Maki

Artist | 18 | Any Pronouns

[mochixat]

Doodle of my OC

[mochixat]

Doodles from September that I was thinking about

[zellk]

Some more drawings on my babygirl Qalaari in DnD !

[cremsie]

Flower power!

Experimental commission for @canethedog !! Had so much fun with this one

[booaue]

Maybe I will become a furry artist who knows

[lsdoiphin]

The modern Original Character Creator experience.

Denizens of tumblr, the answers you seek often lay in the tags or the image descriptions…

[cassetten9]

some OC stuff from twitter!

[mochixat]

Dumb Doodles of some of my characters.

[k-eke]

Enough.

[remanedur]

sketched up a new character, was gonna be an adoptable but i got really inspired with em so i'm gonna try and use her as a warlock for D&D :J

[hamsterscooter]

what does this mean

[squawq7]

meowskulls drawing i made a while ago

[vongulli]

Drawings of my Sona!!! I havent posted her at all here even though i made her in like.. 2020 lol 

(she may or may not be going through a design change so here’s her possibly-old design… hmm…)

[cactasorn]

[mochixat]

❤️

[yinmeowjii]

Adoptable that I enjoyed making 💗 (Sold already)

[loish]

There’s a protest going on against AI art over on artstation, so I feel like now is the time for me to make a statement on this issue! 

I wholeheartedly support the ongoing protest against AI art. Why? Because my artwork is included in the datasets used to train these image generators without my consent. I get zero compensation for the use of my art, even though these image generators cost money to use, and are a commercial product. 

Musicians are not being treated the same way. Stability has a music generator that only uses royalty free music in their dataset. Their words: “Because diffusion models are prone to memorization and overfitting, releasing a model trained on copyrighted data could potentially result in legal issues.” Why is the work of visual artists being treated differently?

Many have compared image generators to human artists seeking out inspiration. Those two are not the same. My art is literally being fed into these generators through the datasets, and spat back out of a program that has no inherent sense of what is respectful to artists. As long as my art is literally integrated into the system used to create the images, it is commercial use of my art without my consent.

Until there is an ethically sourced database that compensates artists for the use of their images, I am against AI art. I also think platforms should do everything they can to prevent scraping of their content for these databases. 

Artists, speak out against this predatory practice! Our art should not be exploited without our consent, and we deserve to be compensated when our art is exploited for commercial use.