#narutaugust day 4: invocation

oozey mess
noise dept.

Jimmy Eat World
The Bright Sessions
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

blake kathryn
No title available
Cosmic Funnies
One Nice Bug Per Day
untitled
Keni
Phantogram Three
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Mike Driver
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
EXPECTATIONS

pixel skylines
RMH
occasionally subtle
Sade Olutola
seen from Germany

seen from Belgium
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye

seen from Hungary
seen from Indonesia

seen from Malaysia
@janinski-198
#narutaugust day 4: invocation
kakashi really and truly reads jiraiya’s trashy romance novels for the plot
Sasuke had no right being so flawless like this 😆
in ACD canon was Sherlock middle class?
Hi Nonny!
Honestly? I am not certain, only because I’ve only read a few canon stories. I’m under the impression that he does come from money, but he chooses to live a bohemian lifestyle.
Watson describes Holmes as “bohemian” in habits and lifestyle [X]
To do what he does without an actual paying job, and given what his brother does, I would assume he has access to a bit of wealth or gets paid well.
But then again, “middle class” in Victorian times wasn’t as poor as the middle class is today, so, different time periods and all that.
Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, friends <3
Holmes describes his family as English squires. The squirearchy were a group below the nobility. There used to be a property qualification for being a ‘squire’: this dropped during the 18th century, I think, but typically, they would be country folk, living in the ‘Big House’ in a village, and the most important people there other than any nobility. They would own a small estate, with a home farm, and possibly other farms let out to tenant farmers. They would be the focus of socialising in the village: giving dances and feasts at Harvest, or Christmas.
The squire would be a local Justice of the Peace: he would know who was doing what, and which families were doing well, were criminals, were in need. He would arbitrate local disputes, would dispense any justice that didn’t go to formal trial, and would plough part of his tenants’ rent back into the land. He might build model cottages, or a small school, and be a model landlord, or he might be a hard-drinking, hard-driving, hard-handed bastard with no care for his tenants. He might have the right of presentation to the church living in his village, and would choose a vicar whose politics he approved of. He and his family would walk first into church. Men in his employ would touch their caps to him as he walked by, women would curtsey.
The squire’s lady would know everything about the families in the village. She would dispense advice, medicine, soup and other comforts to the sick, and would intervene in women’s disputes. Either her family, or the squire’s would have been there for generations. Working for the squire’s family was sought after. It gave status.
The squirearchy in England were important. They exercised a paternalistic, patriarchal, but generally benign and protective function over a limited area. If you’ve read classic English literature, you’ve met squires. Mr Bennet was a squire: when Jane is invited to Netherfield to visit the Bingleys, Mrs Bennet will not let her go by carriage: she wants her to ride. Mr Bennet, when questioned about whether the horses (clearly a dual-purpose pair) are wanted on the farm, he replies that ‘they are wanted on the farm much oftener than I can get them’: this perfectly encapsulates the social position of the squirearchy: ‘carriage folk’ owning their own carriage and horses, but ‘country folk’, with those horses used for farm work also. So was Mr Woodhouse a squire, and Mr Knightley, and Colonel Brandon. Mr Rochester was a squire, and so was Dorothea Brooke’s father, and Squire Cass, of course, from Silas Marner. (Mr Darcy and Mr Bingley, by contrast, are gentry: their carriage horses are carriage horses, and they would never, like Jane Bennet does, ride anything that also worked on a farm.)
Squires’ children were bred to take over the family estate, their sons might attend university, but would also be taught land management at home, although neither Mycroft nor Sherlock have gone back to their roots. In SFISYF, since both of them are gay, and their parents dead, Mycroft holds the estates (there are two, in this case, one from each side of the family) in trust for a cousin to whom the reversion will fall in default of direct heirs. Squires’ daughters would marry within class.
The work that Sherlock Holmes does as a detective can be well understood in the light of this protective function: he is a caretaker, an arbitrator, a decision maker, and investigator and a dispenser of justice. His comments about the crimes that can take place in isolated rural places, unseen by any, also ring true with a country background.
As a squire, Holmes is not ‘middle class’, which is quite an urban distinction. He comes from a dying tradition that sprang from a rural economy, where people knew their station. He is of ‘middle rank’, which is a different thing entirely: and because of the position of the squirearchy, he might, on appropriate occasions be listened to as an expert and would generally be respected as an equal by a member of a higher rank - the old-money landed gentry, or the aristocracy - which explains Holmes’ apparent disregard for rank, or the 'upper class’.
I love this meta! It’s wonderfully informative, and it offers a very believable background for Holmes. We’re so lucky to have such wonderful fics that adopt this backstory for him.
Since Doyle did leave us wiggle room, though, I sometimes wander down another path. I think it’s also possible to read canon in a way that places Mycroft and Sherlock’s generation of Holmeses within the urban middle class. In my own head, I waffle on whether I imagine Sherlock and Mycroft as being raised on a still-functioning squire estate in the country. In one of the only lines in the canon in which Sherlock Holmes discusses his family history, he says: “My ancestors were country squires, who appear to have led much the same life as is natural to their class.”
For one sentence, that seems surprisingly full of ambiguities. He refers to his “ancestors” rather than his “parents,” which suggests to me that this history might be attached to a part of his family tree further in the past. Do they still have this landed estate, or was it lost years ago, perhaps broken up or sold away or simply abandoned as it became too difficult to farm it successfully or to manage the tenants? Holmes says his ancestors “appear to have led” a certain lifestyle, as if he knows this by report or research rather than through his own lived observations and experiences. And finally, he unthinkingly refers to “their class” rather than “our class,” as if he does not consider himself as a member of the same group.
When revealing Mycroft’s true role as being so central to the British government that he practically IS the British government, Sherlock clarifies that there is no wealth or honorary privilege attached to Mycroft’s position. Specifically, Sherlock says: “Mycroft draws four hundred and fifty pounds a year, remains a subordinate, has no ambitions of any kind, will receive neither honour nor title, but remains the most indispensable man in the country.“ Four hundred fifty pounds a year in Victorian London would constitute, I believe, quite a comfortable middle class salary (especially for a man with no family to support), but it wouldn’t be considered anywhere near the top echelon of middle class urban lifestyles (this article says that a man earning more than twice that amount, one thousand pounds a year, could still be considered middle class). Although, of course, class identity was by no means entirely dictated by how much money one earned. The type of work one did, one’s education and family, and other factors were also important and I’m sure others know a good deal more about it than I do. Mycroft lives in Pall Mall, and is so entirely a creature of his particular neighborhood that Sherlock is flabbergasted when he deviates from his routine even so far as to visit Baker Street. “It is as if you met a tram-car coming down a country lane. Mycroft has his rails and he runs on them. His Pall Mall lodgings, the Diogenes Club, Whitehall–that is his cycle… But that Mycroft should break out in this erratic fashion! A planet might as well leave its orbit.” Based on that description, It seems probable that Mycroft never goes to the country.
There are a lot of squires who show up in the pages of the Doyle Sherlock Holmes stories, but surely the most memorable and richly described were Victor Trevor and his father. There are plenty of different ways to read Sherlock’s description of the Trevors’ country lifestyle - in some ways he seems quite comfortable and familiar with it, in other ways he seems a bit wide-eyed at the wealth on display and charmed by the rustic displays of local justice and learning. Is this a lifestyle that he himself grew up in? Is he charmed by the Trevors’ country estate out of nostalgia and because he can easily make himself at home there? Or is it still fairly novel to him as a way of passing a vacation, and is he impressed by things that would be taken for granted by someone more used to them?:
“Finally, he invited me down to his father’s place at Donnithorpe, in Norfolk, and I accepted his hospitality for a month of the long vacation. Old Trevor was evidently a man of some wealth and consideration, a J.P., and a landed proprietor. Donnithorpe is a little hamlet just to the north of Langmere, in the country of the Broads. The house was an old-fashioned, wide-spread, oak-beamed brick building, with a fine lime-lined avenue leading up to it. There was excellent wild-duck shooting in the fens, remarkably good fishing, a small but select library, taken over, as I understood, from a former occupant, and a tolerable cook, so that he would be a fastidious man who could not put in a pleasant month there….The father interested me extremely. He was a man of little culture, but with a considerable amount of rude strength, both physically and mentally. He knew hardly any books, but he had traveled far, had seen much of the world. And had remembered all that he had learned. In person he was a thick-set, burly man with a shock of grizzled hair, a brown, weather-beaten face, and blue eyes which were keen to the verge of fierceness. Yet he had a reputation for kindness and charity on the country-side, and was noted for the leniency of his sentences from the bench.”
One thing is clear, though, which is that after Sherlock leaves the Trevors’ estate, he does not go back to any Holmes country estate to pass the remaining two months of his summer holidays. “All this occurred during the first month of the long vacation. I went up to my London rooms, where I spent seven weeks working out a few experiments in organic chemistry.” By his university years, at least, he is living at school for part of the year and in London for the rest.
So, I’d say it’s plausible to think that Sherlock and Mycroft are considered - by themselves and others - to be urban middle class.
W.S. Baring-Gould, a fan who invented a lot of influential meta theories about Sherlock Holmes in the mid-twentieth century, was also interested in this ‘country squires’ backstory. He came up with the headcanon that Sherlock and Mycroft must have had an older brother who took charge of the family’s country estate, thereby freeing up both Sherlock and Mycroft to be life-long city dwellers and bachelors. Baring-Gould named this invented sibling Sherrinford, a name he took from some of Doyle’s earliest notes before he’d settled on ‘Sherlock’ as the name for his hero. And that’s why there’s been a third Holmes sibling popping up in Holmesian fanon now and then ever since! :)
@educatedinyellow That’s also extremely plausible and a closer reading than mine, I think. But if his ancestors were squires - maybe grandparents but not parents - what are his parents? I don’t read them as excessively wealthy, however Holmes is a gentleman: he has the tastes and habits of a gentleman: dresses well, likes fine wines, well-read, despite Watson’s criticisms of his tastes in literature - but he doesn’t work in the church, army, navy or law: the accepted professions for the younger sons of the gentry or minor nobility. But he’s not engaged in trade, which would render him completely déclassé. What did his parents do?
He seems to have no friends of his own social class: he mixes predominantly with people of a lower social class (Scotland Yard inspectors, the irregulars.)
Is he a rebel or an outcast?
@artemisastarte, I am so curious about his parents, too! They are such a blank, such a puzzle. Here are a few imaginings of mine, but you are so much more steeped in the period history than I am, I hope you’ll let me know what sounds plausible and what sounds unlikely.
So, my instinct is to headcanon that most of the money and the refined tastes in Sherlock’s generation of the family came from his mother’s influence and her French relations. Holmes says his grandmother was sister to one of the Vernet painters - I think she was probably Antoine Charles Horace Vernet’s sister, and therefore Claude Joseph Vernet’s daughter. I imagine that her daughter was Sherlock’s mother. For four generations the Vernets were extremely successful and high-profile painters who worked primarily in Paris and Rome and routinely attracted patronage and commissions from the European aristocracy and also from French royalty and emperors. Their prominence and success lasted through to the mid-19th century, so I think the family money would still have been there during Sherlock’s childhood, though surely Horace’s direct line both generated and inherited a good deal more money than his sister’s line. So, what if we imagine Sherlock’s mother as coming from a well-off, but not absurdly well-off, family; city-dwelling; highly decorated but not noble by bloodline; artistic; well-traveled. They might also be unusually comfortable with straddling class lines, since they had both aristocratic cache and public popularity and their art appeared in very different milieus (they painted epic portraits and battlefields on commission, but they also printed popular lithographs of landscapes and other more everyday subjects).
Perhaps she met his father at some museum exhibition or through a mutual friend in London. Perhaps it was her Verner cousins - probably an English branch of the extended family - who became the point of connection and introduced them. (Holmes’s ‘distant relation’ Verner shows up in Doyle’s “Norwood Builder” when Holmes uses him as cover to buy Watson’s practice with his own money). Let’s assume that they fell in love and married, though how long she lived and how happy the marriage turned out to be are very open questions.
The question then becomes, who was Sherlock’s father and what did he do? If we imagine that, after years of increasing struggle and debt, his father finally lost the family estate, where did the children go from there? They wouldn’t have wanted to remain in their county, it would have been too shameful. So, perhaps as a very young man, let’s say that Sherlock’s father came to London in search of work. He was literate, proud, self-reliant, with a drive fueled in part by bitterness. I can imagine him getting a position as a government clerk and eventually working his way into a middle class rank not too far removed from the life that Mycroft would eventually settle into (although in Sherlock’s father’s case, he was not secretly far more capable, brilliant, or important than his job status reflected).
So, in this headcanon, Sherlock and Mycroft grew up in London, with their father providing them with comfortable middle class surroundings (though what he was providing them in terms of his personal emotional influence is again a potentially loaded question - was he neglectful, remote, abusive? Why do his children never speak of him as adults?). Their childhoods were embellished by their mother’s inherited money and her tastes, but these acted as pleasant accessories to their lives rather than fundamentally changing their social status. (”Only goodness gives extras” - perhaps he thinks of his mother’s influence that way?) Their mother’s style of bohemianism, taste for the classics, and relative ease at blurring class boundaries influenced them, too. Her side of the family would also have provided examples to young Sherlock of careers based more on freelancing than on routine.
I would add that, although Holmes is certainly comfortable working with lower class people for much of his time as an adult, I think an argument could be made that his two closest friends, practically his only friends - Victor Trevor and Watson himself - were both probably of a slightly higher class than he was. Neither of them were upper class. Holmes tends to be annoyed by the upper classes. But Victor was a squire who inherited a flourishing estate (though he couldn’t stand to stay there after what happened to his father). And Watson took the traditional route for a younger son of gentry/minor nobility: he followed the flag after his older brother squandered the family inheritance. But the engraved watch he still carries - worth fifty guineas - and Holmes’s own deduction that his older brother was initially “left with good prospects” shows that Watson probably grew up surrounded by more wealth than he ever inherited.
hisuian zorua's design is fun
SHINY ALOLAN RAICHU ✧ (POKEMON ULTRA SUN AND ULTRA MOON)
Two new rivals in Pokemon Sword and Shield!
I love this scene so much. Watson girl you're laying on the ground cause Holmes told you to pretend to be dead dont act like this guys is weird.
"Do you need a doctor?"
"I'm a doctor, why whats wrong with you?
"Aren't you sick?"
"Nah, I'm dead"
LOCK IN WATSON
THERE ARE CRIMES BEING COMMITTED