Jantee Shaaban
Monterey Bay Aquarium

if i look back, i am lost

Discoholic 🪩
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

pixel skylines
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
sheepfilms

Love Begins
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

No title available
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
RMH
Show & Tell

No title available
dirt enthusiast

Kiana Khansmith
Misplaced Lens Cap

JVL

Janaina Medeiros
AnasAbdin

seen from Iraq
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from Canada
seen from Portugal

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
seen from United States
@gambomen
Jantee Shaaban
Nalgas al aire
🇨🇱
🇨🇿 Vlastimil Kuzel - @vlastimil_kuzel
The internet is under attack.
The controversial bill package FOSTA-SESTA has already impacted sites like Microsoft, Reddit, Craigslist, Google, and Tumblr. Many smaller sites have shut down OVER NIGHT - and that’s just the start.
President Trump signed into law a set of controversial bills intended to make it easier to cut down on illegal sex trafficking online. Both bills — the House bill known as FOSTA, the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, and the Senate bill, SESTA, the Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act — have been hailed by advocates as a victory for sex trafficking victims.
But the bills also poke a huge hole in a famous and longstanding “safe harbor” rule of the internet: Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act. Usually shorthanded as “Section 230” and generally seen as one of the most important pieces of internet legislation ever created, it holds that “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” In other words, Section 230 has allowed the internet to thrive on user-generated content without holding platforms and ISPs responsible for whatever those users might create.
But FOSTA-SESTA creates an exception to Section 230 that means website publishers would be responsible if third parties are found to be posting ads for prostitution — including consensual sex work — on their platforms. The goal of this is supposed to be that policing online prostitution rings gets easier. What FOSTA-SESTA has actually done, however, is create confusion and immediate repercussions among a range of internet sites as they grapple with the ruling’s sweeping language.
Model: Donick Slaick
Photography: Felix Moo
Edited: Gabriel Santos
Repost