Reblog if you ship Reddie <3
Literally OTP
Babes 😍
Oh. Yeah.

Discoholic 🪩

izzy's playlists!
No title available

PR's Tumblrdome
sheepfilms
Xuebing Du
Noah Kahan

pixel skylines
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Not today Justin
occasionally subtle

#extradirty
h
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
No title available

No title available
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
𓃗

Kiana Khansmith

seen from France
seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from France
seen from Dominican Republic
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Ukraine

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Venezuela
@jackdawsinflight-blog
Reblog if you ship Reddie <3
Literally OTP
Babes 😍
Oh. Yeah.
Lyn joins Laura at Robbie's bedside
Sorry, this has been very slow to appear. Been a bit busy... excuses, excuses!
I needed a Clare fix...
I recently read an interview with director Howard Davies (Sept, 2000) about the play, Conversations after a Burial (Yasmina Reza), in which he said:
"For a while, Clare and I steadfastly refused to work together because we thought it would seem improper,... but I could think of no-one who could play Élisa better."
Given how perfect her future husband considered Clare for the role, I thought this Élisa character sounded interesting. So I bought a copy of the play, which arrived today. Hurrah!
The geek in me was excited to find a list of the original cast members on the first page:
The subject matter of the play is obvious from its title and it is said to explore “that ineffable moment of mourning, when the newly deceased is still almost palpable, the moment in which one can sustain the memory of a breath, the intense pause between absence and the return to every day existence, between loss and life.”
It sounds chilling, but also promises to be “richly comic”. Whilst in an ideal world I would master time travel and go back to see the play in 2000, in the meantime I shall have to make do with what looks to be an enjoyable read. Happy days.
Happiness always scared me because it was always followed by… you know.
Every Brilliant Thing (via fuckyeahgreatplays)
Saw this last night at the Lowry and it was fantastic. A heartbreaking but hilarious take on the outlook of a child whose mother suffers from depression. He makes a list of every brilliant thing in life in the hope that this will convince her not to make another attempt on her own. Such a simple, yet clever concept, delivered in an intimate setting (with audience participation) leading to lots of laughs and lumps in the throat. Simultaneously sad and uplifting. Just brilliant.
Touring the UK Summer and Autumn 2015: http://www.pentabus.co.uk/every-brilliant-thing
Hathaway and Lewis air drumming Phil Collins solo. Yes, yes... and more yes.
Clare Holman in Each His Own Wilderness
I am no expert when it comes to plays. Yes, I love the theatre, but my knowledge of the stage and its many wonderful productions is painfully superficial. Doris Lessing herself would no doubt readily label me a dilettante (and, yes, I had to look that word up when I first read Each His Own Wilderness). However, I do know that sometimes I go to see something that captivates me to such an extent that I can’t think about anything else for days afterwards. Clare’s performance (and that of her on stage son, Joel MacCormack) absolutely confounded me… and it’s not usual for me to be lost for words.
Clare played Myra Bolton, a middle-aged widow living in London in the late 50s, who spends her life passionately campaigning for distant causes linked to her socialist convictions. The play opens with a tape recorder playing machine gun fire and explosions - an audio concoction which Myra herself has put together as part of her efforts in protest against the H-Bomb. Looking back, this was an entirely apt prologue to the moment that Clare first burst onto the stage, beginning her fire-cracking, rip-roaring and utterly mesmerising performance as Myra. Throughout the course of the play - which is essentially a window upon the souls of bright, opinionated women in the late 50s - Clare steered Myra on a roller-coaster ride of uproarious highs and depth-plumbing despairing lows, all the while zinging with restless energy. My limited understanding (see above!) of Lessing’s objective is that the play seeks to convey the cry of pain of a generation of women in the late 50s, struggling to find a place for their passions and intelligence in a society that was not quite ready for the feminist movements of the 60s. Basically, these women are wondering what the hell life is all about (ring any bells?) against a backdrop of woeful politics and the apparent ambivalence of their young. And it was certainly a cry of pain which Clare gave us.
Her portrayal of Myra was so scintillating, it made it hard to take your eyes from her, unless it was to the equally mesmerising performance of Joel MacCormack, who played her son. She laughed, she sobbed, she shouted and she simmered: one moment sprawling flirtatiously on the sofa, the next flitting agitatedly about the stage, the next huddled and weeping in an armchair, as Myra unpacked her life and emotions for the audience. Tiny and flighty, unable to sit still for long - as though the whirrings of Myra’s brain were physically manifesting themselves - Clare buzzed with the emotional chasm between our mundane day-to-day existence and the white-knuckle terror of life’s bigger questions.
Clare’s performance was matched perfectly by Joel MacCormack, who gave us an utterly compelling Tony, serving up a myriad of emotions at the flick of a switch: from simpering and plaintive to brooding and sneering. Like his mother, Tony is a twisted wreck of inner turmoil, tormented by the tensions between his ideals, his disappointments and the unfathomable hum-drum of day-to-day life. Mother and son share a depth of feeling and anxiety about the state of the world, but their political convictions and their hopes for Tony’s future do not align. They feel deeply, but irk each other spectacularly - each despairing with the other’s outlook - to make for a a thrilling interaction that crackles with hot-headed affection and bitter disappointment. This provides the focal point for the play.
The characters’ entangled love lives provide the main plot. Clare’s character, Myra, is thronged by dispassionate men (save for one - Philip - whom she had loved painfully deeply, only to have him ‘throw her over’) and does not want for male attention. However, she seems to spend her life yearning - indeed most of the characters do - for something more. My favourite line from the play is Myra’s observation, “Depressed. That word annoys me. Half the time we dope ourselves up with some stimulant - men, our children, work. Then it fails and we see things straight and it’s called being depressed. You know quite well that there’s only one question that everyone’s asking - what are we alive for?” Sometimes, in my darker days, I wonder exactly the same thing. We’re all living right next to each other (in our own little wilderness, as Lessing would have it), searching for the answers. Lessing was writing about it in the 50s, but to me it doesn’t seem that different now. Needless to say, the play ended without any eureka moment.
Urgh, I could talk all day (and just as inexpertly and incoherently as I have done here) about the play. I have been a fan of Clare’s for many years, but something about watching her perform in such an intimate setting (the Orange Tree Theatre in Richmond is tiny) was unexpectedly moving. The play really struck a chord with me and her performance knocked me for six. I can’t stop thinking about it. I am in awe of her. I just wish we got to see more of her. I really do.
Brilliant review of Clare Holman on stage in Each His Own Wilderness. Thanks JackDawesInFlight.
You are a love - ta v much. I didn’t really know what I was talking about but it was WITH FEELING.
Your review is really great. I saw the play too because of Clare and as you I was totally mesmerized by her performance. As soon as she entered the stage she had my full attention even if the other actors were leading a scene. The small stage in the middle made it feel like it all happened in your own living room. It is a bit difficult to describe all my feelings and impressions seeing I am a non-native speaker so thanks for writing this lovely post which mirrors my impressions perfectly :)
Your English is better than mine! Glad to hear you enjoyed it as much as I did. She was just brilliant. Am eagerly awaiting the next time she treads the boards :)
Clare Holman in Each His Own Wilderness
I am no expert when it comes to plays. Yes, I love the theatre, but my knowledge of the stage and its many wonderful productions is painfully superficial. Doris Lessing herself would no doubt readily label me a dilettante (and, yes, I had to look that word up when I first read Each His Own Wilderness). However, I do know that sometimes I go to see something that captivates me to such an extent that I can’t think about anything else for days afterwards. Clare’s performance (and that of her on stage son, Joel MacCormack) absolutely confounded me… and it’s not usual for me to be lost for words.
Clare played Myra Bolton, a middle-aged widow living in London in the late 50s, who spends her life passionately campaigning for distant causes linked to her socialist convictions. The play opens with a tape recorder playing machine gun fire and explosions - an audio concoction which Myra herself has put together as part of her efforts in protest against the H-Bomb. Looking back, this was an entirely apt prologue to the moment that Clare first burst onto the stage, beginning her fire-cracking, rip-roaring and utterly mesmerising performance as Myra. Throughout the course of the play - which is essentially a window upon the souls of bright, opinionated women in the late 50s - Clare steered Myra on a roller-coaster ride of uproarious highs and depth-plumbing despairing lows, all the while zinging with restless energy. My limited understanding (see above!) of Lessing’s objective is that the play seeks to convey the cry of pain of a generation of women in the late 50s, struggling to find a place for their passions and intelligence in a society that was not quite ready for the feminist movements of the 60s. Basically, these women are wondering what the hell life is all about (ring any bells?) against a backdrop of woeful politics and the apparent ambivalence of their young. And it was certainly a cry of pain which Clare gave us.
Her portrayal of Myra was so scintillating, it made it hard to take your eyes from her, unless it was to the equally mesmerising performance of Joel MacCormack, who played her son. She laughed, she sobbed, she shouted and she simmered: one moment sprawling flirtatiously on the sofa, the next flitting agitatedly about the stage, the next huddled and weeping in an armchair, as Myra unpacked her life and emotions for the audience. Tiny and flighty, unable to sit still for long - as though the whirrings of Myra’s brain were physically manifesting themselves - Clare buzzed with the emotional chasm between our mundane day-to-day existence and the white-knuckle terror of life’s bigger questions.
Clare’s performance was matched perfectly by Joel MacCormack, who gave us an utterly compelling Tony, serving up a myriad of emotions at the flick of a switch: from simpering and plaintive to brooding and sneering. Like his mother, Tony is a twisted wreck of inner turmoil, tormented by the tensions between his ideals, his disappointments and the unfathomable hum-drum of day-to-day life. Mother and son share a depth of feeling and anxiety about the state of the world, but their political convictions and their hopes for Tony’s future do not align. They feel deeply, but irk each other spectacularly - each despairing with the other’s outlook - to make for a a thrilling interaction that crackles with hot-headed affection and bitter disappointment. This provides the focal point for the play.
The characters’ entangled love lives provide the main plot. Clare’s character, Myra, is thronged by dispassionate men (save for one - Philip - whom she had loved painfully deeply, only to have him ‘throw her over’) and does not want for male attention. However, she seems to spend her life yearning - indeed most of the characters do - for something more. My favourite line from the play is Myra’s observation, “Depressed. That word annoys me. Half the time we dope ourselves up with some stimulant - men, our children, work. Then it fails and we see things straight and it’s called being depressed. You know quite well that there’s only one question that everyone’s asking - what are we alive for?” Sometimes, in my darker days, I wonder exactly the same thing. We’re all living right next to each other (in our own little wilderness, as Lessing would have it), searching for the answers. Lessing was writing about it in the 50s, but to me it doesn’t seem that different now. Needless to say, the play ended without any eureka moment.
Urgh, I could talk all day (and just as inexpertly and incoherently as I have done here) about the play. I have been a fan of Clare’s for many years, but something about watching her perform in such an intimate setting (the Orange Tree Theatre in Richmond is tiny) was unexpectedly moving. The play really struck a chord with me and her performance knocked me for six. I can’t stop thinking about it. I am in awe of her. I just wish we got to see more of her. I really do.
Brilliant review of Clare Holman on stage in Each His Own Wilderness. Thanks JackDawesInFlight.
You are a love - ta v much. I didn't really know what I was talking about but it was WITH FEELING.
Clare Holman... absolutely nailing Each His Own Wilderness.
Clare Holman in Each His Own Wilderness
I am no expert when it comes to plays. Yes, I love the theatre, but my knowledge of the stage and its many wonderful productions is painfully superficial. Doris Lessing herself would no doubt readily label me a dilettante (and, yes, I had to look that word up when I first read Each His Own Wilderness). However, I do know that sometimes I go to see something that captivates me to such an extent that I can’t think about anything else for days afterwards. Clare’s performance (and that of her on stage son, Joel MacCormack) absolutely confounded me... and it’s not usual for me to be lost for words.
Clare played Myra Bolton, a middle-aged widow living in London in the late 50s, who spends her life passionately campaigning for distant causes linked to her socialist convictions. The play opens with a tape recorder playing machine gun fire and explosions - an audio concoction which Myra herself has put together as part of her efforts in protest against the H-Bomb. Looking back, this was an entirely apt prologue to the moment that Clare first burst onto the stage, beginning her fire-cracking, rip-roaring and utterly mesmerising performance as Myra. Throughout the course of the play - which is essentially a window upon the souls of bright, opinionated women in the late 50s - Clare steered Myra on a roller-coaster ride of uproarious highs and depth-plumbing despairing lows, all the while zinging with restless energy. My limited understanding (see above!) of Lessing’s objective is that the play seeks to convey the cry of pain of a generation of women in the late 50s, struggling to find a place for their passions and intelligence in a society that was not quite ready for the feminist movements of the 60s. Basically, these women are wondering what the hell life is all about (ring any bells?) against a backdrop of woeful politics and the apparent ambivalence of their young. And it was certainly a cry of pain which Clare gave us.
Her portrayal of Myra was so scintillating, it made it hard to take your eyes from her, unless it was to the equally mesmerising performance of Joel MacCormack, who played her son. She laughed, she sobbed, she shouted and she simmered: one moment sprawling flirtatiously on the sofa, the next flitting agitatedly about the stage, the next huddled and weeping in an armchair, as Myra unpacked her life and emotions for the audience. Tiny and flighty, unable to sit still for long - as though the whirrings of Myra’s brain were physically manifesting themselves - Clare buzzed with the emotional chasm between our mundane day-to-day existence and the white-knuckle terror of life’s bigger questions.
Clare’s performance was matched perfectly by Joel MacCormack, who gave us an utterly compelling Tony, serving up a myriad of emotions at the flick of a switch: from simpering and plaintive to brooding and sneering. Like his mother, Tony is a twisted wreck of inner turmoil, tormented by the tensions between his ideals, his disappointments and the unfathomable hum-drum of day-to-day life. Mother and son share a depth of feeling and anxiety about the state of the world, but their political convictions and their hopes for Tony’s future do not align. They feel deeply, but irk each other spectacularly - each despairing with the other’s outlook - to make for a a thrilling interaction that crackles with hot-headed affection and bitter disappointment. This provides the focal point for the play.
The characters’ entangled love lives provide the main plot. Clare’s character, Myra, is thronged by dispassionate men (save for one - Philip - whom she had loved painfully deeply, only to have him ‘throw her over’) and does not want for male attention. However, she seems to spend her life yearning - indeed most of the characters do - for something more. My favourite line from the play is Myra’s observation, “Depressed. That word annoys me. Half the time we dope ourselves up with some stimulant - men, our children, work. Then it fails and we see things straight and it’s called being depressed. You know quite well that there’s only one question that everyone’s asking - what are we alive for?” Sometimes, in my darker days, I wonder exactly the same thing. We’re all living right next to each other (in our own little wilderness, as Lessing would have it), searching for the answers. Lessing was writing about it in the 50s, but to me it doesn’t seem that different now. Needless to say, the play ended without any eureka moment.
Urgh, I could talk all day (and just as inexpertly and incoherently as I have done here) about the play. I have been a fan of Clare’s for many years, but something about watching her perform in such an intimate setting (the Orange Tree Theatre in Richmond is tiny) was unexpectedly moving. The play really struck a chord with me and her performance knocked me for six. I can’t stop thinking about it. I am in awe of her. I just wish we got to see more of her. I really do.
Clare Holman, our girl of “magnificent swagger” - to quote The Guardian.
http://www.theguardian.com/stage/2015/apr/23/each-his-own-wilderness-orange-tree-richmond-review
If I were ever to be described as having magnificent swagger, I think I could die happy. Two words that go so perfectly together. And so perfectly with her. Magnificent swagger she most certainly has got.
Today ITV confirmed that Lewis will return for a ninth series. And there was much rejoicing.
Detectives Robbie Lewis and James Hathaway are returning to ITV in six new episodes of Lewis, as one of ITV’s best-loved and most enduring dramas returns for a ninth series. Kevin Whately and Laurence Fox reprise their roles as the detectives renowned for investigating Oxford’s most complex murders, alongside Angela Griffin (Mount Pleasant, Waterloo Road, Coronation Street) as Detective Sergeant Lizzie Maddox.
Unfortunately, it seems that Rebecca Front aka Chief Superintendent Jean Innocent won’t return:
The arrival of a new Chief Superintendent heralds a fresh dawn for Oxfordshire Police, although the high flyer soon clashes with Robbie Lewis (Kevin Whately) over the latter’s more traditional approach to detective work. With forensic pathologist Laura Hobson (Clare Holman) contemplating early retirement, and the new boss piling on the pressure, will Lewis finally decide to call time on his policing career? Meanwhile, after years of avoiding the thorny issue of family ties, Hathaway (Laurence Fox) is forced to confront his past.
And some more info on the production itself:
The new series of Lewis will go into production in May 2015 and once again feature the beautiful locations in and around the city of Oxford. The creator of Morse, Colin Dexter, continues his association with Lewis acting as consultant on all aspects of production.
Obviously this show is not just about Lewis and Laura (OBVIOUSLY!) but I just wondered if anyone else is a bit concerned about why Laura is contemplating early retirement. Hope it’s for happy reasons...
Media teacher: Part of why media is so constant is that it's so temporary. You can get emotional watching your favorite TV show, but after it's over, you forget about it and move on with your life. You might be upset if a character dies, but you wouldn't lock yourself in your room with a pint of ice cream and cry about it.
Class: -laughs-
Me: -sweats-
Younger Kev.
Different (but equally feisty) doctor character unable to resist his charms.
And who can blame her?
theoofoof:
Oh, the joy! This one of my very fist ships! Between the age of 8 and 11 these were my OTP! Love it.
Ahhh. Shipping in the 90 and 00s. So much trickier. So much more difficult to find someone to talk to about it without inadvertently giving them the impression you were fairly unhinged.
Cancel Halloween.
Lewis is on the telly tonight :)
Younger Kev.
Different (but equally feisty) doctor character unable to resist his charms.
And who can blame her?
"Sorry I mistook it for a peach."
"You better get some even bigger glasses then."
1. Laura tries to protect Robbie from himself.
2. Robbie ignores her and gets an unpleasant surprise.
3. Laura tries to comfort Robbie.
4. Robbie tells her he spent last night with another woman.
5. Awkward.
6. Robbie and Laura stare at each other.
Standard Robson Behaviour.