Got a bluesky? I'm trying to get all the usernames before this ship goes down xx
(sighhh) yeah I should make one, huh.
okay I made one, it's mmstinks.bsky.social
yeah fuck it sure this can be my new pinned. old pinned here

Discoholic đȘ©
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Not today Justin

pixel skylines
AnasAbdin
No title available

shark vs the universe
we're not kids anymore.

JVL
DEAR READER
No title available

Love Begins
Stranger Things

romaâ
Monterey Bay Aquarium

ellievsbear
Three Goblin Art

â
art blog(derogatory)

seen from Malaysia

seen from Australia
seen from Romania

seen from United States
seen from Belgium
seen from United States

seen from Norway

seen from TĂŒrkiye

seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from Switzerland

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Thailand
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye
@mortimermcmirestinks
Got a bluesky? I'm trying to get all the usernames before this ship goes down xx
(sighhh) yeah I should make one, huh.
okay I made one, it's mmstinks.bsky.social
yeah fuck it sure this can be my new pinned. old pinned here
Yes yes i know love is love. But they are still killing CHILDREN. over this.
"Love is love" is a milquetoast cishet marketing phrase
Pride is a FUCK YOU to a society that wants us dead.
d'you ever think about the fact that people still actively talk about the life and activism and sociopolitical contributions of Marsha P. Johnson (a person who actively contributed to acceptance and civil rights with her whole life) almost 35 years after her murder, and not a single person has spoken Bill O'Reilly (a guy who was world-famous for spreading conservative hatespeech)'s name aloud since he stopped hosting his dumbass show, which was less than a decade ago? surely there must be a lesson here
bill o'reilly is still alive. he's in his seventies. he's still doing stuff. at his peak popularity like fifteen years ago he was practically a household name. he's a wealthy cishet white man, with all the advantages in the world. but not a single person gives a shit about him or his work, nobody ever talks about him or even thinks about him, because at the end of the day, he is and has always been a disposable nothing-man who spewed hatred in such an unremarkable and interchangeable manner that when he got fired five more identical guys immediately sprung up hydra-like to take his place.
marsha p. johnson was killed before the age of fifty. she never had a nationally-syndicated broadcast television show. she was, in modern terminology, a trans woman sex worker of colour, four categories of people whose existence and contributions are constantly downplayed, hidden, and erased. but people still talk about her every day. because she was an irreplaceably important person whose successors built on her legacy rather than just retracing her steps.
marsha p. johnson and her activism will never, ever be forgotten. bill o'reilly and his hatred already has been.
d'you ever think about the fact that people still actively talk about the life and activism and sociopolitical contributions of Marsha P. Johnson (a person who actively contributed to acceptance and civil rights with her whole life) almost 35 years after her murder, and not a single person has spoken Bill O'Reilly (a guy who was world-famous for spreading conservative hatespeech)'s name aloud since he stopped hosting his dumbass show, which was less than a decade ago? surely there must be a lesson here
patterns left by woodworms on driftwood
PLEASE search "beetle gallery" and look at images. The patterns larval beetles leave behind under the bark of trees while feeding are so so beautiful
talking like point-and-click game narration to the bugs in my room
you can't get out that way!
that's not very helpful.
maybe the open window will help.
try the open window instead.
"why is this person drawing sexualized art of hatsune miku, isn't hatsune miku canonically 16?" hatsune miku is a voice bank. she's pretty much an electronic piano that goes Oo Ee Oo. hatsune miku is not a person with a life. nobody is doing CSAM of hatsune miku, because hatsune miku is not a C you can do M featuring SA about. that's a glorified slide whistle on the compyooter. you cannot psychologically abuse a theremin. it's generally agreed to be impossible to traumatize a harmonica. hatsune miku is a nonsapient synthesizer software addon. you can't do child abuse to a nonsapient synthesizer software addon. you cannot. do. child abuse. to a nonsapient. synthesizer. software addon. hello hello hello can anyone hear me
do you understand that drawing a picture of a cartoon software mascot in a swimsuit is a different type of action from abusing a child. that's not the same kind of thing. those are two different types of action. there is no connection between those actions. if someone draws a boob that person is not now guilty of assaulting a minor. do you understand. do you understand. do you understand. do you understand.
i understand, why are they drawing it though? it's still kinda weird
why should I give a fuck. who cares
it's been over a month since I made this post and I swear to god 80% of the responses are people saying "yeah I agree" and then 10% are people saying "drawing smut of this bassoon cartoon is basically child sexual abuse material" and the other 10% are people saying "as someone who was sexually abused as a child it's honestly really offensive for people to compare bassoon cartoon smut to my trauma"
y'know someone reblogged this to accuse me of defending CSAM. truly the piss on the poor website
I've noticed that the argument people who are opposed to this sort of art tends to have is like ''Well, why you doing it? It's still weird.' This is notably not an argument, it's an attempt to shame people into agreement
Listen - Ethically what we have to keep in mind is the existence of harm Things are bad when they bring harm This person seems to have accepted the statement that a drawing of Hatsune Miku is an inherently a different thing than child abuse, and people are engaging with it for entirely different reasons than that. (And some people will pursue some quite abstract justifications to not admit this.) So, if a drawing harms no one, is obviously not encouraging others to harm people, and through it's creation has brought no harm, then there is no legitimate reason to oppose it's existence. Opposing something at that point amounts to "This offends my personal sensibilities," which... Well, you can be offended then. That, in and of itself, is not a reason for something not to exist.
You have put it in a way that I've always struggled to articulate
supervillain: aha, hero, but with my new SCIENCE DEVICE I can READ your THOUGHTS! [switches it on]
science device output: please no no no oh god no please oh no no no what if no oh no pleaseplease please oh god pleaseplease please oh noplease no nono oh god no please oh no no no what if no oh no pleasepleaseplease oh god pleaseplease please oh no oh nooo no no please oh god no
supervillain: oh sorry I didn't aim it properly, it was supposed to hit you but instead it just hit a young adult in 2026
hero: which young adult in 2026
supervillain: there is literally no way to glean identifying information from the output. it could be any one of them
One like nitpick thing that drives me crazy is when people call Blue Whales the largest whales or the largest living mammals or some shit like that
Because yes that is true. But when you frame it like that you are completely disregarding the absolutely batshit reality that Blue Whales are the largest animals that have ever existed on earth through the entire history of the planet and they are alive right now today
dude remember when people used the word "disappoint" as an adjective? not "disappointed", just "disappoint"
dear friends, here is a brief psa
things that do not make you a man:
genital configuration
things that do make you a man:
inability to slay the witch-king of angmar
Almost snorted milk out of my nose.
Iâm going to save this as a draft and link to it every time I get a stupid anon
I love how in the second to last one Picard canât even facepalm he is so stoically angry and disappoint.
The Paper Bag Princess by Robert MunschÂ
published: May 1, 1980
ââElizabeth was a beautiful princess. She lived in a castle and had expensive princess clothes. She was going to marry a prince named Ronald.
Unfortunately, a dragon smashed her castle, burned all her clothes with his fiery breath, and carried off Prince Ronald.
Elizabeth decided to chase the dragon and get Ronald back. She looked everywhere for something to wear, but the only thing she could find that was not burnt was a paper bag. So she put on the paper bag and followed the dragon. He was easy to follow, because he left a trail of burnt forests and horsesâ bones.
Finally, Elizabeth came to a cave with a large door that had a huge knocker on it. She took hold of the knocker and banged on the door. The dragon stuck his nose out of the door and said, âWell, a princess! I love to eat princesses, but I have already eaten a whole castle today. I am a very busy dragon. Come back tomorrow.â He slammed the door so fast that Elizabeth almost got her nose caught.
Elizabeth grabbed the knocker and banged on the door again. The dragon stuck his nose out of the door and said, âGo away. I love to eat princesses, but I have already eaten a whole castle today. I am a very busy dragon. Come back tomorrow.â âWait,â shouted Elizabeth. âIs it true that you are the smartest and fiercest dragon in the whole world?â âYes,â said the dragon.
âIs it true,â said Elizabeth, âthat you can burn up ten forests with your fiery breath?â âOh, yes,â said the dragon, and he took a huge, deep breath and breathed out so much fire that he burnt up fifty forests.
âFantastic,â said Elizabeth, and the dragon took another huge breath and breathed out so much fire that he burnt up one hundred forests. âMagnificent,â said Elizabeth, and the dragon took another huge breath, but this time nothing came out. The dragon didnât even have enough fire left to cook a meatball.
Elizabeth said, âDragon, is it true that you can fly around the world in just ten seconds?â âWhy, yes,â said the dragon, and jumped up and flew all the way around the world in just ten seconds. He was very tired when he got back, but Elizabeth shouted, âFantastic, do it again!â
So the dragon jumped up and flew around the whole world in just twenty seconds. When he got back he was too tired to talk, and he lay down and went straight to sleep.
Elizabeth whispered, very softly, âHey, dragon.â The dragon didnât move at all. She lifted up the dragonâs ear and put her head right inside. She shouted as loud as she could, âHey dragon!â The dragon was so tired he didnât even move.
Elizabeth walked right over the dragon and opened the door to the cave. There was Prince Ronald. He looked at her and said, âElizabeth, you are a mess! You smell like ashes, your hair is all tangled and you are wearing a dirty old paper bag. Come back when you are dressed like a real princess.â
âRonald,â said Elizabeth, âyour clothes are really pretty and your hair is very neat. You look like a real prince, but you are a bum.â
They didnât get married after all.ââ
âThis story is a success because it is real. There are no princes but there are a lot of bums, and you donât want to marry one.â
-Robert MunchÂ
okay but by a wide margin the funniest part of the TADC finale is that I tried to predict exactly ONE plot twist, and I thought it was gonna be the Big Final Plot Twist if it happened at all, like, I thought it was gonna be the big wham moment right near the end, and it was the only thing I bothered to consider as a potential prediction, and I was like "well this probably won't happen but if it DOES happen then it's gonna be, like, the last thing to happen in the episode", and then it was the first thing that happened in the episode lmfao
People are unfazed if you hate women but if you dislike dogs they assume you're a bad person
Tumblr users will read a post complaining about normalized misogyny and hyperfocus on your claim that it's ok to dislike dogs
Happy pride to those 5 seconds where Charlie Swan thought Jacob was coming out to him in the most insane way possible
quirky fourth wall breaking character but theyre just fucking. wrong about the medium theyre in. they keep making references to cinematic techniques and directorial styles and the other fourth wall breaking character is like "dumbass we're in a fucking comic book" and they are in a video game.