"all varieties of fascism, from the enormous ones that surround us and crush us to the petty ones that constitute the tyrannical bitterness of our everyday lives." âFoucault's preface to Anti-Oedipus

if i look back, i am lost
almost home
I'd rather be in outer space đž

Andulka

No title available
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
official daine visual archive
tumblr dot com
YOU ARE THE REASON

Discoholic đȘ©

â
untitled

Kaledo Art
cherry valley forever

Product Placement
wallacepolsom
đȘŒ

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
One Nice Bug Per Day
No title available
seen from Argentina

seen from Venezuela

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
@juliecarmine
"all varieties of fascism, from the enormous ones that surround us and crush us to the petty ones that constitute the tyrannical bitterness of our everyday lives." âFoucault's preface to Anti-Oedipus
ALOK VAID-MENON Getting Curious with Jonathan Van Ness 1x03 (2022)
Alokâs book report of The Biopolitics of Feeling: Race, Sex, and Science in the Nineteenth Century by Dr. Kyla Schuller
What do social media companies produce?
Not postsâall moral rights for a post belong to the author. Musk does not PRODUCE his usersâ posts.
Social media companies produce MATERIAL SOCIAL RELATIONSâfollowerships, âfriendshipsâ, online âcommunitiesâ.
True, the individuals related themselves produce what happens within those relations: the events, the durée.
But the individualsâ social adjacency is a solely a product of technology. Itâs literally a spreadsheet of zeros and ones: an âacquaintanceship graphâ, mathematicallyâ0 if two persons are not related, otherwise 1.
We produce a REAL friendship within the space opened up by the digital association called âFacebook Friendsâ. We create REAL communities within the virtual homesteads of online âcommunitiesâ.
Usus, fructus, abusus, the rights of property-owners in Romeâthe social media company OWNS the virtual territory; it owns the virtual social relations PRODUCED; Nature = humans produce non-virtual, real communities the company is free to DISPOSE OF.
Property in land prior to original accumulation Notes on an excerpt from Marxâs Grundrisse Text: Marx, âForms Preceding Capitalist Productio
An anarchistâs take on whatâs at stake for the American Left in the current iteration of the student Palestine movement:
âstudents and their allies, comrades, friends fighting against the administration create new spaces for political encounter [âŠ]
and [âŠ] new commitments to one another about what it means to keep each other safe, what it means to struggle togetherâ
and in that process they start forming sometimes actual political groups, sometimes affinity groups, sometimes friend circlesâ
but they create commitments to one another to allow them to learn and think and strategize together [âŠ]
To me that seems to be whatâs actually important in terms of our position in the United States:
the formation of new layers of people who are able to think and concretely strategize together in order to achieve goals.â
(The Antifada, ep. 251)
I was born here. In the fucking 1970s. Who would want to become what this place makes most people? So many American kids have seen that for forever, have seen what a crock of shit this whole fake country isâthere are too many youth countercultures historically to list.
But how could I escape from this place? Iâve never physically been off this rock, North America. How could I _get out,_ if not through ideas?
The world of ideas has maybe been the only thing thatâs kept me from losing my mind completely these past 5 decades (ish). Growing up in this country you have to infer the existence of collectivist ways of living and being, of being human, from shadows on the wall.
We all long for it; thatâs just human, you canât stamp that out. We go to church maybe. Some Canadians write songs about it. And we could maybe change it all for the better, if we would just talk about what it means to be humanâto be *of the community*âand what it means to live accordingly. Itâs very sad.
âAmong the Germanic peoples [⊠t]he commune [âŠ] exists [âŠ] merely by virtue of [âŠ] periodic gatherings [âŠ] and not as a unity. In fact, the community therefore does not exist as a STATE SYSTEM [âŠ]â
âWe are exhausted by the daily continuous killing.â
The world tells me every day I am grotesque.
But thatâs not ALL it tells me. It also tells me I am worthy of kindness.
The hardest and richest lesson life teaches is acceptance.
âNo one has ever died from contradictions.â
BUTâŠ
Itâs whatâs most beautiful
in collectivism:
when one person steps forward,
if they are in sync with others,
the movement makes them strong
without granting
any one person dominion.
âThe purpose is to be equalsâ /ly
Maybe we should lean into the line, âScratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds.â It strikes liberals where they are most susceptible to influence: their guilt.
That âthe Man has a branch office in each of our headsâ, as Pynchon put itâthat inside us is not so much an inner child who must be lavished with self-love and self-attention, but an inner fascist with a settler colonizer mindset who needs to be constantly cross-examinedâthis is the sort of self-criticism liberals are most likely to respond to, because every liberal feels the guilt of knowing it to be so.
Every white person has heard white people talk about Black people when Black people are not around. Every cisgender person possesses in themselves the collective social knowledge of how to mock a trans person for being trans. Every person without disabilities can recall having at minimum failed to consider the needs of a person with a disability, and probably can recall having socially excluded such a person on the basis of their mobility, etc., inadvertently or not.
It takes real work to unlearn racism, homophobia, ableism and all the rest of it. Conservatives disdain that work. Liberals know they have not done enough of it.
Socialists do that work collectivelyâin the real world, through collective action, not just in the world of ideas.
A liberal is someone sustained by the fantasy that they are not a fascist. (See 2024âs Civil War.) But the liberalâs complicity with all varieties of fascism in the real world manifests as a symptom: liberal guilt.
Letâs stick the knife in right there. Letâs keep calling genocide what it is. Letâs call out co-aggressors and enablers by name.
How _can_ I vote for Biden on the grounds that heâd be better for trans people, or for the labor movement? I voted no confidence in the presidential primaryâor as near as we could get to a vote of no confidence here in Georgiaâand since then Iâve only gotten more horrified by the growing magnitude of the mass murder in Gaza that the Biden administration continues to fund and defend.
We cannot be slaves to Duvergerâs Law (âin a winner-take-all electoral system, any vote other than for the two leading candidates is wastedâ).
We do not have political freedom in a system that allows us only to choose our next chief executive to be either Joe Biden or Donald fucking Trump.
We _must_ work toward _emancipation_ from this system. (Cf. âlight and airâ for the workers movement.)
And we canât forsake our socialist principles every time thereâs a serious election, if we want to keep calling ourselves socialists.
The only position that makes sense to me is to ruthlessly criticize the two-party systemâand if a candidate canât win office _while_ doing that, they are doing something else terribly wrong!
The people are certainly united in their hatred of the two-party system. And I think the people are smart enough to elect a person who declares a pox on both houses of the current bipartisan consensusâthe consensus that keeps us apologizing for Israelâs mass crimes against humanity, that keeps us paying insurance corporations and student loan corporations for our healthcare and education, that keeps us renting and not owning property, and that keeps us ensnared in the bear-trap of âwork or starveâ for decades of the best years of our lives.
âON KYRIARCHY: NON-IDENTITY POLITICSâ (Feb. 19, 2024) What are the necessary conditions for a revolutionary movement? A revolution is by de
When a comrade misgenders me, it hurts. But it doesnât make it weird for me. Iâve misgendered people accidentally too. Itâs an accident. Itâs not weird. It happens all the time.
What makes it weird is when people avoid me, or avoid acknowledging Iâm present, because theyâre afraid to misgender me. If they donât know me, they donât know how Iâll react. In Leftist spaces, theyâre especially unsure what reaction to expect.
Accidental misgendering is like stepping in shit. It happens. Donât make it weird by avoiding acknowledging the person youâre afraid you might accidentally misgender. That amounts to the silent treatment.
If I can be brave enough to be out, you can be brave enough to risk stepping in shit.
"A revolutionary group at the preconscious level remains a subjugated group (groupe assujetti), even in seizing power, as long as this power itself refers to a form of force that continues to enslave and crush desiring-production.
The moment it is preconsciously revolutionary, such a group already presents all the unconscious characteristics of a subjugated group:
the subordination to the socius as a fixed support that attributes to itself the productive forces, extracting and absorbing the surplus-value therefrom;
the effusion of anti-production and death-carrying elements within the system, which feels and pretends to be all the more immortal;
the phenomena of group 'superegoization', narcissism, and hierarchyâ
the mechanisms for the repression of desire.
A subject-group (groupe-sujet), on the contrary, is a group whose libidinal investments are themselves revolutionary.
[âŠ]
And what revolution is not tempted to turn against its subject-groups, stigmatized as anarchistic or irresponsible, and liquidate them?
How do we combat the deadly inclination that makes a group pass from its revolutionary libidinal investments to revolutionary investments that are simply [âŠ] investments of interest, then to preconscious investments that are simply reformist?"
05:54 Policy Solutions: DSA's Demands08:31 Discussion questionsL i n k s :Tithi Bhattacharya, âHow to Not Skip Class: Social Reproduction of