PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

blake kathryn

JVL

Discoholic šŖ©
Claire Keane
Aqua Utopiaļ½ęµ·ć®åŗć§čØę¶ćē“”ć
i don't do bad sauce passes
šŖ¼
dirt enthusiast
we're not kids anymore.
todays bird
Three Goblin Art

PR's Tumblrdome

oozey mess
Peter Solarz

#extradirty

shark vs the universe
$LAYYYTER
trying on a metaphor

Love Begins

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Romania
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Hungary

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Armenia
seen from Armenia

seen from Canada

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
@mysemperfidelis
Tribal chief said ISIS was poised to attack a band of local tribesmen.
Iām no expert, but I donāt think these guys are getting the 72 virgins.
This is hilarious
Warrior Culture : SPQR
SPQR stands for āTheĀ Senate and People ofĀ Romeā and was emblazoned on the standards of Roman Legions, symbolizing the power and reach of Rome through its legions. After the Marius Reforms they became a truly imposing military power. Reforming themselves into the well organized, masters at adaption of tactics that we know of today.
The Legions used cutting edge technology for the time, recruiting the first real professional (contracted) army of its age. They signed troops up for 20 year stints, and upon retirement you could either rejoin under a special unit of veterans where you had prestige, and lessened duties, or retire and receive land of your own in the border lands. This was brilliant of the Romans for any number of reasons, but long story short, it gave the border lands and other freshly conquered territories additional troops and Romans if the locals were to ever rebel and land to the Empire.
The Romans also organized their military exceedingly well. Splitting it into squads (tent parties), platoons (century), Companies (cohort), and Division or regimental levels (Legions). They invented essentially the modern military, and we use much of their wisdom and knowledge to this day.
Legions were able to operate independently of each other or in concert to achieve goals and persecute the foes of the Empire. The Roman legion changed the rules of warfare in many ways, they built roads and other public works as they went so that future generations or missions could move quickly through Roman territories. Instead of making camp each night Romans would actually make fortifications, digging ditches, filling moats, placing spikes, etc⦠in order to protect their camps from attack and subterfuge.
Roman Legionaries carried most of their tools and weapons with them on the march freeing up wagons and slaves for provisions, siege equipment, etc⦠A few things to note about the Roman Legionary are the (more or less) full armor, the tower shield, and the javelin (each Legionary was issued 2). These were of the utmost importance to Roman dominance in the region as its soldiers were far better protected than its enemies, and that its soldiers had both ranged and melee availability. As the enemy closed on a Roman legion or vice versa the Romans would throw their javelinsā (specifically designed to twist and bend on impact, meaning that even if it didnāt kill you it twisted inside you making it harder to remove and more likely to incapacitate you for a kill).
Germany during ww1: can you stop using shotguns it's really fucked up
also germany: *dropping mustard gas on allied trenches* lol
A bunch of asshurt dems are mocking the Tennessee wildfires because itās a red state. Gatlinburg is pretty much gone, hundreds of homes have been lost, not to mention the death toll of all the wildlife, and these fucking assholes are cheering because people there voted for Trump.
Itās a state of emergency here, people stand to lose everything they have.
Fuck these motherfuckers.
Typical pieces of shit. Ā People have died in that fire.Ā
Sheer evil.
Some seriously fucked up morals
Thatās the problemā¦they have no morals.
When you wanna go spying on the USSR and the squadās all for it
Ohio shooting!
FromĀ stripper_clip
What It Means To Be A Veteran Without The Experience Of War
Without having been involved in combat, this veteran says heās left wondering what kind of man he is.
Editorās Note: This article by Nathan Eckman originally appeared onTheWarHorse.org, a nonprofit newsroom focused on the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs.
As a Marine infantryman I wanted to kill like Iād been trained to do. The fact that I havenāt weighs on me. Itās a different burden than that of soldiers who have been trained to kill and do. Itās different, too, from the legless infantrymanās. Its weight comes from the scars I donāt have. Itās not on par with that of children who have lost a mother or father at war, or parents who have lost a child. Iām a veteran, but faux, disingenuous, a wannabe. When Iām thanked for my service Iām confused. There are no fewer terrorists alive because of my actions. And I wish there were. I feel slighted, as though I served in time but not in duty, because every place I went peace endured.
I canāt pinpoint any moment when I knew Iād join the military. I decided gradually, influenced by a myriad of selfish and selfless desires. Admittedly, Iām a product of the post-9/11 nationalism campaign. In elementary school I witnessed the nation sticker the back of its cars with American flags and prayers āfor our troops.ā On the radio I heard songs glorifying the fight of men and women in countries whose names I couldnāt yet pronounce. As I grew up my consumption of media did too. Entertainment stepped aside for education; music made way for news articles and books. But the message remained the same. In high school I devoured memoirs by Navy SEALs and dispatches from war correspondents. In my downtime I played Call of Duty. And I learned that being an American, at least one worth remembering, meant becoming a warrior.
I answered the call to enlist in 2011, and I served. I fired my rifle into paper targets at the School of Infantry. Months later we were still practicing, yelling ābangā in lieu of actual rounds, frugally training for a fight I slowly realized would never come. Fallujah fell. Training continued. A ragtag group of āJVā terrorists filled power vacuums across the Middle East. Videos of public assassinations swept across the dark web. And still, we trained just in case. It was a helpless feeling. For a moment, it had seemed like this generationās good fight was at hand ā our World War II. In another moment it became apparent we would never be authorized to step foot on foreign soil to kill anyone, evil as they may be. For four years we stared down our scopes at inanimate targets and imagined that one day ā soon, we told ourselves ā weād fight like those we had listened to, read about, and mimicked in our youths.
To me, āveteranā was synonymous with āwarrior.ā
And the warless, like me, are not. But the idea that only warriors or those directly affected by war in obvious ways can speak to warās effects with authority isnāt true. In many respects the difference between those who served like I did was a matter of luck. We signed the same contract, shipped off to the same training grounds and entered similar units. For months we all ran around jungles, deserts and oceans refining our tactical abilities. At-home memories of loved ones faded and love did too. Divorce and breakups were a common occurrence. All for our country, we said, swimming toward the bottom of another liquor bottle. We were as prepared as any other unit, but it was the Pentagon that chose which units went to war. Ten thousand here, 15,000 there were sent off to fight, and we stayed behind. War wasnāt a reward for the most prepared, but a strategy to which we were never privy. The stories of those who have served in combat dominate war lit ā novels, memoirs, stories short and long. Yet roughly 90 percent of the military doesnāt experience that kind of war; our stories remain largely unwritten. Iām not the kind of veteran whoās asked to write a memoir, whoās remembered in books, or whoās written about in news stories. But like most veterans I have a story: Iāve been affected by war, though not by its obvious horrors.
Every time someone discovers I served in the Marines they ask if I deployed. I respond quickly and clarify quicker because Iāve learned what they usually mean. āYes, I have deployed. No, I didnāt go to Iraq or Afghanistan.ā My tone has changed since I left active duty in January 2016. At first I clarified with sadness. I was disappointed in what I hadnāt done. Now Iām more matter of fact. I know how great a blessing it is to be home and unscathed, but I can hold both feelings at once: pride that I joined and chagrin that I didnāt help as Iād hoped. And so Iām a veteran, but not the kind I want to be.
When I speak to my generation of fight-less veterans they too are conflicted. Yes, weāre veterans, but of a lesser kind than those who fought. We wanted war, and thought it would give life meaning. But weāre not blood thirsty. Right? The men and women given the highest honors have endured the worst war has to offer. Theyāve earned glory through focused thought and spilled blood, palatably packaged as āfighting for our freedom.ā Standing by is a lot less glorious. I wonder how weāll be remembered. Certainly not with the same adoration or the same glory. Without having seen combat, I feel as though I donāt have a clear identity as a veteran. Iām unsatisfied by this conclusion. I need to know what it means to be my type of veteran, because for me, combat is still something I only hear or read about or watch on TV, a horror witnessed from afar.
War was supposed to be my transformation. I wanted to fight as a rite of passage. I thought combat was where men discovered lifeās greater meaning: the horrors of humanity and the goodness of it, in others and themselves. Carpe diem, I imagined saying, because each day after war would feel like an undeserved gift. And I wouldnāt just say it, I would seize the day, because after war, what couldnāt I do?
Without having been involved in combat Iām left wondering what kind of man I am. Would I have frozen or fought when the first bullet was fired? Would I have considered risking my life if it meant protecting one of my own? Not having seen combat I feel my country owes me nothing, because didnāt I give them the same? Just a few years of my life on standby, no blood, no victories. Yet, Iām honored with the same title as those whose scars are physical and at times psychological and whose glory rests in their victories and losses, both tactical and personal ā often respectively.
There were a handful of contrived reasons I gave for enlisting: education benefits, a sense of adventure, fulfilling a societal need and, among others, an expectation I had for myself that serving would make me a good American. All those reasons could have not existed and I still would have joined. The real reason was uncomfortable to admit: I yearned for values and character stronger than Iāve ever known in myself. I longed to matter in a way small town U.S.A. does not allow.
Iāve seen something in the eyes of those warriors who have killed too many. A prerogative, a deep inner wisdom and a knowing sense of self. If only I could have been exposed to the brutalities of war, then maybe I would understand better lifeās preciousness. Instead Iām left wondering just how ungrateful and self-centered my thinking must seem, how shallow I must be to want those scars. I donāt know pain like vets whoāve lost their mobility. I donāt know joy, not like those guys who thought theyād never breathe again and who today sit at their wivesā sides. War, notorious for destroying lives, in a strange way, expands many more.
I will never know if I am the kind of man I admired in the documentaries and books I cherished as a kid. I doubt Iāll ever feel like I am wholly a veteran, worthy of the thanks, praises and even the discounts endlessly showered on us today. But I donāt want to chase conflict, because war makes no promises, and neither survival nor sanity is guaranteed. And though I know this, I wonder why Iām unsatisfied, why I feel less capable because of it, why I canāt fully understand what it means to be a veteran, and why, despite the irony of which Iām very much aware, I believe I need to have killed a man to become a man.
Pretty much sums up the feeling of my entire generation of grunts that missed the tail end of the GWOT.
I'm so close to getting out, yet so far away..
PTSD is one hell of a drug.
If every cigarette takes 5 mins off my life, but I spend 10 mins enjoying it, then Iām still operating at a net gain.
Pretty much.