw Botticelli or the David or the Mona Lisa or whatever. But these works are not treated as artworks!! These people don’t know what the hell it is they’re looking at!! (I mean, sure, Michelangelo is impressive in his works but the David is not much more art historically important than any other David made by any other Renaissance artist, like Donatello, and nobody goes to the Bargello to see that!) And to prove that they were there and they saw the art, they have to take a picture.
Okay. I understand taking pictures of sculptures. For one, I often can’t find good photos of the sculptures at the angles that I want to see them. But with a painting, there are many problems. There’s always a glare; you can never frame it correctly; you will never get it the right way. Just go downstairs and buy a fucking postcard if you want the photo so bad!!!! And since everyone wants a photo, if you try and go up to look at the actual painting from less than a few feet away, not only do you look a little insane, but also people start yelling at you to get out of their photo! You cannot see the brush strokes in a photo. Let me get close up to my favorite painting and go buy a postcard if you want the photo so bad.
It just really annoys me. I don’t think that art should be a tourist attraction. The people who come to museums to take photos to prove they were there are not the ones who should be going to the museums. In the Prado, photos aren’t allowed, and I didn’t notice this phenomenon at all - should we ban photos in museums? Would that change it? I don’t know. But I just wanted to put this out there (sorry it’s so angry) so perhaps the word will spread and less people will do this.
Gerhard Richter, Fuji, 1996
Dark nouveau by Malleus http://www.malleusdelic.com/site/
Canova vs. Abramović
Falkland Islands by Sebastião Salgado (2009)
Some of the best gallery shows happening in Chelsea right now are sculpture exhibitions. We take a tour of five shows to catch this spring in New York’s ever-inventive art district
Gerhard Richter :: Elbe 2 , 1957
You don’t have to look hard to find recent indicators of the former in American popular culture. In March, SeaWorld announced that they would stop breeding orca whales in an effort to placate their increasingly vocal opponents and regain some of the visitors lost in the wake of Blackfish, the 2013 documentary detailing what can rightly be called the horrors of captivity for the sea mammals. There are now many laws on the books against animal abuse, and events like dogfighting and horseracing have been made illegal or otherwise rendered unpopular as the ethics around the use of animals for human hijinks continues to shift. While we’re hardly turning into a nation of vegans, there is a widespread and growing awareness of animals as thinking, feeling entities with some kind of claim on their own lives.
In the art world, however, things are a little different. Live animals in art are nothing new—famous works like Joseph Beuys’s I Like America and America Likes Me, featuring a wild coyote, and Jannis Kounellis’s recently restaged Arte Povera classic Untitled (12 Horses) dot 20th-century art history. But the past few years have seen a marked uptick in the number of artworks featuring actors from around the animal kingdom.
Le charme discret de la bourgeoisie - movie poster sketch by Antonio Fernandez Reboiro (1975)
Yago Hortal, KL40, 2011
Tokujin Yoshioka.
Luigi Russolo (1885-1947), Profumo / Perfume, 1910.
oil on canvas, 64,5 X 65,5 cm
Yayoi Kusama (b.1929), All the Eternal Love I Have for the Pumpkins, 2016.