Hey it's my first time being on this so how's it going
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

PR's Tumblrdome

ellievsbear

Andulka

@theartofmadeline

#extradirty
Show & Tell
Cosmic Funnies
i don't do bad sauce passes

Origami Around
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

pixel skylines
Stranger Things
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Cosimo Galluzzi
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
noise dept.
art blog(derogatory)

No title available

seen from Ukraine

seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Canada

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from South Korea
seen from United States

seen from France
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from Malaysia
seen from Spain
seen from Romania

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Poland
@hawkmorgan
Hey it's my first time being on this so how's it going
Sens. Tammy Baldwin and Susan Collins: Federal recognition of marriage equality is long overdue.
This is important bipartisan legislation that should be passed, especially in light of the threat by Clarence Thomas to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges. Everyone should have a right to marry the person they love and people currently in same-sex or interracial marriages should not be afraid that their marriages could suddenly be considered null and void because of a right-wing judicial agenda.
Millions of American families have come to rely on the promise of marriage equality and the freedoms, rights and responsibilities that come with making the commitment of marrying the one you love.
But Congress has not enshrined marriage equality for same-sex and interracial marriages into law. That is why we are working to pass the Respect for Marriage Act, bipartisan legislation that is another step forward in the United States to prevent discrimination, promote equality and protect the rights of all Americans.
Individuals in same-sex and interracial marriages need, and should have, the confidence that their marriages are legal. These loving couples should be guaranteed the same rights and freedoms of every other marriage. The American people overwhelmingly agree.
Over the past 30 years, Americans have grown more supportive of marriage equality. In 1996, less than one-third of Americans — a mere 27 percent — supported same-sex marriages. A quarter-century later, in 2022, more than 70 percent of Americans support marriage equality, including a majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents.
We all have family, friends, co-workers or neighbors who are in these marriages. These partnerships deserve fairness and the recognition, stability and rights of marriage. They are an accepted part of American life.
While a wedding ceremony and party are rites of passage that everyone should be able to enjoy if they wish, a legally binding marriage comes with another set of amazing rights and responsibilities. Married Americans are afforded tax benefits, often paying a lower rate. Married couples are able to receive earned benefits for spouses, such as Social Security, Medicare, disability and those from the armed services. Those who are legally married are able to visit their spouses when they are ill, while others are often not and are considered strangers under the law. In a dire circumstance when a spouse is incapacitated and unable to make their own medical decisions, their better half has the right and responsibility to make those tough decisions for them, as it should be.
The Respect for Marriage Act is a simple, straightforward measure, only four pages in length — it is shorter than this op-ed. The bipartisan legislation would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, a 1996 law that allowed states and the federal government to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages validly performed in other states. The Respect for Marriage Act would simply require the federal government to recognize a marriage if the marriage was valid in the state where it was performed. It would guarantee legal marriages are given full faith and credit, regardless of the couple’s sex, race, ethnicity or national origin. This legislation has earned bipartisan support in Congress because it grants same-sex and interracial couples the certainty that they will continue to enjoy the same equal treatment under federal law as all other married couples.
Must Reads: He voted for Trump. Now he and his wife raise their son from opposite sides of the border
This is where 2 quinces your actions have consequences big time more people just think it's true than just doing sleeping on whatever popularity thing is happening I actually think before you leap
Sens. Tammy Baldwin and Susan Collins: Federal recognition of marriage equality is long overdue.
This is important bipartisan legislation that should be passed, especially in light of the threat by Clarence Thomas to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges. Everyone should have a right to marry the person they love and people currently in same-sex or interracial marriages should not be afraid that their marriages could suddenly be considered null and void because of a right-wing judicial agenda.
Millions of American families have come to rely on the promise of marriage equality and the freedoms, rights and responsibilities that come with making the commitment of marrying the one you love.
But Congress has not enshrined marriage equality for same-sex and interracial marriages into law. That is why we are working to pass the Respect for Marriage Act, bipartisan legislation that is another step forward in the United States to prevent discrimination, promote equality and protect the rights of all Americans.
Individuals in same-sex and interracial marriages need, and should have, the confidence that their marriages are legal. These loving couples should be guaranteed the same rights and freedoms of every other marriage. The American people overwhelmingly agree.
Over the past 30 years, Americans have grown more supportive of marriage equality. In 1996, less than one-third of Americans — a mere 27 percent — supported same-sex marriages. A quarter-century later, in 2022, more than 70 percent of Americans support marriage equality, including a majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents.
We all have family, friends, co-workers or neighbors who are in these marriages. These partnerships deserve fairness and the recognition, stability and rights of marriage. They are an accepted part of American life.
While a wedding ceremony and party are rites of passage that everyone should be able to enjoy if they wish, a legally binding marriage comes with another set of amazing rights and responsibilities. Married Americans are afforded tax benefits, often paying a lower rate. Married couples are able to receive earned benefits for spouses, such as Social Security, Medicare, disability and those from the armed services. Those who are legally married are able to visit their spouses when they are ill, while others are often not and are considered strangers under the law. In a dire circumstance when a spouse is incapacitated and unable to make their own medical decisions, their better half has the right and responsibility to make those tough decisions for them, as it should be.
The Respect for Marriage Act is a simple, straightforward measure, only four pages in length — it is shorter than this op-ed. The bipartisan legislation would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, a 1996 law that allowed states and the federal government to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages validly performed in other states. The Respect for Marriage Act would simply require the federal government to recognize a marriage if the marriage was valid in the state where it was performed. It would guarantee legal marriages are given full faith and credit, regardless of the couple’s sex, race, ethnicity or national origin. This legislation has earned bipartisan support in Congress because it grants same-sex and interracial couples the certainty that they will continue to enjoy the same equal treatment under federal law as all other married couples.
Report: Trump Stored Another Country’s Nuclear Secrets at Fucking Mar-a-Lago
There is no reason for Trump to have information on another country's nuclear weapons unless he was planning on selling that information or using that information in some other nefarious way.
This is NOT Trump's personal property. This belongs to the American people.
In light of this, Judge Cannon's order is even more bizarre and clearly grounds for her impeachment because her order represents a deliberate attempt to obstruct justice.
my dad asking me what i'm laughing at and me telling him "you wouldn't get it" bc how is he supposed to get this
my dad asking me what i'm laughing at and me telling him "you wouldn't get it" bc how is he supposed to get this
he literally served more pussy in this look than i thought was scientifically possible
LUCIFER SEASON 1 CHALLENGE ➝ favorite therapy session
LUCIFER | 1.06 “Favorite Son” The Sandman #23 Lucifer #75
JAMIE DORNAN as CHRISTIAN GREY FIFTY SHADES FREED (2018) dir. James Foley
Gay
Gay
Florian Hetz
http://mystuffff.tumblr.com/
(via total1mo, total1mo, artfulawful)