Colossians 3:18 Wives, submit to your own husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.
When God created woman from man He said, āIt is not good that man should be alone; I will make him a helper comparable to him.ā God created woman to be a perfectly suitable helper to the man. This means God gave the plan and agenda to Adam, and he and the woman together work to fulfill it. God gives to man the responsibility (and the accountability) to be the leader in the home and Church and gives to the woman the responsibility and the accountability to help him. We only see āhelpingā as a position of inferiority when we think like the world thinks. God considers positions of service as most important in His sight (Matthew 20:25-28). Not only was the woman to be a helper, but also she was made comparable to the man. She should be considered and honored as such. A woman or wife cannot be regarded as a mere tool or worker, but as an equal partner in Godās grace and an equal human being.
The apostle Paul wrote in both Ephesians and Colossians, āWives, submit to your husbands, as is fitting in the Lordā and without proper context and study that would seem to pretty much make women inferior but as everything in life, context is key. Sadly, itās hard to find those who really care toĀ understand the context of passage or to study the original language in which the text was written.
The ancient Greek word translated asĀ submitĀ is essentially a word borrowed from the military. It literally means āto be under in rank.ā It speaks of the way that an army is organized among levels of rank, with generals and colonels and majors and captains and sergeants and privates. There are levels of rank, and one is obligated to respect those in higher rank.
We know that as a person, a private can be smarter, more talented, and be a better person than a general. But he is still under rank to the general. He isnāt submitted to the general so much as a person as he is to the general as a general. In the same way, the wife doesnāt submit to her husband because he deserves it. She submits because he is her husband.
The idea of submission doesnāt have anything to do with someone being smarter or better or more talented. It has to do with a God-appointed order. Anyone who has served in the armed forces knows that rank has to do with order and authority, not with value or ability.
Therefore, submission means you are part of a team. If the family is a team, then the husband is ācaptainā of the team. The wife has her place in relation to the ācaptain,ā and the children have their place in relation to the ācaptainā and the wife.
The form of the verb shows that the submission is to be voluntary. The wifeās submission is never to be forced on her by a demanding husband; it is the deference that a loving wife, conscious that her home (just as any other institution) must have a head.
The phrase āsubmit to your own husbandsā defines the sphere of a wifeās submission. The Bible never commands nor recommends a general submission of women unto men. It is commanded only in the spheres of the home and in the Church (and one of the reasons why women canāt be leading pastors in the Church). God does not command that men have exclusive authority in the areas of politics, business, education, and so on.
The phrase āas is fitting in the Lordā is absolutely crucial. It colors everything else we understand about this passage. There have been two main āwrongā interpretations of this phrase, each favoring a certain position:
The interpretation that āfavorsā the husband says that as is fitting in the Lord means that a wife should submit to her husband as if he were God himself. The idea is āyou submit to God in absolutely everything without question, so you must submit to your husband in the same absolute way.ā This thinks that as is fitting in the Lord defines the extent of submission. But this is wrong. Simply put, in no place does the Scripture say that a person should submit to another in that way. There are limits to the submission your employer can expect of you. There are limits to the submission the government can expect of you. There are limits to the submission parents can expect of children. In no place does the Scripture teach an unqualified, without exception, submission - except to God and God alone. To violate this is to commit the sin of idolatry.
The interpretation that āfavorsā the wife says that as is fitting in the Lord means āIāll submit to him as long as he does what the Lord wants.ā And then it is the wifeās job to decide what the Lord wants. This thinks that as is fitting in the Lord defines the limit of submission. This is also wrong. It is true that there are limits to a wifeās submission, but when the wife approaches as is fitting in the Lord in this way, then it degenerates into a case of āIāll submit to my husband when I agree with him. Iāll submit to him when he makes the right decisions and carries them out the right way. When he makes a wrong decision, he isnāt in the Lord, so I shouldnāt submit to him then. It isnāt fitting to do so.ā Simply put, that is not submission at all. Except for those who are just plain cantankerous and argumentative, everyone submits to others when they are in agreement. It is only when there is a disagreement that submission is tested.
As is fitting in the LordĀ does not define the extent of a wifeās submission. It does not define the limit of a wifeās submission. It defines the motive of a wifeās submission. It means, āWives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands because it is a part of your duty to the Lord, because it is an expression of your submission to the Lord.ā They submit simply because it is fitting in the Lord to do it. It honors Godās Word and His order of authority. It is part of their Christian duty and discipleship.
Therefore,Ā as is fitting in the LordĀ means:
ā¢Ā For wives, submission to their husband is part of their Christian life. ā¢Ā When a wife doesnāt obey this word toĀ submit to your own husband as is fitting in the Lord, she doesnāt just fall short as a wife. She falls short as a follower of Jesus Christ. ā¢Ā This means that the command to submit is completely out of the realm of āmy natureā or āmy personality.ā Wives arenāt expected to submit because they are the āsubmissive type.ā They are expected to submit because itĀ is fitting in the Lord. ā¢Ā This has nothing to do with your husbandās intelligence or giftedness or capability. It has to do with honoring the Lord Jesus Christ. ā¢Ā This has nothing to do with whether or not your husband is ārightā on a particular issue. It has to do with Jesus being right. ā¢Ā This means that a woman should take great care in how she chooses her husband. Remember, ladies: this is what God requires of you in marriage. This is His expectation of you. Instead of looking for an attractive man, instead of looking for a wealthy man, you better first look for a man you can respect.
As is the case in every human relationship, the command to submit is not absolute. There are exceptions to this command for a wife to submit to her own husband:
ā¢ When the husband asks the wife to sin, she must not submit. ā¢ When the husband is medically incapacitated, insane, or under the influence of mind altering substances, the wife may not submit. ā¢ When the husband is violent and physically threatening, the wife may not submit. ā¢ When the husband breaks the marriage bond by adultery, the wife does not need to submit to her husband being in an adulterous relationship.
And finally, Paul finishes that verse inĀ ColossiansĀ by saying,Ā āHusbands, love your wives and do not be bitter toward them.ā
Paulās words to husbands safeguards his words to wives. Though wives are to submit to their husbands, it never excuses husbands acting as tyrants over their wives. Instead, a husband must love his wife, and the ancient Greek word translated as love here isĀ agape.
Significantly, this puts an obligation upon the husbands in here. In the ancient world - under Jewish, Greek, and Roman customs, all power and privileges belonged to husbands in regard to wives, to fathers in regard to children, and to masters in regard to slaves. There were no complimentary powers or privileges on the part of wives, children, or slaves.
The verbĀ agapaoĀ does not denote affection or romantic attachment; it rather denotes caring love, a deliberate attitude of mind that concerns itself with the well-being of the one loved.
Strictly speaking,Ā agapeĀ canāt be defined as āGodās love,ā because men are said toĀ agapeĀ sin and the world (John 3:19,Ā 1 John 2:15). But it can be defined as a sacrificial, giving, absorbing, love. The word has little to do with emotion; it has much to do with self-denial for the sake of another.
Some can read this passage and think that Paul means, āHusband, be kind to your wife.ā Or āHusband, be nice to your wife.ā There is no doubt that for many marriages, this would be a huge improvement. But that isnāt what Paul writes about. What he really means is, āHusband, continually practice self-denial for the sake of your wife.ā
Of course, this agape love is the kind of love Jesus has for His people and this is the love husbands should imitate towards their wives (Ephesians 5:25).
The implication of āAnd do not be bitter toward themāĀ is perhaps the wife has given the husband some reason to be bitter. Paul says, āThat doesnāt matter, husband.ā The husband may feel perfectly justified in his harsh or unloving attitude and actions towards his wife, but he is not justified - no matter how the wife has been towards the husband.
AgapeĀ loves even when there are obvious and glaring deficiencies, even when the receiver is unworthy of the love.
Ephesians 5:25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her
Paulās words to Christian husbands safeguards his previous words to wives. Though wives are to submit to their husbands, it never excuses husbands acting as tyrants over their wives.
As Martyn Lloyd-Jones put it, āIt is not naked power, it is not the power of a dictator or a little tyrant, it is not the idea of a man who arrogates to himself certain rights, and tramples upon his wifeās feelings and so on, and sits in the home as a dictator. No husband is entitled to say that he is the head of the wife unless he loves his wife. So the reign of the husband is to be a reign and a rule of love; it is a leadership of love.ā
Jesusā attitude towards the church is a pattern for the Christian husbandās love to his wife. This shows that the loveless marriage doesnāt please God and does not fulfill His purpose. This is love given to the undeserving. This is love given first. This is love that may be rejected, but still loves.
Charles Spurgeon said this, āIt is possible that some husbands might say, āHow can I love such a wife as I have?ā It might be a supposable case that some Christian was unequally yoked together with an unbeliever, and found himself for ever bound with a fetter to one possessed of a morose disposition, of a forward temper, of a bitter spirit. He might therefore say, āSurely I am excused from loving in such a case as this. It cannot be expected that I should love that which is in itself so unlovely.ā But mark, beloved, the wisdom of the apostle. He silences that excuse, which may possibly have occurred to his mind while writing the passage, by taking the example of the Savior, who loved, not because there was loveliness in his Church, but in order to make her lovely.ā
We might say that Paul taught two things at once here. He taught about the nature of the relationship between husband and wife, and he taught about the relationship between Christ and His Church. Each illustrates important principles about the other.
Jesusā action towards the church is a pattern. This helps us define what agape love is all about: it is self-sacrificing love. How should a husband love his wife? As Christ loved the church and gave Himself for it. What did that involve? Perhaps the best statement concerning that matter is in Philippians 2:5-8, where it shows that the focus of Jesus was on the church. It was for the church that He did what He did, not for Himself.
This word is especially needful for husbands who see headship in submission with worldly understanding instead of godly understanding. Some husbands think that because God said they are the head of the home and the wife is obligated to submit to them that they do not have to be humble, lay down their lives, and sacrifice for the benefit of their wife. They need to understand the difference in thinking between worldly headship and godly headship.
Worldly headship says, āI am your head, so you take your orders from me and must do whatever I want.ā
Godly headship says, āI am your head, so I must care for you and serve you.ā
Worldly submission says, āYou must submit to me, so here are the things I want you to do for me.ā
Godly submission says, āYou must submit to me, so I am accountable before God for you. I must care for you and serve you.ā
This is not the height of romantic love as the world knows it. This isnāt love based on looks, image, the ability to be suave and cutting-edge cool. This is love expressed through sacrifice.
