Frog @insomni-frog - Tumblr Blog

panny-lii

Participating this year 🎭

An art gifting game

manfrommars2049

UBI needs to happen. via antiwork

hasufin

I think most importantly, it would give us the leverage to say “no”. To walk away from bad jobs and abusive managers. To refuse to work in unsafe environments. To demand better pay.

To demand better, because the options are no longer “suck it up” or “die”.

tehamelie

The counter-argument: Not having UBI is in the interests of those in power who want to do anything to the people they are in power over in order to remain in power.

If the greed of the few should come before the need of the many.

mckitterick

rip-quizilla

cosmicwhoreo

"Oh you've started watching One Piece? Thats cool! What's gotten ya into it to go through so many episodes?"

...The plot.

poetrylesbian

good news everyone

despazito

It's actually super unethical to keep a peeve as a pet

chibifox2002

I had nearly forgotten how to draw this man

wisteriaaa

this audio cracks me up

cosmicwhoreo

I don't think I explore Vezzpa being... i guess being amything other than annoyed or smug enough?

Cuz, girl has more going on trust. She just doesn't let other people know it if she can help it.

Yeahhh... see, Vezzpa has a hard time expressing a lot of emotion that's not annoyance or anger.

Her childhood never gave her the room for tears or stress when work was always THE priority. Busy bees or something or other.

So, she usually just swallows it down until it chokes her.

#tw dissociation #Tw nervous breakdown #Tw Sobbing #tw breakdown

goobygnarp

when youre a slave to bbeauty

allthingswhumpyandangsty

despazito

bovid-beauty

The rule could have heavy impacts towards trans people across society.

Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"

The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointee—not a career expert or peer reviewer—to ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people exist—through its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processes—could be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to “support the notion that sex is mutable” and have its federal funding blocked.

Importantly, the gender ideology prohibition has no age limitation—hospitals could be targeted not just for providing care to minors but for providing gender-affirming care to adults, because prescribing hormone therapy to a transgender patient of any age could be deemed promoting the belief that "sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic."