My friend Ina found this lovely spot in Sweden to read “Imperial Bedrooms” by Bret Easton Ellis. ❤️ 📖
Thank you for this beautiful pic, Ina!
Claire Keane
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

Janaina Medeiros
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
KIROKAZE
YOU ARE THE REASON
sheepfilms
art blog(derogatory)

No title available
we're not kids anymore.
Three Goblin Art
No title available

izzy's playlists!
tumblr dot com

No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi
Cosmic Funnies
styofa doing anything

oozey mess

pixel skylines
seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia
seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from Lithuania

seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Pakistan

seen from Italy
seen from Australia
seen from Poland
seen from Comoros

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from China

seen from Sweden

seen from India

seen from Iraq

seen from Tunisia
seen from Nepal
@fuckyeahbreteastonellis
My friend Ina found this lovely spot in Sweden to read “Imperial Bedrooms” by Bret Easton Ellis. ❤️ 📖
Thank you for this beautiful pic, Ina!
Is evil something you are? Or is it something you do?
Less Than Zero (1987)
“I’m gonna try to do something right for once. I mean it. I just want you to wish me luck wether you believe me or not”
Bret Easton Ellis, late ‘80s - NYC
Behind the scenes of American Psycho, 2000.
Patrick Bateman’s morning routine, on a t-shirt
What happened to taboo art? Art that challenged our preconceptions about men, women, or sex? What happened to mischief in movies? What happened to the irresponsible?
Bret Easton Ellis (via clash-official)
Bret Easton Ellis, American Psycho
New B.E.E podcast with filmmaker Mark Duplass
From Bret Easton Ellis’s FB page:
THE B.E.E. PODCAST: Mark Duplass and the future of film, his midlife crisis, the end of the cinematic experience and the death of the middle-class movie, independent filmmakers as endangered species and being your own enabler, on being a white cisgender privileged member of the patriarchy, how to make money within a crumbling system, on being a melancholy nostalgic person, becoming a member of The Academy, starring on The League as sweat money, terrible life lessons from studio moviemaking, buying into the victimization narrative, Comrade Snowflake demanding only nice people make art, the earnest self-importance of celebrity narcissism, Sundance ideology trumping aesthetics, Humpday vs The Overnight and gay progress, the development process at HBO and being overpaid by them, Netflix as savior, the romantic hopelessness of Blue Jay, admiring The Coen Brothers and Bob Rafelson, Sarah Paulson, Author: The JT LeRoy Story, Nate Parker's acquittal and the personal and professional disaster of The Birth of A Nation, hysterical feminism, Feelings Are Not Facts, art is not created by a democracy, Moonlight, the cancellation of Togetherness as liberation, collaboration with brother Jay, John Cazale as coolest thing, fear of failing as an artist...Available on iTunes and PodcastOne:
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/id753552884
I write books to relieve myself of pain. That’s the prime motivator to write. Period.
Bret Easton Ellis (The Art of Fiction, No 216). (via the-library-and-step-on-it)
American Psycho.
economies of luxury
just read and finished bret easton ellis’ the informers, and it’s an interesting book when it’s not soporific. it’s definitely not a fantastic book - the writing is sloppy at parts, the literary elements not woven intricately enough, but there’s a few interesting things here and there that are worth commenting on.
the informers is fundamentally fascinated by what we call the economies of excess and luxury. it’s obsessed with obsession, with reflections and symbols and luxury. the characters that populate the book, when they do surface for awareness, are mirages within this rich landscape. the choosing of los angeles – the city of glitz and glamour, is so overt for its associations to vacuity and shallowness that it is probably the first thing that stands out when you read it.
what ellis does, and sometimes does admirably, is juxtapose the economies of luxury against the transactions of the inner soul. there is a price to pay, he implicitly argues, for buying into the lifestyle of the decadent and artificial. perhaps one loses the ability to form meaningful connections - as most people begin existing in a state of self-obsession, pleasure the only numbed goal of the mind. connections that form are so tenuous, so devoid of emotional rapport, that they fracture as easily as they are built. he does this best of course, in the stories that show the descent from a full-bodied soul to an emaciated and starved person: “letter’s from l.a” and “the fifth wheel” come to mind. the former because it shows the gradation and erosion of anne, the character’s, inner landscape, substituted and then replaced entirely by one that seeks stimulation above all else, the latter for it’s sudden appearance of violence, not muted nor ellipted (as ellis is so prone to do in the informers), but placed front and center – gory and transgressive and yet all the more horrifying because the main character is so numb that he doesn’t grasp the totality of his actions, he only wishes for it to be over, apathetic to the moral sin he has committed.
structurally, of course, the economies of luxury succeed in demonstrating emptiness, in a sense harkening to what baudrillard termed the desert of the real. people seek pleasure, seek markers and symbols of having made it in the economic and capitalist system – but the achievement of knowing people like michael jackson is all the more impoverished and unreal for the fact that everyone knows it. everyone wears the latest brands, everyone has a trust fund baby. in essence - nothing can be filling if we are fed fever dreams. of course, there are characters aware or perhaps cognizant on some level that they are experiencing soul death - self-medication and drugging pervades through the novel. this medication as a deficient symbol of healing, as a substitution for the lack of meaningful events and emotional life, is explored and perused and subsequently found wanting. characters bleed into each other: ellis chooses to rarely name his cast, to show in absentia their individual lives, as they all seek the same lifestyle, the goal of having it all - cash, clothes, sex, drugs, beauty. there is almost a mocking, satirical way in which he uses the personal perspective, as if he asks, if none of us live our own individual lives, then what’s the point of distinguishing ourselves, calling myself “I”? indeed, one of the most effective parts of ellis’ critique is his usage of the first person, and his blurring of the various individual “I” characters into a barely distinguishable melange. in it, he inverts the act of self definition, naming, and turns it into a hazy placeholder.
where ellis fails, unfortunately, is in message. not all the stories of the informers is tightly written, not all of them seem braced for a punch. the blurriness of the various personas instead encourages reader diffidence. in places, the story seems poised to describe nothing more than the heat illusions that plague the story’s characters, and no amount of technical handwaving can revive a plot or message that, from the very beginning, had no meaning to begin with. if one came here to look for social consciousness, a social commentary – ellis can sometimes leave readers disappointed. it’s certainly no american psycho, at least.
I am going to listen to a three hour interview between two people I don’t like very much (Bret Easton Ellis & Eli Roth) talking about something I love (horror movies).
Will I survive? Will I come away with a better understanding? Will I not like them more? Will I scream internally for the whole three hours?
Stay tuned for more from “Know What You Hate and Why”
Bret Easton Ellis and Alex Israel. We now know the reason for Bret Easton Ellis’s high-profile presence with Alex Israel at Art Basel Miami Beach this year.
I realize that I would rather spend my money on drugs than on art supplies
Bret Easton Ellis -love u (via deathlyparasite)