Dominant And Strict

Enthusiastic bdsm lover. Most of what you see is pure fantasy. Nsfw

[sj0]

you have been visited by the seven magic dragon balls your biggest wish will be granted but only if you reblog

[hersheyhipster]

Couldn’t risk it.

[justjengie]

didn’t realize they change colors. now I know o gotta wish.

[pinayputa]

THIS SHIT IS REAL I GOT THE JOB I WAS NUTS ABOUT BC I REBLOGGED THIS YESTERDAY maybe it’s a coinkidink but it okay just take the necessary steps to achieve what you’re wishing for and YOU CAN DO IT

[fuckress]

Another wish thingy :D the first one I reblogged actually worked, so sure, why not ^^

[1treesfartingrainbows1]

Might as well

[goodwhitedaddy]

I’m a sucker for these💖

[misscookiesncream-deactivated20]

I want to ride the dragon

[maginator1995]

I can always hope lol

[nikkiprincessssi]

Reblog if you’re a sissy/daddy…let’s chat!🎀

[maturemetallocked-deactivated20]

If this post gets 50 notes before my session ends I will be required to add 2 weeks to my time and 4 weeks to my max time. (This was a dare I accepted because of a generous donation)

[maginator1995]

Sissy love

So I have recently discovered a violent passion for dominating sissy boi sluts. Who knew lol. Now I want to find one to control permanently. So you know, hit me up lol.

[menandcocks-deactivated20121116]

[maginator1995]

Quite a thrill

[youcan-callmesir-deactivated201]

Dear future Doms and Tumblr Dom wanna be's

Being a Dom does not mean you can demand nudes.

Being a Dom does not mean everyone wants to fuck you.

Being a Dom does not mean you can treat people how ever you like.

Being a Dom is about being respective and caring of your submissive partner.

Being a Dom is a title that is given to you by your sub, not something you can demand of strangers online.

Please for all our sakes, just stop!

[not50shadesdom]

Yes!

[mel0395-deactivated20150128]

reblogging this just because

[maginator1995]

Fantasy aside I agree completely.

[sheneedsithuge]

[maginator1995]

Perfect state for a whore

[extreme-fetiche-deactivated2022]

[maginator1995]

Mmmm

[felicia-fiddle-sticks]

Want a video in your inbox?! ;)

If you’d like a short video of me doing what I do best in your inbox reblog this. Since tumblr won’t let me post videos I’ll do individual videos. (: Makes for some happy followers!

[maginator1995]

Wonderful

[theironbox]

[fucktoy1013]

Where do i sign my rights away?

[maginator1995]

Come to me and I'll do it for you I'll make you into the worthless slave you dream to be

[subordinategirl-deactivated2014]

Please call me a fat fuckpig and make me humiliate myself.

[maginator1995]

Turn on your asks then It would make it much easier to command you pig

[subordinategirl-deactivated2014]

Command me to do degrading things and then post it on here.

[maginator1995]

Video yourself masturbating with a collar and throw some wax play in while you're at it

[maginator1995]

Bored

I'm bored and horny. Any female followers who wana have some fun hit me up.

[teethheart]

Greta Carlson

[maginator1995]

Leave her there on the tracks for a nice show

[coffeemages]

-You cannot be sexist toward men. Sexism is based on a system of oppression. You CAN be discriminatory, rude, inconsiderate, and/or prejudiced against men but you CANNOT be sexist toward them.

-You cannot be racist towards white people. Racism is…

[goodwhitedaddy]

This took me a little while to understand as well, but it is true: Prejudice and Racism/Sexism are NOT the same thing. Racism and Sexism were established by the gender/race which holds the lion’s share of authority over the laws and social order of western society—in other words, white men. Every instance of legal, institutionalized inequality against women was established by men. Every instance of legal, institutionalized inequality against non-whites was established by white people. These are not accusations—they are facts. Ignoring or denying them does not make them go away. Men have never been treated as less than equal due to their gender by the laws of the land.

Whites have never been treated as less than equal due to their color by the laws of the land. This isn’t an insult or accusation—it’s simply the way things are.

If a man is treated as a second-class citizen for his gender, or a white person for his or her race—rest assured that it is an isolated incident that goes against the laws and customs recognized by most of the western world. It would be the act of an independent individual or group, and not have the backing of law or tradition.

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

There are a few things that do effect men- such as the draft, family custody, etc; what people forget is that these are things established by majority lawmakers in the country- men, vast majority of the time, white men.

There are legitimate issues facing men (I do not think there is anything pervasive against white people specifically, but I would agree there are issues for men as a whole that we need to also systematically fight and which are talked about in mainstream (white woman) feminism as much as they need to be, but that doesn’t make racism less a thing or sexism less a thing.

Basically, when pointing out unfairness to other people, they are instead of fighting the people who create these unfair systems, fighting legitimate concepts that have been studied numerous times and have numerous amounts of research backing it up.

See also: Resume studies Implicit racism and sexism studies Contraception and abortion laws To name a few.

TL;DR: a white man and a black man being murdered by guns are both tragic; but the person who shoots the white man is more likely to be arrested. See also- Trayvon Martin and countless other stories I can’t even remember right now but I hope others can for me.

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

What an interesting implicit set of assumptions

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

They aren’t assumptions.

Please review racism and sexism studies, arrest logs, etc. Read the studies, examine their protocol.

Then look at police logs and just let the facts speak for themselves.

I’m not pulling this stuff out my my ass. Go out there and read. Do more than react against a post. Go learn and research.

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

They are nothing but assumptions and the idea that you can decide the level at which terms such as racism can or cannot be applied is arrogant to the extreme. Your attempted condescension is noted, but misdirected.

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

Read academic studies. Seriously. You saying the same thing based on your “I’m a white guy” knee jerk reaction doesn’t make you less misinformed. It just makes you look stubborn.

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

And you continue your assumptive heuristic

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

Are you going to actually read something and bring something constructive to the discussion or are you going to continue to be a broken record?

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

I am going to continue to be an educated person who has already pointed out your systematic error. As we are not personally known to each other, your persistence in such cognitive errors is of little importance to me, though it is interesting, as I said.

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

You using a bunch of big words doesn’t make you more right.

All you’ve said is that I’m making assumptions, am condescending, and used the word heuristic. That’s not an argument. You’re just trying to convince me you’re smart. You don’t need to do that. You just need to explain how I’m wrong. You’ve not done that. You’ve just repeated that I’m making assumptions and am condescending, and I responded by telling you to read studies. You doing learning on your own (of course, you had to use heuristic because big words are SOOOO intimidating) is what’s necessary at this point because you won’t listen to anything I say anyway, because you disagree with the concept. The only way you would agree is if someone as full of hot air as you said it was true. Preferably someone old and white and uses big words just for the hell of it.

God, it’s like freshmen year history all over again.

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

Yes, you utterly failed to engage my actual point other than through implicit ad hominem responses. With that response to my critique of your initial arbitrary claim, what would be the level at which you would constructively engage? You frame-shifted from an initial definitional discussion to a completely different discussion while never responding to my second post. Whether I’m intelligent is unimportant when determining whether the initial critique is reasonable. To think about: if only the dominant “culture” can be “-ist” what grounds will you use to critique systematically discriminatory practices by various groups with power who may lay outside that dominant group? You have mis-identified the direction of my initial response and i have to say I’m disappointed to see you claim that others fail to have a nuanced view when your original definition is both arbitrary and leads to such harmful downstream conclusions.

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

We can continue this discussion over asks/fanmail.

[maginator1995]

You’re all children. Racism is a prejudice against someone because if their race. You can be black and be racist towards whites and you can be white and be racist towards blacks. All other races fit in as well. Sexism is a prejudice against someone because of their gender. Women can be sexist towards men. Men can be sexist towards women. The argument is done and hopefully you will both behave now.

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

If your first thought is to call the person you’re trying to convince a child, then you’re not going to get very far in convincing anyone.

You’re also not saying anything new.

Next.

[maginator1995]

If you act like children I will treat you as such. Now refrain from reblogging this as our followers don't want to get involved any further. You can message me if you want to continue.

[coffeemages]

-You cannot be sexist toward men. Sexism is based on a system of oppression. You CAN be discriminatory, rude, inconsiderate, and/or prejudiced against men but you CANNOT be sexist toward them.

-You cannot be racist towards white people. Racism is…

[goodwhitedaddy]

This took me a little while to understand as well, but it is true: Prejudice and Racism/Sexism are NOT the same thing. Racism and Sexism were established by the gender/race which holds the lion’s share of authority over the laws and social order of western society—in other words, white men. Every instance of legal, institutionalized inequality against women was established by men. Every instance of legal, institutionalized inequality against non-whites was established by white people. These are not accusations—they are facts. Ignoring or denying them does not make them go away. Men have never been treated as less than equal due to their gender by the laws of the land.

Whites have never been treated as less than equal due to their color by the laws of the land. This isn’t an insult or accusation—it’s simply the way things are.

If a man is treated as a second-class citizen for his gender, or a white person for his or her race—rest assured that it is an isolated incident that goes against the laws and customs recognized by most of the western world. It would be the act of an independent individual or group, and not have the backing of law or tradition.

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

There are a few things that do effect men- such as the draft, family custody, etc; what people forget is that these are things established by majority lawmakers in the country- men, vast majority of the time, white men.

There are legitimate issues facing men (I do not think there is anything pervasive against white people specifically, but I would agree there are issues for men as a whole that we need to also systematically fight and which are talked about in mainstream (white woman) feminism as much as they need to be, but that doesn’t make racism less a thing or sexism less a thing.

Basically, when pointing out unfairness to other people, they are instead of fighting the people who create these unfair systems, fighting legitimate concepts that have been studied numerous times and have numerous amounts of research backing it up.

See also: Resume studies Implicit racism and sexism studies Contraception and abortion laws To name a few.

TL;DR: a white man and a black man being murdered by guns are both tragic; but the person who shoots the white man is more likely to be arrested. See also- Trayvon Martin and countless other stories I can’t even remember right now but I hope others can for me.

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

What an interesting implicit set of assumptions

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

They aren’t assumptions.

Please review racism and sexism studies, arrest logs, etc. Read the studies, examine their protocol.

Then look at police logs and just let the facts speak for themselves.

I’m not pulling this stuff out my my ass. Go out there and read. Do more than react against a post. Go learn and research.

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

They are nothing but assumptions and the idea that you can decide the level at which terms such as racism can or cannot be applied is arrogant to the extreme. Your attempted condescension is noted, but misdirected.

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

Read academic studies. Seriously. You saying the same thing based on your “I’m a white guy” knee jerk reaction doesn’t make you less misinformed. It just makes you look stubborn.

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

And you continue your assumptive heuristic

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

Are you going to actually read something and bring something constructive to the discussion or are you going to continue to be a broken record?

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

I am going to continue to be an educated person who has already pointed out your systematic error. As we are not personally known to each other, your persistence in such cognitive errors is of little importance to me, though it is interesting, as I said.

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

You using a bunch of big words doesn’t make you more right.

All you’ve said is that I’m making assumptions, am condescending, and used the word heuristic. That’s not an argument. You’re just trying to convince me you’re smart. You don’t need to do that. You just need to explain how I’m wrong. You’ve not done that. You’ve just repeated that I’m making assumptions and am condescending, and I responded by telling you to read studies. You doing learning on your own (of course, you had to use heuristic because big words are SOOOO intimidating) is what’s necessary at this point because you won’t listen to anything I say anyway, because you disagree with the concept. The only way you would agree is if someone as full of hot air as you said it was true. Preferably someone old and white and uses big words just for the hell of it.

God, it’s like freshmen year history all over again.

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

Yes, you utterly failed to engage my actual point other than through implicit ad hominem responses. With that response to my critique of your initial arbitrary claim, what would be the level at which you would constructively engage? You frame-shifted from an initial definitional discussion to a completely different discussion while never responding to my second post. Whether I’m intelligent is unimportant when determining whether the initial critique is reasonable. To think about: if only the dominant “culture” can be “-ist” what grounds will you use to critique systematically discriminatory practices by various groups with power who may lay outside that dominant group? You have mis-identified the direction of my initial response and i have to say I’m disappointed to see you claim that others fail to have a nuanced view when your original definition is both arbitrary and leads to such harmful downstream conclusions.

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

We can continue this discussion over asks/fanmail.

[maginator1995]

You’re all children. Racism is a prejudice against someone because if their race. You can be black and be racist towards whites and you can be white and be racist towards blacks. All other races fit in as well. Sexism is a prejudice against someone because of their gender. Women can be sexist towards men. Men can be sexist towards women. The argument is done and hopefully you will both behave now.

[maginator1995]

I don't want to see this on my dash again.

[coffeemages]

-You cannot be sexist toward men. Sexism is based on a system of oppression. You CAN be discriminatory, rude, inconsiderate, and/or prejudiced against men but you CANNOT be sexist toward them.

-You cannot be racist towards white people. Racism is…

[goodwhitedaddy]

This took me a little while to understand as well, but it is true: Prejudice and Racism/Sexism are NOT the same thing. Racism and Sexism were established by the gender/race which holds the lion’s share of authority over the laws and social order of western society—in other words, white men. Every instance of legal, institutionalized inequality against women was established by men. Every instance of legal, institutionalized inequality against non-whites was established by white people. These are not accusations—they are facts. Ignoring or denying them does not make them go away. Men have never been treated as less than equal due to their gender by the laws of the land.

Whites have never been treated as less than equal due to their color by the laws of the land. This isn’t an insult or accusation—it’s simply the way things are.

If a man is treated as a second-class citizen for his gender, or a white person for his or her race—rest assured that it is an isolated incident that goes against the laws and customs recognized by most of the western world. It would be the act of an independent individual or group, and not have the backing of law or tradition.

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

There are a few things that do effect men- such as the draft, family custody, etc; what people forget is that these are things established by majority lawmakers in the country- men, vast majority of the time, white men.

There are legitimate issues facing men (I do not think there is anything pervasive against white people specifically, but I would agree there are issues for men as a whole that we need to also systematically fight and which are talked about in mainstream (white woman) feminism as much as they need to be, but that doesn’t make racism less a thing or sexism less a thing.

Basically, when pointing out unfairness to other people, they are instead of fighting the people who create these unfair systems, fighting legitimate concepts that have been studied numerous times and have numerous amounts of research backing it up.

See also: Resume studies Implicit racism and sexism studies Contraception and abortion laws To name a few.

TL;DR: a white man and a black man being murdered by guns are both tragic; but the person who shoots the white man is more likely to be arrested. See also- Trayvon Martin and countless other stories I can’t even remember right now but I hope others can for me.

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

What an interesting implicit set of assumptions

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

They aren’t assumptions.

Please review racism and sexism studies, arrest logs, etc. Read the studies, examine their protocol.

Then look at police logs and just let the facts speak for themselves.

I’m not pulling this stuff out my my ass. Go out there and read. Do more than react against a post. Go learn and research.

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

They are nothing but assumptions and the idea that you can decide the level at which terms such as racism can or cannot be applied is arrogant to the extreme. Your attempted condescension is noted, but misdirected.

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

Read academic studies. Seriously. You saying the same thing based on your “I’m a white guy” knee jerk reaction doesn’t make you less misinformed. It just makes you look stubborn.

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

And you continue your assumptive heuristic

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

Are you going to actually read something and bring something constructive to the discussion or are you going to continue to be a broken record?

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

I am going to continue to be an educated person who has already pointed out your systematic error. As we are not personally known to each other, your persistence in such cognitive errors is of little importance to me, though it is interesting, as I said.

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

You using a bunch of big words doesn’t make you more right.

All you’ve said is that I’m making assumptions, am condescending, and used the word heuristic. That’s not an argument. You’re just trying to convince me you’re smart. You don’t need to do that. You just need to explain how I’m wrong. You’ve not done that. You’ve just repeated that I’m making assumptions and am condescending, and I responded by telling you to read studies. You doing learning on your own (of course, you had to use heuristic because big words are SOOOO intimidating) is what’s necessary at this point because you won’t listen to anything I say anyway, because you disagree with the concept. The only way you would agree is if someone as full of hot air as you said it was true. Preferably someone old and white and uses big words just for the hell of it.

God, it’s like freshmen year history all over again.

[iplayoneinreallife-deactivated2]

Yes, you utterly failed to engage my actual point other than through implicit ad hominem responses. With that response to my critique of your initial arbitrary claim, what would be the level at which you would constructively engage? You frame-shifted from an initial definitional discussion to a completely different discussion while never responding to my second post. Whether I’m intelligent is unimportant when determining whether the initial critique is reasonable. To think about: if only the dominant “culture” can be “-ist” what grounds will you use to critique systematically discriminatory practices by various groups with power who may lay outside that dominant group? You have mis-identified the direction of my initial response and i have to say I’m disappointed to see you claim that others fail to have a nuanced view when your original definition is both arbitrary and leads to such harmful downstream conclusions.

[asubmissiveintraining-deactivat]

We can continue this discussion over asks/fanmail.

[maginator1995]

You're all children. Racism is a prejudice against someone because if their race. You can be black and be racist towards whites and you can be white and be racist towards blacks. All other races fit in as well. Sexism is a prejudice against someone because of their gender. Women can be sexist towards men. Men can be sexist towards women. The argument is done and hopefully you will both behave now.