LOUDER

loud || ilo Laso | he/they/it

[napkinmath]

the pinned will appear one day

until then i’m loud and i like nasty little critters. mi ilo Laso.

i’m black and transmasc.

mi pilin pona wawa tawa ilo ale 🤖 taso ijo ma li suli kin 🌱 i hate most uses of generative AI and i hope you do too

i make art and music, and one day it will appear here.

mi pali e kalama musi lon tenpo muuuuute. taso, mi *pini* e kalama musi lon tenpo lili. kin la mi wile lape lon tenpo ale.

ijo nanpa wan lon tenpo ni: adachi rei

[napkinmath]

kalama musi

[napkinmath]

test

[napkinmath]

test

[napkinmath]

elbow grease?

[napkinmath]

eat five sticks of gum

[wheelie-sick]

when people tag posts "unreality" it's a signal to people who struggle with discerning reality that a (likely scary if believed to be true) post is not real even though it's written as if it was. it's also a filter tag so those people can opt out of seeing posts like that entirely. many people who rely on the unreality tag are psychotic and struggle with paranoia alongside (or because of) the struggles discerning what's real. posts that these people interpret to be real can lead to incredible distress and compulsions.

when someone tags your post "#unreality" and you screenshot the tags and say "what are you talking about? this is real" because you consider the post easy to discern as not real and find this joke funny you're actually just causing paranoia for people who now feel like they can't trust the unreality tag. not everyone has the same reality discernment skills as you. what's "obviously" a fictional story to you may not be obvious to other people.

I don't think most people make this joke maliciously. I think most people making this joke don't even realize why the unreality tag exists. anyways, if you've made this joke or have the urge to make this joke then consider not doing that.

[napkinmath]

if i say everything juuust right every conversation will look like this

[napkinmath]

the algorithm makes your phone the evil queens mirror never forget

[napkinmath]

if we talk juuust right every conversation will flow so smoothly that it’ll give a tumblr user a boner

[janmisali]

pick whatever option the person you follow who reblogged this post appears to NOT want you to pick. if you're seeing the original post and not a reblog, pick at random. if it's unclear which option the person whose reblog you're seeing wants you to pick, pester them until they give you a straight answer then do whatever they don't say. reblog at your own risk.

first option

second option

Remaining time: 7 hours 11 minutes

[napkinmath]

i’m of 4 minds about this

[kechadon-2000]

mashiro washed?????

[napkinmath]

and i point out their new infatuation with the word "psychosis" because it's different from previous common derogatory usage of the word "psychotic" to mean dangerous or unhinged because usually that's meant to evoke psychopathy (which is of course unrelated to psychosis). someone who's angry is acting psychotic because they're yelling and getting red, like someone preparing to disregard your human rights . ?

the new common derogatory "psychosis" is either an extension of that or, more likely, in the same family as recent common derogatory usage of "schizophrenic". someone who's thinking really hard and connecting dots about something is "schizophrenic" (not necessarily "sch-zo", which is just a rougher term for "crazy" which is just a rougher term for "strange"), and if they do so with zeal and energy that you perceive as dangerous, they're "In Psychosis". in fact, fuck it, if they have zeal and energy that you perceive as dangerous, they're in psychosis. someone who's acting angry is "in psychosis" because you can't understand why they're angry, because they're in a state you can't relate to.

[napkinmath]

all the same mechanism as whatever's happening to autism (and i'm guilty of this) where we see someone who's eccentric in any way and call them or their actions "autistic" which at this point no longer helps spread useful awareness about autism and instead serves to narrow the definition to a more palatable, relatable, even entertaining experience. or a softer version of the r slur

[napkinmath]

and i point out their new infatuation with incorrectly using the word "psychosis" because it's different from previous common derogatory usage of the word "psychotic" to mean dangerous or unhinged because usually that's meant to evoke psychopathy (which is of course unrelated to psychosis). someone who's angry is acting psychotic because they're yelling and getting red, like someone preparing to disregard your human rights . ?

the new common derogatory "psychosis" is either an extension of that or, more likely, in the same family as recent common derogatory usage of "schizophrenic". someone who's thinking really hard and connecting dots about something is "schizophrenic" (not necessarily "sch-zo", which is just a rougher term for "crazy" which is just a rougher term for "strange"), and if they do so with zeal and energy that you perceive as dangerous, they're "In Psychosis". in fact, fuck it, if they have zeal and energy that you perceive as dangerous, they're in psychosis. someone who's acting angry is "in psychosis" because you can't understand why they're angry, because they're in a state you can't relate to.

[napkinmath]

the pop culture psychotic spectrum

schizophenic (amusingly paranoid or strange) < - - - crazy (uncomfortably abnormal or zealous) - - - > psychotic (dangerous)

[napkinmath]

i walk around and can only think None Of You Care About Psychotic People

[napkinmath]

which is crazy because chances are you've literally been psychotic before! my experience with psychosis enhanced my empathy for those who deal and have dealt with it. off tumblr everyone's so scared