look, if you DON"T stop to look at that GIANT FUCKING SALAMANDER just sitting there on the sidewalk? YOUR HEART IS DEAD.
đ

No title available
sheepfilms
Keni
No title available
$LAYYYTER
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Sweet Seals For You, Always
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr

ellievsbear
d e v o n
đ©” avery cochrane đ©”

oozey mess
Mike Driver
Sade Olutola
Claire Keane
The Bright Sessions

Origami Around
The Bowery Presents
seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Argentina

seen from Malaysia
seen from Spain
seen from Thailand

seen from Hungary
seen from Indonesia
seen from Brazil

seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia
seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Mexico
@greyhairedgeekgirl
look, if you DON"T stop to look at that GIANT FUCKING SALAMANDER just sitting there on the sidewalk? YOUR HEART IS DEAD.
obsessed with the way martha wells refuses to write an overarching plot for murderbot. every new book you think okay this is the one where she introduces the grand corporate conspiracy and recurring cast of corporate villains that set the premise of her next few books and instead she's like no actually i think i'll just put secunit in a Situation again
Yes, but I'm definitely seeing an overarching plot starting to take shape with the latest one, but it might take a couple more books for my hypothesis to pan out
The overarching plot of Murderbot is the nature of personhood and the human redefinition of "personhood" to encompass non-human entities.
But also the overarching plot of Murderbot may be happening in the background: Mensah becoming the Liberator of Personhood. So the front story will always benefit "Murderbot and the New Situation" but the B story might just be the actual A story in terms of Big Plot Arcs and Interstellar Developments.
Palestinian craftsmen, Model of the Church of the Holy Sepulcher, 18th century. Olive and pistachio wood, mother-of-pearl, camel bone.
Courtesy Alain Truong
For more information for history nerds, here's the source, and the page from the exhibit at the Frick this is from: https://www.frick.org/exhibitions/holy_sepulcher/1
This is fascinating, because IRL the old city is so built up that you cannot see the shape of the outside of the building at all - you come around a corner and there's a fairly uninspiring courtyard and - there you are.
As I read somewhere else - the variety of materials helps convey the feeling of this being a building that is actually a collection of buildings, some built inside and over each other as multiple groups, through time, tried to get a little piece of space as close as possible to a spot they thought was one of the holiest on earth. Having done a lot of Northern European cathedrals, I think I was expecting something like that, but the the Holy Sepulcher is very different and somehow equally moving.
Seen a bunch of people asking who is the narrator of Radiant Star. Here is my reply:
I leave that as an exercise for the reader.
I finished the book and immediately went looking to see if there were any interviews or discussions on the narrator, because I'd been randomly shouting at my family (who are in line to read it when I'm done) things like "I'm loving how this plays with narrator voice" and "the narrator really starts emerging as a character over time but I'm not sure..." (to which my kid yelled "STOP MOM NO SPOILERS" so here I am on Tumblr instead.
Anyway: Go read Ann Leckie's latest, "Radiant Star" because it honestly had me saying "I don't know where this is going yet" for the entire book and I loved it for it. It plays with character and point of view in ways that had me turning back to re-read and still being completely engrossed. It made me think of Season 2 of Andor in all the best ways. I'm practically throwing it at my partner and kid so I have someone IRL to talk about it with.
THE PITT 2.15 âą 9:00 P.M.
reblog if youâve had an online friendship thatâs lasted more than 2 years
Mr and I met online, does that count?
Folks I met in an old school pregnancy board (before Babycenter existed) are still people I regularly talk to on socials. And the group I joined in 2009 to snark Mothering dot com still has meetups and vacations.
i have an essay due
Reblog if you do NOT want the new Tumblr update
Apparently, from what I hear people say, in the new Tumblr update, if someone reblogs your post and adds a comment of their own, that reblog is counted as a new post and it belongs to the reblogger. Not you. You, as the OP, do not get the notifications if someone else later reblogs from the person who reblogged your post with their own comment. You canât see what comments people leave on the reblogs of the post you originally made unless they reblogged directly from you.
If this is actually true, it will just open doors for harassment. And also it takes the credits away from the OPs. Tumblrâs etiquette has always been âreblog donât repostâ. So this new update, if true, contradicts the whole core values of Tumblr as a community.
Respectfully, we donât want this @staff @support @tumblr @changes please listen to your users.
Iâd also like to clarify that this is what I hear from what a lot of people are saying, and it bothers me. But if I got anything wrong, I do apologize.
I fully understand this isnât everyone, but love the sect of m/m shippers who donât want to be inserted into the relationship at all. dont want to fuck them, donât want x/reader. this isnât about me itâs about my boys being in situations and then fucking about it. Iâm barely a fly on the wall im not even here.
this used to be most of fandom đ«
Too nice and accurate to stay in comments, @petralemaitre
#my blorbos are not my type#they are each other's type
Consider this a sequel to this morningâs post talking about that SOS from that woman.
To kidnap people, starve them, beat them, torture them and even rape the whole taking their personal belongings? HOW does someone NOT being here âlegallyâ justify that EVIL treatment?? Because guess what fuck sticks? NO ONE but Native Americans are here legally.
But thankfully a group called Haven Watch is formed to help these victims. You can donate if you can but if you canât just spread the word!
No One Walks Alone
My mom and her teacher friends have a similar group here in New York and me and my friends have a similar kind of group going on.
Because this is NOT about differing opinions BUT of whatâs morally right and I donât want to look in the mirror 20 years from now regretting not what j could have done.
Re-Run Friday #44: Do you recognize this TV theme song?
I know this and can name the series
I know this but can't name the series
I might know this
I've never heard this
im adopting the âdark jockâ aesthetic. iâm going to lurk around crumbling old institute buildings in a black tanktop with a skull on it and a backwards ballcap and iâm going to get dark academia people to write my essays for me while i call them nerds and doofuses and prep for the big dark football game
this is sooooo... true đ
#i have spent extended time in multiple of these regions and can confirm. six WILL drink you under the table
It's all the Lutherans LOL
I am FROM region six and this is absolute truth.
Remember that the Germans have an entire monthlong festival devoted to beer.
Hawkeye Pierce & the Queer Politics of the Incorrigible Flirt
When someone thinks of Dr. Benjamin Franklin âHawkeyeâ Pierce, the first thing that would float up in oneâs imagination is surely a ruby-red robe hanging from a willowy frame. The second is probably a martini glass. The third, I would say, is the flirtiness- oh God! All that flirtiness!
Hawkeye- Americaâs favourite TV doctorsâ TV doctors- flirts with most things that move. Itâs a big part of his whole deal. In fact, âcarousingâ and âwomanisingâ are listed just below âdrinking heavilyâ and just above âpulling pranksâ in the first two lines of his Wikipedia page.
 Nothing particularly out of the ordinary for a white male âheroâ at the centre of a beloved piece of American popular media. Hawkeye Pierce is an unlikely television Lothario. He is reasonably far from a picture of mid-century Hollywood machismo. Rather he embodies a âslinkierâ masculinity - he slithers around like a cat, constantly gesticulating, prattling on in a rhythmic New York accent flavoured with a dash of vaudevillean spark, wielding knife-edged quips and show tunes like a cowboy in a western wields his gun. This is a joint creation of both the text of the show as well as Alan Aldaâs burlesque and vaudeville upbringing. Â
I would argue that Hawkeyeâs flirting goes beyond being a charming quirk of character, and has a lot of political potency wrapped underneath it. Hawkeyeâs flirting, whether written to be or not, is an act of subversion and of fostering radical intimacies- which makes it an act that is just so very queer. Whether written to be or not.
First things first, a disclaimer: most of the interactions I think of as Hawkeye âflirtingâ, the show itself does not frame them as such- especially his interactions with men. The more salacious and suggestive comments he makes to and about men are coated in heavy layers of humour within the show. However I would argue that even if you donât prefer to read these interactions as sincere, you would draw pretty much the same conclusion about what they tell us about Hawkeye the character- that he is charming, wisecracking, smooth-talking, funny. What Hawkeye engages in is, in a very loose sense, âflirting for funâ (Fox 2017), delinked from any romantic, sexual or homosexual intent. Yet what differentiates it from bantering or some good olâ fashion rapport-building is how the dialogue and exchanges makes connections with different kinds of intimacies.
Flirting as a mode of intimacy: Hawkeye's flirting doesn't mean anything or go anywhere, in the strict heteronormative sense of what it should mean or where it should go. Yet they are instrumental in creating a kind of intimacy âin and of themselvesâ (Byron, Moeller 2021). Think of the first exchange he had with BJ Hunnicutt in 4x01 : "You married?" / "Someone will have to get me pregnant first." That exchange is not intended to be romantic or sexual, of course, but you can't help but clock the flirty undertone. It's a crucial moment in the episode as the first stone paved in the road to the deep intimacy forged between BJ and Hawkeye over the rest of the show. Think also of the parting gift trapper leaves with radar for Hawkeye: a kiss on the cheek. The show doesn't end the joke with radar kissing Hawkeye with an exaggerated grimace, Hawkeye pecks him back.
Flirting to create a transgressive, private space that disrupts the rigid institutional structure: Hawkeye's flirting, along with his larger performance of vulnerabilities, creates "the kinds of connections that impact on people, and on which they depend for living (if not "a life"), do not always respect the predictable forms" (Berlant 1998). The flirtation is a substantial part of the camaraderie Hawkeye develops with BJ, with Trapper, with Margaret, with Klinger, with the nurses at the 4077 MASH. The flirtation, especially due to it being so far from the picture of midcentury machismo and coupled with Alan Alda's (the actor) 'slinky' burlesque-theatricality flavoured masculinity, is 'improper' behaviour for an officer in the US army and thus is a deliberate mockery of the normative ideologies of the military institution.Â
Flirting as a performance of (queer) failure: Halberstam (2011) reimagines "failure" not as a lack of achievement, but as a radical refusal to participate in the "success" metrics of a heteronormative, capitalist, or this case, militaristic society. Hawkeye "fails" to be a good GI Joe. He lounges around in his red robe, knits and plays golf with an orange, swings a martini glass, has no respect for the linguistic propriety of the military, and he flirts. All this, though in a more muted, less obvious way, contributes to a performance of "unfitness" much like Klinger does with drag.
Flirting as friendship as a way of life: Hawkeye forges deep, intense bonds with friendship with multiple characters on the show and much of the forging is done through flirting. These intimacies exist in spaces where institutional codes of the army, but also more broadly codes of "good ol' meat and potatoes christianity" can't regulate them. "These relations short-circuit it and introduce love where there's supposed to be only law, rule, or habit", as Foucault (1981) put it. His friendship with BJ and Trapper feature a lot of emotional intensity, tactility, shared body language and domestic rituals. His relationship with Margaret too lives and thrives in a liminal space between heterosexual romantic love and platonic friendship, and in a stunning contrast to most stories in popular media of its stature, does not lead to a neat ending, either in a marriage or a breakup.Â
By inhabiting a persona that is sets up a tent and stubbornly squats in the "in-betweenâ, between gendered performances, between platonic and romantic love, and between soldier and civilian, Hakweye becomes a potent ambassador of M*A*S*Hâs anti-war message. He utilizes flirting, friendship and frivolousness to show the proverbial middle finger to the Great American War Machinery, which also, in some way, makes him a fitting 70s American icon.
References:
Berlant, Lauren. "Intimacy." Critical Inquiry, vol. 24, no. 2, Winter 1998, pp. 281â288.
Foucault, Michel. "Friendship as a Way of Life." interview by R. de Ceccaty, J. Danet, and J. Le Bitoux, Gai Pied, 1981. Translated by John Johnston in Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, edited by Paul Rabinow, New Press, 1997, pp. 135â140.
Halberstam, Jack. The Queer Art of Failure. Duke University Press, 2011.
Byron, P., & MĂžller, K. (2021). Flirting and Friendship at the Periphery of Hook-up App Research.Lambda Nordica, 26(1), 23-52. https://doi.org/10.34041/ln.v26.720
AO3 đ TAGS đ ARE đ NOT đ SPOILERS đ
iâm so tired of authors not tagging correctly because they donât want to âspoil the ficâ
correctly tagging your fic allows readers who DONâT want to read things like major character death, gore, mpreg or whatever may be their squick to filter your fic out from the main ship/fandom tag. not including the correct tags on your fic is harmful to readers and iâm tired of pretending itâs not.
âdonât like donât readâ great! i wonât! tag your fic correctly next time ffs
if you fear a tag will ruin the plot or reveal a twist write that in the notes at the beginning and a detailed warning in the end notes!
Ao3's tag system is a great tool that helps sensitive readers take more educated risks, but if we're jumping all the way to 'if you don't tag my squick then you are HARMING me' then we've gone waaay too far.
(If OP had just been talking about failing to follow Ao3's rules around the major warnings that would be one thing, but they also threw in 'mpreg or whatever may be their squick' so now it's rant time.)
I do think warning your readers about major common squicks outside the archive warnings is a great impulse! I do it myself! And yet it's also true that literally anything can be a squick or trigger. A potential trigger may seem obvious to you while being totally unnoticeable to the author, and vice versa. Maybe you remembered to tag mpreg, but did you tag for needles? Vomiting? Menstruation? Blood? Doctor's offices? Drug use (because the character takes tylenol one time)? Car crashes? Underage drinking (that isn't considered underage in your country of residence or the time period in which your story is set)? Fatphobia? Character skipping meals? Racial slurs (against Vulcans)? Child endangerment? These are all things that might be reasonably expected to squick or trigger readers because they bring to mind real-world awfulness. I see all of these used as content tags sometimes, but waaaaay less than they 'should' be if authors were truly obligated to protect us from being squicked. And that's not even getting into common narrative or sexual squicks that might be a huge deal to some (unprotected sex, unlubed anal sex, rimming, ass to mouth, breeding kink, daddy kink, undernegotiated D/S, etc) but are so entirely within the realm of normal for others it would never occur to them to tag.
I certainly encourage authors to use tags to help readers find what they're looking for and avoid what they don't want, but enthusiasm for Ao3's tagging system can go too far, wherein readers with specific squicks or triggers begin to hold authors more accountable than they hold themselves. Tagging literally everything is impossible, and there is no fandom consensus on what has to be tagged other than the standard archive warnings.
Creating a new fandom consensus on what MUST be tagged beyond the existing consensus of rape, under-18 sex, graphic violence, and major character death would be incredibly fraught. Standardizing a warning is a powerful normative act, one that can easily inflate existing personal feelings into harsher moral judgments. "We all agree this topic is so upsetting it MUST be warned for" is one step down from declaring a topic entirely taboo. And that has consequences. Victims of rape and child abuse talk about how psychologically damaging it can be to have to cordon off a major part of your own life experiences lest they discomfort others; it can easily feel like you yourself are being declared a blight rather than the harm that was done to you.
Awareness of this impact is why I confess I do find it concerning that the untagged sqicks people get most vocal about tend to involve deviation from sex and gender norms. I understand that pregnancy is a horrifying threat to many fanfic readers and that a lot of us have deep discomfort with our sexual traits, which can naturally lead to us only being able to enjoy a narrower slice of available fictional content, but I never see anybody up in arms about undeniably negative shit like untagged car crashes the way I see some people up in arms about having to occasionally encounter neutral things like untagged mpreg or omegaverse or gender-atypical genitalia.
This is always especially unnerving to me when the offending topic is something that is both inherently morally neutral and entirely possible to encounter among real-life strangers in a positive context. Sure, getting hit with a wave of gender dysphoria when you're trying to read erotica is a bad time, and it's entirely logical to want to select your erotica according to your own genital preferences, but the level of moral outrage people occasionally exhibit when they encounter unexpected genital configurations in erotic fanfic tends to be, uh, pretty unmistakably hostile towards trans bodies, even when it's coming from trans people. Like, okay, say mpreg is a trigger for you because you associate it with threats of corrective rape and you don't want to read about it in your escapist fanficâfair enough. Do you also ask real pregnant trans men in real life to put content warnings on their happy selfies of themselves just existing? Do you get why that would be fucked up? Do you get how it would be extra fucked up to make that request mandatory at an institutional level? Especially if cis pregnancy didn't require any warnings?
Then there's the structural question.
Ao3 content tags were designed to be used positivelyâthe 'exclude' feature did not exist at launchâand as such there was an implied expectation that if you tagged your story as x, you were putting the tag there for people who might want to filter FOR stories with x. That meant a very brief mention of x occurring offscreen wouldn't merit an x tag; nobody came to a fic tagged Arranged Marriage expecting to hear about the main character's cousin having an arranged marriage.
The recent push to use content tags as warnings has led to aggressive overtagging of minor mentions of x, making the x tag less and less useful as a positive filter. This is somewhat mitigated by people using 'minor x' or 'x mention' instead of clogging the 'x' tag (shoutout to people putting background ships in the content tags instead of the ship tags!) which I appreciate. However, this points to a fundamental tension in the practical use of Ao3 tags now that we do have the 'exclude' feature.
If the point is to help readers avoid things, authors will tag very differently than if the point is to help readers find things they might like. And the original structural design of content tags was to help readers find things they might like. Ao3 is firstly for authors to archive their fics and secondarily to help readers find those fics. Only thirdly is it optimized to help readers NOT find fics.
Talking like the 'correct' use of Ao3 tags is to optimize exclusion means you've got your understanding of Ao3 tags backwards.
tl;dr:
there is no standardized list of minor archive warnings; squicks/triggers are so varied it would be impossible to mandate warning for all of them
mandating warnings for x inherently imposes a structural & cultural penalty against x content
ao3 is structured to favor positive content tags (help readers find) over warning tags (help readers avoid)
Authors can be expected to tag the stuff they personally find most relevant about their fic, in much the same way a book in the library has a few major keywords attached. More granular content warnings are a bonus. If you as a reader are highly sensitive to encountering a type of content that falls outside of the major archive warnings, you have to take responsibility for that yourself; it will never be reasonable to 100% conclude that a given fic lacks your squick just because your squick isn't tagged. Unless somebody is blatantly lying about archive warnings or actively mis-tagging, they are not tagging their fic 'incorrectly.'
It's great to encourage people to tag more comprehensively! Explaining why certain tags are of interest to readers would be a good start, or perhaps explaining how to maximize the use of filterable tags that work as both positive and negative simultaneously. But OP's post is neither helpful nor accurate.
HOWEVER:
Noobs to the A03 need to rapidly get their brains around this:
There is no algorithm. NONE. There is no system that will attempt to suss out who likes to read what and offer it up to them on a garnished platter.
Those tags are all you've got to get your stories to the people who will most appreciate them. As a fandom grows larger, many folks are going to be finding things to read by searching for specific character, ship, or genre tags. You don't tag, you're not going to get the readers who really appreciate your style and content.
Via lafermededoudou