hugs @kentucky-criedfricken - Tumblr Blog

I’m not saying that disliking Supergirl (2026) means being misogynistic. I’m just saying that of fucking course the film about a woman who loses her shit, becomes a hero because her dog is dying, and ends up saving dozens of women and girls who were bought to be (child) brides is heavily criticized.

guabiju

Tumblr sexy man of the year if you people weren't cowards

sevahcosmos

how many times must olivia cooke endure this? and i don't simply mean alicent as a character but olivia as an actress. why are the writers so intent on using her body to simulate so many instances of sexual violation and humiliation for not only her character but she herself as well? lord jasper is executed for an entirely different reason so why was it necessary to have that scene? truly what purpose does this serve narratively? i am already so sick and tired of sexual assault being used as a plot device because i think it's lazy and ends up fetishising and perverting women's pain to the benefit of a male audience, but especially in this scenario because it is literally to no end. nothing comes of this! who and what the fuck was that scene for? free my girl!

secondly, i don't know that i've ever made this clear but i quite despise rhaenyra's character. and yes, i've read the books. i understand she's worse there. and what if i told you i don't care? her characterization in this show is fucking pathetic. why is she more sympathetic to the people that started this entire war than to her own allies? why is she not allowed to be vengeful? to be mad? to be cruel to the people that have taken so much from her? why does she somehow have more venom for the people trying to protect her and fight for her cause? why must every other character be stripped of everything that makes them who they are in order to make her look more magnanimous and sympathetic? when in the end, she justifies every reason as to why there is belief that she should not rule.

it's already bad enough that the effects of rhaenyra's mistakes are pawned off to other characters to sanitise her while the mechanics behind the most critical, pivotal moments of the plot have all been resigned to mishaps and misunderstandings of those other characters because now can anyone point to a single fucking person in this show and tell me, with conviction, what is their motive to do any of the things they do?

i'm supposed to believe alicent, who we've seen slash rhaenyra's arm for the injustice aemond suffers, who has told aegon "living or breathing, you are the challenge", who shields him with her own body when meleys emerges from the dragon pit, who answers "you idiot" to aegon questioning whether or not she loves him because it's so obvious and inevitable as the knowledge that the sun rises in the east—this is who i'm supposed to believe is selling out both sons to die by the hands of the woman she has spent decades detesting? she is suddenly so frightened and horrified at the reality of war only WEEKS IN that she forfeits her own children's lives? if anything, why does that not make her more intent on ensuring their survival?

alicent is nothing if not dutiful. she was once ambitious and righteous but #that man stripped her of that, set fire to her agency and cunning and then called it feminism and we all mourned. she may not be the most emotionally intelligent mother. she may not know how to show them she cares but she bleeds as they bleed. she cries for helaena because of what they've done to her girl. she sees aegon burned and broken and she asks if her son is going to die with so much fear and despair in her voice. why is rhaenyra the only mother on this show allowed to consider her children? allowed to fester in her own grief? although i have to admit that even then, they won't allow her to let that ebbing harden and be honed, as is of characteristic of grief, because the writers ,for some reason or the other, think angry, rageful women are impossible to sympathise with and this episode proved it.

helaena, most egregiously, is largely unaffected by jaehaerys' death. unlike her book counterpart, she does not desire to be queen nor she does not sink into such debilitating despair after b&c that she loses grasp of reality. but what then is left of her? and the answer is absolutely nothing. there is no grief, there is no urgency, there is no rage. there is quite literally nothing at all. the writers want me to believe this is innocence but frankly, i think it's cruelty. this just makes it seem like she had no regard for her son at all.

and in all of this, rhaena, baela and house velaryon are still who i grieve for most. i do not understand how any of them are still on rhaenyra's side and why the writers seem to hold their black characters in such contempt if not complete disregard. baela doesn't even really mourn jace and we're already setting her up with that loser ass baldie??? she brought jace back five minutes ago. why is she just #fine?

rhaena, by definition, was the only truly innocent targaryen in the dance. and it's not simply because she didn't have a dragon. book helaena took dreamfyre to the skies on her coronation day and wrote to rhaenyra asking her to swear fealty to aegon. she did not object to her half-sister's usurpation. but they're setting up rhaena of all people as the one who is to blame for jace's death (book rhaenyra ordered jace to fight in the gullet btw). they're using rhaena as a scapegoat for what was originally rhaenyra's orders and whitewashing helaena of her allegiance to rhaenyra's usurper at the cost of rhaena's innocence. i think this is the most upsetting thing to me because why can they not let a black female character exist as a beacon of feminity and gentleness as she was in the written material? even nettles, who was fierce and loud and brave, was not foolish or even morally grey. they've taken two beautiful and capable female characters, despite being nothing alike, merged them, and then turned the audience against her when neither of those characters were even remotely unlikeable to begin with!

they've also robbed rhaena of lady arryn's genuine care and consideration when contrary to the bullshit they put on my screen, even show lady arryn would have more reason to take rhaena in, after rhaenyra was incredibly disrespectful and did not uphold her side of the deal with the vale. rhaena is the king consort's daughter. who genuinely believes she's at any real risk of death?

this episode annoyed me more than any other in the whole show, i think. it was so anticlimactic and cheap for how fucking long they've been building up to this.

alphard-hydraes-blog

Repeat after me: incest does not mean every family boundary disappears.

Dynastic incest has rules, taboos and political logic. It is about bloodline, succession, power and exceptionalism, not about turning every family relationship into a sexual possibility.

The Targaryens marrying siblings, uncles, nieces, cousins, etc. does not automatically mean parent and child incest is a normal or obvious extension of that system.

Even historically inbred dynasties (for the peace of the Habsburgs) still had rules, religious and legal limits, dispensations and boundaries. Endogamy does not mean "family free-for-all".

So no, "the Targaryens are incestuous" is not a magic argument that makes every possible taboo equally coherent.

And "this character is disturbed" is not a magic argument either.

A character having trauma, unhealthy attachments, poor boundaries or a damaged idea of affection does not mean every extreme sexualized interpretation suddenly becomes inevitable or well-written.

Unhealthy attachment is not automatically sexual attraction. Trauma is not automatically fetish. Parental issues are not automatically sexual desire toward a parent.

You can see the dysfunction without accepting the idea that this was the natural, inevitable or well-written conclusion.

"Intentional" does not always mean "good writing". Sometimes it just means the writers made a choice, and people are allowed to think that choice is bad.

thehelenas

The argument that Fire & Blood is a history book that's completely unreliable kinda falls apart when you remember it's a fictional book meant to tell a fictional story, and stories have a theme. They have a why. And if you think the moral of the story is "if only they had let that one woman be the exception" or even "if westeros would also accept women as rulers by right be it of conquest or divine" then you're not engaging with the very prevalent anti monarchy sentiment of GRRM's work, and though that's not a crime, taking the author to the back and shooting him dead is still not a faithful way of adapting and consuming his intellectual property. At one point you have to consider authorial intent. It's why the characters you're entertained by exist after all.

evi-anxiety

Tbh the thing that pisses me off the most about this Haunting Adeline situation is how much defenders throw around the word "censorship". It feels like they're trying to make it a loaded term but none of them even use it correctly.

No, you're not being censored just because people find the book fucking disgusting. No, a random user on tiktok who hates the book is not on the same level as entire governments BANNING and CENSORING books that often involve racial and queer issues and representation, and to even imply that ur rape fantasy book is on the same level is disrespectful and insulting.

No, you don't actually care about censorship, you just want to see like the 'better person' in this argument.

permabuggie

big fan of baby krypto biting superman

leulahart

frank and mel are ready for the cold

mikesseleven

dimensionlessabstractbanjaran

what most people miss about alicent is that she isn't just supposed to be the forever suffering pitiable being who couldn't free herself of the clutches of the patriarchy and westerosi politics, into which she was thrust into as a young girl, suffering years of abuse, birthing and raising children where she was too just a child herself and taking on responsibilities as the queen. She is a product of the very system that made her suffer in the ways she did, and while the political aspects can be argued as necessary so as to survive in such an environment, the patriarchal ones- where she subjected rhaenyra to unsolicited scrutiny and humiliation to invalidate her position as the next in line to the throne over the years- all because she believed rhaenyra did not suffer as much to get where she did, hence perpetuating the cycle of oppression. this belief that sacrifice is something that defines everyone's character and capabilities just because they themselves went through is something the patriarchy as such counts on for its sustenance. alicent was a victim, yes, but that didnt stop her from being the torchbearer of the very system that doomed her.

whyamihereat4am

Look I don't think Supergirl (2026) is secretly a perfect masterpiece or anything (I personally thought it was like. a 6/10 fun time) but I do think it's wild that Tumblr isn't going crazy for it because this Kara is one coattailed suit away from being a Tumblr sexyman. she is the flawed messy female character people have supposedly been clamouring for. she's the popular archetype of a gruff self-destructive alcoholic middle-aged man begrudgingly having to look after a kid and growing fond of them but genderswapped and also 23. she's allowed to be visibly messy and kind of gross and her hair is constantly all over the place and she literally cries, screams, throws up, and pisses onscreen. she's caustic and mean and puts up an act of carelessness but has a heart of gold. she's heavily traumatised and coping with it terribly. if anything happens to her dog she will kill everyone in this room and then herself. she spends most of the movie in a trench coat and baggy band T-shirt. she gets into bar brawls and breaks a guy's hand. she is Going Through It 24/7 and looks the part. she stabs a guy in the throat. how is everyone else not obsessed with her.