And there it is!!! Finally.
occasionally subtle

JVL
art blog(derogatory)
KIROKAZE

Kiana Khansmith

Kaledo Art
Peter Solarz
almost home
Keni

No title available
styofa doing anything
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

★
i don't do bad sauce passes
Claire Keane
DEAR READER
NASA

titsay
Show & Tell
Today's Document
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from France
seen from T1

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore

seen from India
seen from United States

seen from Ireland
seen from Switzerland

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany
seen from Germany
@mr-brightside24
And there it is!!! Finally.
everybody hates it
IM LAUGHING
Oh my god 😂😂😂😂😂
Heck new season or not, canon johnlock or not, disaster or not..I am not going anywhere. Love this fandom too much.
cinematic parallels
oak i NEED you to delete this
I don't know how to feel about that
Jane Austen almost certainly never had sex with a man and may have instead engaged in “lesbian sex”, according to a historian. Lucy Worsley, a BBC presenter, said the esteemed Georgian era novelist did not have heterosexual sex because of her place in Britain’s rigid class system. Writing in her new book Jane Austen at Home: A Biography, Worsley says: “People often long to know if the eternal spinster Jane Austen ever had sex with a man. The answer is almost certainly not."
'engaged in "lesbian sex"'
Cate Blanchett and Rooney Mara attend the Premiere of “Carol” during the 68th annual Cannes Film Festival on May 17, 2015 in Cannes, France.
#hades pulling persephone into the underworld on may 17 2015 in cannes france (via xjehan)
I will never not reblog this.
ALWAYS REBLOG
Honest question to myself : Do I even want another season?
i mean i'd love to make a ball out of mofftiss' new and complete failure and sit there drinking champagne while watching bbc doing CPR on the show. it could be fun :D and I do have a right to be that mean because we've been massively hurt and treated with disrespect constantly. same happened to the characters of the show btw. but... nah. martin and ben didn't deserve s5. with that level of writers self-awareness I don't want another season because it's gonna throw a shade on freebatch careers
Details
Rami Kadi
Spring/Summer 2017 Couture
JOHN HAMISH WATSON: THE IDEAL MAN. (#nsfw -ish? for sex fantasy bit)
A prequel to my ‘courtroom scene’ meta-videos - this is the one I was working on. Basically, I believe that through these MP women we are privy to Sherlock’s romantic thoughts for John. With that in mind, and in the spirit of spreading the John Watson love, here’s what would be a comprehensive list of John’s positive character traits, explicitly verbalized throughout the series (not even Sherlock’s been given that many), which make him ‘The Ideal Man’ in Sherlock’s eyes:
♡ The best man. ♡ The bravest and kindest and wisest human being. ♡ Has many fine qualities. ♡ Very loyal. ♡ Warm and constant friend. ♡ Very good Doctor, over-qualified. ♡ Brave Soldier, ♡ Strong moral principle. ♡ Crack shot, a fighter, nerves of steel. ♡ Has endured war, injury and tragic loss. ♡ A quaint, good man. ♡ On sparkling form. ♡ Nice-ish, clever, important to some people. ♡ Very romantic. ♡ Very charming. ♡ Listens. ♡ Is sweet. ♡ Has a lovely… *pointed look at John’s pelvis - cue sexual fantasy distraction* ♡ Has a lovely manner. ♡ Home-loving. ♡ Likes cuddling. ♡ Caring. ♡ Great boyfriend. ♡ Will do anything for Sherlock. ♡ Lovely husband, upright, honourable. ♡ Best parent in the World (Sherlock calls himself a ‘Baby’, impying John’s his Daddy.) ♡ Great, amazing, fantastic. ♡ Has got a great singing voice. ♡ Can cook. ♡ Observant in ways Sherlock isn’t. ♡ Pretty damned smart. ♡ Saves your life. ♡ Is Sherlock’s help-mate. ♡ Keeps Sherlock right.
This is what the title character thinks of John: the man he loves the most in all this World… UGH! ;)
NOTE: This is fun, but none of it is crack at all. So, hope you enjoy Sherlock scolding himself for wishing to compromise the integrity of John’s relationship with his fiancée as much as I do, because that’s an actual interpretation of mine based on visual parallels. If you need me to explain, I’ll be happy to!
[Just tags below the cut.]
Keep reading
oh my god I LOVE THIS!!!! this is absolutely wonderful!! Please do tag me in your future metas.
I love this too. had such a heartwarming effect on me. god I miss them I miss them I miss those two
just a bitch who loves documentaries
Martin Freeman with Yolanda Ramke (director of Cargo)
aren't we blessed
Sherlock actor Martin Freeman adds star touch at cinema launch (x)
Look at ma babe :*
Martin Freeman at Opening Event of Depot Cinema (x)
Aww more pics
MFreemanology on twitter shared this lovely experience of a anonnymous fan
He is so lovely
i wanna hang this one on the wall 'cause it's so sunny and lovely and peaceful
Martin Freeman arriving at Lewes Depot Cinema for the grand opening. (x)
God I missed him
Martin Freeman arriving at Lewes Depot Cinema for the grand opening
https://twitter.com/lunaholic_shiho/status/868005022340190208
God he’s precious
It’s a video aaa he is so beautiful I cry
WAS NICE KNOWING YALL BYE EVEEYONE IM DEAD
Something More About Mary
I didn’t realize people would be so salty about my brief convo with Steven about Mary. I prefer Mary to be evil cuz I think it’s more logical and hella more interesting, but to me it’s their show, they do what they want. Anyways, here’s the whole exchange while I remember it.
Me: do you think Mary was redeemed in the end, or was she still morally dubious?
Steven, surprised: well I don’t think she was morally dubious at all!
Me: uhh she did shoot Sherlock…
S: but she did it nicely, it was surgical. She was stuck in a difficult situation. If Sherlock didn’t mind it, why should we?
Me: so you think she was redeemed by her ending?
S, slightly frustrated with me: she didn’t need redemption, it’s not a scorecard. She had such a tougher background, so her movement towards humanity means more than …Sherlock is also, but he’s getting there, and John is solidly (for humanity, something like that I forget the wording, he rambled a bit, Mary took a bullet for Sherlock etc. )But she’s dead now, and there’s not a scorecard for that. It’s not black and white.
Me: ok, thanks for your time.
Sigh.
Moff’s emotional intelligence, understanding of relationships, of the natural consequences of one’s actions, and knowledge of the way to influence and impact your audience with your writing seems to be really low… I mean even Amanda was tweeting stuff like, “Mary is a fucking psychopath”. Granted Amanda says a lot of stuff on Twitter for strokes, but like I think it’s fair to say that even she thought Mary’s arch was either going to turn out a little differently than it did, and/or felt that some of Mary’s actions in TST qualified her for ‘fucking psychopath’ status. Also, if you set a character up to a) come between the protag and his love interest, and b) have them shoot the protag, and c) have that protag claw his way back to life just to save his love interest, and then d) have that character threaten to murder him again if he causes her to lose the man they both love, it’s only logical that an audience will assume that that character is meant to be viewed as villainous, or at the very least a clear danger and obstacle to your protag’s happiness and wellbeing. And yet Moffat seems incapable of comprehending this? The mind boggles…
“If an abuse victim doesn’t mind getting abused, why should we?”
“If Sherlock has such a low self esteem that he is willing to be used as a doormat, why do we care?”
Is what I hear. Fcking just.
I am tired
wow. I'm really starting to dig the 'real mofftiss were abducted by aliens' conspiracy