Assignment 2 - Artist Statement
My final artwork is a product of my initial poster and the concept produced for assignment 1, my series of experiments and my research into artists that used walking as a basis for their artworks. I produced a film utilising the visuals of a short walking journey and a commentary of the experience while on the journey. The commentary was delayed for added effect.
All my experiments used walking in some form and all were completed in pairs using the same journey to produce the experiment. My first 2 experiments didn’t present any specific idea and had no particular purpose other than exploring ways of communicating a particular journey I took. My next 2 experiments strayed from the usual method of description and convey a particular path. In These experiments, I used audio from the walk and while walking, I wrote down the interactions and ‘communication’ I had with other people. This pair explored the more abstract experience and allowed the audience to imagine what the journey would feel like. The final experiments were done in a different environment that was more organic and natural. These experiments explored the closed off visual experience and the physical feeling of walking. The particular methods I chose allows the audience to really immerse themselves in the experience and calls on the audience to use their imaginations using these 2 abstract descriptions.
To produce my final work, I chose a path in Surry Hills to walk. I continued the theme of using pairs of different methods to describe and demonstrate a journey. This particular pairing was a mix of audio, visual and sensory experience explained through a voice over. While walking I filmed the visuals of what I saw when walking and at the same time recorded my voice explaining the experience of walking. This included describing things I heard, the feeling and atmosphere and directions I took, a lot like a commentary on my journey as I walked it. When I was editing the audio, I found that the microphone picked up sounds of the environment, like the wind, my breathing, crackling of leaves and cars driving past. Though they were a distraction from my voice, it added to the atmosphere and feeling as if the audience were joining me on the walk. The background sounds which are often ignored added realism to the walk and the changing tones in my voice some emotion to the walk.
The film explores how the different senses have a play in communicating a journey and for the audience to distinguish between the film and the voice over. This film uses walking in an urban setting as the subject and the method to explore how different forms of communication affect how the audience perceive and understand a journey and can experience it. When matching the audio and visuals, I decided to delay the audio by a few seconds, this created a confused and staggered experience.
Alys F, ‘Francis Alys’, in Francis Alys. 2017, viewed 19 September 2017.
http://francisalys.com/
N/A, ‘Vito Acconci’, in Guggenheim. 2017, viewed 25 September 2017.
https://www.guggenheim.org/artwork/artist/vito-acconci
N/A, ‘Vito Acconci, Following Piece’, in Khan Academy. 2017, viewed 25 September 2017.
https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/global-culture/conceptual-performance/a/vito-acconci-following-piece
N/A, ‘About’, in Walking Artists Network. 2016, viewed 19 September 2017.
http://www.walkingartistsnetwork.org/about/
Schneider CM, ‘The Ten List: Walk as Art’, in Glasstire. November 2012, viewed 19 September.
http://glasstire.com/2012/11/23/the-ten-list-walk-as-art/
Wood J, ‘Artworks’, in Jeremy Wood. 2016, viewed 25 September 2017.
http://www.jeremywood.net/artworks.html