Y'know, my first instinct would not be to cast Kermit as Battler, but on the other hand you do have to cast Miss Piggy as Beatrice, so I'm not sure there's any other optio--
--wait. No hang on. Kermit can be Ronove like he's supposed to be- Battler, trying to prove that this is a crime possible for humans, is the one human actor.
Three Pieces of Webfiction I Have Read of Late, and Some Short Reviews Thereof
Last month, I read three pieces of web fiction that I enjoyed enormously - Chili and the Chocolate Factory: Fudge Revelation, Cockatiel x Chameleon, and How the Questing Beast Chased, and Caught, Her Own Tail. Below the cut, I have written some reviews of each, which together proved to be long enough that I've put them under a read-more. The executive summary, if you're so interested, is that all of these are excellent and that I'd highly recommend them to any interested party.
Chili and the Chocolate Factory: Fudge Revelation by Gazemaize (2019-2020)
People will on occasion praise a work's prose by saying "I didn't know you could use words that way." I suspect this is often meant somewhat metaphorically, praising an evocative turn of phrase or an illuminating simile.
When I say that Chili and the Chocolate Factory: Fudge Revelation caused me to say "I didn't know you could use words that way" you should take that literally. Specifically, these lines, from the start of Chapter 8:
One million people were gathered in front of the gates to Wonkaland, which was either in England or America. Nobody really knew. The sky was a dark gr[redacted]y col[redacted]r.
I mean quite literally that it had not occurred to me that doing something like that was an option, a valid string. There was something mildly revelatory about the whole experience.
This is quite possibly one of the funniest things I've ever read; there's a constant pulse of jokes, delivered all in a perfect deadpan. And it's mostly puns and absurdism, which as everyone knows are the best forms of humor. I ended up ranking this as the best piece of media I consumed during the month of April, and it takes that place largely on the virtue of its humor.
It is also at times quite chilling. The depiction of the now-adult Charles Bucket, molded into a new form by decades spent with only Wonka as an influence, is easily one of the better villains I've come across in webfiction; the scenes from Keerthi's perspective are perhaps some of my favorite in the book for this reason.
This is easily top-shelf stuff, with the meditations on writing and what, if anything, authors owe their audiences being an excellent inclusion. It does end rather abruptly, but that is, of course, part of the gag.
Cockatiel x Chameleon by Bavitz (2022)
(An initial note: while this is not a pornographic story, or even really a story about pornography, it is a story that contains a large amount of explicit sexual content -- the AO3 tags are not a joke)
Since coming across Bavitz's work sometime last summer, I've been slowly working my way through his oeuvre, with this being the last of his original (as in, non-fanfiction) novels that I got around to. To at least some extent, this was because I was putting it off -- not due to the content of the work, but due to a review I read some months back. Fortunately, my concerns proved to be unfounded, and I quite enjoyed this.
Bavitz has always been highly adept at creating interesting characters, and there's no shortage of them here: Royce Ru, Somebody's Little Sister, and Mimmy Wowzers are all top-notch; Mimmy especially stands a high likelihood of being the next inductee into the pantheon of "Bavitz characters who have left an indelible mark upon my psyche" alongside Maximillion Ackerman and Miranda Van Zandt.
The use of physical space as a metaphor for virtual space is by no means unprecedented, but the particular depiction of Van der Gramme's discord server was quite striking -- I was reminded of the Smoking Room from Umineko (which might have been a direct inspiration), as well as the Ashtray Maze from Control. As noted by other reviewers, however, the relative lack of characters from VdG's server was notable, and left it feeling less lively than a server for such a figure would be.
There are a number of sexually explicit scenes, as might be expected given the subject matter. It's quite clear that these were not written to be titillating, and while this is the correct call (actual erotic content would be wildly dissonant with the tone of the rest of the novel) I found it left them -- with one very notable exception -- feeling rather light on content, and I found them more dull than anything else, though I imagine that at least part of this is due to the length of these scenes. Still, it's possible I'll find something more in them should I end up reading this again.
One little detail of no account I noticed was the repeated occurrence of the number 753 (once in Part I Chapter 10 as the Candy Crush level Papimon beats, and twice in Part I Chapter 12, during the I-can't-believe-it's-not-NieR-Automata RP sequence, as part of a serial number (VLS-753) and part of a speed (3,753 m/s)). This doesn't mean much of anything -- other than that coming up with truly random numbers is hard -- but it was something I noticed, so here it is.
How the Questing Beast Chased, and Caught, Her Own Tail by Pseudoactual Mahou (2024-Present)
I've got somewhat less to say about this than the other two, but this should not be mistaken for a lack of endorsement; it's largely an artifact of the fact that this is ongoing at time of writing. This is a Puella Magi Madoka Magica fanfiction, and one of the best pieces of fanfiction I have read.
If there's one thing that ties these works together, it's having good prose. And of the three works listed, I think this very well might have the best prose of all of them. I've found myself re-reading the first chapter again and again, not something I normally do.
The rendition of Kyubey, the viewpoint character (most of the time), is top-notch, and easily some of the best xenofiction I've read. From an initial state of a collection of maximizing functions, one can chart her slow progression towards personhood chapter by chapter, and it's fascinating to watch.
I was also quite impressed by the original character of Pink; the description of her cavernous base of operations under a replica of the Sagrada Familia is I think one of my favorite parts of the novel.
This is a romance, and a story with very subtle character work. I have never been a deft hand at such kinds of psychological interpretation, though, so I had the persistent (if slight) sense while I was reading Questing Beast that I was missing something, that some vital element was going over my head; not in the motivations of action, but more in how they are to be interpreted by the audience. I'll pay special attention to these matters on my next readthrough, I imagine.
Another thing I'll be on the lookout for in future readings: allusions. I caught two of them (Kyubey being a "shape rotator" in Chapter 1, and the "white-hot allostatic loads" fired by Pink's weapon); I'd be highly surprised if these were the only two, so there are likely several that have passed beneath my notice, which is all the makings for a fun literary scavenger hunt.
It also has the highest usage rate of the word 'cabbity' of any story I've yet read, and really, what more is there to say?
did belle and the beast hear ms. potts singing to them, when they were dancing to the title song in the ballroom? she called him a beast to his face, it's in the song! i know she got turned into a teapot and was probably harboring some resentment over that but it was still a rude (and counterproductive!) gesture at that point
i have been brainstorming ideas for bad pixar direct to disney plus spinoff shows, i think i came up with some good ones:
ratatouille spinoff in the style of the pitt where the entire season is one really long busy shift at la ratatouille after their recent expansion (maybe they bought the old gusteau building?). i would have a side plot where emile is brought on as an apprentice chef (he controls that “WITH THIS THUMB” cook from the first movie who walked off in the first movie and didn’t want to be a cook anymore but he got hit by a car and is brain dead so emile has gotten used to puppeteering his body to live out his entire life for him, makes love to his wife, raises his children, eats his baguettes, etcetera) but remy catches him stealing food again and kicks him out until season 2. colette gets knocked out by ego’s crazy uncle. several mater cameos
sad true-to-life slow drama revealing that mater has been in car hospice for years and that every mater’s tall tale was nothing more than morphine-fueled delusions he tells lightning on zoom when they talk every day to keep his spirits up. i would have mater come through with an unexpected recovery and live but lightning would get hit by a (larger) car in a failed carjacking (which in this context is just a regular mugging) and die in the penultimate episode so you still get an unexpected waterworks ending
the incredibles, mr. incredible and dash and their new friend mater go on boys trip a la a goofy movie, dash learns and sometimes he needs to take the slow path, it’s worth it to stop and smell the flowers once in a while (or the oil filters, as mater adds! haha). there shouldn’t be a single scene in this show that doesn’t have mater in it
bug’s life 1 ½, we reveal that mater was watching the garden’s happening all along and directed it subtly from above like a god to send good fortune off the bugs without them ever knowing about it. the bird that ate hopper at the end was actually trained by mater and obeys his every command. the reason mater chooses not to reveal himself directly to the bugs is because he does not want to scare them into believing him, he wants them to worship him as a matter of free will, it’s very important to him
walle prequel series, mater was the one who destroyed the earth (and he invented walle and all the robots from lightyear too)
lightyear 1 ½ (mater was zurg too)
mater reacting every standup routine in richard pryor’s career, word for word
seven hours of a large rotating brown sphere overlaid on a static background. you occasionally hear a distorted audioclip of an elderly spanish woman (a former mexican supreme court judge) whispering “el mate es el horror ineludible” and similar comments.
mater goes to monster’s university (“I THOUGHT THE M IN MU STOOD FOR MATER!!!”), he doesn’t graduate
did we give up too soon on real time television shows because 24 sucked?
the pitt is the first live-action television show that has been strongly recommended to me in the last five years (that i wasn’t already aware about and planning to watch) by multiple people that did, when i watched it myself, end up being as good as everybody said it was.
The only specific gimmick that the pitt has over any other medical drama is that a) the writing is (mostly)* excellent; b) supposedly it is the most accurate medical drama created, if the fans can be believed; but most importantly c) each season of the pitt represents only a single long shift on an emergency floor, split between an ensemble cast.
this is such great competence porn. so much of this show is watching people do their jobs, patient after patient after patient after patient, boom boom boom boom. i was talking to a friend about what makes sports movies good and a big conclusion i believe is that they usually need (assuming they’re about the sport itself and not about the social mechanics surrounding it, a la moneyball) to have a lot of the actual sport in question shown, and to make all those moments as interesting as possible and distinct from each other; (the sports movie in question we were gassing up was umamusame, and as someone who’d played the game or watched the show i loved it, and so much of that was that the movie did well at having a bunch of different race scenes back to back and having them all feel very memorably unique from each other).
somebody in my family loved house md and i watched a decent amount growing up and by far the best part of the show was those scenes where they’d make house do clinic duty and this entire show is that! and they go out of their way to have so many different cases, some of them which get resolution and some of which end as abruptly as the dude who waits nine hours in the waiting room before storming out in episode 10 and punching a nurse on the way out before dropping his crumpled AMA form in her face or the patients who just disappear because they don’t want to get the bill, or simply because they get transferred to a different part of the hospital (it’s like if there was a cop show where every 2nd guy they chased made it to another jurisdiction and the cops actually acknowledged that and transferred responsibility appropriately instead of pushing back on it and continuing the case anyway).
i love how the show has almost no soundtrack, it perfectly strikes the balance between the viewer understanding that they are watching a hypothetically-maximally interesting day at the ER while still being, in many ways, just a regular day! i say this with both seasons, which take different approaches to solving the 24 problem (and if they keep this format up which i assume they will i wonder if they will resist the temptation to continually raise the stakes to the point of absurdity, hopefully so)
watch the pitt!
*occasionally there will be some bad whedon-esque level lines that slip through, especially during big emotional moments, but contrast it to say any other hospital that has ever aired other than scrubs and compared to the competition it’s killing it. (i’ve heard people try to blame noah wyle, the executive director/writer who also plays the lead, and i can confirm the correlation that most of the episodes he has a writing credit for are also the ones where it seems to dip, so i believe it, though i haven’t examined it closely.)
Ever since I was a very little kid, the main way I get to bed most nights is by having extended fantasies of alternative lives I live out in the time between when I shut my eyes and when I fall asleep (sometimes they continue in my dreams, but what makes it into dreamtime rarely if ever gets properly canonized later, though it does give me ideas that end up influencing the plot). I’ve probably had about fifty or sixty different storylines, about ten of which I finished off properly by giving them a proper ending, but they get abandoned once I get bored of them.
I have a document on my computer where I’ve written up casual descriptions of all of them, more than a few of which I’ve mined for writing ideas, and which I plan to mine more in the future.
Currently, I’m all in on this one called “Breakfast Investigator”. (This is all in the first-person and I usually don’t name any of my characters, so it feels strange to talk about Breakfast Investigator in the third-person, but know that I’m really talking about me here. I am Breakfast Investigator.)
So Breakfast Investigator is a forty-something Korean ex-paralympic archer who completely crashed out after winning the bronze in 2008 and after spending ten years on hard drugs finally got his act together and made a successful reviewbrah-esque YouTube channel where he reviews hotel breakfasts. Like reviewbrah he also wears a suit, but that’s only because he discovered that if he wears a nice suit and rolls into a hotel for breakfast nobody ever questions him about it or asks to see his room key, so he usually doesn’t have to stay at the hotel the night beforehand and can hit up about four or five a day sometimes if he feels like has the energy for it. He has trained his actual service dog to film him covertly while he eats (border collie, so not a stretch, they are the smartest dogs).
He didn’t get popular enough to make a livable income until post-COVID when he really blew up. Right now he’s in an active social media feud with Marriott Hotels (officially he’s banned from all of their properties, but he always manages to sneak his way back in, perhaps unrealistically, maybe I should have him actually get arrested soon) and an expy for that insane Shopping Cart guy who has a permanent beef with him following a tweet he made once after relapsing.
Most of the characters I end up focusing on are usually spin-offs of characters who have appeared in previous storylines, and my expectation is that the Shopping Cart expy will probably be next. I like the idea of isekai-ing him to a fantasy world and him having to learn a lesson about not harassing depressed old people for the content mill.
I am probably going to kill off Breakfast Investigator soon, sadly. I haven’t killed any of my protagonists off in over a year and if I don’t do it enough these things start to feel hollow, and since I like him so much it makes sense. Yeah, I get that BI is definitely more of a slice-of-life adventure but that’s the thing about slice-of-life, if you want to do it right, you have to give it weight sometimes. Probably going to have to kill off the dog too and it won’t even be at the same time, one will have to watch the other die choking on a poisoned breakfast sausage. I’m not looking forward to it at all.
hey found you through the Garfield story and I very much enjoyed it, as I look through your blog I continue to have a general amount of flabbergast
you strike me as vaguely similar to Jon Bois
Who are you?
thank you and have a good day
Remy!
I'm not, but I'm a huge fan of his! I'm planning on getting some novels out in the coming months, and two of them are very inspired by 17776 and Pretty Good.
Revolutionary Leo calls the Revolutionary support hotline after his daughter is kidnapped and gets lectured and told to go fuck himself because he doesn't remember the secret Revolutionary passwords.
There’s a lot I find annoying about this movie but this scene is the best and funniest mini-encapsulation of not just leftist but basically all political/intellectual gatekeeping I've ever seen. Feels like they brought on Robert Kurvitz just to write this bit, it's perfect.
I've been down on Leo as an actor since Killers of the Flower Moon (amazing movie, and he isn't terrible in it but he's the worst of anyone and was an obvious miscast IMO) but OBAA did a lot to redeem his ability in my eyes. If you're going to keep casting him, do it in more stuff like this where he's just a sad bumbling confused man constantly bumping into things, that's what he excels at.
9. David Vs Goliath, David
This movie sucks ass and is animated like an insurance commercial but they nailed the only scene in the movie that matters, so who cares.
My enjoyment is this 100% reliant on the detail that they decided to explicitly model Goliath's design, voice, and mannerisms on the TF2 Heavy (I don't mean a little, it's to the extent that this was a choice the people working on this made consciously, I do not think the Goliath they settled on would be anything like the way he is if not for the existence of TF2). It's so incongruent with every other choice the film makes it loops back around to being hilarious.
8. Post-Credit Behind-The-Scenes, Good Boy
Good Boy is the meme "horror movie starring the dog" movie, which ended being way better than I thought it would be; at the end of the theatrical release they had (what felt like) a surprise 10 minute behind-the-scenes of how the movie was filmed only by two people and a dog for $70,000 over the course of years, and that was worth the price of admission alone. They kept repeating, on a loop: Remember, Indy (the titular Good Boy) doesn't even know he's in a movie!
Sadly that clip isn't up anywhere even though the film's been out for awhile (presumably since it has a bunch of spoilers), but the movie itself is worth watching too. It's bolstered massively by the fact that they chose to make it a crisp 73 minutes, which I think didn't include the BTS bonus stuff; there are a lot of movies that I think would fit comfortably in that 50 to 75 minute space that seemed to get unnaturally chopped or elongated to fit different standards, ruining them. Good pacing (and dogs) are everything!
I'm looking forward to seeing what this director does next.
7. The Scene Where They Draw The Map, Demon Slayer: Infinity Castle
As someone who has never seen any of the rest of Demon Slayer (went with family), I strongly disliked this movie, possibly because I experienced it with the worst audience I have ever sat down to see a movie with but there's this one scene that happens amidst three hours of generic shonenslop fighting and boring flashbacks where a bunch of random characters you've never seen before are using magic telepathic ravens to map out a giant ever-expanding labyrinth from the outside and it was awesome!
Before you get mad at me, maybe it's a good movie if you've seen the rest of it and aren't surrounded by the loudest most annoying thirty-something old weebs in the world! I don't know, it's very possible! That one scene was sick.
I also loved the mid-credits scene where I yelled at them to go fuck themselves as we were walking out, but the payoff wasn't worth the struggle to get there and that might have been a theater-exclusive. A big thanks to the manager of that AMC who literally shrugged at me and walked away when I went to complain after asking them politely to shut up during the movie for the fourth time
6. Family Scene, Rental Family
This was one of the sappiest tryhard feel-good movies I've ever seen but I like Brendan Fraiser a lot and there's this one scene at the end where they reveal a dynamic about one character's family, and I thought it was a great little twist that added a lot.
In retrospect I think it was very obvious and most people probably got it immediately, but it worked on my oblivious ass so I can't complain.
5. The Ending, Weapons
Best chase scene of all time. Not spoiling it for you if you haven't seen it, but it's perfect. Oh so Dahlian in the best possible way.
4. That One Scene in Fixed, Fixed
Genndy Tarkovsky (Dexter's Laboratory, Powerpuff Girls, Samurai Jack, Primal, Symbionic Titan, Clone Wars) is one of only a tiny handful of creatives in the Western animation sphere who has enough established creative and commercial success (he also made the Hotel Transylvania movies, which mostly stink but made a bazillion dollars) to probably get just about any project he could ever want greenlit.
He finally decided to cash in on this lifetime of hard-earned clout and blew the entire wad on a beautiful traditionally-animated 2D movie about dog balls, and they'll probably never let him make another movie ever again for the rest of his life because of it. Development for this thing started in 2018, he had the idea in 2009. This was the result of a dream.
If you want to watch Fixed, watch Fixed, and the whole movie you'll be saying "Oh, this is the scene, this must be scene Remy warned me about", and no, no no no, you'll know the scene when you get to it, and then you'll realize only minutes oh NO NO NO NO THAT WASN'T THE SCENE, THAT WASN'T THE SCENE. This song and dance will repeat itself on loop as the film regresses further into madness.
I'm not fucking with you when I say that in spite of the movie's writing being (heh) dogshit, the two leads have genuinely great chemistry. I unironically ship the two main dogs from Fixed. Thanks Genndy!
3. Guy Who Shits Himself To Death in The Long Walk, The Long Walk
I probably had never been so excited for any adaptation of a movie from a novel in my entire life as I was with the Long Walk, and when this happened twelve minutes into the movie, oh my god, I was so happy, I was so so happy, the people making this really knew what they were doing and they truly cared about it.
Basically other death scene from this movie is also on this list but this is the one that matters most to me. I feel bad for anybody who didn't get to experience this in theaters.
I wish this actor a long and fruitful career, and a blessed life.
2. Rain Race Scene, 100M
Just a bunch of dudes getting ready to race in the rain. When movie-people use the word "atmosphere" this is what they're talking about.
One of the most effective uses of music I have ever seen in any film, period.
This might be my favorite sports movie if not for the ending (and whether or not you count Whiplash as a sports movie, an argument I am very sympathetic towards).
Honey Scene, Marty Supreme
Marty Supreme is a movie about winning, and how winning can be used to achieve ends of great selfishness or great selflessness; in the same way that this honey anecdote is a Rorschach test for Marty, who is captivated by the clever mechanisms of how victory is achieved rather than the reasons those sacrifices are being made in the first place (the good of other people) the entire movie is a Rorschach test for the viewer. There's another scene as good as this one which is the only time where Marty's worldview is seriously challenged by another character, but it doesn't hit at all unless you've seen the rest of it, and you really should.
I can't recommend it enough, I still need to watch it a third time, but it's probably overtaken Hundreds of Beavers as my new favorite movie.
Heyyy i really liked sivan's question! But respectfully, in the future could you please consider using read more's?
I edited it but a bunch of people had already reblogged, sorry! In the future for posts of that length I'll definitely make sure to use it.
I only started posting very long stuff on tumblr recently and it had been my assumption that tumblr does that automatically for posts over a given length, I didn't know, sorry.
When a newcomer arrives, they are greeted by Sivad. Sivad is the ruler of this place, which has no name but many call Mondays. It is always Monday in Mondays.
Sivad has told me that Mondays is not infinite, but it is large enough that I no longer see purpose in making the distinction. It is a plain of small green hills which continue on in each direction longer than anyone has ever traveled. Sivad claims that four impassable perpendicular walls lie at the ends, which connect at the corners to create the massive square of land in which we reside. I often ask him if anyone has ever reached the walls, and no one ever has. I have also asked to know in miles the distance it spans, and he will not answer. He does not often respond to questions with numerical answers: the number of people in Mondays, the amount of towers spanning all of this place, the eons that have passed since my death, these are mysteries.
The hills are repetitive: grass, people, towers. There is nothing else. Grass is everywhere, it grows back as soon as it is pulled, most people remain in towers. I am a continual traveler, which is uncommon but not rare enough to draw interest. The majority remain in the same tower or group of towers for centuries or millennia at a time. I have rarely stayed in one for longer than a month.
There is night and day, but no sun. Light slowly and inexplicably ebbs and flows from the clear sky. Days last exactly nine hundred hours. I have counted this and heard it corroborated by thousands of others who have done the same. There are no stars at night, and then it is only possible to travel by the glow of the towers.
The towers are arranged in a uniform grid. They are similar, but each has differences in construction, some more than others. They are all concrete, tall and unpainted, between forty and one hundred and forty stories tall. Each floor on each tower except for the first floor and the roof has thirty rooms. Twenty-nine of the rooms are undecorated identical bedrooms and the last is a library which is normally the room closest to the building's staircase. The arrangement of any floor's library is unique, but every library in every tower has the same content: several thousand copies of the same indestructible book. The book is unchanged at every tower. It is over twenty-two hundred pages long, bound in orange leather. It has no title or author inscribed on the front or side, but four thick black stripes run horizontally across the surface.
If one runs in any cardinal direction from a tower at a fast pace, they will reach another in about four hours. No matter where someone is standing, if it is day, it is always possible to spot exactly one tower. This shouldn't be possible, as taller entities can normally be seen from farther distances than smaller ones, but it is natural in Mondays. As soon as a traveler crosses the halfway point between two towers, the one that is farther away will vanish from sight even if it is being seen by someone walking backwards. I have conducted this experiment on countless occasions. I stand still and push my head forward and back at an invisible border, watching a tower reappear and disappear with each movement. It is impossible to see two at once from the same location. If two people with towers behind them stand at the opposite side of a border and face each other, neither will be able to see a tower, but if they each turn around they will notice what the other could not.
I came to Mondays in my early thirties. I died young. My husband had picked up baking as a hobby during quarantine, and I stole a taste of raw cookie dough, which killed me.
There is an area of towers in the center of Mondays, a twenty by twenty square where newcomers arrive. Immediately after death, they always wake up in a bedroom, alone, in one of those four hundred center towers. Sivad greets them as they wake and offers to answer the questions they may have. I should say that he greeted them. Sivad has told me that no one new will ever come to Mondays again. Humanity has died out, and everyone has either been sent here or elsewhere.
Everyone sees Sivad differently. I see him as a flat humanoid shadow moving through the walls and floor, except for his hands, which stick out from the wall and are made from moving sand, the fingers of which snap repeatedly whenever he answers a question. I have heard descriptions of him as a man made of grass, a living gold statue, a talking hat, a perpetually bleeding horse, a small sun, a collection of colored pyramids, a suitcase with teeth, and a lizard which vomits glowing images of numbers whenever it speaks.
I once met a woman who said that her Sivad was Jon. I am certain she was lying.
My first question when I came was where. Sivad does not call it Mondays, this is only the name that those who stay at the center have agreed on, which has spread through slow osmosis over time. He told me that we are in a place where it is always Monday, and I asked for him to explain further, to provide me with reason, and he did.
Measurements are not a human construct. They are implanted inside us by the Kings, who Sivad will not elaborate on beyond the cold statement that it was they who overthrew and consumed the Creator. Some measurements used by humans obey the desires the Kings have given us, and some rebel against these natural instincts.
Sivad calls it obedience or rebellion, but he has never dictated either to be positive or negative. The words are only explaining if we are living in accordance with the Kings' measurement systems. Metric is obedience, imperial is rebellion. Denary numeral systems are obedience, all others are rebellion. The Gregorian calendar, or any calendar with a repeating seven day structure, is also obedience. Monday is the human name we give the second day of the obedient week.
Only time of death determines where we go. It is not a punishment or a reward, only how it is. Each day delivers everyone to a separate afterlife where obliteration is impossible, and from each of these seven afterlives it is possible to escape to a final destination which is said to be a shared eternal paradise, free of suffering. This paradise is not us ceasing to exist, it is a place, I asked. No one who is there would ever want to leave.
There were never children in Mondays. Those who die before the age of sixteen are sent immediately to the shared paradise.
Five of the seven afterlives have been collapsed, as everyone inside them has escaped to the shared paradise. No one has ever escaped from Mondays, and no one has ever escaped from another day, although Sivad will not tell me which one it is.
Naturally I asked Sivad how I might escape. Everyone in Mondays can only escape together. There is a question which Sivad provides us. It is a binary question with a correct solution and we can only answer yes or no.
Whenever we are alone in a bedroom or a library with a closed door, we can summon Sivad by calling for him. It does not matter if someone has summoned him elsewhere. If we are not alone he will not come, and if we are speaking and someone opens the door he will leave until we call him again under the correct conditions. Whenever we call Sivad we can change our answer, and he will remember it until we change it again. We begin with no declared answer, but once we answer for the first time we cannot go back to being undecided, only switch between yes or no. We can change it as many times as we wish. We can also summon him to answer questions for us, many of which he does answer, many of which he does not.
In order for us to leave, we would need to all, everyone who is in Mondays, what is likely about one-seventh of all humans who have ever lived, need to at the same time have registered the same answer to Sivad's question, and this answer would need to be correct. If we all provided the same incorrect answer, our memories would be erased and we would be sent to random towers throughout Mondays. This has not happened before.
I asked what the question was. Sivad told me.
"On the 30th of May, 1990, did Jon Arbuckle drink dog semen?"
The first time I heard this question, I asked him to repeat it. This is all he will do. He is the most strict about questions which attempt to clarify his question, which is a terrible problem for us. We cannot ask for definitions or clarifications, so he would not tell me who Jon Arbuckle was.
When I realized my attempts at clarifying the question weren't going to work, I moved on.
The next questions I had for Sivad was about myself, and he answered. Our minds and bodies are changed when we arrive in Mondays. We cannot die again, we cannot be hurt or experience pain, we cannot eat or drink, we cannot make waste, we cannot sexually pleasure ourselves or others. My penis now has as much sensation as my toes and nothing can motivate it to rise. My prostate, once a trusted smile provider, now grants me only indifference. We can sleep, but we do not have any physical need. We never physically tire, even with severe exertion. It is impossible to lose or gain weight, but it is only cosmetic. Everyone is as strong and fast as everyone else. We can run for years without needing to stop. Our memories are improved, and we have an immeasurably greater, but finite and imperfect, ability to retain information. I can remember everyone I have spoken to since I have come here and all the conversations I have had in enough detail to recreate them perfectly in my head.
We do not and cannot speak any language from Earth. I once knew English and some Portuguese, and I cannot remember how to speak either. The language on Mondays sounds similar to German, I am told, but it involves frequent purring, which we are all innately capable of. Strangely, it often takes newcomers minutes or hours to first notice the switch.
We cannot touch others. If two people attempt to shake hands, they will phase through each other as if they are ghosts. It is possible to interact with another through objects, but not harm someone. If someone were to throw a book at my head, it would connect, but there would be no pain or injury even if they had dropped it on me from the roof of a tower. It takes us several minutes, but we can travel through walls of the towers and most objects, so it is not possible to be trapped.
After I learned this I decided that I would leave the tower and seek help, reasoning that others who had been there longer would be more knowledgeable than I and that I could call for Sivad again later. I left my bedroom and ran into a woman immediately in the staircase. I told her I was new, and that I didn't understand the question, and she brought me to the floor's library. There was a small crowd gathered reading and chatting, and she ordered that everyone be quiet. She explained to them that I was new, then she thrust one of the books into my hands and had me read silently. They all watched me. I noticed many of them smiling.
The only book inside every library is a complete collection of every nationally syndicated Garfield comic strip published daily from 1978 to 2038, one month short of sixty years. They were ordered by publishing date, and there were on average ten comics on each page. When I read it for the first time, I discovered that Garfield's owner was named Jon Arbuckle. Garfield was not a significant factor in my life prior to my death. I had read less than ten of the strips and had never purposely sought them out beforehand. I once as a child won a keychain with Odie's face on it for a subpar performance in my school's spelling bee, which I lost and had not missed.
I read enough random strips to grasp Garfield conceptually. Jon Arbuckle was a lonely young cartoonist who lived with his dog Odie and his obese tabby, Garfield. It is not always Monday in the world of Garfield, but time does not seem to pass. No one ages, the status quo is rarely harmed. Their dimension is encased by a bubble of slow, invisible lasagna which weakens the damage time would otherwise inflict.
The punchlines came as I read, universal truths which I was made to recognize. Jon was lonely. Garfield was lazy. Jon was geeky. Garfield loves lasagna. Jon, despite his best efforts, was not skilled when it came to attracting women. Garfield was a poor mice catcher. Jon's optimism was rarely awarded. Garfield bullied Odie. Garfield bullied Nermal, a small kitten who annoyed him. Garfield bullied Jon. The universe often punished Garfield for his cruelty, laziness, and pessimism.
It did not take me long to find the strip for the 30th of May, 1990. It had three panels, as do most Garfield strips.
In it, I saw Jon, Garfield, and a female veterinarian I would later learn was Liz. For more than twenty-five years of the comic's publication, Jon attempted to unsuccessfully seduct Garfield's veterinarian, a sardonic woman who most often displayed apathy and occasionally open contempt towards him. In 2006, they began dating, although the apathy remained. In 2032, they wed.
Garfield was the ring bearer. He ate it. Garfield is fat.
They were not dating on the 30th of May, 1990. In that day's comic, Jon had taken Garfield to her office for a physical examination. Liz and Jon are standing, and Garfield is watching them from the examination table.
In the first panel, Jon notices an unidentified cup of liquid on the same examination table Garfield is sitting on. He looks satisfied with himself. He imitates Liz and declares in her voice that the cup is filled with coffee, which she has left for him. He thanks his crude emulation of her and reaches for it. Liz appears shocked, and most readers before reaching the second panel understand that something is wrong. It does not create the expectation that what Jon is drinking is what he believes it to be.
The cup is blue and opaque. The reader cannot see the color of the liquid inside it. One recurring point of debate is whether the cup is a mug or not. The cup appears to resemble, in thickness, a mug more than a disposable or plastic cup, but the reader cannot see any handle in any of the three panels, and Jon does not pick it up by the handle when he drinks it in the second panel. It is theorized by some that the cup is a mug and that it is always positioned in a way where the handle is hidden from the reader's perspective. I disagree with this idea, but I am of the opinion that it doesn't matter. The mug theory is only important to the rare individuals who seriously contend that Jon is drinking coffee, and these people are hated by almost all others in Mondays.
In the second panel, Jon raises the cup to his lips and drinks, his eyes closed. He is still smiling, and we understand that he has not tasted it yet. Garfield is apathetic, but Liz's face has changed. She is herself again, sarcastic and unsympathetic for what Jon's hubris has brought him to do. She congratulates him, but does not say for what.
In the third panel, our earlier suspicions are confirmed. Jon was not drinking coffee, as evidenced by his face which is wrinkled in disgust. He may vomit. Liz smiles cruelly and tells Jon that he is going to give birth to a fine, healthy litter of puppies.
Garfield hears this and his eyes widen. He exclaims that he hates puppies. With this remark, the strip is over.
The first occasion I saw these three panels, in the library in front of the crowd, I read it almost ten times and then dropped the book on the floor. I had accepted my death, it had not been difficult. This was harder for me to come to terms with, that my salvation would depend on my understanding of whether or not Jon Arbuckle had consumed dog semen.
I looked at the ones who had been watching me. I said nothing but hoped for reassurance, and they laughed at me, the hopelessness obvious on my face.
They weren't trying to hurt me. It was funny, and they had all gone through it themselves. I had died early in human history. People had only been in Mondays for at most several hundred thousand years, when the first Homo Sapiens died. People were more friendly then, as a whole.
Most of the crowd ignored me after that, but a small group including the woman who greeted me sat down with me and explained the known history of Mondays and the basic arguments of Sivad's question.
People arrived in Mondays long before Garfield was created, I discovered. The first ones discovered they could read despite having died before the creation of the written word. This is not because Mondays is separated or disconnected from time in our universe. The comic strips were transported from the future to the past so that the first arrivals at Mondays could begin to think about the question, although they were not allowed to answer until there was a population exceeding five hundred million.
The first problem the question creates is that we cannot know what it is truly asking. We do not know what it means when it is asking whether Jon Arbuckle has consumed dog semen. Presumably Jon Arbuckle is fictional, and does not exist. When we want to know if he has done something, what are we appealing to? Is it asking what the artist of the comic believed Jon Arbuckle was drinking, or what Sivad thought he was drinking, or what the Kings thought he was drinking, or what the majority of people who have read it thought he was drinking? Or is it that Jon Arbuckle's dog semen consumption is an objective universal truth or falsehood? Or is it that Jon Arbuckle does exist in a physical reality we cannot visit but that comics allow us to view, and that in that reality there was something liquid in the cup he was drinking, which was or was not dog semen?
Whatever the question leads us to conclude, we only have two answers.
The first is yes, it is dog semen. Yes explains why Jon is disgusted and why Liz would connect it with a hypothetical canine pregnancy experienced by Jon. Yes is appealing because it is intuitive and seems to connect with the original intentions of the comic the best. Yes Men often are more focused on the conditions around the comic instead of the comic itself. They think about who the comic may have been intended for and how people tend to interpret it contextually. They primarily rely on a perspective that takes our own world into account and focuses chiefly on how the comic suits it.
There are actually some outside conditions that would suggest no, but Yes Men ignore them or have invented counterarguments, some of which I think are excellent. The largest of the outside conditions against them is the word of the author. Some people have reported that while on Earth they read about an interview with the creator of Garfield discussing the strip we are tasked with analyzing, and this rumor which by now is impossible to prove or disprove is accepted as fact across Mondays. When asked, he supposedly stated that he did not intend for the drink to be seen as dog semen. He grew up on a farm, and he said that pregnant cows would be given special formulated supplements to improve the health of them and their calves. When drawing the comic, he said that he assumed a similar formula might exist for pregnant dogs, and that it is this formula that Jon is drinking.
The Yes Men have multiple responses to the word of the author. The first is that he is lying. Garfield is a highly commercialized family-friendly comic which intentionally avoids politics and inflammatory controversy as much as it can, and the artist clearly has a strong financial motivation to refuse to acknowledge that the deuteragonist of his story swallowed a warm cup of dog semen.
Another answer is that the word of the author is unimportant to the question, and that the art itself informs us of the truth we choose to accept, not the artist's attached statements, especially ones made decades after the fact. It is or isn't dog semen, but this is not up to the artist to decide.
One last response, which I do not care for, is that the artist's opinion can be ignored because he is incorrect about the existence of a supplement formula given to healthy dogs. I do not know whether it is real or not and I do not care. I have spoken to many experts and many others have claimed to speak to experts and have heard it said with absolute authority that it does or doesn't exist. I do not think it concerns us and I refuse to carry on conversations about the scientific accuracy of this detail. When I meet people who are concerned with this issue I immediately leave them and move on to the next tower.
The other real world factor which goes against the Yes Men is that, Garfield being the safe and commercialized property that it is, it would not make sense for the author to have written a comic that intentionally implies that a character has downed a shot of dog semen. This is often challenged with other examples of Garfield comics that go against the trend and show us that even Garfield can break the rules. There exists a small series of comics in October of 1989, less than a year before the strip Sivad has asked us about, where Garfield awakens to find himself living in an existential nightmare, where Jon and Odie have abandoned him in an empty house and he is starving to death. Instead of accepting his situation, he denies it, imagining that Jon and Odie are still with him and living happily with his delusions. There are several other strips with minor sexual references, although there are none that can be charitably read to imply that Jon Arbuckle, Garfield's human owner, regularly drinks dog semen.
No Men are generally more focused on the comic itself, and our natural reaction is an afterthought. We may think initially that Jon is drinking dog semen, but logic makes it clear that this cannot be true. Most No Men subscribe to the dog pregnancy supplement formula theory, but not all. Some believe that it is a harmless drink that Liz had concocted to taste like dog semen in order to prank Jon, some think it is something entirely fantastical and futuristic, and others contend that it is actually coffee. The only common explanation more disliked than coffee is dog urine. I share this dislike.
The No Men ask questions. Why would Liz keep out an unmarked, unprotected cup of dog semen on her examination table during Garfield's checkup? Whether it is going to be used for eventual insemination or for testing there must be some refrigerated storage facility for dog semen at the clinic for her to use. She does not appear to be incompetent at her profession.
The Yes Men mostly answer to this that the same question applies to a formula for dog pregnancy, or any other proposed liquid that can be connected to Jon's theoretical dog pregnancy. Why does it make any more sense for dog pregnancy supplement formula to have been left on the table in place of dog semen?
The No Men are not bothered by the answers the Yes Men give them. There are always more questions.
How would Jon not notice that it was dog semen before drinking? Shouldn't the smell or feeling of the cup have alerted him that he was not bringing coffee to his mouth? Even if she is not fond of him, how could Liz act so horribly smug after seeing Jon drink dog semen? Why does Liz, a trained animal expert, suggest that Jon, a human male, would become pregnant after drinking dog semen? If she is only kidding, isn't her joke nonsensical?
The Yes Men are not bothered by the questions the No Men give them. There are always more answers.
Jon did not notice because he was not paying attention. His eyes were closed and he was focused on impressing Liz, not the dog semen he was drinking. Liz hates Jon more than we realize and put out the dog semen intentionally because she knew he would drink it without thinking. Maybe he has come into her clinic and stolen her coffee in the past, perhaps from the same cup, which she poured the dog semen into in order to trick him. Liz's joke is nonsensical, but only because she is shocked that her plan has worked.
These answers are always different in small ways, and they can travel back and forth endlessly, creating abstract hypotheticals too complicated and ridiculous for anyone to actually view as a correct solution. These are argued anyway as a game which both sides enjoy.
This game can be fun. Many of the proposed solutions are delightful. One of my favorite scenarios has Jon and Liz portrayed as bad actors. Liz is a saboteur who has put out the dog semen intentionally to deceive Jon, and Jon is a secretive pervert who is aware of her trick but who also happens to love drinking dog semen, and he pretends to be a fool who thinks it is coffee as an excuse, so he can drink the dog semen. They are both liars and each of them has won. It's almost romantic. Past and future comics are used to bolster these fantasies with loose evidence, which no one actually thinks is connected but everyone involved pretends to.
I also enjoy the schemes which appeal to science fiction or magic. I once encountered a trio of No Men on the roof of an otherwise abandoned tower who theorized that Liz was a scientist who had created a solution which would permanently alter a person's sense of taste to make all liquid taste like dog semen, and that she had added the solution to what was otherwise an ordinary coffee. This is the rare variety of coffee theory I enjoy. Another No Man I met suggested to me that Liz had actually engineered a way in which she could make Jon pregnant with dog spawn and that her remark at the end was completely serious.
These are only games, and while I once enjoyed them, time has worn at the novelty. Our existence is mundane and torturous, and I long for paradise or even true death, though I know we will never make it there. Our test is impossible. We are too spread apart and have no way of coordinating our answers, and there is great disagreement among us. With eons behind us and our original universe having descended into the final stages of heat death, I still encounter optimists. They are never itinerants. Being a traveler, it is possible that I meet fewer travelers than those who remain in one or a few towers for long periods, but never, never have I met another who told me that they thought we could do it. We can't. Anyone who travels knows we can't.
I only stayed in the center towers, which are emptier than most newcomers expected, for several million years, which is when all of humanity died and Sivad told us there would be no more newcomers. I left and went north, and I continued north until I decided to go west, and then I went south again, and I have gone south since.
I have seen everything.
There are towers with lone individuals spouting out nonsense. Pretenders. They are not crazy. It is not possible for us to go completely insane in Mondays, Sivad changes our minds so that we cannot. We cannot help but remain sane. Many refuse to accept this and pretend to be insane in hopes that they someday will be. I used to pity Pretenders, but I do not anymore. It is meditation, and I may decide to join them one day. It may be the closest I will ever come to peace.
There are the organized communities filled with Yes Men or No Men or both, towers with between hundreds of optimists, who argue with each other with the serious attitude that once they can agree they will be able to convince others and finally free us. Often these communities will be divided and floors devoted to different purposes. They will have a floor for serious intellectual debate on the dog semen comic and on how to convince others of their view, another for the fun game scenarios, more for casual socialization, and often a floor or floors for discussing other questions presented by Garfield which may help to answer Sivad's question. It is often debated whether or not Garfield can be understood by Jon on these floors.
I once liked these communities and I admire them, but they sadden me. I wish I could express to them how vast it is and how hopeless their efforts are. We will never find everyone, we will never coordinate, we will never agree. If they traveled more they would know. I am sure I have seen so little compared of Mondays, but it was enough to make me understand. I both want them to understand and want them not to, since I do not want to disturb their innocence. When I visit these communities, I now only visit the floors where the games are played and people relax.
These communities are easily destroyed. One motivated enemy can destroy everything. There are travelers who go around, both alone and with others, who look for these communities and enter them and scream whenever people in the most active floors try to speak. We cannot touch each other or trap each other, so these people cannot be punished or forced to leave. The Screamers will not be reasoned with. As they never tire, they can scream as long as they need to without end, and the community cannot leave to escape since they will be followed. Discussion ends and members leave slowly, and the community ultimately falls apart. The Screamers almost never lose. They will only stop screaming when people part ways.
Sometimes individual Yes Men or No Men travel and seek out towers where they share the minority opinion, viewing themselves as messengers for the truth. These people fascinate me. When they do manage to convert a tower, which is rare, they immediately leave. They are unhappy anywhere where people agree with them. I always ask them if they think we can do it when I meet them, and they say no.
There are towers with smaller communities which do not argue about Garfield anymore and have accepted what is our fate. Sometimes these communities spend most of their time sleeping, sometimes they stay awake and spend time together, trying to entertain each other as they burn through eternity. I agree with these towers and have fallen in love with the people in them, but I never stay. When I become comfortable with a tower, I soon start feeling like there is somewhere else I should be instead.
There was one tower with only ten people like this, and I stayed there for several million years, which I have never done at any other single tower. They were lovely people led by a psychologist who had died at old age from a terrible degenerative illness. She was healthy in Mondays but still had the appearance and body of an extremely sickly woman. I have never met anyone as compassionate and caring in my life or death.
After I was there for about three thousand years, a group of sixty Screamers came and entered the tower. Screamers love dramatic power disparities, both when they are in the minority and when they are not. They saw us eleven as easy pickings. I did not think we could beat the Screamers and I was still not attached to the group, but I resolved not to leave until the first of the original ten had, not wanting them to think less of me.
It took over one million years, but the Screamers all eventually left, which I have never seen happen anywhere else. I have come to the conclusion that smaller towers without dog semen debate are best suited to dealing with the Screamers. The members of the traditional communities are there to achieve a goal, and when the Screamers come and attempt to prevent that, they eventually decide that it will be easier to fulfill the same goal somewhere else. The only goal of the ten was each other. There was nowhere else to go, no reason to leave.
I stayed with the ten but eventually left and continued north. I avoided friends or traveling companions for a long time, but I made an exception for an old mostly bald man named Thomas, who was living together with a large tower community of Pretenders but was not one himself. In life, he had written about politics. I liked speaking to him because he would take anything as seriously as anything else, except for Garfield. He loathed Garfield. He would rant for hours about anything and I would listen to him. He liked talking and I liked listening to his talking.
He spoke about the Kings sometimes, who Sivad tells us devoured the Creator. He would call them fools and rant about how they were wrong to have disturbed the universal hierarchy. This always made me laugh, because he would admit that he didn't know anything about the Kings or the Creators. He just hated anyone who broke up any hierarchy.
He did not feel real to me. I would talk to others we would meet during our journey, and they would rarely acknowledge that he was beside me. Everything he did and said felt meaningful to me. We spent hundreds of billions of years together and I thought we would be together forever, but as we were leaving a tower he stopped me and said that we would only spend one more year together. I asked him why and he told me that he had said everything to me that he wanted to.
One short year later, he left me. He went east and I didn't follow him, as he requested. He said he was going to go exploring. I never saw him again.
I have been alone since, other than my brief visits inside of towers. I have seen the rise of the Cult of Lyman in the area of Mondays I have traveled through, who believe that Lyman is the Creator that the Kings replaced, and that he will return to save us. I have met a group of redeemed Screamers who try to convince other Screamers to change their ways, and a different group who were convinced that if every book were destroyed, we would be freed. I am still baffled by the amount I meet that are hopeful. I was asked today by an optimist at a debate tower why I think, with eternity on our side, that we cannot do it.
I told him this. I think maybe the Pretenders could be convinced to stop pretending and the Screamers convinced to stop screaming. I think perhaps with organization, I do not know how, but perhaps all the Yes Men and the No Men might agree to give in and submit to one side. It is unlikely, but it is possible. I think it might be doable to convince all the hopeless not to be hopeless and to try, to deconvert the cults, to stop playing games, to make progress. But with all that still we cannot do it, and I know why.
There is one tower I visited soon after Thomas left me, while I was going west. It was a small tower of forty floors, and there were seven people there who never left the second floor library. They sat and read Garfield together, but did not debate it. I asked them why they would read it if not to find the solution to the Sivad's question, and they replied without looking up from their books that they all just happened to enjoy Garfield. They would occasionally smile as they read, soft puffs of air gliding down from their noses.
I wanted to know if they were optimists, so I asked them if they would tell me what they thought about Mondays.
Smiling Friends seems to have actually ended, despite my intuition that it wasn't going to and that it's earlier announced cancellation back in late-February was an extremely early setup for an elaborate April Fools' joke.
(I will literally eat a hat at some point, I guess, be on the watch for that! To my memory I have made the eating-the-hat bet exactly six times in my life beforehand and this is the only time I've actually been on the losing end, so at least I'll finally get to find out what it tastes like.)
There has been a microtrend in the last few years of audience-led conspiracies regarding creators lying about shows being over or expecting secret bonus episodes; the obvious example is Stranger Things (which, having never watched past the first episode, I only know the details of because of that Drew Gooden video), where the show's ending was so unsatisfying and filled with plot holes that a significant plurality of fans found it easier to believe that the last episode was actually a dream hinting at a secret double finale rather than accepting it was dogshit because the showrunners waited so long to start writing they had to start filming without a real finalized script (yeah yeah glass houses, I know).
(I swear Sherlock fans also had talked themselves into one of these mass spirals too at some point, though I don't care enough to google it.)
With Smiling Friends, though, I think this was a much more reasonable assumption, honestly, based on their style of humor and the current time. I know the Smiling Friends creators (Zach Hadel and Michael Cusack) were well-known for flash animations online and Oney Plays, but aside from YOLO (Cusack's other Adult Swim show, which started in 2020 and I was also a huge fan of) I hadn't watched any of their other stuff or really known anything about them personally before reading into them a little more during Season 3, and especially after this announcement.
People are so radically on the lookout for April Fool's Day jokes that if you want to succeed on the large-scale (especially working for Adult Swim, the channel famous for their high-concept AFD pranks) yeah, you might actually need to start planning over a month out in advance. The prank-meta is a lot harder than it used to be! So I was wrong on this one but reasonably so, I want to say.
Now, I am in favor of this fan conspiracy trend, even when they end up being fake! I think it's cool that people are interacting with media like this! And the Smiling Friends instance is a lot cooler than Conformity Gate in that it stems from a desire to see more of the show because it was so great, rather than as a cope response to being fed pure shit by pantsing Mystery Box writers who clearly don't care about what they're making anymore and just want to be finished with it.
Ultimately I trust that the creators did what was best for them, but honestly I did enjoy the show so much that I could have dealt with a not-insignificant quality drop before the show would have stopped being astounding for me. It just really was my style of humor, and I hope more stuff comes that fills some of that "Gumball But For Adults" vibe it had cultivated perfectly. Some people have cited the start of a decline but I just didn't see it, and I felt like a lot of fans only jumped on that bandwagon after the announcement, not before. I was still laughing my ass off every episode.
Still, even with how high-effort of a show as it clearly was, I'm a little skeptical that they couldn't have scraped out another excellent season or two (they cite their only reason for not making more as a fear of not being able to match earlier quality!) In the last non-bonus episode of the show, Pim is watching season 487 of the Simpsons, and it's a good bit, and I can understand being afraid of becoming neo-neo-neo-zombie-skeleton Simpsons, of descending so far into the corporate abyss that you become a shell of a shell of a shell of a shell of yourself, but come on, you weren't anywhere close to that.
Maybe take a year or two off and end things with a movie or a thirty-minute special or something. Just something to think about, guys.
To celebrate the 10th anniversary of its final chapter, great writer @weaselandfriends (Bavitz, author of Modern Cannibals, 1/X, Cockatiel x Chameleon) just started republishing a remastered version of his classic Madoka Magica fanfic Fargo as Fargo DX on AO3/Royalroad. If you've seen Madoka Magica and never read Fargo before, I strongly recommend it; I'm not even a particularly big fan of Madoka as a property and I love this story to bits, and though I've yet to reread the rewrite myself, based on everything he's told and shown me about it I fully expect that it'll be even better than the original.
Fargo was Bavitz's first story published under that name, and has done tremendously well for itself in the time since, especially given that it was posted more than a few years after the Madoka fandom had begun to wither away. (It carries the honorary distinction of having a tiny amount of recursive fanfiction about it, or at least fic written by someone who really hated the main character a lot and included them in a story they wrote to shit on them.)
Fargo's is one of the best revenge stories I have ever read, and until this rewriting of the story, it's only had one big issue that would prevent me from recommending it more strongly than I already do: some of the fight scenes — especially those in the first of three arcs — went on for way too long. Coming back to this after another six (excellent, long, complete) novels, Bavitz told me he's changed almost none of the central narrative while tightening up the language and cutting up a lot of prosaic fluff, which is exactly what a lot of the story needed. According to him, he's cut out 50,000 words from the original 336,000, about ~15% of the original story! (Even as a much more novice writer, I can tell you that this is type of stuff is both the hardest and probably most important part of editing in general. They say kill your darlings and people think it refers to characters or scenes or plotlines, and it does, but often it more is talking about this, which can be just as if not more painful to work through:
He's also changed some extremely minor plot errors (there's an infamous scene where a character boils water incorrectly he fixates on a lot when talking about Fargo, which I find really funny), but it's mostly just tightening up an already awesome story.
Seriously, read it! Even if you were part of the wave that read it back in 2015 - 2016, it's worth a reread, especially now that the kinks of it being his earliest published work have been ironed out. I linked it twice in the same post! I wouldn't do that if I didn't love it.
Note 1: On Royalroad, to maximize metrics, Bavitz has made the excellent decision to rename the story Magical Girl Machine Gun (three times!) which I adore. He mentioned the idea of doing this to me awhile ago, and I initially thought he was kidding, so it was a pleasant surprise to find out that he’d actually gone through with it, the madman. I think I’d like to see more webfic/fanfic authors do this type of thing generally, have alternate titles for their stories for different websites (the same way that tradpub authors and people in other mainstream mediums will have different titles for different countries. Curious if anybody knows any other examples of this specifically in the online sphere, I can’t think of anything.
Note 2: It’s lame as hell when authors shill other author’s stories just because they hang out or are friends, this is not one of those cases, and I can say that confidently because I loved this story before I ever spoke to Bavitz and have reread it twice since my first time.
Note 3: The sequel to Fargo, Chicago, kicks even more ass, and is the prize you get for finishing it. (Bavitz says that you don't have to read Fargo to read it, and some people have done that actually, though I think this is a case where you do get a lot more out of it having finished the first book.) When I shill Chicago, I describe it as the Great American Fanfiction, and I really don't think I'm overselling it with that promise. I will add that your liking Chicago is moderately contingent on you finding political stories interesting and enjoying moderately confusing but excellent battle scenes, both of which I do very much. Chicago will never receive a rewrite, says Bavitz, as it does not need one; I couldn't agree more.
Note 4: With this rerelease, Bavitz joins a tiny fraction of webwriters who actually did go back and... edit an old fanfic they finished...
most people have at least one tenet of established, factual, basic food safety that they simply have decided is not true, or is not worth following, or is somehow simply not real.
mine, if you’re curious, is hair in the food. Now as someone who worked in the restaurant industry as a manager for a decent amount of time i was always going to to treat the situation super seriously if you find a hair in your food (or pretend to, even, as long you are aren't a smug asshole about finding the long blonde hair in your food when everybody in the kitchen! i don't give a shit, your refund/free meal doesn't come out of my paycheck) but imo you are profoundly weak to give a shit. do you understand how hot kitchens get, how many skin and sweat particles even in the cleanest, most optimal kitchens in the world will get into your food as a simple function of the cooks spending 12 hours at a time in extremely hot, dense, cramped environments where they are moving around constantly and sweating like pigs? it's literally inevitable. and it's not just restaurants! all of your food has skin cells in dead, the air has skin cells in it, we all shed just shy of ten fucking pounds a year of the stuff! you are constantly breathing in dead parts of your friends and random strangers and that's fine, the body can handle it. if i find a hair i pull it the fuck out, who cares, it's just skin. if you had a drink with a single ice cube in it at 90% of restaurants i promise you that is 100x the hazard of eating one hundred strands of human hair (assuming you subscribe to germ theory). and the ice isn't dangerous either 99.9% of the time, it just looks gross as fuck if you look inside the machines.
i will not judge you if this is a mental block you genuinely cannot parse, i get that. but at least broadly acknowledge that it's probably not something worth throwing out an entire perfectly edible meal over. you can't have them remake a steak dinner because you found a single hair on it and then feel self-righteous because you didn't waste anything because you didn't use a straw.
(i will acknowledge that a restaurant that regularly has hairs getting in the food is probably worrying in the sense that it may be indicative of them not taking other, much more important food safety practices seriously in general, but if you just ask them to remake the dish without the hair then you aren't taking that into account anyway.)
now, there's a lot of shit that people do not take seriously! i have get into arguments with me because i told them that no, i'm sorry, your server is correct, you cannot order chicken "a little pink in the middle". no sorry m'am we cannot legally let you take raw oysters home in a to-go box, no, i know you promise not to sue if you die, but this is not how america or my company or your hypothetical surviving loved ones would see the problem. trust me based on the way you're speaking to me i would be all to happy to let you kill yourself by food poisoning but then i'm liable to being fired, so alas for both of us...