Untitled

[meishmu]

Navigating Conflicts on Social Media: A Case Study of the Free Palestine Movement

In the digital age, social media has become a battleground for contentious issues, amplifying conflicts and tensions around the world (Shixin Ivy Zhang 2020). One such case study is the Free Palestine Movement, a Palestinian Syrian armed movement and community organization advocating for justice and equality for Palestinians. With its prominent presence on social media platforms and the widespread use of hashtags like #freepalestineps, the movement provides valuable insights into the dynamics of conflicts on social media (Zeitzoff 2017).

Importance of Information Governance: Managing Conflicts on Social Media

In light of the significance of information governance in managing disputes on social media, it is imperative to examine the conceptual framework consisting of four fundamental elements: subject, object, tool, and content.

Within the given framework, the term "subject" pertains to the entities or individuals engaged in social media discourse concerning the Free Palestine Movement. This group consists of indifferent observers, opponents, and proponents of the movement. Every participant in the conversation contributes their unique set of viewpoints, personal experiences, and prejudices, which in turn influence the discourse and give rise to disagreements. Mohammad Ghassany, Balagué, and Lamya Benamar (2017).

Concerning the Free Palestine Movement, the "object" of the discourse is the material disseminated across social media platforms, encompassing articles, videos, posts, and images. Users may become entangled in heated debates and conflicts as a result of the intense emotions and opinions that these objects evoke (Dennen, Choi & Word 2020).

The term "tool" pertains to the physical social media platforms, including but not limited to Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, that enable users to engage in communication and interaction. According to Shixin Ivy Zhang (2020), these platforms function as arenas where conflicts take place, as their functionalities and algorithms impact the dissemination and prominence of content associated with the Free Palestine Movement.

Finally, the term "content" refers to the particular data that is disseminated through social media platforms. This includes both objective information and propaganda, as well as misinformation. Material pertaining to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, violations of human rights, and geopolitical dynamics has the potential to generate intense discord and controversy, contributing to fervent discussions and divisions among users (Cian & Amann 2017).

Amplification of Conflicts: Impact of Social Media Platforms

By utilizing hashtags such as #freepalestineps and maintaining a presence on social media platforms, the Free Palestine Movement illustrates how digital communities can become entangled in disputes pertaining to intricate geopolitical matters. Engaging in discussions, sharing content, and exchanging viewpoints, proponents of the movement, adversaries, and impartial observers all contribute to the discourse pertaining to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

These conflicts stem from divergent narratives, competing truth claims, and profoundly held identities and beliefs. By facilitating the dissemination of information, the organization of supporters, and the expression of dissent, social media platforms exacerbate these conflicts (Zeitzoff 2017). Nevertheless, the absence of regulatory measures and effective supervision on these platforms may further escalate conflicts by facilitating the dissemination of false information, the proliferation of hate speech, and the scapegoating of specific individuals or collectives (Lamya Benamar, Balagué & Mohamad Ghassany 2017).

As a result, information governance assumes a critical role in determining the characteristics and dynamics of social media conflicts. Information governance is a comprehensive system comprising policies, procedures, and technologies that are specifically engineered to efficiently oversee information while safeguarding its confidentiality, availability, and integrity (Lamya Benamar, Balagué & Mohamad Ghassany 2017). It comprises a variety of protocols, including fact-checking, content moderation, adherence to community guidelines, and adherence to user conduct standards.

Promoting Peace in the Digital Realm

By embracing the principles of information governance and adopting strategies to promote constructive dialogue and understanding, social media users can navigate conflicts more effectively and contribute to a more harmonious online environment. As we engage in discussions related to contentious issues like the Free Palestine Movement, let us strive to foster empathy, respect, and dialogue, building bridges and promoting peace in the digital realm.

Reference

Cian, H & Amann, H 2017, ‘A review of Education and Social Media using conflict and functionalist theories’, Cultural studies of science education (Print), vol. 13, no. 3, Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 837–843, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11422-017-9821-5>.

Dennen, VP, Choi, H & Word, K 2020, ‘Social media, teenagers, and the school context: a scoping review of research in education and related fields’, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 68, no. 4, Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 1635–1658, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423-020-09796-z>.

Lamya Benamar, Balagué, C & Mohamad Ghassany 2017, ‘The Identification and Influence of Social Roles in a Social Media Product Community’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 22, no. 6, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 337–362, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/22/6/337/4675174>.

Shixin Ivy Zhang 2020, ‘Introduction: Media and Conflict Studies in the Social Media Age’, Springer eBooks, Springer Nature, pp. 1–20, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-15-7635-5_1>.

Zeitzoff, T 2017, ‘How Social Media is Changing Conflict’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 1970–1991.

[meishmu]

Exploring Platformization in the Gaming Industry: Reshaping Digital Communities

The gaming industry has undergone significant transition in recent years, owing to the advent of digital platforms and online connectivity. This process, known as platformization, has transformed how gamers communicate, collaborate, and engage with gaming material. Before digging into the consequences of platformization for digital gaming communities, let us first define platformization.

Understanding Platformization: Integration of Digital Platforms

Platformization is the widespread integration of digital platforms into our daily lives, influencing how we connect, communicate, and consume material (Hein et al. 2019). It entails the extension of digital ecosystems such as social media networks, streaming services, and online marketplaces into new sectors such as entertainment, commerce, and communication (Costabile, Iden, & Bendik Bygstad 2022).

In the gaming business, platformization has resulted in a fundamental shift in how players access, experience, and share gaming material. Online gaming platforms like Steam, Xbox Live, PlayStation Network, and Twitch act as primary hubs for players to communicate with one another, access a diverse range of games, and participate in multiplayer experiences (Ulf Wilhelmsson et al. 2022).

Reshaping Digital Communities: The Impact of Platformization

Platformization has had a significant impact on gaming's digital communities, transforming how players engage and collaborate. These digital communities, which were formerly limited to local gaming groups or forums, have now grown into worldwide networks where gamers from all over the world may gather to share their enthusiasm for gaming (Gouriou 2020).

Platformization has transformed digital communities in several ways, including increasing connectivity and communication among gamers. Regardless of their geographical location, players can quickly connect with friends, join gaming communities, and participate in multiplayer matches via online gaming platforms and social media networks (Keogh 2020).

Furthermore, platformization has fostered the rise of novel kinds of community participation and collaboration in the game industry (Tseng, Huang, & Teng 2015). From livestreaming gameplay sessions on Twitch to engaging in online forums and groups, gamers today have a plethora of options for connecting with like-minded people, sharing gaming experiences, and collaborating on game projects.

Implications for Gamer Culture and Community Dynamics

The rise of platformization has also brought about significant implications for gamer culture and community dynamics. On one hand, it has fostered a sense of inclusivity and diversity within gaming communities, allowing gamers from different backgrounds and identities to come together and bond over their shared love for gaming.

However, platformization has also given rise to new challenges, such as issues of toxicity, harassment, and gatekeeping within gaming communities. As digital platforms become increasingly central to the gaming experience, ensuring a safe and welcoming environment for all gamers has become a pressing concern for industry stakeholders.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Gaming as a Social Phenomenon

To summarize, platformization has profoundly altered the gaming business, transforming digital communities and redefining how players connect and engage with gaming content. As the gaming landscape evolves, industry stakeholders must prioritize inclusivity, diversity, and community-building initiatives to keep gaming a positive and enriching social phenomena for all.

Reference

Costabile, C, Iden, J & Bendik Bygstad 2022, ‘Building digital platform ecosystems through standardization: an institutional work approach’, EM (Sankt Gallen. Print), vol. 32, no. 4, Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 1877–1889, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12525-022-00552-0>.

Gouriou, M 2020, INFLUENCE OF VIRTUAL COMMUNITIES OF COMPANIES IN THE GAMING INDUSTRY: a CASE STUDY OF MMO GAMES, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://research.cbs.dk/files/62180734/906204_MASTER_THESIS_FINAL.pdf>.

Hein, A, Maximilian Schreieck, Riasanow, T, David Soto Setzke, Wiesche, M, Böhm, M & Helmut Krcmar 2019, ‘Digital platform ecosystems’, Electronic Markets, vol. 30, no. 1, Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 87–98, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4>.

Keogh, B 2020, ‘The Melbourne indie game scenes’, ResearchGate, unknown, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343457715_The_Melbourne_indie_game_scenes>.

Tseng, F-C, Huang, H-C & Teng, C-I 2015, ‘How Do Online Game Communities Retain Gamers? Social Presence and Social Capital Perspectives’, Journal of computer-mediated communication, vol. 20, no. 6, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 601–614, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/20/6/601/4067586>.

Ulf Wilhelmsson, Wang, W, Zhang, R & Toftedahl, M 2022, ‘Shift from game-as-a-product to game-as-a-service research trends’, Service-oriented computing and applications (Internet), vol. 16, no. 2, Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 79–81, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11761-022-00335-7>.

[meishmu]

Navigating Authenticity in the Era of AR Filters

Augmented reality (AR) filters, which provide a plethora of options to enhance our photos and videos with virtual effects, have revolutionized the way we present ourselves online in today's digital age. As users interact with these filters, they raise concerns about the validity of their digital representations and the effects of these upgrades on self-perception. To go deeper into this phenomenon, we will investigate the junction of authenticity, social comparison theory, and objectification theory in the context of AR filters.

Understanding Authenticity

Authenticity is at the heart of human expression and identity, including a variety of dimensions that influence our relationships with the environment. Consistency, conformity, and connection are pillars of authenticity that guide people in their search for real self-expression (Nicolotti and Maria Elena Magrin 2020).

Consistency entails matching exterior traits to interior values, such that our digital representations reflect our genuine selves (Hällgren & Björk 2022). When using AR filters, users may look for solutions that match their unique aesthetics and beliefs, ensuring a sense of continuity between their digital and real-world identities.

Conformity, on the other hand, requires striking a compromise between uniqueness and cultural norms (Levitan & Verhulst, 2015). While AR filters provide creative freedom, users can navigate cultural and societal expectations by choosing filters that reflect their individual identity while staying aware of larger cultural settings.

Connection provides another element to authenticity, emphasizing the deep relationships we form with our digital counterparts. Users can choose filters that inspire nostalgia, cultural heritage, or personal memories, creating a sense of connection to their past experiences or goals (Zimmermann, Wehler, & Kaspar 2022).

Navigating Digital Self-Esteem

According to social comparison theory, people evaluate their own abilities and characteristics by comparing them to those of others. In the context of AR filters, users can make upward or downward social comparisons, assessing their looks and attractiveness in relation to others.

Upward social comparisons can cause feelings of inadequacy or low self-esteem, particularly when users believe they fall short of unreachable beauty standards imposed by filtered photos on social media (Park, Kim, & Park 2021). In contrast, downward social comparisons can boost self-esteem by exposing perceived defects in others' appearances.

AR filters can worsen these inclinations by allowing users to change their appearance to match perceived societal expectations, promoting artificial beauty standards and encouraging a culture of comparison and rivalry (Isakowitsch 2023).

Examining Digital Self-Objectification

Objectification theory suggests that individuals may internalize societal norms that objectify and commodify the human body, leading to self-objectification and body dissatisfaction (Mercurio & Landry 2008). In the context of AR filters, users may engage in digital self-objectification by enhancing their appearance to conform to idealized beauty standards.

These filters offer users the opportunity to modify their features, blur imperfections, and enhance their physical attributes, often leading to a distorted perception of self and increased body dissatisfaction (Silva & Steins 2023).

Moreover, the prevalence of filters that promote sexualized or exaggerated features may contribute to the objectification of both oneself and others, perpetuating harmful stereotypes and reinforcing unrealistic beauty ideals.

Embracing Authenticity: Cultivating Genuine Self-Expression

Amidst these complex dynamics, embracing authenticity becomes paramount in navigating the era of AR filters. By prioritizing consistency, conformity, and connection in their digital interactions, users can cultivate genuine self-expression, foster meaningful connections, and uphold ethical engagement in the digital realm.

Ultimately, authenticity empowers individuals to transcend the pressures of social comparison and objectification, guiding them towards self-acceptance, self-awareness, and genuine connection in an increasingly digitized world. As we navigate the complexities of AR filters and digital self-expression, let authenticity serve as our compass, guiding us towards a more genuine and fulfilling online experience.

Reference

Gerber, JP, Wheeler, L & Suls, J 2018, ‘Taking A Closer Look at Social Comparison Theory’, https://www.apa.org, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://www.apa.org/pubs/highlights/spotlight/issue-115>.

Hällgren, C & Björk, Å 2022, ‘Young people’s identities in digital worlds | Emerald Insight’, The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 49–61, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJILT-06-2022-0135/full/html>.

Isakowitsch, C 2023, ‘How Augmented Reality Beauty Filters Can Affect Self-perception’, Communications in computer and information science (Print), Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 239–250, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-26438-2_19>.

Levitan, LC & Verhulst, B 2015, ‘Conformity in Groups: The Effects of Others’ Views on Expressed Attitudes and Attitude Change’, Political Behavior, vol. 38, no. 2, Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 277–315, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11109-015-9312-x>.

Mercurio, AE & Landry, LJ 2008, ‘Self-objectification and Well-being: The Impact of Self-objectification on Women’s Overall Sense of Self-worth and Life Satisfaction’, Sex Roles, vol. 58, no. 7-8, Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 458–466, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-007-9357-3>.

Nicolotti, M & Maria Elena Magrin 2020, ‘Authenticity: Psychological Perspectives and Operationalizations’, Springer eBooks, Springer Nature, pp. 1–7, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_104669-1>.

Park, J, Kim, B & Park, S 2021, ‘Understanding the Behavioral Consequences of Upward Social Comparison on Social Networking Sites: The Mediating Role of Emotions’, Sustainability (Basel), vol. 13, no. 11, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, pp. 5781–5781, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/5781>.

Silva, RC & Steins, G 2023, ‘Social media and body dissatisfaction in young adults: An experimental investigation of the effects of different image content and influencing constructs’, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 14, Frontiers Media, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1037932/full>.

Zimmermann, D, Wehler, A & Kaspar, K 2022, ‘Self-representation through avatars in digital environments’, Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), vol. 42, no. 25, Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 21775–21789, viewed 1 April 2024, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12144-022-03232-6>.

[meishmu]

DON'T LOSE VIEWS FOR BODY MODIFICATIONS!

Navigating Self-Censorship and Algorithmic Intervention in the Era of Body Modification on Social Media

The idea of algorithmic intervention and self-censorship has significant ramifications in the dynamic world of social media, particularly for conversations around body modification. As we investigate the nexus of digital citizenship, health education, and aesthetic ideals promoted on visual social media platforms, it becomes clear that artists' understandings of platform governance and algorithmic (in)visibility have a significant impact on molding online experiences.

Understanding Self-Censorship and Algorithmic Intervention

Self-censorship refers to the practice of individuals moderating their own content to align with perceived platform guidelines or societal norms. A study conducted on Chinese social media platform Sina Weibo found that 90.4% of the respondents acknowledged practicing self-censorship. On the other hand, algorithmic intervention involves the automated processes through which social media platforms curate, promote, or suppress content based on various factors such as user behavior, engagement metrics, and platform policies. Social platforms are increasingly adopting automated approaches to suppressing communications that they deem undesirable.

Implications for Body Modification

Algorithmic intervention and self-censorship interact in complex ways when it comes to body modification. Creators who alter their bodies may have to strike a careful balance between being true to themselves and following social norms or platform policies. The human and mechanical components of social media content moderation, which come together to uphold normative gender roles and regulate content pertaining to women and their bodies, have an impact on this equilibrium.

For example, people might self-censor content about body alteration to prevent unfavorable audience reaction or possible algorithmic suppression. To comply with platform policies and prevent inadvertently activating content moderation algorithms, this may entail providing no explicit photographs or descriptions of body altering procedures.

Algorithmic (In)Visibility & Marginalized Identities

Algorithmic intervention can indeed perpetuate algorithmic (in)visibility, particularly for marginalized identities within the context of body modification. Content producers that question social norms or stray from conventional beauty standards may be subject to algorithmic suppression on social media platforms, which would reduce their visibility and audience.

People who identify as LGBTQ+ or display non-traditional body alteration techniques, for instance, may face algorithmic biases that favor mainstream content or uphold heteronormative beauty standards. In online environments, sentiments of marginalization and exclusion may be exacerbated by this algorithmic invisibility.

It's crucial to remember that these biases represent both the biases in the data that these algorithms were trained on as well as the biases that the algorithms themselves produce. Therefore, in order to solve these problems and lessen bias and promote inclusivity, broader societal reforms must be made in addition to adjustments to platform regulations and algorithms. 

Navigating Platform Governance

In order to preserve visibility and reduce the possibility of algorithmic suppression, creators may use a variety of tactics as they negotiate the tricky terrain of platform governance and algorithmic intervention. In order to increase their reach, this could involve working with like-minded producers, participating in specialized forums, or strategically using hashtags.

However, these efforts may also entail a degree of self-censorship as individuals tailor their content to appeal to algorithmic preferences or avoid triggering content moderation algorithms. The conflict between visibility and authenticity highlights the more significant difficulties in managing platform governance in the digital era.

Promoting Digital Literacy and Advocating for Inclusivity

To address these challenges, it is essential to promote digital literacy and advocate for inclusivity within online spaces. By raising awareness of algorithmic biases and fostering dialogue around platform governance, we can empower creators to navigate the digital landscape more effectively while advocating for a more equitable and inclusive online environment.

In conclusion, the concepts of self-censorship and algorithmic intervention have significant implications for discussions surrounding body modification on social media. As creators grapple with platform governance and algorithmic (in)visibility, it is crucial to recognize the complexities of navigating online spaces while advocating for digital literacy and inclusivity. By fostering dialogue and promoting awareness, we can work towards creating a more equitable and empowering digital landscape for all.

Reference

Baer, T 2019, ‘Algorithmic Biases and Social Media’, Apress eBooks, pp. 95–106, viewed 24 March 2024, <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4842-4885-0_11>.

Chen, X, Xie, J, Wang, Z, Shen, B & Zhou, Z 2023, ‘How We Express Ourselves Freely: Censorship, Self-censorship, and Anti-censorship on a Chinese Social Media’, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 93–108, viewed 24 March 2024, <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-28032-0_8>.

Cobbe, J 2020, ‘Algorithmic Censorship by Social Platforms: Power and Resistance’, Philosophy & Technology, vol. 34, no. 4, Springer Nature (Netherlands), pp. 739–766, viewed 24 March 2024, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-020-00429-0>.

Duffy, BE & Meisner, C 2022, ‘Platform governance at the margins: Social media creators’ experiences with algorithmic (in)visibility’, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 45, no. 2, SAGE Publishing, pp. 285–304, viewed 24 March 2024, <https://www.academia.edu/83730630/Platform_governance_at_the_margins_Social_media_creators_experiences_with_algorithmic_in_visibility>.

Gerrard, Y & Thornham, H 2020, ‘Content moderation: Social media’s sexist assemblages’, New Media & Society, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1266–1286.

Gongane, VU, Munot, MV & Anuse, AD 2022, ‘Detection and moderation of detrimental content on social media platforms: current status and future directions’, Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 12, no. 1, Springer Science+Business Media, viewed 24 March 2024, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13278-022-00951-3>.

[meishmu]

Bridging the Gap: Slow Fashion, Social Media Influencers, and Sustainable Style

Competing with the fast fashion movement has become both an opportunity and responsibility for Influencers

In the whirlwind world of fashion, where trends come and go in the blink of an eye, there's a quiet revolution brewing. It's called Slow Fashion, and it's challenging the status quo of the fast-paced industry with its focus on quality, sustainability, and conscious consumption. The convergence of social media influencers and the Slow Fashion Movement has sparked a transformative shift in consumer behavior and trends.

What is Slow Fashion?

At its core, Slow Fashion stands in stark contrast to the rampant consumerism and environmental degradation associated with fast fashion. It's about more than just clothes – it's a movement that calls for a fundamental shift in the way we think about fashion and consumption.

The Slow Fashion Movement is a concept that emerged in response to the fast fashion industry’s negative social and ecological impacts. It represents a counter-culture that offers alternate solutions while hosting a necessary discussion about the dangers of fast fashion.

Influencers have a huge impact on FASHION!

At the heart of this intersection lies the influence of social media influencers, who play a pivotal role in promoting ethical values and sustainable practices within the fashion industry. Through their platforms, influencers advocate for fair labor practices, transparency in the supply chain, and cruelty-free production methods, raising awareness and encouraging consumers to make socially responsible choices.

Influencers wield the power to shift consumer behavior towards more sustainable consumption habits by showcasing the value of quality over quantity. By endorsing brands that prioritize eco-friendly materials and production processes, influencers inspire their followers to make mindful purchasing decisions that align with the principles of Slow Fashion.

Shaping the customers behaviors

Indeed, understanding consumer motivations is a crucial aspect of driving change within the fashion industry. A study by McKinsey found that consumers are becoming more engaged in sustainability topics, with 57% of surveyed consumers making significant changes to their lifestyles to lessen their environmental impact. It is also the key for influencers who are adept at tapping into their followers' desire for authenticity, individuality, and social responsibility. By promoting the Slow Fashion Movement and encouraging sustainable shopping practices, influencers empower their audience to make meaningful choices that reflect their values.

Moreover, influencers have the ability to shape consumer attitudes towards fashion and sustainability by sharing personal stories, experiences, and insights. By humanizing the Slow Fashion Movement and making it more relatable and accessible, influencers bridge the gap between consumers and sustainable style, paving the way for a more conscious and sustainable future.

Conclusion

In essence, influencers have a significant impact in driving consumer behavior towards more ethical, sustainable, and socially responsible fashion choices. As influencers continue to champion the principles of Slow Fashion, they inspire positive change and pave the way for a more sustainable fashion industry and world.

Reference

Domingos, M, Vera Teixeira Vale & Faria, S 2022, ‘Slow Fashion Consumer Behavior: A Literature Review’, Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 5, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, pp. 2860–2860, viewed 23 March 2024, <https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2860>.

Granskog, A, Lee, L, Magnus, K-H & Sawers, C 2020, ‘Survey: Consumer sentiment on sustainability in fashion’, McKinsey & Company, McKinsey & Company, viewed 23 March 2024, <https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/survey-consumer-sentiment-on-sustainability-in-fashion>.

Lloyd, A 2022, ‘Slow Fashion Influencers You Need to Follow’, Setting Mind, viewed 23 March 2024, <https://settingmind.com/slow-fashion-influencers-you-need-to-follow/>.

Silva, J, Breno & de, J 2020, ‘The sustainability in fashion: a systematic literature review on slow fashion’, ResearchGate, International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, viewed 23 March 2024, <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344448515_The_sustainability_in_fashion_a_systematic_literature_review_on_slow_fashion#:~:text=The%20slow%20fashion%20movement%20appears%20as%20a%20counterpoint,that%20grows%20in%20a%20dizzying%20way%20over%20time.>.

[meishmu]

Navigating the Digital Landscape: A Deep Dive into Digital Citizenship

Week 5 - MDA20009

The idea of digital citizenship becomes apparent as a crucial aspect of our online lives in the fast-paced, globally connected world of the internet (Oyedemi 2018). This investigation explores the complex relationship between digital citizenship and political activity, as well as its relationship to platform studies, varied viewpoints, hashtag publics, and traditional citizenship.

The concepts of traditional citizenship are expanded into the digital sphere by digital citizenship. Based on the ideas of accountability, moral conduct, and public participation (Oyedemi 2018), it modifies these principles to fit the changing online environment. Essentially, the goal is to promote a feeling of shared accountability and community within the digital realm.

The notion of digital citizenship is multifaceted, representing the range of ways people engage with the digital realm (Christensen, Biseth & Huang 2021). It entails, in the first place, staying secure online, being aware of the threats, and using technology responsibly. Education is an essential element that enables people to traverse the digital terrain with consciousness (Öztürk 2021).

In addition, the platforms and the algorithms that control them also have an impact on digital citizenship (Tomasello 2023). Every platform sets its own standards and guidelines, which impact how users behave in that area (Öztürk 2021). It is essential to comprehend these platform-specific factors in order to act responsibly online.

The investigation of the technological and cultural ramifications of digital platforms is the focus of platform studies. Platformization is the process by which digital platforms are widely incorporated into different facets of our lives. Platformization changes how we interact with information, communities, and even our sense of self, from social media behemoths to online marketplaces (Neto & Chiarini 2022).

Hashtag publics, which are dynamic locations where users congregate around common interests or causes, have emerged with the introduction of social media. Hashtags function as focal points for activism, facilitating communication, information sharing, and mobilization for societal transformation. Hashtags, such as #BlackLivesMatter and #ClimateAction, enable people to communicate their opinions and spark social movements (Rambukkana 2015).

Political participation has crossed traditional lines in the digital age. Staying informed, taking an active part in online political discourse, and using digital platforms to promote social and political issues are all components of being a digital citizen (Vromen 2016). Citizens can express their views, interact with legislators, and influence political outcomes through the use of digital platforms as a conduit for civic engagement (Vromen 2016).

It is clear that there is no one-size-fits-all framework for digital citizenship as we explore its complicated terrain. Safety, education, platform dynamics, hashtag activism, and political participation are all included, representing the variety of ways people use the internet. Navigating this complex web with awareness, accountability, and a dedication to building a supportive, active online community are all part of being a conscious digital citizen. Let's embrace the tenets of digital citizenship as a roadmap to help us manage the intricacies of our globalized world as we move forward in the digital age.

Reference

Christensen, IR, Biseth, H & Huang, L 2021, ‘Developing Digital Citizenship and Civic Engagement through Social Media Use in Nordic Schools’, Northern Lights on Civic and Citizenship Education, pp. 65–92, viewed 4 February 2024, <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-66788-7_4#citeas>.

Neto, S & Chiarini, T 2022, ‘The Platformization of Science: Towards a Scientific Digital Platform Taxonomy’, Minerva, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1–29, viewed 4 February 2024, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11024-022-09477-6>.

Oyedemi, TD 2018, ‘The Theory of Digital Citizenship’, Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change, pp. 1–19, viewed 4 February 2024, <https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-981-10-7035-8_124-1>.

Öztürk, G 2021, ‘Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study’, Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 11–22, viewed <https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1286748.pdf>.

Rambukkana, N 2015, ‘Hashtag Publics : the Power and Politics of Discursive Networks’, Stanford.edu, viewed 4 February 2024, <https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/11475760>.

Tomasello, F 2023, ‘Digital Civics and Algorithmic Citizenship in a Global Scenario’, Philosophy & Technology, vol. 36, no. 2, Springer Nature (Netherlands), viewed 4 February 2024, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-023-00638-3>.

Vromen, A 2016, ‘Digital Citizenship and Political Engagement’, Interest Groups, Advocacy and Democracy Series, pp. 9–49, viewed 4 February 2024, <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-137-48865-7_2>.

[meishmu]

Making Sense of Reality TV: Exploring MasterChef Australia's Public Digital Journey

Week 4 - MDA20009

Within the immersive realm of Reality TV, gripping shows that transcend the television screen and become part of the digital public sphere have become increasingly popular in Australia. With an emphasis on one of Australia's most well-known reality series, Masterchef, this investigation explores the dynamic interaction between Reality TV and the internet public sphere. The story develops in the changing Reality TV scene as we analyze the shifting relationships amongst performers, viewers, and networks.

Drawing upon Jürgen Habermas's notion of the public sphere, the digital sphere emerges as a dynamic forum for citizens to participate in candid conversations (Singh 2012). This digital public sphere takes the form of social media platforms in the context of reality television, offering dynamic venues where networks, stars, and viewers may come together to create stories together (Graham & Hajru 2011).

The unscripted portrayal of real-life circumstances in the popular TV genre of "reality TV" has sparked discussions about ethics and authenticity (Rose & Wood, 2005). Programs such as "MasterChef Australia" are prime examples of this genre in Australia; they skillfully combine personal storytelling with culinary expertise to weave a tapestry of stories that enthralls viewers (Kirkwood 2017).

Enter the digital age, where networks, viewers, and reality TV stars have different relationships as a result of social media (Stefanone & Lackaff 2009). In the digital sphere, icons from programs like "MasterChef Australia" become recognizable figures. Through direct engagement, fans break down barriers and create a connection that extends beyond the TV screen.

Social media and "MasterChef Australia" come together to create a digital public space where dialogue is encouraged. Supporters take part in live conversations, impart their culinary knowledge, and help shape the story. Stars use social media sites like Instagram and Twitter to answer fan questions, share behind-the-scenes photos, and foster a lively online community (Kirkwood 2014).

As a case study, let's focus on the hashtag #CulinaryChats. Fans of "MasterChef Australia" have taken to using this hashtag as a forum to talk, offer criticism, and exchange strong thoughts about the show. Participants take an active part in the competition by exchanging recipes, unique content, and amusing banter (Kirkwood 2014). The collaboration among celebrities, followers, and platforms in #CulinaryChats is a prime example of how the digital public sphere may improve the Reality TV experience (Eisenegger & Schäfer, 2023).

It is clear that reality television has broken through conventional barriers and is prospering in the dynamic world of digital publics and the public sphere as we navigate the alluring world of "MasterChef Australia" and its digital journey. Social media is the medium through which the connections between celebrities, fans, and networks have experienced a radical transformation. The discourse carries on in this gastronomic expedition, molding the stories that enthrall Australian viewers and redefining what it means to be authentic in the digital era.

Reference

Eisenegger, M & Schäfer, MS 2023, ‘Editorial: Reconceptualizing public sphere(s) in the digital age? On the role and future of public sphere theory’, Communication Theory, vol. 33, no. 2-3, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 61–69, viewed 4 February 2024, <https://academic.oup.com/ct/article/33/2-3/61/7205472>.

Graham, T & Hajru, A 2011, ‘Reality TV as a trigger of everyday political talk in the net-based public sphere’, European Journal of Communication, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 18–32.

Kirkwood, K 2017, ‘MasterChef Australia: Educating and Empowering through Entertainment’, Entertainment Values, pp. 91–107, viewed 4 February 2024, <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-137-47290-8_7>.

Kirkwood, K 2014, ‘Tasting but not Tasting: MasterChef Australia and Vicarious Consumption’, M/C Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, Queensland University of Technology, viewed 4 February 2024, <https://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/761>.

Rose, RL & Wood, SL 2005, ‘Paradox and the Consumption of Authenticity through Reality Television’, Jstor.org, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 284–296, viewed 4 February 2024, <https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/432238>.

Singh, MN 2012, ‘Jürgen Habermas’s Notion of the “Public Sphere”: a Perspective on the Conceptual Transformations in His Thought’, Jstor.org, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 633–642, viewed 4 February 2024, <https://www.jstor.org/stable/41858870>.

Stefanone, MA & Lackaff, D 2009, ‘Reality Television as a Model for Online Behavior: Blogging, Photo, and Video Sharing’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 14, no. 4, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 964–987, viewed 4 February 2024, <https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/14/4/964/4583558>.

[meishmu]

Unveiling Tumblr: A Digital Town Square for Activism, Creativity, and Expression

Week 3 - MDA20008

Within the dynamic environment of the internet, Tumblr is more than a microblogging site; it's a dynamic digital public space. The public sphere, as defined by Jürgen Habermas as a forum for free speech and civic participation (Staab & Thiel 2022), is a modern concept that Tumblr embodies. We'll explore this distinctive online space's history, features, and opportunities that foster activism, creativity, and expression as we peel back its layers.

In order to comprehend Tumblr's function as an online public space, let's take a little tour through the development of blogging. Blogging started off as a way for people to share their thoughts and personal stories in the late 1990s. In the modern day, blogging has developed into a varied ecosystem where people come together to express their viewpoints and tales, including artists, activists, and individuals (Shema, Judit Bar-Ilan & Thelwall 2012). An important turning point in this progression was the creation of Tumblr in 2007, which brought a microblogging format that would change the landscape of online expression (Chang et al. 2014).

Tumblr, which was founded by David Karp, revolutionized the blogging space by fusing adaptability and simplicity (Halliday 2012). Users can easily combine multimedia content with its microblogging style to create an immersive visual experience (Chang et al. 2014). It has developed into a center for creativity over time, giving users the means to express themselves honestly. It is necessary to comprehend Tumblr's history and features before delving into its unique role as a digital public domain.

The foundation of Tumblr is user-centric design and simplicity. With the help of the reblogging tool, users may interact with others, easily curate material, and build personalized blogs (Nield 2017). The platform's design encourages a feeling of closeness and community, which makes it a perfect place for idea sharing and the development of online communities.

The affordances of Tumblr—features that influence user experiences—are essential to the platform's function as a digital public sphere. According to Dawson (2018), anonymity gives individuals a shield to express themselves honestly, encouraging sincere communication. According to Hijbul Alam, Ryu, and Lee (2017), the hashtag system facilitates the creation of communities centered around common interests and content discovery. Tumblr is notable for having less surveillance than other social media sites, which gives users more freedom to move throughout the site (Shahbaz & Funk 2019).

Let's use the #OscarsSoWhite hashtag, which became popular on Tumblr, to demonstrate these ideas. This movement, which started as a protest against the lack of diversity in the entertainment business, is a prime example of Tumblr's ability to spark activism and social critique (McCracken 2017). Users gathered around the hashtag, sharing personal anecdotes, having deep conversations, and raising their voices in a setting that was comparatively free of surveillance.

Tumblr appears in the digital era symphony as a digital public sphere that echoes the values of free speech and civic participation, not merely as a platform. Tumblr has had a significant influence on activism, creativity, and expression since its inception as a blog platform and throughout its growth into a vibrant, diverse community. Let's embrace Tumblr's function as a digital town square, where a variety of voices come together to construct the stories of our rapidly changing digital age, as we navigate its intricate network.

References

Chang, Y, Tang, L, Inagaki, Y & Liu, Y 2014, What is Tumblr: A Statistical Overview and Comparison, viewed <https://arxiv.org/pdf/1403.5206.pdf>.

Dawson, J 2018, ‘Who Is That? The Study of Anonymity and Behavior’, APS Observer, vol. 31, viewed 2 February 2024, <https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/who-is-that-the-study-of-anonymity-and-behavior>.

Halliday, J 2012, ‘David Karp, founder of Tumblr, on realising his dream’, the Guardian, The Guardian, viewed 2 February 2024, <https://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/jan/29/tumblr-david-karp-interview>.

Hijbul Alam, Md, Ryu, W-J & Lee, S 2017, ‘Hashtag-based topic evolution in social media’, World Wide Web, vol. 20, no. 6, Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 1527–1549, viewed 2 February 2024, <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11280-017-0451-3>.

McCracken, A 2017, ‘Tumblr Youth Subcultures and Media Engagement on JSTOR’, Jstor.org, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 151–161, viewed 2 February 2024, <https://www.jstor.org/stable/44867867>.

Nield, D 2017, ‘What Does It Mean to Reblog on Tumblr?’, Small Business, viewed 2 February 2024, <https://smallbusiness.chron.com/mean-reblog-tumblr-61882.html>.

Shahbaz, A & Funk, A 2019, ‘Social Media Surveillance’, Freedom House, viewed 2 February 2024, <https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-on-the-net/2019/the-crisis-of-social-media/social-media-surveillance>.

Shema, H, Judit Bar-Ilan & Thelwall, M 2012, ‘Research Blogs and the Discussion of Scholarly Information’, PLOS ONE, vol. 7, no. 5, Public Library of Science, pp. e35869–e35869, viewed 2 February 2024, <https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035869>.

Staab, P & Thiel, T 2022, ‘Social Media and the Digital Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 129–143.