Casting Benedict Cumberbatch as Khan was the most galaxy brain racebending in Hollywood bc they really thought they'd get praise for making the character less racist by making him white, because they said it'd be problematic to cast someone who wasn't white to "play a terrorist", except Khan wasn't a terrorist before, so they invented a way for it to be problematic and thought people would say "good job" for avoiding that
Help, we took a tragic mastermind and turned him into a terrorist and then made him white to avoid the stereotypes we added to our script for no reason, why are you mad at us. Where's our kudos. We did a tie-in comic where we explain that Khan had plastic surgery to turn himself white so like, it's not even a plot hole
Looked up commentary on this and saw defenses bc "well, Khan flies a ship into a city in this, it would be problematic to cast an actor of color in that role". And that makes me lose my mind bc at what point was "doing a 9/11" a core trait of Khan From Star Trek. Nothing forced them to write that in, or to keep it in; after all, they could have just as easily gone "this is problematic, we should rewrite this". But they didn't rewrite it, they did something way more complicated than rewriting it. Also, does it really evade stereotypes when he's still named Khan, and everyone watching knows what he used to look like
The thing is, Star Trek: Into Darkness is 100% a 9/11 movie. Which is an absolutely wild thing to do in 2013 when most of Hollywood had already gotten that sort of thing out of their system, but there you have it: a villain whose terrorist attacks threaten to send the Federation down a dark path, and James Kirk who prevents us from going that way and then gives a speech about how we shouldn't lose track of our liberal values.
And then for some reason they decided to graft Khan onto that. (Well, I say "some reason"; the reason is that JJ Abrams doesn't know any other way to write franchise stuff except non-stop borrowing from other writers' original work.) And then you end up with his bizarre wrangle of "do we fix the whitewashing inherent to Khan's character"/"do we make a brown-skinned character a terrorist" that concludes with Benedict Cumberbatch playing a character named Khan Noonien Singh who has nothing in common with what the original Khan actually was. But the original sin of all this was the concept of "NuTrek does 9/11".
My die-hard tinfoil hat theory is that Cumberbatch was hired to play a younger Jean-Luc Picard who comes from the dark future of the Kelvin-verse timeline, and thus A. has a super powerful ship that Admiral Marcus commandeers and B. is deeply concerned about his crew. BUT then Abrams or some other executive chowderhead was all "Wait, the bad guy has to be Khan, that's Kirk's nemesis, we gotta make him Khan", even though Khan even being a thing or caring the slightest about Kirk in this timeline didn't make a lick of sense, so they did a quick copy-and-paste of the script to change names and added a scene where Spock phones a friend so the main characters would have a reason to care about who Khan even is.
















