Cerrando Puertas de Abriendo Puertas
Our preceptor meeting to wrap up Team AP was encouraging. Sofia was pleased with the work Team AP had done and the flexibility we maintained throughout the semester. Low AP participation was not just a frustration Team AP encountered, but was also shared by the centers. The low attendance for all seasonal events, not just AP, was not projected by any of the centers and as a result they are losing funding. This is a wicked problem the centers encounter on a daily basis. Due to low attendance, funding is decreased which results in limited resources to recruit higher participation for future programs, less families are served, and less data is reported. The centers did not want us to help recruit, but we found out it was due to a misunderstanding. When we asked if we could help recruit, they thought we meant for Migrant Head Start and not just for the AP program. They are having difficulty just recruiting for the Migrant Head Start, which has not been a huge problem in the past. This helps explains why just one program in this organization (AP) did not have a high enrollment.
Throughout our practicum we saw opportunities for improvements with the East Coast Migrant Headstart/Telemon Corporation, AP classes, and migrant farmworker outreach. Our preceptor was excited to hear our suggestions. Tess, Nisel, and I are working on a more formal proposal. We found there were often disconnects in communication between the Raleigh headquarters and the individual centers. We might show up to a center and we didn’t know an event was canceled because of various reasons. Working more directly with center employees may help improve communication. However, the center directors have a lot on their plate and it is important they don’t become overwhelmed with multiple projects. Due to multiple roles, AP might not be the main focus for the employees running the lessons. Future practicum groups could have training programs where the AP teacher is taught basic skills for running an AP lesson. In addition, the government requires that certain topics be covered by the centers and it may not necessarily be information that the migrant farmworkers wish to hear. Asking the migrant farmworkers what topics they want to learn about may encourage participation and interaction. We discovered that the migrant farmworkers wanted to learn English so they could help their children with their homework. We thought about incorporating ESL into the parent meetings as a way to help them learn basic vocabulary. Sofia told us that East Coast Migrant Headstart has attempted many strategies to effectively teach English to the migrant farmworkers and none of them have worked over the years. The strategies ranged from partnership with a college to teach ESL, to giving the farmworkers tape cassettes with headphones, to listen to phrases while they worked, to individual tutoring. Sofia explained that every migrant farmworker will tell you that they want to learn English. However, when they weigh work and family responsibilities, learning English is not a top priority.
Specifically with the Abriendo Puertas classes, we suggested that the lessons revolve around a “learner center model” that incorporates a facilitated dialogue, which was a focus of the Cooking Matters Program. Having open ended questions and a variety of learning styles may encourage participation. UC Berkeley evaluated AP through a national survey that was given to participants who had completed the program. Evaluations need to be made within rural areas to gain an accurate perspective of the effectiveness of AP within migrant farmworker communities along the East Coast. An interesting observation that Team AP made was that we couldn’t assume all individuals given the survey could read or even speak Spanish. English and Spanish surveys need to be available at the centers and they need to be read with enough time for the participants to understand what the question is trying to ask. Craig and Noelle evaluated the data collected from the surveys in SPSS and found some participants had put they had completed a doctorate program along with other misrepresented findings that could be attributed to misunderstanding. Providing incentives for AP participants could be an effective strategy to increase participation.
As public health professionals, it is important to continually advocate for migrant farmworkers by developing new policies and increasing outreach partners to improve their health status. Policies that provide provisions for housing or payments for living wages could improve substandard housing conditions. Due to the low attendance of migrant farmworkers at the centers, I felt like many of our interactions with the migrant farmworkers were not as intentional as I had hoped they would be. Sofia mentioned that some centers in Florida are hosting the AP meetings by rotating around in the migrant farmworker homes. If future groups could somehow receive opportunities to meet migrant farmworkers within their own environment it may help then to gain a deeper understanding of their daily struggles. There has been increased research on the use of “natural helpers” within migrant populations. Natural helpers, also known as “promotoras” in Spanish or “lay health advisors” are individuals that others naturally turn to for advice, emotional support, or aid. Research has shown they are effective in assisting health professionals by providing the population with health education materials, referrals, and resources that may be difficult to get individuals directly. Currently the NC Farmworker Project is working on providing training to chosen “promotoras”. This could be a potential project for future practicum groups.
Overall, my AP practicum experience contributed to my public health education. I definitely learned the importance of being flexible and overcoming frustrations dealing with data collection of a very mobile population. I look forward to future work with migrant farmworker populations and I am optimistic about the difference future AP practicum groups can make.









