Interviewed.
An interview is a very interesting social ritual. You are asked to come in to prove to a prospective employer that you are worth something. That your experience will make you an excellent employee. That your temperament will work well with others within the organization and department. You have an hour to prove yourself. You leave. Those that interviewed you discuss you and your qualifications. You send a thank-you not. Your prospective employer may ask for a second interview. You oblige. You either get the job or you don’t. You move on with a new job or continue your search for something that will pay the bills.
I just had an internal interview the other day -- within my own organization. I was a bit nervous going in. I was not very confident, which was odd. I tried to feel out my nervousness, let it settle in so I could have a chance at overcoming it. I asked myself why I was nervous, why I had butterflies, and why I was not looking forward to being interviewed by people that I already work with.
I came up with an answer and it did not settle well with me. It still doesn’t. I felt like I was not being authentic. The whole interaction forced me to put on a mask and push forward an inauthentic version of myself. One that has to prove that I have done something with my life. I had to prove to my colleagues that already knew me that I was the best thing that will ever happen to them.
The whole interview was odd. Not only did it make me feel like I was presenting an inauthentic version of myself, one that forced me to silence my personality and push forward something false, but I was being treated like a stranger by the colleagues that were interviewing me. Colleagues that I have known for almost 3 years. It was odd to say the least. I had to prove to them that I was a hard worker, when they already knew it.
Why do we waste time trying to follow a norm that an unhealthy society has defined for us? When do we break free? When do we finally figure out that we don’t have to do the same things the same way to achieve successful results?
The interview continued. Questions were posed. I answered. Interview ended. And you know what it felt like after I left the room? I felt judged. I felt judged because I was not the choleric-tempered leader they might have been conditioned to be looking for. But the reason that I felt judged was because they already knew that. They knew I am mild-tempered, yet they expected me to take on a role I was not true to who I am.
Since when did a calm and mellow personality become the antithesis of a leader? Since when was the definition of a leader altered to fit only one kind of person? I argue that the interview forces you to become someone you are not, and this is the problem. Organizations should want to get to know the authentic you, not force you to fit the mold.
Kindness is not weakness. Not speaking up does not mean you are not aware. Being yourself is not wrong.










