A watch chain with a difference
Item 3428, GTC. Watch chain, donated by the maker’s daughter.
We are all familiar with gold and silver watch chains, but this chain was made by a Lancaster woman for her husband using her own beautiful auburn hair. It has been carefully woven and twisted and is complete with all the original rose gold chased fittings and clasps. This was obviously a treasured possession and must have only been worn on special occasions, as it is in such excellent condition.
The wearing of watch chains was a standard part of men’s dress during the Victorian era. It allowed a watch to be safely tucked into the waistcoat pocket (hence the term “pocket watch”) and prevented it from being accidentally dropped by the owner. It also foiled any pickpockets - like Charles Dickens’s fictional character the ‘Artful Dodger’ in his novel “Oliver Twist”.
The common term for these chains is an “Albert” – named after the Prince Consort, Queen Victoria’s husband, and the presentation watch chain he was given in 1849 by the jewellers of Birmingham. According to Brewer’s Dictionary, this then started a new male fashion.
Chains simply connecting a watch in the waistcoat pocket to a buttonhole are known as a “single Albert” type. However this particular chain is a “double Albert”, having two separate chains and clasps with a central fob attachment. One clasp would be attached to the watch and the other fastened to a trinket (such as a vesta case, a medallion or a seal) in the opposite pocket, so that the two chains were draped across the waistcoat. The ‘T’ shaped "button bar" then went up through one of the buttonholes at the centre front of the waistcoat, to secure the chain and allowing the display of a decorative fob.
Item 3428, detail of central fittings showing the button bar
However, in America these double chains were known as “Dickens chains” – his works were very popular there, especially after his reading tours in the 1860s. He is shown wearing a double watch chain in this portrait taken in New York in 1867 in the link below:
by George Gardner Rockwood albumen carte-de-visite 1867 © National Portrait Gallery, London
It was not unusual to use hair in this way. Throughout the nineteenth century, it was very fashionable to incorporate human hair into sentimental jewellery and accessories, as an external display of both mourning and remembrance. These were made either by professional hair-workers or by amateurs at home - following instructional books like Mrs Speight’s ‘The Lock of Hair’, published in 1871.
Hair jewellery could have a much happier purpose as well:
“... hair was also a reminder of the living and was exchanged between relations, close friends and lovers. In this spirit it was frequently set in more light-hearted rings and lockets or woven into a strong, slender braid suitable for a gentleman’s watch chain.” (P67 Jewels and Jewellery, Clare Phillips)
However, according to the accession records, the donor of this piece said that it had been made by her mother, Edith Gent Smith, about 1924 – at a very much later date, when hair jewellery had not been popular for many years.
So, had Edith followed the modern fashion and had her hair “bobbed” in the short styles of the 1920s? This was a significant decision for many women, who would have worn their hair long since childhood. The donor also said that Edith had made the watch chain for her husband Sydney. Was it perhaps a love token, as well as a lasting reminder of her “crowning glory”?
Item 3428, detail showing the twisted weaving
Of course, this is all just speculation, but what else can we find in the official records about this couple? What is the story behind this beautifully crafted and very personal item?
The history of both of families show significant geographic mobility - presumably in search of work - and there are also links to the cotton textile industry in the North West.
The maker of the chain, Edith Gent Smith (1895-1984) was the daughter of Joseph Gent Webster, a bricklayer, and his wife Frances Parsons. She was born in Preston, although both her parents were originally from the Market Bosworth area in Leicestershire. At the time of the 1891 census, the family was living in Preston, but by 1901 they had moved again, to Lancaster.
In 1911, 14-year-old Edith was working as a “Creeler in Cotton Mill”. A “creel” was a frame holding a number of roving bobbins which fed into the spinning mule, and the creeler’s job was to replace any empty bobbins with full ones. Like hair-work, this was obviously a job which required nimble fingers!
By 1921, Edith, 25, was a “Card Room Worker” at Storrs Bros. Mill in Caton. The card room was where the raw cotton was combed by large carding machines to align the fibres, which produced a much stronger thread when spun. Later that year, she married Sydney Smith, who was a bricklayer, like her father.
Sydney had been born in Lancaster in 1896, but his parents were not local people either – his father (and namesake) was born in Bow, Devon in 1862 and his mother, Mary Ann Johnson, in Bury St Edmunds in 1860. Interestingly, on the 1891 Census, Mary Ann Johnson, 31, “Cotton Weaver”, was then living with her widowed mother and sister in Nile Street, Lancaster and their lodger was none other than Sydney Smith, “Mason”, born in Bow, Devon! Love must have blossomed, as the couple were married by the end of the year…
On the 1911 Census, when the family were living in Nun Street, Lancaster, Sydney H Smith, 49, was listed as a “Mason Journeyman” and his 14-year-old son as an “Apprentice to Stonemason” - most probably to his father. By 1921, Sydney jnr was working as a 'Bricklayer' for R Ward, Builder & Contractor in Aldcliffe.
Item 3428, detail of the central chain attachment used for a fob.
The next time we catch up with Edith and Sydney Smith as a couple is on the 1939 Register. They were now living in Simonstone Lane, Simonstone, Burnley, with their daughters, Mary, 16, Elizabeth, 15, and Doris, 6. Sydney was a “Master Bricklayer, Railway Engineering,” Edith was a housewife (“Unpaid Domestic Duties”) and their eldest daughter, Mary, was a “Cotton Weaver”.
Then we found a report in the Burnley Express, 19 April, 1947, of the marriage of Miss Elizabeth Smith to Petty Officer, George Parker, at St Leonard’s Church, Padiham. Two of the bride’s sisters, Edith and Doris, were bridesmaids. This fourth daughter, Edith, was born in 1928 in Lancaster, and must have been away from home on the night the 1939 Register was taken.
But the newspaper report also revealed that Sydney and Edith were by now landlords of the Simonstone Hotel! The wedding reception was held there, before the happy couple spent their honeymoon in Blackpool. Unusually, the pub must have had its own bowling green, based on the many reports of bowling matches taking place there in subsequent years.
Edith and Sydney’s story was certainly one of mobility – both geographical and social.
Jane H.
REFERENCES:
Jewels and Jewellery: Clare Phillips, V & A Publishing, 2008
How the Watch was worn: A Fashion for 500 Years: Genevieve Cummins, Antique Collectors Club, 2010











