A few months ago with Zac I think...
Interview Vampire Daily

titsay
h
cherry valley forever
macklin celebrini has autism

Kiana Khansmith
Show & Tell

Andulka

PR's Tumblrdome
EXPECTATIONS

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
Claire Keane
occasionally subtle
sheepfilms
Fai_Ryy

tannertan36
★
almost home
Xuebing Du
Sweet Seals For You, Always
seen from France
seen from Brazil
seen from Ecuador

seen from Russia
seen from China

seen from Türkiye

seen from Greece

seen from Ecuador
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from Vietnam
seen from Germany
seen from Venezuela
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Türkiye
seen from Venezuela
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
@mollyluft
A few months ago with Zac I think...
Oh myspace memories
Current living situation: peace and quiet
A night or two before I left.
Manchester, by the sea....in Washington...I've moved to a quiet, peaceful town.
Healing from Grief & Loss Charm Bag
[x] Lavender: happiness, peace
[x] Sandalwood: healing, spirituality
[x] Marjoram: health, love, protection
[x] Rose quartz: love, emotional healing, release of stress
[x] White organza bag: peace, love, acceptance
[x] Red organza bag: strength, healing
[x] Lotus flower charm: purity, peace, serenity
Thought I would take this time to share some original content with everyone!
Last week my grandfather passed away, and I felt the need to create some magic for my family to carry with them while we process this difficult loss.
I created charm bags centered around healing from grief and loss with different options for herbs and colors for the bags along with their correspondences.
Before I placed everything in the bag, I cleansed everything in the smoke of frankincense & myrh.
✨Reblogable, just don’t delete the caption & repost✨
Zodiac Groupies
Most Misunderstood:
ARIES, GEMINI, SCORPIO, CAPRICORN
Most Talkative:
GEMINI, CANCER, LIBRA, PISCES
Most Athletic:
TAURUS, LEO, SCORPIO, CAPRICORN
Most Likely To Be Famous:
GEMINI, LIBRA, AQUARIUS
Most Intelligent:
CANCER, VIRGO, SCORPIO, PISCES
Most Fashionable:
LEO, LIBRA, SAGITTARIUS, CAPRICORN
Most Likely To Be Successful:
ARIES, LEO, VIRGO, SAGITTARIUS
Most Friendly:
TAURUS, LIBRA, SAGITTARIUS, AQUARIUS
Hey I just think it’s important to say that like: phrases such as “all rapists are monsters” or “all rapists should die” when they’re not from the mouths of victims and survivors can actually be dangerous, and I’m certainly not saying that because I want to defend rapists, nor am I aiming to stop all those phrases altogether.
I absolutely believe that raping someone is a horrific act of violence and I absolutely believe all of us that have experienced sexual trauma should be able to talk about it, and about our abusers, in whatever way resonates best for us.
But I’m also aware that many rapists, unfortunately, are humans. They’re humans you like and trust and would never call a monster and would never say should die. Heck, many of us even garner attachments to our own abusers and while it’s perfectly valid to hate them to no end, lots of people who have been groomed or experience complex relationships love our abusers. A lot of them have done things we’d consider nice, have faces in the public that seem forgivable, qualities we care about and want to redeem.
So when someone, with no experience of trauma, with no understanding context for those phrases starts to use them, what happens when an abuser doesn’t look like a monster, or we don’t want them to die? We quickly get defensive. People say they can’t really have done that. People believe that they weren’t abused and are overreacting. People blame the victim. People who are smart, educated, who know the dynamics of abuse and understand that abusers don’t look like abusers will still go on the defense because it’s very difficult to say that someone who’s your idol, your family, your friend, your lover is a monster that should die.
It’s really a natural cognitive dissonance because reconciling someone who’s done, over the course of your life, many things you appreciate and love with a person who you’re supposed to want dead is difficult.
We have to be able to swallow the fact that people we don’t think are evil, and people we don’t think should die are still capable of atrocious and irreparably harmful acts. We have to be aware that people who are abused should not be pushed into a situation where they have to condemn the abuser to the title of being worthy of death before they name their abuse if they don’t feel that way. We have to stop letting traumatized people have and express a range of emotions, and we also have to stop denying the fact that abusers are real complex people who may have good aspects but are still abusers.
So here’s really what I’m saying- be mindful. If you’re traumatized or affected, say what’s cathartic, what you feel, what you need to. But all of us should be mindful of context, of audience, and of the context and world these phrases exist in.
Taking drugs and thinking that you are happy is like taking a loan and thinking you have money
For starters, if you don’t know who Crowley was (no, not the Supernatural dude), he was a 1900s occultist who coined a portion of what modern witchcraft uses today, such as the word “magick” which he, although did not ‘invent’, popularised. (you’ll learn why I denounce that term and try to educate people who use it in a second). He was, in a nutshell, everything modern society hates. Racist, antisemitic, sexist, you name it and Crowley was it.
Crowley wrote several books about the occult, some of them having slightly useful information and still are referenced today, but his occult books are not what I intend to talk about. Little known to most, Crowley wrote an essay entitled “The Jewish Problem”, that title is enough of a disgrace, but what is actually IN the writing is atrocious, which I will be going over in a second. In other writing, he refers to Jewish people as “parasites”, “a barbarous race”, talks about how Jewish people are their bad stereotypes, among other things. This article does a wonderful job of compiling some of his worst quotes and explaining how racist he really is, as well as explaining some of the undertones of the quotes.
“Christians and other troglodytes — but most especially the parasites of man, the Jews (The New Comment on Liber AL, III:11)“
“the Jews were an entirely barbarous race, incapable of any spiritual pursuit. (preface to 777, printed in The Equinox, Vol. 1, No. 8)”
“A similar case is presented by the Jew, who really does only too often possess the bad qualities for which he is disliked (Confessions, chapter 54)“
“But in America, the Christian elements have been removed so that wealthy Jews may reach the summit of masonry. (Confessions, chapter 72)“
“It has been said that every nation has the government which it deserves. I would add, the type of Jew which it deserves. (Confessions, chapter 61)“
“the Jews are a critically important factor in the social and economic problems of the day (Confessions, chapter 75)“
Anyway, he also used to throw slurs at his Jewish friend Victor Neuburg and admitted to being interested in fascism multiple times.
As for quotes from The Jewish Problem:
“Israel has corrupted the world, whether by conquest, by conversion, or by conspiracy. The Jew has eaten his way into everything.”
“The Jew, living so long on sufferance, by subterfuge, servility, and self-effacement, has taught his tricks to the whole world.“
And many, many, many more.
Some of his comments on other groups of people:
About Chinese people: “One cannot fraternize with the Chinese of the lower classes; one must treat them with absolute contempt and callousness“ / “The Chinese does not respect the white man as the Indian does — for his possession of high moral qualities.“
About Mexican people: “Neither the coyotes nor the turkey-buzzards will touch a dead Mexican. His flesh has been too thoroughly impregnated with chillies and other pungent condiments.”
About black people: “Where Islam and Christianity meet in open competition, as in some parts of Africa, it is found that only the lowest type of Negro, such as is accustomed to arrange matters with conscience by hanging a rag on a piece of stick, accepts Christianity”
About Indian people: “I am not fond of Benaglis at the best and he as the worst specimen of his race I have ever seen. He was fat and oily, with small piglike treacherous eyes.”
Crowley also heavily used the term “black magic” in reference to the “dark art” types of witchcraft, this term is now considered racist by a good portion of the community. Not to mention he was also a regular user of the N slur! I’m talking hard-R.
He was also heavily misogynistic and sexist, as if the dude wasn’t enough of a crapshoot. Here is a list of all the gross, sexist things he’s said!
Anyway,
I never much liked the usage of magic with a K to start with, but I’ve been learning more and more about AC as time has passed, I’ve started denouncing it entirely and educating people about it’s connections to him as best as I can, most people have no idea how awful he is. It’s scary to think that someone so despicable is still heavily referenced and worshiped in the Occult community, so I wanted to finally make this post. I am asked a lot about it and why I hate the term “magick” so much, now you all know. I hope you will consider using the terms witchcraft, or even just magic rather than adding the K at the end, because we all know what the K stands for now, and who it represents. This is not even the beginning of how awful he was, there is so much more that can be dug up. I encourage you to do it, research him and understand how absolutely terrible he was. Please.
In conclusion:
Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.
Special thanks to @alistaires
I DIDNT KNOW THIS :0
He was a super creep like whenever someone mentions him all I can think is how he would cum in food, ect (for ritual purposes) and he wouldn’t tell anyone.
Ew. O.o to be honest this is why I find ritual magic and magicians to be so off-putting. I do know genuinely lovely people who are into such things but so many of them model themselves after Crowley etc and think what they’re doing is cool and edgy. Firstly magic isn’t meant to be cool, it’s not a game. But also there’s nothing edgy about racism etc. O.o I don’t know, I always liked the look of ‘magick’ but now I understand that the insinuations are related to a racist edgelord who wanted to make himself seem elitist, no thanks. This would also explain why I’ve been having creepy dreams with him involved. O.o
Yeah… I was reading up on Crowley for writing research, as I’ve been wanting to get some details right for a project. Anyway, just the historical foreword to his Book IV sent up about a dozen red flags, which it seemed as if the guest writer was attempting to gloss over—I just got a huge sense that there was much “in between the lines” that actually might make people less excited to read a Crowley book, so it couldn’t get published in one.
Lo and behold, a few minutes of independent research later, I found out that he tended to go through women like tissue paper, but at one point was married to one Rose Edith Kelly. She was who from which he received much of his guidance for The Book of the Law—she would go into a trance via ritual and would dictate knowledge for him. This was a role he often had women in his life fulfill—he would typically draw them into his circle, ply them with substances and with his noteworthy charisma, and before long, they would start spouting secret knowledge on his behalf, often enduring some very questionable conditions. Anyway, Rose and him had two children, and it is said she developed a drinking problem, but it is also fact he committed her to an asylum for “alcohol dementia” in her thirties a couple years after their divorce. Further research uncovered another noteworthy name: Mary Desti, who it seems Crowley met the same year he had Rose committed. She was the “seer” who revealed much of his seminal Book IV. Her son, the playwright Preston Sturges, was none-too-happy to recount that in her induced trances, if she stepped out of line in any way, including if she would start a sentence with “I”, Crowley would slice open her arm with a penknife. Some may start to wonder less why Rose started to drink. Mary would later leave Crowley as well, and Crowley would head over to another mistress, and the train of the world’s fascination with him would keep rolling.
I could go on for ages; this is an exceedingly small sample of how he treated those nearest and “dearest” to him. It honestly put me off using the term “magick” in my project and deeply put me off using many other elements of his work. The sanitized elements that trickled down and insinuated themselves into later traditions… I suspect there is good reason those survived, but lionizing Crowley himself is not an act I think I could look at without some suspicion.
Ew… O.o and I’m guessing he simply said that these things were revealed to him with no credit to the women involved. When you say ‘seer’ do you think it’s more likely that she was simply being put into an altered state of consciousness and suggested to rather than actually being given wisdom by spirits?
As it is for the role of many women involved with male historical figures, what Crowley said they were is what is oft sourced and repeated, and Crowley seemed to truly believe their words were brought to him from some higher place. He would call these women his “Scarlet Women” and seemed to think them of paramount importance in his pursuit of secret knowledge; Rose and Mary would not be the last. He had all the apparent charisma of a successful cult leader, to be frank, and had no problem attracting women, though he usually seemed to use his notoriety to get ritual sex and fame more than he used it to gain sustainable wealth. If Mary Desti’s son hadn’t been a playwright who gained some fame of his own, it is possible his account of his mother’s abuse wouldn’t have gained overmuch attention; people just loved to be fascinated with the man. I believe Mary Desti later wrote a book regarding her life, but I haven’t read it yet—though I’ve been told she makes no mention of Crowley at all. He did, at least, give Mary some credit for Book IV as well as some of his other “students” (one can find their names in the dedications inside the cover.) He did seem to value them in his way and was frank about their contributions… up to and including writing them obscene poetry celebrating their genitals inspiring him… he just didn’t seem very nice to them… at all. And they were quickly replaced.
Honestly, the more one reads about Crowley, the more it boggles the mind. You can either buy into the religion he founded—Thelema—assuming he was always just a step away from vast revelation, and that what these women said (via his accounts) was true, or you can decide his life was a debauched race from one heady coincidence to the next, and that he probably influenced what these women would say with drugs, later editing to give it some kind of coherency that furthered his philosophical and cultish hold on others. It is worth noting that much of what his secretive religion is about does not really resemble what one might think of as today’s witchcraft, though I can’t speak for the subset of ritual/summoner practitioners that cite him most often.
Personally, I think he was full of it, which is why I used quotation marks around “seer,” and the more I survey his work, the more I feel that way. I think he used dozens of psychological techniques to create false memories and confessions, so to speak, though I will allow that he may not have done so entirely knowingly. His belief seems quite sincere.
I think I just find it alarming, as it seems you may @hedgewitchwanderings , that so many people choose to throw around his name as if he is some grand forefather of their beliefs. In psychology, it is okay to do so with Freud, but anyone worth their salt critically considers the value of his work in modern context. Freud was mostly wrong, though he inspired better thought down the road. That… in some ways… is Crowley, I think.
(By the way, I enjoy your writing very much!)
(Thank you,much appreciated!)
Yes, I’m inclined to agree with all of that. When I first started with magic I was involved in a Thelema group and obviously it was great to finally discover people who actually believed that magic was possible but I do feel that people who think he was amazing,by and large though I know that doesn’t apply to everyone, do seem to be the kind of people who think magic is this big, fancy enterprise when actually that’s more psychodrama. I mean, no one on my group was actively horrible, it just all felt a bit ‘churchy’ for me which is what I used at at the time to explain my lack of synchronization with ritual magic more generally.
I guess for me, part of the problem is that anything overly ritualistic has a tendency to become dogmatic and it doesn’t help if the people who are figureheads are themselves objectionable.
Like, in contrast, I know I initially has misgivings about Wicca, but I came to realise that the people who are interested in that are fine if they just get on with it because really it’s the people who want to make a big show and dance about magic who seem to be interested for cool points.
Similarly I’ve seen a lot of people go on about Crowley’s ideas about Godhead etc, and while that’s fair enough.. I don’t know, I think it would be fair to say that there are a brand of people who approach things like ritual magic as a way to have something more interesting in their lives and I guess each to their own but that just doesn’t make sense to me.
In all I think it’s clear that Crowley, like any other edgelord type, was interested in getting noticed.
friendly witchcraft reminder that
- intrusive thoughts won’t affect your magic or draw bad things into your life because there’s no intent behind them
- your deities are smart enough to know that you don’t mean your intrusive thoughts and to therefore not act on them or be offended by them
- if you have anxiety, then anxiety when you do magic isn’t your intuition telling you that something’s wrong. It’s just a symptom of your mental illness and it doesn’t mean anything.
*me flirting* hey wanna suffer together
If it's in b&w it looks like I'm outside having a lovely day.
Oly
thelovelyseason
For future reference