Hahaha, oh man this is beautiful!
PokƩmon only say their species name
This Meowth appears to be able to converse with the trainer
Meowth* says that it is in fact only saying its name, thus behaving as all other PokƩmon
*thus it is not actually aĀ āMeowthā but a species of a name that consists of every utterance it ever said or will say
If its linguistic behavior is indistinguishable from a humanās linguistic behavior, who is to say that humans arenāt also only saying their species name over the course of their lifetime?
One of the reasons this is brilliant is because āinfinite utterances with finite resourcesā is a key tenet of human language. We (humans) can respond to unexpected situations with novel, unexpected, and unique utterances. In other words, how could every single utterance be pre-programmed into us, when (at our birth), there are words that donāt yet exist that we will use in our lifetime? Concepts we canāt imagine now? Things that donāt exist yet?
(remember this? who could have predicted this headline when you were born?)
For instance, PokƩmon: PokƩmon was released in 1996. If you were born before then, there would have to be a remarkable coincidence in genetics and biology for your pre-programmed linguistic behavior to include that word (as so many other people also, coincidentally, had that word programmed into them).
Unless, the universe itself is pre-programmed. Freaking out yet?
Donāt worry, quantum physics suggests that this canāt be the caseĀ (or at least is highly implausible). The universe is too unpredictable to be pre-programmed. So what does that leave us with?
If something can produce linguistic behavior (i.e., utterances) that are indistinguishably similar to humansā linguistic behaviors, this means that it can (seemingly) respond appropriately to otherwise unexpected circumstances. After all, the endangered ferrets can be discussed, as can PokĆ©mon, as can whatever else is going on in the news. If the universe is too unpredictable to be preprogrammed, then utterances canāt be preprogrammed in our genetic code or in our brains. Unless weāre all just very lucky all the timeā¦?
Anyway, this is a great demonstration of how a thought experiment can help you test hypotheses about language. Itās not 100% conclusive, but itās a good way to start thinking about how one might test a hypothesis, or what one would need to find in order to support or disprove a hypothesis.
gracieabrams
areudirty
2087
kianamaiart
amandla
vaporwave
