Let me spell out what’s terrifying about the Bell yume/self-shippers.
I busted out laughing at those walking contradictions. Dumbs down Adbell to pure nonsense, then flips it around and sexualizes Bell the so-called “victim”? LOL.
That’s even more twisted than Adbell.
It’s hilarious: Bell’s the “victim,” but they still gotta screw them, so no rivals allowed.
Contradictions stacked on contradictions. And seriously? you get hard over a “victim”? That’s only if you’ve even got one, to begin with.
And about that anti-Adbell blogger reblogging Adler’s “abortion”..?
what do I think? Those clowns just want to compete over who’s more inhumane. At this point, Adbell almost looks normal compared to them.
ragebait successful ✅ i'll bite i guess
for one, i myself never claimed that bell was, in general, a "victim". a victim to the brainwashing and general cruelty, yes, but i never once said they were the victim of the situation. it really amuses me how you'd rather go off other people's talking points instead of engaging with me on your own.
two, the thinly veiled transphobia:
was unnecessary and not helpful to the argument. just goes to show you can't have a civil conversation without attacking my identity.
three, i don't dislike adbell because of "competition"?? 😭 despite being heavily attached to them, i primarily dislike adbell because of how most people write it. i dislike how people feel so comfortable romanticizing abuse that it becomes the norm in the fandom. doesn't mean i'll go out of my way to harass people who disagree unlike a certain someone
maybe it would be more constructive if you directed that frustration at the copious amounts of rape art and fics in the fandom
It’s always the same—one by one, the clueless ones line up to appear. Since you raised your hand and came forward, I’ll give you a comment.
Do you really think every post is about you?
The post I had an issue with was this one.
I said what I did because you can’t tell from the text whether the person is male or female, since I haven’t clicked on their profile.
If you thought I was targeting you, that’s just your misunderstanding and excessive victim mentality.
You already blocked me and ran away, but now you’ve crept back in, still thinking everything revolves around you.
Enjoy your transphobia ^^. I referred to Bell as “they” and didn’t lock them into a single gender.
Go tell your friends who insist on calling Bell “he” the same thing.
Oh, I guess it includes YOU.
oh yeah because obviously i'm supposed to assume it's about the person that only started posting like a month ago and hasn't interacted with you ONCE to my knowledge 😭 i blocked you because you REFUSED to engage with my argument and was so stuck up on other people's that it was all you would focus on. you're so afraid of being wrong that you had to make a burner, turn off your comments, AND turn off your asks, and suddenly I'm the one running away?
don't know where you even got that last part but oh well i guess lmao
Don’t talk nonsense. I’ve never blocked anyone, and usually it’s the side that wants to refuse a conversation that does the blocking, isn’t it? I kept my account as it was. If I had really intended to use it as a burner account, I would have deleted it from the start.
And if you read through your past replies carefully, you’ll see that it was you who didn’t want to continue the conversation.
Looking at your reblogs, you seem excessively fixated on Bell’s male body, which clearly shows a lack of balance and goes against the intent of the character.
i never said you'd blocked anyone. don't put words in my mouth. and yes, i explicitly stated that II didn't want to continue the conversation because YOU WOULDN'T ENGAGE WITH MY POINTS. i never denied that. and i'm "fixated on bell's male body" because that's what the majority of people on tumblr post about. my twitter is actually very mixed and i myself consider bell a gender neutral character lmao
When I said that, you blocked me, didn’t you? That’s why I concluded you had no intention of continuing the conversation.
Originally, this conflict was about AdBell “yaoi” (the exact term used by the person who first raised the issue), but I responded to that post only because certain aspects could provoke anger within the fandom.
However, from my conversation with that person few hours ago, I learned what parts they could accept. They said they had no intention of denying everything the fandom has created since 2020, nor of criticizing everyone’s works. So I decided to accept that.
yeah. i blocked you because i'd already tried explaining it to you MULTIPLE times and you were still trying to twist my words. i already had to THREATEN blocking you because you didn't care about anything i had to say, so obviously i'm just gonna do it if you continue not to, no? i'm not just gonna roll over on my back and continue a conversation with someone that doesn't care to understand who they're arguing with.
also, that post absolutely could've been left at THAT post. you started crossing lines when you made your own independent posts and started spamming them with fandom tags
Oh, is that so?
You mean Anti-shipping posts can be made publicly without issue, but any defense must be silenced? And "left at ONLY THAT POST"...?
That’s nothing but blatant bias. If they block me in that case, all the comments I worked hard to write will become meaningless, and I cannot just stand by and watch that happen.
You completely ignore the existence of those who carried out so-called “terror acts” using public tags, yet you take issue with me simply for exercising my right to speak.
In fact, the person who first started this showed me more understanding just a few hours ago compared to you.
Living in a country that upholds freedom as its banner, but for someone like that, you show a surprising lack of understanding of others’ rights.












