What do you think about Michael not defending David on his comments as he is getting criticized by politicians and other powerful people? I hope they are okay.
If ever David needs defending, I have no doubt Michael will be there.
Being criticized by the Tories, on the other hand, is a badge of honour, and Michael didn't need David when the Tories went after him earlier this year for The Way. It's like being gummed by a toothless dog.
People are being so .... ugh about this.
"Why did he choose a black female tory to shit on"
Because if you didn't know. Kemi was the one actively gunning for trans youth in her leadership campaign.
KEMI was the one, while brianna gheys (a teenage trans girl who was BRUTALLY attacked) murderers were convicted, released an article saying trans youth shouldn't have safe spaces at school and should, BY LAW be outed to family and superiors by teachers who find out/or are confided in.
He called out kemi not because it's easier to shit on a black, cis female politition.
He called out kemi because SHE is the one who was the cause of terror and outrage of trans youth and their families. Which may I remind people, includes him and his family.
Have some links and screencaps
Conservatives would change law so trans people could be excluded from single-sex spaces, if party wins election
The equalities minister said protections for those using single sex spaces needed to be tightened.
Transgender activist and Liberal Democrat Helen Belcher criticises Kemi Badenoch's proposed changes to the Gender Equality Act.
This was at its most basic a parent challenging a right-wing politician for her ideologies that target his own children.
Badenoch is a Tory. She has privilege (and wealth) - furthermore she has real and genuine political power. She has a platform. She has the ability to drive her transphobic ideology into legislation. She is an actual danger to trans children.
And, as the prime minister said, free speech is a fundamental part of democracy. And that most definitely includes freely speaking out against politicians and policies that are harmful.
This was never a case of a wealthy privileged white man punching down at a woman of colour. That's how the tories and the terfs spun it. This is a father putting himself in front of his (and our, and your) kids.
You cannot in conscience speak from your position of authority as a politician, then claim victimhood when you are judged and challenged on what you say.
You cannot attempt to legislate people that make you feel icky out of existence then cry when someone turns the tables on you.
Reblogging for the (far more articulate than me) extra context and commentary.





















