Shopping Istanbul

[istanbulmarket]

Qualifications for a Judicial Career

A career in the judiciary is open to all Bulgarian citizens who meet specific requirements. Candidates must:

Be at least twenty-six years old.

Have completed a full course of legal education.

Successfully pass a State examination.

Serve at least six months as candidates attached to a Departmental Court.

In addition, the candidate must:

Be proficient in the official language of the Principality.

Enjoy full civil and political rights.

Have no criminal charges that carry the penalty of hard labour.

These requirements ensure that only qualified and responsible individuals enter the judicial profession.

Promotion and Appointment

Judges may be promoted to higher positions periodically. Promotion is based on:

The number of years served in their current position.

Favorable reports from the superior court.

Judges, public prosecutors, and Justices of Peace are appointed by royal decree on the advice of the Minister of Justice. Candidates are usually chosen from a list of three names recommended by the respective courts. However, the Minister of Justice is not obliged to select from this list and may propose other candidates, as long as they meet the necessary qualifications Istanbul Tours.

Restrictions on Judicial Activities

To ensure impartiality, judges may not hold other positions at the same time. They cannot be:

Members of Parliament or deputies,

Barristers or civil servants,

Professors or teachers,

Merchants or company directors,

Editors of political newspapers, or members of political parties,

Concessionaires or State contractors.

These rules prevent conflicts of interest and protect the independence of the judiciary.

Permanency of Judges

The principle of permanency applies to judges who have:

Specialized legal education.

Served at least fifteen years as judges or examining magistrates.

Permanent judges cannot be retired or transferred without their consent, except in cases of disciplinary action. They cannot be moved to a higher post without written approval. However, officers of the Public Prosecution Department are not permanent, and their positions are more flexible.

These rules create a professional, independent, and stable judiciary in Bulgaria. By setting clear qualifications, restricting outside activities, and granting permanency to experienced judges, the Principality ensures that justice is fair, impartial, and consistent throughout the country.

[istanbulmarket]

Liberal Changes in the Constitution

The original draft of the Organic Statute gave very few rights to the legislative body. Most of the legislative initiative—the power to propose new laws—was reserved for the Prince and the Government. Members of the National Assembly had little ability to create new laws or influence policy.

The Constituent Assembly played a key role in changing this. Many of the liberal institutions that now form part of the Bulgarian constitution were introduced by members of the Assembly. These changes were significant and gave the legislative body more independence and influence than originally planned.

Composition of the National Assembly

The draft gave the National Assembly more the character of a senate than a popular assembly. Not all members were to be elected by the people. Some were appointed by the Prince, while others were included by virtue of their office: the Exarch, bishops, and presidents of law courts all automatically became members Istanbul Tour Guide.

The State Council was another important institution proposed in the draft. Its responsibilities were:

Advising the Government in preparing bills.

Acting as the supreme administrative court.

Settling disputes between the judiciary and administrative organs.

Authorising extraordinary expenses and communal loans.

Approving expropriations for public utility.

Ensuring the observance of the constitution.

This made the State Council a powerful body, closely linked to the government.

The Constituent Assembly

The Constituent Assembly that reviewed the draft had 231 members. Its composition was as follows:

89 members elected by popular suffrage (one deputy per 10,000 male inhabitants).

21 members appointed by the Imperial Commissary, including 11 Mahommedans.

5 members representing various societies.

11 members representing the clergy: 9 Orthodox, 1 mufti, and 1 rabbi.

105 members were high officials, including presidents of law courts and departmental or municipal councils.

This mix ensured that different social, religious, and administrative groups were represented in the Assembly, giving it more authority and legitimacy.

Thanks to the initiative of the Constituent Assembly, Bulgaria’s constitution became more democratic and balanced than the original draft. The Assembly expanded the powers of legislators, ensured representation of different communities, and strengthened the rule of law. These reforms laid the foundation of modern Bulgarian governance and established a system that could adapt to the needs of a newly independent state.

[istanbulmarket]

Snowfall and Climate

Snowfall

Snow usually falls in Bulgaria from November to April. The frequency and amount of snow vary depending on the location:

Sofia: average of 42.2 days with snow per year

Philippopolis (Plovdiv): 14.8 days

Bourgas: 12.8 days

This shows that mountainous and northern areas receive more snow than southern and coastal regions. Snow cover often supports winter agriculture and maintains water supplies for rivers and streams.

Moisture and Clouds

Bulgaria’s climate is between the Mediterranean and Central European climates. The average cloud density during the year ranges from 5 at Philippopolis to 5.5 at Gabrovo Turkey Sightseeing.

November is the cloudiest month, with Sofia recording 7.9 on average.

August is the clearest month, with Bourgas at 2.6.

Humidity also varies: the average moisture is 70% at Gabrovo and 79% at Bourgas. Moisture decreases in summer to 58% and rises to 66% in December. Atmospheric pressure is highest in summer at Philippopolis (13.3) and lowest in January at Gabrovo (3.4).

Vegetation

Forests and Flora

Bulgaria’s vegetation reflects its geographical and climatic diversity. The mountains are covered with forests similar to those of Central Europe, including oaks, beeches, and pines. The northern plains along the Danube resemble the Russian steppes, with open grasslands. In contrast, Southern Bulgaria produces plants typical of southern Europe and Mediterranean regions.

Historically, Bulgaria was very rich in forests, as travellers’ memoirs confirm. However, reckless logging and mining have destroyed much of this wealth. Today, the remaining forests are mostly in remote mountain areas, far from towns and major roads. These forests are important for biodiversity, water conservation, and maintaining soil fertility.

Bulgaria’s climate, snowfall, and vegetation are influenced by its mountains, plains, and position between Central Europe and the Mediterranean. Snowfall provides water for rivers, while cloud and humidity patterns affect agriculture. Despite past deforestation, the remaining forests and diverse plant life continue to support the country’s ecological and economic balance, giving Bulgaria a unique natural environment.

[istanbulmarket]

The Wall of Leo the Armenian

The Threat from the Bulgarians

In the year 813, the Byzantine emperor Leo the Armenian ordered the construction of a new wall to strengthen the northern defenses of Constantinople. The need for this wall came from the threat of the Bulgarian ruler Crum, who was preparing for a second attack on the capital.

Crum had already tried once to capture the city but failed. After his first defeat, he swore revenge. He also wanted to punish the Byzantines because of a treacherous assassination attempt made against him during peace talks with Emperor Leo Private Tours Bulgaria Varna.

The Failed Assassination Plot

A meeting was arranged between the two leaders near the Heraclian Wall, on the clear condition that both sides would appear unarmed. This was necessary because there was little trust between them. However, Leo secretly placed three archers in hiding, instructing them to shoot Crum on his signal.

When Crum arrived, he quickly noticed signs of danger. Just as he dismounted his horse, he grew suspicious. Leaping back into his saddle, he galloped away toward his army camp. The hidden bowmen released their arrows, and although one wounded Crum, he escaped with his life.

Byzantine historians later described the failure of this plot as God’s punishment for the sins of the empire. Crum, on the other hand, saw it as treachery and vowed to destroy Constantinople. He returned to Bulgaria to prepare for a massive new war, but he died before his plan could be carried out.

Building the Wall of Leo

Knowing that Crum might return, Leo immediately improved the city’s defenses. He built a new wall and moat in front of the older Wall of Heraclius. This additional barrier became known as the Wall of Leo the Armenian.

The wall stood about 77 feet west of the Wall of Heraclius and ran parallel to it for 260 feet before turning toward the Golden Horn. Its design was lighter than other city walls, measuring only about 8 feet thick. To give it strength, the wall’s parapet-walk was supported by arches, which also helped buttress the structure.

Towers and Gateways

To increase its defensive power, the wall was reinforced with four small towers. Two were placed on the side facing the Golden Horn, while the other two stood at the ends of the wall section that faced the countryside. Interestingly, the two western towers projected inward from the wall’s rear side, creating space for a gateway between them. This entrance matched the position of the Gate of Blachernae in the Wall of Heraclius, ensuring passage between the two defensive lines.

Importance of the Wall

Although not as massive as the famous Theodosian Walls, the Wall of Leo the Armenian was an important part of Constantinople’s layered defenses. It symbolized the empire’s determination to withstand foreign attacks, especially during a period when the Byzantines were under constant pressure from Bulgarians and other enemies.

By building this wall, Leo not only strengthened the city but also ensured that the sacred Blachernae quarter, home to the famous church of the Virgin, remained securely protected.

[istanbulmarket]

Government Support Brings Prosperity to Industry

The Bosnian government has not only helped farmers but has also made important improvements in other industries. By following a paternalistic policy, the government has aimed to guide and care for the people, just as a parent would. This has resulted in increased happiness and prosperity across the country.

To support industrial development, the government has built factories and technical schools in all major towns. These institutions focus on training artisans and mechanics, who were previously very rare in Bosnia. The goal is to create a new generation of skilled workers who can contribute to building a modern economy.

Practical Education for a Skilled Workforce

In these training schools, students learn practical subjects such as:

Electricity, Chemistry, Mechanics, Engineering, Architecture and home construction, Machine design and maintenance, Carpentry, Masonry, Stone cutting, Iron working, Textile and fabric design

With this education, young Bosnians are becoming well-prepared to work in useful and productive trades. If they continue on this path, the next generation will be highly skilled in both technical fields and manual trades.

Growth of Textile Industries

Recently, the government has opened a wool mill and a carpet factory. The wool mill produces low-cost fabric for everyday clothing—similar to the homespun cloth traditionally worn by locals. The carpet factory buys raw wool from farmers, then turns it into Turkish-style rugs. These carpets are sold in Austria and Hungary at good prices, providing income for both the factory and the farmers Sofia Guided Tours.

In connection with the carpet factory, the government has also opened:

A spinning and weaving school for training workers. A design school to encourage young artists. A dye-making laboratory to create high-quality colors for fabrics.

These initiatives are fully supported by the public treasury and supervised by government officials. Even though they make a profit, the main goal is not revenue—it is to improve the lives of the people.

Life Under Turkish Rule vs. Austrian Rule

Under Turkish rule, Bosnians had a very difficult life. Most people lived hand to mouth, barely surviving. They were not allowed to build wealth, own good homes, or live comfortably. Corrupt officials would often take what little the people had. Because of this, many families would hide their homes deep in the woods or valleys to avoid attention.

Now, under Austrian rule, those days are gone. People no longer live in fear. They are building comfortable cabins, barns, and animal pens. Life is becoming more stable and enjoyable, and people are once again starting to dream of a better future.

[istanbulmarket]

Prince Alexander's Return to Bulgaria

After his forced abdication, Prince Alexander returned to Sofia, where he was welcomed with great enthusiasm by the Bulgarian people. They celebrated his return in triumph. However, staying true to his honest nature, Prince Alexander immediately sent a telegram to Czar Alexander III of Russia, saying:

“I received my crown from Russia. I am ready to return it to the hands of her sovereign whenever it is demanded.”

The Czar’s response was swift and predictable. He expressed his disapproval of Prince Alexander’s return to Bulgaria and criticized his administration. Despite the support of Stambouloff and other Bulgarian leaders, who begged Prince Alexander to stay and challenge Russia, Alexander decided that it was best for him to step down to avoid a potential war with Russia Ephesus Sightseeing.

Prince Alexander’s Decision to Abdicate

In his final act as ruler of Bulgaria, Prince Alexander demanded a promise from the Czar. He asked that Russia would allow the Bulgarian people to manage their own affairs without interference. Sadly, this promise was broken within thirty days, and Russia continued to interfere in Bulgarian politics.

After appointing a regency, Prince Alexander officially abdicated the throne. Despite his departure, he left Bulgaria with the love and respect of the people. He went into retirement in Austria, taking the title of Count Hartenau, where he remained until his death in 1893.

The Search for a New King

Once Prince Alexander abdicated, Bulgaria needed a new king. The first choice was Prince Waldemar of Denmark, a member of the royal family and the brother of several European monarchs, including the Queen of Great Britain. However, Prince Waldemar refused the offer, fearing that accepting the throne would upset his brother-in-law, Czar Alexander III, who had forced Alexander to give up his crown.

To find a new ruler, a committee was sent to various European capitals, looking for a suitable king. During this time, Stambouloff, the president of Bulgaria’s parliament, took control of the country as regent. His policies were openly anti-Russian, and he refused to follow any orders from Russia.

Stambouloff’s Leadership and Russian Defeat

Despite Russian efforts to regain control, including sending two commissioners to Bulgaria and sending Russian warships to the port of Varna, Stambouloff stood firm. He treated the Russian officials respectfully but made it clear that Bulgaria would not follow their demands.

Eventually, the Russians became frustrated and withdrew all their officials, including consuls and military personnel, leaving Bulgaria to govern itself. It is unclear what Czar Alexander III had hoped would happen. He might have expected chaos in Bulgaria, which could give him an excuse to send in the Russian army. However, this did not happen. Instead, Bulgaria remained peaceful and stable.

Stambouloff’s Successful Leadership

Stambouloff proved to be an effective leader. He ruled the country well and followed many of the policies that had been set by the deposed Prince Alexander. His anti-Russian stance continued, but he managed to keep Bulgaria peaceful and prosperous during a time of great political uncertainty.

[istanbulmarket]

Understanding the Location of Byzantium’s Ancient Gate

The historian Zosimus makes a statement that, when read alone, can be misunderstood. His words suggest that the ancient gate of Byzantium may have stood west of Constantine’s Forum. This would mean that the Forum was built east of the gate, inside the city walls built by Emperor Severus.

According to Zosimus, people entered the porticoes of Severus and exited the old city by passing through arches. These arches stood on the east and west sides of Constantine’s Forum. This layout would only make sense if, when moving from east to west, the structures were arranged as follows:

Constantine’s Forum

Porticoes of Severus

The old gate of Byzantium

If this were true, then when Zosimus said the Forum stood “where the gate had been,” he might have meant that the porticoes between the Forum and the gate were too short to be worth mentioning Sofia Daily Tours.

Conflicting Historical Sources

However, reading Zosimus in this way causes problems. It contradicts other historical sources:

Theophanes, a later historian, provides a different account that doesn’t support Zosimus’s version.

Hesychius of Miletus clearly states that the wall of Byzantium did not extend beyond the Forum of Constantine. In his words, the wall reached “not beyond the emperor’s market” (Forum).

Even though it is less critical, the Anonymus and Codinus also provide a different explanation. They say the circular shape of the Forum was inspired by the shape of Constantine’s tent when he laid siege to the city. This would place the Forum outside the old city walls.

Modern Scholars’ Interpretation

Modern scholars such as Lethaby and Swainson propose a clearer arrangement of the city’s layout. They place the Forum of Constantine directly between the porticoes of Severus on the east and the ancient gate of Byzantium on the west. According to their interpretation:

The western arch of the Forum stood on the site of the old gate.

A person inside the Forum could go east to enter the Severus porticoes, or west to exit the city through the old gate.

This explanation helps to align Zosimus’s account with the archaeological and historical evidence. It shows how Constantine restructured the city, using existing features like the Severan gate and adding monumental spaces such as his Forum.

A City of Layers

Constantinople (originally Byzantium) was a city shaped over centuries. Each emperor, including Severus and Constantine, left their mark by rebuilding, expanding, and adapting existing structures. The debates about the location of the ancient gate and the placement of the Forum show how deeply architecture and imperial ambition were linked in the making of this historic capital.

[istanbulmarket]

Bulgaria’s Recent History From Communism to the European Union

1949–1954 Change in Leadership

In 1949, Georgi Dimitrov, the longtime communist leader of Bulgaria, died suddenly. He was replaced by Valko Chervenkov, a strict follower of Soviet leader Stalin. Under Chervenkov, political repression was harsh, and many people lived in fear.

1954–1978 Todor Zhivkov’s Rule

In 1954, Chervenkov was replaced by Todor Zhivkov, who stayed loyal to the Soviet Union but eased some political control. Zhivkov allowed a little more freedom for writers and intellectuals. During his time, Bulgaria remained firmly part of the Soviet Bloc Mystical Bulgaria Tours.

However, not everyone agreed with the government. In 1978, a famous Bulgarian dissident named Georgi Markov was killed in London. He was poisoned by an assassin using a special umbrella. This murder shocked the world and showed the harsh methods used against critics.

1980s Growing Tensions

In 1981, Bulgarian secret services were involved in an attempted attack on Pope John Paul II. The details remain controversial but show the extent of Bulgaria’s secret police activities.

In 1984, Zhivkov launched a harsh campaign to force ethnic Turks living in Bulgaria to change their names to Bulgarian ones. This policy caused protests that were violently suppressed by the government. Many ethnic Turks felt oppressed and unsafe.

1989 The Fall of Communism Begins

By 1989, the campaign against the Turks intensified, causing thousands to flee to Turkey. Then, on 10 November 1989, just one day after the Berlin Wall fell, Todor Zhivkov was removed from power by the Bulgarian Communist Party.

In December 1989, anti-communist groups joined forces to create the Union of Democratic Forces (SDS), aiming to bring democratic reforms to Bulgaria.

1990–2001 Political Changes and Economic Struggles

In June 1990, Bulgaria held its first multi-party elections. The communists, now renamed the Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP), won. But soon, economic problems and political instability weakened their control.

From 1991 to 2001, power shifted back and forth between the BSP and the SDS. The SDS generally managed the economy better, but many Bulgarians remained unhappy because economic growth was slow, and most people did not feel any improvement in their daily lives.

2001–2007 New Leaders and European Integration

In spring 2001, Simeon II, Bulgaria’s former king who had lived in exile in Spain since childhood, returned to politics. He formed the National Movement Simeon II (NDSV) and won a big victory in the elections. However, he struggled to solve the economic problems, and his popularity dropped quickly.

In April 2004, Bulgaria became a member of NATO, marking a big step toward closer ties with the West.

A year later, in April 2005, Bulgaria signed the EU Accession Treaty, officially starting the process to join the European Union.

In August 2005, new elections gave a narrow win to the BSP, with Sergei Stanishev becoming Prime Minister.

In November 2005, Boyko Borisov, known for his tough style, was elected mayor of Sofia, showing the public’s frustration with traditional politicians.

Finally, on 1 January 2007, Bulgaria and Romania officially became members of the European Union, opening a new chapter in the country’s history.

2007 and Beyond New Political Movements

In October 2007, Boyko Borisov founded a new political party called GERB (“Shield”), aiming to appeal to many voters. He also won a second term as mayor of Sofia, showing his growing influence in Bulgarian politics.

[istanbulmarket]

The Greek Church Controlled Education in Bulgaria Before the Exarchate

Before the Bulgarian Exarchate was established, the Greek Church was the only Orthodox Church recognized by the Turkish government.

In Turkey, all education was run by the churches, so Greeks controlled the education of Bulgarians. The Turkish government treated Bulgarians as if they were Greeks, and the Greeks encouraged this, as it suited their plans.

The Revival of the Bulgarian Exarchate

After a long struggle, the Bulgarian Exarchate was revived and recognized by the Turks. But, the Greek Patriarch declared the Bulgarian Church to be schismatic (separated from the main Church) and excommunicated it Sightseeing Turkey.

The Difficult Situation for Bulgarians in Greek and Serbian Territories This explains why Bulgarians in Greek and Serbian Macedonia faced such bitter conditions. In these areas:

Their churches and schools were taken away.

They were not allowed to learn in their own language.

They could only receive religious services from priests who viewed them as schismatics.

Bulgaria’s Efforts to Help Bulgarians Outside Its Borders

Even though the Treaty of Berlin gave Bulgaria only part of Macedonia, the country did a lot to support Bulgarians living in the parts of Macedonia that were separated from it.

This shows how deeply Bulgaria was involved in the lives of its people in these areas and helps explain why there are now over 160,000 refugees from these regions in Bulgaria. These refugees fled from their supposed “liberators” who treated them badly.

Bulgarian Exarchate in 1911

In 1911, the Bulgarian Exarchate had:

Churches

Chapels

Metropolitan Bishops

Priests

Schools

Teachers

Scholars

The following data shows the number of these institutions in Macedonia and Thrace, areas that were later assigned to Greece and Serbia by the Treaty of Bucharest.

[istanbulmarket]

Bulgarian Political Emigration and Armed Resistance

The Bulgarian political emigration played an important role in the country’s armed resistance during the communist regime. Many Bulgarians who had escaped the country joined various exile groups that aimed to fight against the oppressive government and support the Goriyani movement, a major resistance group in Bulgaria.

Political Emigration’s Support for the Resistance

After the communist regime was established in Bulgaria, many Bulgarians fled the country and crossed the border illegally. These emigrants formed organizations that supported the Bulgarian resistance. In fact, official records from the State Security reveal that in 1955, 52 armed groups from abroad entered Bulgaria to join the Goriyani movement. These groups were organized by the Bulgarian National Committee, which was later renamed the Bulgarian Liberation Movement Private Bosphorus Tours.

Emigrant Organizations in Exile

A number of organizations were created by Bulgarian emigrants to assist the resistance movement. These organizations included a variety of groups with different focuses, all united by the goal of freeing Bulgaria from communist rule. Some of the key emigrant organizations were:

Bulgarian National Committee “Free and Independent Bulgaria” Bulgarian Liberation Movement “Free Bulgarians” Union Bulgarian Human Rights League Free Bulgarian Centre Bulgarian Hearth Provisional Bulgarian Mission Union of the Bulgarian Anarchists Abroad Bulgarian Organization “Tsar Simeon” Bulgarian National Front “Freedom” Bulgarian National Front “Struggle” The Bulgarian Social Democratic Party in exile Union of the Bulgarian Ex-Military in exile Students’ Organization “Stefan Stambolov” The Bulgarian Orthodox Church in exile

And many more

These groups organized protests, made connections with other international organizations, and coordinated efforts to weaken the communist regime inside Bulgaria.

The Bulgarian NATO Company

One of the most significant contributions of the Bulgarian political emigration was the formation of the first Bulgarian NATO company in 1951. This company was set up near Zeilsheim, a small town in Germany, not far from Frankfurt am Main. The company was made entirely of Bulgarian political emigrants who had escaped the country and were eager to fight against communism.

The soldiers in the company were all Bulgarians who had managed to escape the communist regime. They joined the company with the hope of defending the free world from the threat of communism, particularly from the Warsaw Pact, and contributing to the eventual liberation of Bulgaria from communist rule. Over the course of its 14 years of existence, about 2,500 Bulgarians joined this company, all committed to the cause of freedom and democracy.

The political emigration of Bulgarians played a crucial role in supporting the armed resistance against the communist regime. Many organizations were formed in exile to help with the resistance efforts, and the Bulgarian NATO company served as an example of the emigrants’ dedication to freeing their homeland. Despite the hardships faced by those who had escaped, they continued to fight for a free and independent Bulgaria.

[istanbulmarket]

The 1919 Conference of Women Communists

The 1919 Conference of Women Communists

In 1919, a conference was held for women communists in Bulgaria. The women who attended were closely connected to the Bulgarian Communist Party (which was previously part of the “narrow” socialists). After this conference, the Women Communists started publishing two newspapers: Ravenstvo (Equality, 1919-1923) and Rabotnichka (Woman Worker). These newspapers spread Bolshevik ideas and supported the Communist Party’s activities Bulgaria Holidays.

Legal Trouble for Women Communists

During the 1920s, some women communists faced trials for their involvement in anti-state communist actions. However, many managed to escape to Soviet Russia, including well-known activists, such as the ones connected to Vela Blagoeva.

The Women’s Social-Democratic Union (1921)

Another important left-wing women’s group before World War II was the Women’s Social-Democratic Union, which was part of the international socialist movement. It was established in 1921 with the goal of educating working women both politically and civically. The organization aimed to research the living conditions of women and children and to attract and educate working women, preparing them for the realization of socialist ideals.

Leaders and Structure of the Women’s Social-Democratic Union

Most of the leaders in the Women’s Social-Democratic Union were the wives, sisters, or close relatives of prominent male activists from the Social-Democratic Party. These women included Yordanka Bozvelieva, Vera Sakuzova, Maria Dzhidrova, Yulia Sultanova, and Kina Konova. This pattern shows that, similar to other European countries, many women were drawn to socialist ideas through their male family members.

The Union’s Goals

The Women’s Social-Democratic Union was not independent. Its main goal was to support the work of the Workers’ Social-Democratic Party and help achieve its larger objectives.

[istanbulmarket]

A Litigious Town

Constant Lawsuits in Tirnova

Tirnova is known for having many lawsuits. It might be something in the air, or maybe it’s just the way things have always been. But no other town in Bulgaria has as many legal disputes as Tirnova. The courts are always busy. However, it’s not because the people of Tirnova are dishonest or greedy. They take pride in their reputation for lawsuits, and even the street in the town where lawyers work is famous.

The Lawyers of Tirnova

The lawyers in Tirnova have shops, just like stores that sell goods like cigarettes. In the windows, there are stacks of dusty books, but they also make sure there’s space where people can see them working. The lawyers are often sitting at their desks with papers in front of them, a cigarette in their mouth, and a cup of coffee nearby. If they have a client, they’ll sit by the window, where passersby can watch them talk. If not, they sit in front of the window, staring blankly across the street, but always ready in case anyone needs legal help. In Tirnova, if a person isn’t going to court regularly, people think something is wrong with them Ancient Bulgaria Tour.

Pride in the History of Tirnova

The Historic Significance of Tirnova

The people of Tirnova are very proud of their old town. For two hundred years, in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, Tirnova was the capital of Bulgaria. The kings lived there, and I stumbled over the crumbling walls they built to protect the city from invaders. This is where revolutions were planned, and where kings died in battle. In 1257, during a bloody time when kings and princes were killed, the first National Assembly met there, and Constantine Ticho was chosen as king.

Although Bulgaria’s power weakened over time, and other cities like Sofia became more important, Tirnova never forgot its role as the heart of Bulgaria. It still insists that it is the most important town in Bulgaria and deserves respect.

Tirnova’s Influence in Bulgaria

When Prince Alexander was forced to leave his throne by Russia, the three men who became the Regency came from Tirnova. When Prince Ferdinand was chosen as the new ruler, he didn’t truly become the prince until he had visited Tirnova and been proclaimed there.

The people of Tirnova are proud of their history. A man from Tirnova may seem calm and lazy while sitting at a cafe playing dominoes, but when the conversation turns to their town’s history, a spark of pride lights up his eyes.

[istanbulmarket]

The Scenery and My Discomfort

The scenery around me was beautiful, but I couldn’t fully enjoy it because I wasn’t staying at a comfortable hotel. The colourful leaves on the trees, the rushing river, and the grey, jagged rocks that looked like castles would have made for a wonderful description if I had been sitting on a hotel porch with no worries except waiting for dinner. Instead, I smoked my pipe, appreciated the beauty, and promised myself to come back when a hotel was built on the hill. Then, I went to the kitchen to check on the chickens that were being boiled.

Simple and Dark Living Conditions

In my room, the only light I had was a candle stuck in a crack in the floor. The floor also served as my seat and table. The soldiers were downstairs by the firelight, singing sad Turkish love songs. I used my boots as a pillow and kept my hands in my pockets to stay warm while I tried to sleep Istanbul Daily Tour.

The Mysterious Dawn

There’s something strange and eerie about traveling through an unfamiliar land at dawn. The light in the early morning is mysterious. As we set out for Elbasan, we all shivered in the cold. We had promised ourselves we’d reach the town by night, but we had to climb higher in the dark. None of us spoke because it was too cold to talk. The leaders of the group stayed close, and we climbed over rocky clefts. The animals hesitated at times, but kept going. As daybreak came, a thin haze covered the world, and clouds hung in the dark ravines below us, making the place look like a giant graveyard.

The Difficult Descent

The path down the mountain was steep and winding. The force of centuries of rushing water had carved deep gaps in the rock, so our route cut into and out of the mountain. Sometimes, the track was so narrow it was only a few inches wide. At times, I held my breath as my horse carefully walked along the edge of a cliff, with a drop of a thousand feet below. My heart raced when one of the soldiers’ horses slipped, but I couldn’t turn around for fear of disturbing my own horse. For a brief moment, the horse struggled to regain its balance, and we all stopped to let the frightened animal calm down.

[istanbulmarket]

Arrival at Sileohlu

We arrived at Sileohlu in the afternoon. It was a small, scattered place, with both Turkish and Bulgarian people living there. I had a headache from riding for so long in the hot sun with little food, so I decided to stop. I rested in the shade of a quince tree while my dragoman went to find a place for us to stay for the night.

Friendly Village Life

Some of the village leaders came to meet us—both Turks and Bulgarians, Christians and Muslims. They lived together peacefully, as I had seen in other places, unless there was trouble stirred up by political groups, which led to the Turkish authorities taking harsh actions. The mayor and a group from the local council wanted me to stay as their guest. I thanked them but insisted on paying for my stay. They insisted again, saying they just wanted to make sure I left with good memories of the village Socialist Museum.

A Stranger Welcomed

Here I was, a stranger, arriving in a village I had never heard of just twelve hours before. Yet, the head-man was eager to make me feel welcome, putting aside his own matters to be kind to me. I noticed there was a bit of rivalry between the Christians and Muslims, each group trying to show who could be the most helpful.

Resting in the Shade

The head-man heard that I had a headache and suggested we spend the afternoon resting in a cool forest. We walked to a shaded spot with many trees. There was a large marble tank filled with cool water. We sat on mats, and cushions were brought for us. Melons were thrown into the tank to chill, and then we ate them while they were cold. A fire was lit, and the mayor made coffee. A mild-mannered man, who I called the town clerk, sat nearby and played sad Turkish music on a guitar. We drank many cups of coffee and smoked countless cigarettes.

[istanbulmarket]

Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe

The signing of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe in 1975 brought hope to the nations of the Eastern bloc. This document reaffirmed human rights as a fundamental principle, inspiring people living under totalitarian regimes to seek freedom and justice. It became a powerful tool for those wanting to challenge their governments.

Rise of New Opposition

With the Final Act as a backdrop, a new type of opposition began to emerge across Eastern Europe. More citizens started to openly protest against the restrictions on their rights, demanding that these rights be respected by the communist authorities. The activities of the Solidarity Union in Poland became particularly influential, energizing human rights movements throughout the region.

In the autumn of 1980, inspired by the Polish workers’ struggle for their rights, workers in Romania, Georgia, and the Soviet Baltic Republics also began to strike. In Bulgaria, discontent started to surface as well. The government recognized the growing unrest, leading Directorate Six of the Secret Service, which monitored political enemies, to take action. Their task was to prevent any organized opposition that might be influenced by the anti-socialist forces in Poland Rose Festival Tour.

Government Response

By the end of 1980, the Directorate was conducting targeted operations aimed at the intelligentsia, youth, and perceived counter-revolutionaries. The authorities imposed strict censorship on books, newspapers, films, and any propaganda materials coming from Poland. This censorship aimed to control the narrative and prevent the spread of revolutionary ideas.

The influx of Polish tourists to Bulgaria’s Black Sea coast during the summer raised alarms for the State Security. The government worried that these visitors might share ideas of dissent with local citizens, further stirring unrest.

Propaganda and Misinformation

To combat the growing influence of Polish movements, the Bulgarian press became a tool for propaganda. The media published distorted accounts of the situation in Poland to mislead the public about the goals of Polish trade unions and the desire of Polish people for democracy. The official daily newspaper, Rabotnichesko Delo, frequently reprinted articles from Soviet publications like Pravda and Izvestiya. These articles claimed that Western powers were interfering in Poland’s internal affairs, painting a picture of external threats to justify the regime’s actions.

In conclusion, the signing of the Final Act in 1975 catalyzed a wave of hope and resistance in Eastern Europe. The emergence of new opposition movements, particularly inspired by Poland’s Solidarity Union, marked a significant shift in the struggle for human rights. However, the response from communist authorities was one of increased repression and propaganda. The government’s efforts to control information and maintain their power ultimately demonstrated the deep fear of change that existed within these totalitarian regimes. As people continued to push for their rights, the foundations for future movements were being laid.

[istanbulmarket]

Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe

The signing of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe in 1975 brought hope to the nations of the Eastern bloc. This document reaffirmed human rights as a fundamental principle, inspiring people living under totalitarian regimes to seek freedom and justice. It became a powerful tool for those wanting to challenge their governments.

Rise of New Opposition

With the Final Act as a backdrop, a new type of opposition began to emerge across Eastern Europe. More citizens started to openly protest against the restrictions on their rights, demanding that these rights be respected by the communist authorities. The activities of the Solidarity Union in Poland became particularly influential, energizing human rights movements throughout the region.

In the autumn of 1980, inspired by the Polish workers’ struggle for their rights, workers in Romania, Georgia, and the Soviet Baltic Republics also began to strike. In Bulgaria, discontent started to surface as well. The government recognized the growing unrest, leading Directorate Six of the Secret Service, which monitored political enemies, to take action. Their task was to prevent any organized opposition that might be influenced by the anti-socialist forces in Poland Rose Festival Tour.

Government Response

By the end of 1980, the Directorate was conducting targeted operations aimed at the intelligentsia, youth, and perceived counter-revolutionaries. The authorities imposed strict censorship on books, newspapers, films, and any propaganda materials coming from Poland. This censorship aimed to control the narrative and prevent the spread of revolutionary ideas.

The influx of Polish tourists to Bulgaria’s Black Sea coast during the summer raised alarms for the State Security. The government worried that these visitors might share ideas of dissent with local citizens, further stirring unrest.

Propaganda and Misinformation

To combat the growing influence of Polish movements, the Bulgarian press became a tool for propaganda. The media published distorted accounts of the situation in Poland to mislead the public about the goals of Polish trade unions and the desire of Polish people for democracy. The official daily newspaper, Rabotnichesko Delo, frequently reprinted articles from Soviet publications like Pravda and Izvestiya. These articles claimed that Western powers were interfering in Poland’s internal affairs, painting a picture of external threats to justify the regime’s actions.

In conclusion, the signing of the Final Act in 1975 catalyzed a wave of hope and resistance in Eastern Europe. The emergence of new opposition movements, particularly inspired by Poland’s Solidarity Union, marked a significant shift in the struggle for human rights. However, the response from communist authorities was one of increased repression and propaganda. The government’s efforts to control information and maintain their power ultimately demonstrated the deep fear of change that existed within these totalitarian regimes. As people continued to push for their rights, the foundations for future movements were being laid.

[istanbulmarket]

The Soviet-Backed Communist Takeover in Bulgaria

Soviet Invasion and Occupation

On September 8, 1944, the Soviet Army invaded Bulgaria, marking the beginning of a three-year occupation that would last until December 1947. As soon as Soviet forces entered the country, the Bulgarian Army was placed under Soviet command, and political commissars were introduced to ensure that the army aligned with Soviet policies. This invasion set the stage for a dramatic shift in Bulgaria’s political landscape.

Signing of the Armistice

On October 28, 1944, an Armistice was signed between Bulgaria and the Allied powers, including the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States. While this agreement ostensibly ended Bulgaria’s involvement in World War II, it also effectively sanctioned the Soviet occupation of the country. Soviet Marshal Fyodor Tolbukhin was appointed Chairman of the newly established Allied Control Committee, with Colonel General Sergey Biryuzov serving as his deputy. This committee was responsible for overseeing Bulgaria’s administration during the occupation, further solidifying Soviet control.

The Rise of the Fatherland Front

As Soviet troops advanced into Bulgaria on September 8, 1944, the National Committee of the Fatherland Front, a coalition dominated by communists, declared itself the only legitimate political entity in Bulgaria. The Fatherland Front accused Prime Minister Konstantin Muraviev’s government of wavering and being hypocritical in its dealings with the Soviet Union. This declaration was a clear signal of the impending power shift in Bulgaria Istanbul Tour Guides.

The Coup of September 9, 1944

In the early hours of September 9, 1944, at 2:15 a.m., as Soviet forces had already entered Bulgaria, army officers affiliated with the Zveno political group staged a coup, overthrowing the democratic government of Prime Minister Muraviev. Power was quickly transferred to the Fatherland Front, the communist-led coalition. Just a few hours later, at 6:25 a.m., Bulgarian Radio announced the formation of a new government headed by Kimon Georgiev, a key figure in the Fatherland Front.

Communist Consolidation of Power

Before the coup, the Bulgarian Communist Party was a relatively small organization with only a few thousand members. However, after seizing power, the communists swiftly took control of key government ministries, particularly the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Justice. This allowed them to exert total control over the new government’s decisions. Although the new regime portrayed itself as a government “of the people, for the people, by the people,” it quickly became apparent that it was anything but democratic.

The new government, installed through a military-political coup with significant assistance from the Soviet Army, began to impose a totalitarian system modeled after the Soviet Union. This regime used brutal tactics to maintain its grip on power, suppressing any opposition and eliminating political freedoms. The takeover marked the beginning of an era of severe repression and the establishment of a Soviet-style dictatorship in Bulgaria.

Conclusion: The Beginning of a Totalitarian Era

The events of September 1944 were a turning point in Bulgarian history, marking the transition from a constitutional monarchy to a communist dictatorship. The Soviet-backed coup and subsequent occupation paved the way for decades of totalitarian rule, characterized by oppression, lack of political freedom, and strict adherence to Soviet policies. The Bulgarian people would endure this repressive regime until the fall of communism in Eastern Europe in the late 1980s.