So yes this is a joke but it raises an important point
The reason webcomics are so bad (and I'm a firm believer that more than 99% of them are terrible ❤️) is that the bar to entry is extremely low.
Anyone can draw a few panels. By hand, with ms paint. I've seen webcomics where it was photos rather than drawings. (I say drawings rather than art because photos, of course, are also an artistic medium)
Anyone can write a joke. (Most of the bad webcomics I've seen have purported to be comedies.) In fact, when you think of a webcomic as just an illustrated joke it becomes really clear how low the bar to entry is.
And on the level of artistic expression that's a great thing. Anyone SHOULD be able to draw a few panels, write a joke, slap it on the internet, and make a webcomic.
For quality, it's a very bad thing. You don't need any practice, you don't need any training, you don't need any editors, you don't need any test audiences. These things all get a bad rap (and certainly there are many artists without formal training and there are great writers without editors) but they generally raise the quality level.
So there you have it. Webcomics are bad and that's why.
Though if you do think gay creators are worse at it than straight ones I recommend you examine a little thing I call *the entire history of human art* ;)
