Having a mix of “male” and “female” traits leads to better mental health, new study suggests
A new study argues that 50% of people are some shade of androgynous and that this gives them an advantage as far as psychological health goes.
Male brains and female brains.
Is there such a thing as a “male” or a “female” brain?
Scientists have desperately scanned, dissected and mapped brains in order to see if there are any solid differences. Researchers have found some parts of the brain that seem to be different between men and women, but there are two important caveats:
These differences are only found on an aggregate level, so there are a lot of men with “female” structures and vise versa.
Moreover, scientists have never been able to fully document a causality between these brain differences and – let’s say – gendered behavior as reflected in interests, abilities, expressions and identities.
One problem is that we have very messy and blurry notion of what it means to be male or female, so the research becomes equally messy. Much of this research is based on culturally defined gender stereotypes, which are not fixed in biology in humans.
Since culture and our ideas of the normative female and male behavior changes, the scientists are basically trying to hit a moving target.
One of the scientists who constantly talk about “female” and “male” brains is Simon Baron-Cohen. His own research shows that only half of women have “a female brain”, as he defines it. If that many women do not have a “female brain”, what do they have?
Contemporary science is gradually giving up on the idea that men are not from Mars and women are not from Venus. We are all from Earth.
To give you a recent example:
Barbara Jacquelyn Sahakian, Professor of Clinical Neuropsychology at the University of Cambridge, and her colleagues Christelle Langley, Qiang Luo, Yi Zhang and more, decided to use the connectivity between different brain areas as a measure of gender. This kind of connectivity has been known to vary between men and women on an aggregate level.
They included 4,495 scans of brains (magnetic resonance imaging or fMRI) from men and 5,125 from women in their sample. There is no data on trans participation, so I assume that “male” and “female” refer to biological sex.
They write over at Science Alert:
“We discovered that brains were indeed distributed across the entire continuum rather than just at the two ends.
In a subsample, approximately 25 percent of brains were identified as male, 25 percent as female, and 50 percent were distributed across the androgynous section of the continuum.
What’s more, we found that participants who mapped at the centre of this continuum, representing androgyny, had fewer mental health symptoms, such as depression and anxiety, compared with those at the two extreme ends.
These findings support our novel hypothesis that there exists a neuroimaging concept of brain androgyny, which may be associated with better mental health in a similar way to psychological androgyny.”
There are at least two take-aways from this research:
1. Gender is indeed a spectrum. As they put it in the original paper: “The importance of brain androgyny, akin to psychological androgyny, is that you are neither male nor female, but a combination of both.”
2. Being somewhere in the middle between the male and female extremes is good for your health.
The latter may come as a surprise to trans and nonbinary people who have been bullied for not living up to the gender binary, but the point here is that being more “androgynous” gives room for a wider spectrum of feelings and expressions.
A meta-analysis of 78 studies of about 20,000 participants revealed that men who conform to typical masculine norms, for example never relying on others and exercising power over women, suffered more psychiatric symptoms than others, including depression, loneliness and substance abuse. They also felt more isolated, lacking social connections to others.
This tells me that trans and nonbinary people would probably have been more psychologically balanced than extreme cisgendered people , hadn’t it been for all the transphobia and the bullying.
Androgyny is natural and good
The researchers argue that this study documents that people who are more androgynous in their behavior are not going against their biological nature. They are doing things that their brains are optimized for.
So although their paper is not about transgender and nonbinary people per se, it does debunk the idea that androgyny is caused by the “transgender cult”. Gender variance is a natural part of biological and psychological diversity.
This study say nothing about gender identity, though. It is not as if trans people are necessarily more “androgynous” than cis people.
But what are they talking about, really?
To be honest with you, I am still not sure about what they are really measuring here, as brain connectivity is clearly not a solid measure of assigned gender, experienced gender or gender expression. It is simply a measure of brain connectivity. Reducing the “gender continuum” to a measure of brain connectivity is therefore not unproblematic.
To give one example: The effect a culturally conservative and restrictive upbringing has on a person’s psyche, may also help shape the relevant brain structures. The brain is flexible. Cultural conditioning causes it to change.
But even if these brains are as they are partly because of social pressure, the study nevertheless says a lot about the relationship between androgynous personalities and mental health.
The article also documents how far contemporary neuroscience have moved from previous attempts at documenting a strict gender binary. I suspect that the strong influx of female researchers, with a more flexible view of sex and gender, has caused these communities to develop new and more interesting research questions. At least half of the authors of the original paper are women.
The original science paper is called “The Human Brain Is Best Described as Being on a Female/Male Continuum: Evidence from a Neuroimaging Connectivity Study”, and was published in Cerebral Cortex in January 2021
Gina Rippon: How ‘neurosexism’ is holding back gender equality – and science itself
On the statistical difference between men and women
New Brain Study Indicates Great Gender Diversity
Genes, hormones, sex and gender identity
See also this video from SciShow Psych.
Top illustration: Jolygon
