A Blast from the Past?: Gayle Rubinâs Charmed Circle of Sexuality
Rubin believes that sexuality could not be separated from politics because of a history of sexual oppression within society. The 1940s-1960s cemented a period where sexuality that differed from the heteronormative standard was condemned. Social movements set up campaigns that fought against prostitution and masturbation, encouraged abstinence, and demonized homosexuality.Â
Rubinâs charmed circle illustrates actions that are deemed as a socially acceptable use of sexuality and other actions that are not. Everything located within the center of the circle, represents a form of sexuality that has been ingrained within social and political life, allowing for individuals to have the preconcieved notion that sexuality must be expressed in one way.Â
While we can certainly argue that some things within the charmed circle could be updated within the 21st century, its ability to illustrate how society polices and oppresses certain forms of sexuality, casts some similarities to the extent of which transgender individuals are increasingly excluded and condemned from dating apps like Tinder. I think it is important to remember that if sexuality is always ingrained within the individual, then so is the ability to express hatred.Â
It is important for not only Tinderâs users to be aware of the policed state of sexuality, but for Tinderâs CEO, employees and policy-makers to be aware. While the online exclusion of a group can appear like an easy issue to fix, removing the hegemonic oppression of non-conforming sexuality is not.Â














