Trump Administration Rolls Back Dozens of Gun Regulations
These fucking twats roll back laws limiting gun access to those who need mental health but also makes it harder to get treatment for mental health. Fuck this guy. Campaign contributions are much more important to Traitor Trump than the well being of the American people.
"The Trump administration is scrapping more than three dozen firearms regulations, abandoning a crackdown on illegal sales, restoring gun rights to some people with mental illness and loosening oversight of private weapons transactions."
That's real fucking odd because politicians often say that “the problem is mental illness, not guns”. And here they are, relaxing regulations around mental illness.
[Source - without paywall]
@outspokenblackman wow talk about uneducated on the facts. please keep speaking with ever word you display your lack of understanding and wonderfully display your side as uneducated on topics they speak about. 1. ATF " regulations" that did not go throw congress are not laws they are enforced by same people writing them without checks and balances. that a simple fact even democrats openly admited too. you claimed they were "LAWS" you just spreader misinformation or did you out right lie your pick ? 2. YOUR OWN SOURCE IS OPENLY BIAS "“With the Biden regulations that we got and put in place, we advanced the ball,” said Kris Brown, the president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, one of the country’s biggest gun control organizations." oh look they will not even call it laws. 3. OH YOUR SOURCE "“These guns are going to start to percolate back out into the community over the next couple of years,” said Marianna Mitchem, a former A.T.F. official who now advises Everytown for Gun Safety, a nonprofit advocacy group founded by Michael R. Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York." WOW SO ATF agent now gets paid by democrats and dirrectly linked to demcrats candidate for president in 2020 is trust worthy to you ??? wow 4. OH AND YOUR CLAIM ON MENTAL HEALTH "The Veterans Affairs Department in February removed the requirement that veterans who require a fiduciary to manage their benefits be prohibited from buying firearms, and veterans who were previously reported to the F.B.I. were being removed from its list." THAT YOUR SOURCE oh so you support removing rights from VETS that committed no crime? 5. funny how you block people from replaying to your posts. so much for you supporting freedom of speech wow you really dont like other people have rights do you? please post like this 1000 times a day let all see just how your side really is.
YES MY SIDE SUPPORTS FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS. TOO BAD YOUR DONT BUT THANKS FOR PROVING IT.
What is with the weird formatting/placement?
This is hard to read!!!
Dude! It doesn't take much time or effort!
Or is this another anti leftist weird anti grammar anti readable things?
Dude were you drunk or dehydrated?
OH you have issue with the format. funny how i kept the same format as the leftist that you want defend but cant disprove a single point i made. but thank you for displaying how you dont have a single source to discredit me and its clear to all your upset about it. thanks again for displaying the lack of education on a topic the left has.
Lol
Uhhh my dude? Or dudett?
Lack of sorcees do not indicate lack of ability to have or share such sorces.
Looks like you are the emotional one.
No formats are not owned by the left or right. Neither is grammar.
What you posted is squished together, no breaks like any side would post.
It should be
1. Reason/sorce
2. Notes the space here?? Reason/sorce.
3. Reason/sorce
Not 1.........,............................2 ....................
..3..................................4..............,..............................5........6
Get it?
You compressed everything, making it hard to read!
Please drink water!
I think you need it!
Again lack of defense or sorces ect don't mean lack of ability to prove such.
That person was pointing out with no emotion your weird formatting!
when you make a claim and cant back it up with sources of facts and you seek to defend your claim without sources or facts your words have no value your feelings. now if you want make a pure emotions based talk that fine but then the first post should not added the news. btw on not liking formatting ivy legal schools done studys over such things same with grammar etc in a debate its a sign of weak views you cant defend or low iq. so if you want run with that fine but then because of studys done by top schools you are saying your view is weak or you have a low iq so your calling yourself less than.
